https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117408
Bug ID: 117408
Summary: ICE on `#pragma arm "arm_mve.h" false`
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117406
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117395
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117395
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
>
> The bigger issue is GCC does not have a copy propagation for aggregates pass
> (see PR 14295 and others).
Basically we depend on SRA to do most if not all of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117412
Bug ID: 117412
Summary: Bogus execution count for assignment with function
call
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117413
Bug ID: 117413
Summary: [15 regression] RISC-V: stage2 build failure with
__builtin_prefetch
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117413
Edwin Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117407
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117385
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note maybe_fold_comparisons_from_match_pd is an example of generating gimple on
the stack.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117401
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> That doesn't really matter. Anybody who used the option in GCC 13/14 got
> that deprecation message.
They might not have seen it, though, as it is easy for war
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117410
Bug ID: 117410
Summary: Ambiguous overload with ellipsis
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111055
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Still to do:
- and (I have a patch but it needs more tests)
-
-
-
-
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117406
--- Comment #2 from Paul Keir ---
Created attachment 59519
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59519&action=edit
Test for the proposed fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117398
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117407
Edwin Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ewlu at rivosinc dot com
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117381
Jordan <8e3g6jay6 at mozmail dot com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114326
Adhemerval Zanella changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adhemerval.zanella at linaro
dot o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114326
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Adhemerval Zanella from comment #7)
> It has triggered a regression on arm32 Linaro bots [1]:
This is recorded as PR 116860 already. I might take a look later but I suspect
it is a missed with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102445
Bug 102445 depends on bug 117394, which changed state.
Bug 117394 Summary: evil regex causes a stack overflow and a crash
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117394
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117394
--- Comment #2 from vincent.lebourlot at starqube dot com ---
fair enough. Any chance this might be looked at at some point? llvm doesn't
seem to have such a problem on that regex.
Cheers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117401
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117401
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117403
Bug ID: 117403
Summary: [C++26] Implement P1901R2 Enabling the Use of weak_ptr
as Keys in Unordered Associative Containers
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117402
Bug ID: 117402
Summary: [C++26] Implement P2363R5 Extending associative
containers with the remaining heterogeneous overloads
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117398
Bug ID: 117398
Summary: ICE: in invert, at value-range.cc:2165 at -O3 with
"-fno-thread-jumps"
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
();
}
```
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk-20241101/configure
--prefix=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-build/staging
--enable-libstdcxx-backtrace=yes --build=x86_64-linux-gnu
--host=x86_64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117399
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117401
Bug ID: 117401
Summary: Spell that ./configure --enable-link-mutex is
deprecated
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117396
--- Comment #2 from Дилян Палаузов ---
I think all of them (--disable-ld, --disable-ada, …) should be changed. This
way ./configure --help will only suggest how to toggle the default and what is
the default.
Here a legthy discussion (by me):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117399
--- Comment #2 from Дилян Палаузов ---
This was suggested here:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22707265/how-to-build-libgcc-of-gcc-compiler/22707330#22707330
.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116887
--- Comment #28 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c8d35f2ecbf124bdd164dbb1c36de9d90695843b
commit r15-4842-gc8d35f2ecbf124bdd164dbb1c36de9d90695843b
Author: Xi Ruoyao
Date: Fri Oct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116887
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117373
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:36a92c3829ba7a2683c3b095356b9ed08978420a
commit r15-4841-g36a92c3829ba7a2683c3b095356b9ed08978420a
Author: David Malcolm
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117361
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8e95e064ea73d46b50a68b0104c18685251d326d
commit r15-4840-g8e95e064ea73d46b50a68b0104c18685251d326d
Author: David Malcolm
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117361
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117373
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112596
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101887
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Simon Martin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe919da3c395d2214ffc81ad4f51f8344ad5a5c1
commit r15-4843-gfe919da3c395d2214ffc81ad4f51f8344ad5a5c1
Author: Simon Martin
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117399
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
Note that r15-2368-g6a55ff29578e8a makes the error better.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117399
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117289
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.faust at oracle dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101887
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to fail|12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114801
--- Comment #38 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> At least if the behavior is either perform the operation on all elements and
> then based on the 16 bits in the predicate choose result between the newly
> computed result and something else o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117392
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117396
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
There are others which have a similar help file issue:
AC_ARG_ENABLE(ld,
[AS_HELP_STRING([[--enable-ld[=ARG]]],
[build ld @<:@ARG={default,yes,no}@:>@])],
ENABLE_LD=$enableval,
ENABLE_LD=yes)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117396
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117371
--- Comment #2 from Ludovic Brenta ---
The trigger for the bug is the "BY k" in the third loop at line 20.
Removing these words removes the error reported (but obviously
makes the program less efficient).
--
Ludovic Brenta.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117399
Bug ID: 117399
Summary: make all-target-libgcc fails because gcc/as line 114
is "exec $original" and $original is --64
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117396
Bug ID: 117396
Summary: gcc/configure --help should print --disable-multilib
instead of --enable-multilib
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117397
Bug ID: 117397
Summary: [modules] ICE in binding_cmp with imported deduction
guide
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117392
--- Comment #3 from Hana Dusíková ---
Thanks for the workaround!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117394
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61601
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vincent.lebourlot@starqube.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117388
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117405
Bug ID: 117405
Summary: std::type_info::before() fails the asymmetry
requirement
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117407
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build, diagnostic
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109310
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110361
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110361
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> Looks like this was fixed sometime after r13-2020-g16b013c9d9b but before
> the release of GCC 13.
I'll bisect when I'm done with another.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117396
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build, documentation
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114461
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1ae24f7e0bdbdeaef9265a053a737af11f8393d2
commit r15-4848-g1ae24f7e0bdbdeaef9265a053a737af11f8393d2
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117401
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117401
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That doesn't really matter. Anybody who used the option in GCC 13/14 got that
deprecation message.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117406
--- Comment #3 from Paul Keir ---
At least for ilogb.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117410
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-11-01
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117411
Bug ID: 117411
Summary: Request for documentation to include exception example
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117415
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117415
Bug ID: 117415
Summary: Bogus execution count for assignment to *func()
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92259
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
I wonder if this is the same issue as Andi was looking at, actually.
BTW: I note that you were using Gentoo -- were you working on any sort of
integration of autofdo with Portage? I'm open to looking into this i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117350
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #22 from Sam James ---
h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92259
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> I wonder if this is the same issue as Andi was looking at, actually.
Most likely very the same issue overall. Considering need_assembler_name_p has
been around for a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117287
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:62420dbd105bbc4fe732881875c5c85aa55b6069
commit r15-4851-g62420dbd105bbc4fe732881875c5c85aa55b6069
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117407
Bug ID: 117407
Summary: [15 regression] bootstrap fails after
r15-4847-g79a75b1f551821
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117401
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109310
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dilyan.palauzov at aegee dot
org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55189
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113946
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117350
--- Comment #23 from Andrew Pinski ---
See reading https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64346#c4 seems like
this has basically been a known issue with autofdo and constructors due to
thunks and clones from the front-end.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117415
--- Comment #2 from Wentao Zhang ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I think this is the same underlying issue as PR 117412.
Hi Andrew, thanks for your reply!
In practice we've seen many such cases caused by multi-line expression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113932
Bug 113932 depends on bug 113946, which changed state.
Bug 113946 Summary: Switch ft32 to LRA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113946
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117407
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-11-01
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111055
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7a4fced2b122bde47fed2d99fb8e3cf197f9c46f
commit r15-4853-g7a4fced2b122bde47fed2d99fb8e3cf197f9c46f
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117409
Bug ID: 117409
Summary: ASAN issues compiling
gfortran.dg/diagnostic-format-sarif-pr105916.f90
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117309
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117345
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||3.4.6
Keywords|error-recovery
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117400
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-11-01
Summary|ICE on in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117410
--- Comment #3 from Artyom Kolpakov ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> But without the variadic arguments, the functions have equivalent function
> parameter lists, so the constraints are checked. With the ellipsis, they do
> no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117410
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> I think the reason GCC rejects the original one is because it's the only
> compiler that correctly implements P2113.
Clang apparently supports P2113 since v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117376
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think there is a missing check to see if the warning was emitted before the
inform.
I have seen the "note: destination object" diagnostic without a warning before
too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117376
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I suspect there are some missing auto_diagnostic_group usage in
gimple-array-bounds.cc
gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc
pointer-query.cc
tree-ssa-strlen.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20242
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117279
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
Julian Waters changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #59322|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117376
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> I suspect there are some missing auto_diagnostic_group usage in
> gimple-array-bounds.cc
> gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc
> pointer-query.cc
> tree-ssa-strlen.cc
Let me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117414
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117410
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
But without the variadic arguments, the functions have equivalent function
parameter lists, so the constraints are checked. With the ellipsis, they do not
have equivalent function parameter lists, so the c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117408
Torbjorn SVENSSON changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |azoff at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115560
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117407
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:115ab8d7ad33a7f500460dc5af28f6912ddfb91c
commit r15-4856-g115ab8d7ad33a7f500460dc5af28f6912ddfb91c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117309
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
