https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115210
Bug ID: 115210
Summary: Missed optimization opportunity in redundant copies
for large structure
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115208
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115210
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114148
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #4 from Hongtao Liu ---
> (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #3)
[...]
> uoops, does below patch fix the testcase on Solaris/x86?
>
>memcpy (pd_sr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110035
user202729 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||user202729 at protonmail dot
com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114148
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8
commit r15-814-g51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8
Author: liuhongt
Date: Fri May 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114148
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115211
Bug ID: 115211
Summary: [11/12/13/14/15 regression] -frecord-gcc-switches
refactoring lost list of enabled options
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115212
Bug ID: 115212
Summary: testsuite should produce DejaGnu style summary, log
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115144
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b9b3bae33cae7fca2e3c3e3028be6b8bee9b698
commit r15-815-g5b9b3bae33cae7fca2e3c3e3028be6b8bee9b698
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115182
Bug 115182 depends on bug 115144, which changed state.
Bug 115144 Summary: [15 Regression] 2% performance regression for some codes
with r15-518-g99b1daae18c095
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115144
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115144
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115209
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
As already noted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-May/652571.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115211
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.5
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115170
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
-solaris2.11, sparc-sun-solaris2.11,
i686-pc-linux-gnu
Build: i386-pc-solaris2.11, sparc-sun-solaris2.11,
i686-pc-linux-gnu
Between 20240523 (f0a02467bbc35a478eb82f5a8a7e8870827b51fc) and 20240524
(51f4b47c4f4f61fe31a7bd1fa80e08c2438d76a8),
memory
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115213
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115167
--- Comment #6 from David Edelsohn ---
The libgcc failure is due to something not being built or rebuilt.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115213
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115211
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
> This was done on purpose, you can use -help=optimizers now I think.
The thread I cited rather suggested is was removed because Martin argued
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105229
--- Comment #7 from Simon Martin ---
Bisection shows that this has been fixed by
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=252e9dfee9b1d01e0e44773ad83e0e44f3650945
Test case addition proposed in
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/202
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115211
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #2)
> > --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
> > This was done on purpose, you can use -help=optimizers now I think.
>
> The thread I cited rather
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115211
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
[..]
> Ah! Use -Q --help=optimizers (how intuititve...)
Or when invoking cc1 omit -quiet. remember to put --help=optimziers after
optimization options.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115192
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a0fe4fb1c8d7804515845dd5d2a814b3c7a1ccba
commit r15-820-ga0fe4fb1c8d7804515845dd5d2a814b3c7a1ccba
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115192
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14/15 regression] |[11/12/13/14 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115214
Bug ID: 115214
Summary: tree-ssa-pre.c(ICE in find_or_generate_expression, at
tree-ssa-pre.c:2780)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115215
Bug ID: 115215
Summary: views::concat rejects non-movable references
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115190
--- Comment #8 from Peter Damianov ---
I have been totally unable to reproduce this outside of MSYS2, with any
compilers I built myself. The "MSYS2 MSYS" shell also doesn't have this
problem.
I can't explain why. I tried investigating, but didn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115213
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115208
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113598
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f1457841abc2fd8657a52d1371c983ac010f1cc
commit r13-8798-g5f1457841abc2fd8657a52d1371c983ac010f1cc
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111529
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:53cdaa755de57e57ba9e787f232adc3cfde88209
commit r13-8799-g53cdaa755de57e57ba9e787f232adc3cfde88209
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114561
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7076c565e22281e193aeafafbf40676426a64b75
commit r12-10466-g7076c565e22281e193aeafafbf40676426a64b75
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114562
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7076c565e22281e193aeafafbf40676426a64b75
commit r12-10466-g7076c565e22281e193aeafafbf40676426a64b75
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113598
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:419b5e17eace9b6b985b9853db0dc1a5478375b6
commit r12-10467-g419b5e17eace9b6b985b9853db0dc1a5478375b6
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111529
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:19827831516023f2dff449af0b228b2d60190a28
commit r12-10468-g19827831516023f2dff449af0b228b2d60190a28
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114562
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b35afe75674ff9f79cf9685d099bc80f10442216
commit r11-11446-gb35afe75674ff9f79cf9685d099bc80f10442216
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114561
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b35afe75674ff9f79cf9685d099bc80f10442216
commit r11-11446-gb35afe75674ff9f79cf9685d099bc80f10442216
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114561
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114562
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114561
--- Comment #11 from Liam Jackson ---
Thank-you all for narrowing down and fixing this issue, and back-porting the
fix to older compilers. It is much appreciated.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115210
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14295
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||user202729 at protonmail dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115210
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115208
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth ---
An i686-pc-linux-gnu reghunt just completed, looking for the rust OOM failures
reported in PR bootstrap/115213. This patch is the culprit:
commit fae5e6a4dfcf9270cd09c2240480860b09c2c627
Author: Andrew MacLeo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115200
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dae606a11eb99814e452b49241fa76f7678f53b8
commit r15-824-gdae606a11eb99814e452b49241fa76f7678f53b8
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115200
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 115200, which changed state.
Bug 115200 Summary: [modules] ICE in declare_module() with unclosed namespace
scope before module perview
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115200
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114275
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fd6fd88b1a93f4fb38f095688255ab5c00122810
commit r14-10240-gfd6fd88b1a93f4fb38f095688255ab5c00122810
Author: Nathaniel S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105320
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fd6fd88b1a93f4fb38f095688255ab5c00122810
commit r14-10240-gfd6fd88b1a93f4fb38f095688255ab5c00122810
Author: Nathaniel Sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114275
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 105320, which changed state.
Bug 105320 Summary: Use of shared_ptr within a type exported from a module
results in spurious compiler error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105320
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105320
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 114275, which changed state.
Bug 114275 Summary: using std::thread within a templated function in a module
fails to compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114275
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115216
Bug ID: 115216
Summary: operator auto() gets instantiatied too eagerly
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115216
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 58281
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58281&action=edit
testcase
Next time please attach the testcase or place it inline rather than just a link
to godbolt.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115216
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
MSVC and ICC (EDG in GCC compat mode) also rejects the code for the same reason
as GCC. Are you sure this is not a clang issue?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114868
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:782ad2033ea0709a25ef3e899cbb9491406146d5
commit r14-10241-g782ad2033ea0709a25ef3e899cbb9491406146d5
Author: Nathaniel Sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114868
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 114868, which changed state.
Bug 114868 Summary: [modules] func declared in GMF and exported via using-decl
in module partition is not actually exported
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114868
Wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114683
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-05-24
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=06
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114831
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f1798c1a93257526196a3c19828e40fb28ac551
commit r15-825-g9f1798c1a93257526196a3c19828e40fb28ac551
Author: Martin Uecker
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115187
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9031c027827bff44e1b55c366fc7034c43501b4c
commit r14-10242-g9031c027827bff44e1b55c366fc7034c43501b4c
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 104318, which changed state.
Bug 104318 Summary: [modules] ICE tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:16621
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104318
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104318
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nshead at gcc dot gnu.org
Res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115187
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115217
Bug ID: 115217
Summary: Register pairs can't be encoded in RISC-V inline asm
blocks
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100667
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ba57a52dbf6a64ba66f72c20064c5c0e8cc9dbbb
commit r12-10470-gba57a52dbf6a64ba66f72c20064c5c0e8cc9dbbb
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115217
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note aarch64's TImode is always allocated in starting in even number registers
(starting in GCC 9:
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/20181002161915.18843-10-richard.hender...@linaro.org/
) .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115218
Bug ID: 115218
Summary: The conversion constructor of concat_view::iterator
always default-constructs variant
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100667
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:16046a075cb54c90609825e30b2ab45a03395ca1
commit r11-11447-g16046a075cb54c90609825e30b2ab45a03395ca1
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113598
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:38de942670ad39c60ba4feae893d11843e0aebe8
commit r11-11449-g38de942670ad39c60ba4feae893d11843e0aebe8
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111529
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a644775c363979bc25951532819ffa0f244b82f4
commit r11-11448-ga644775c363979bc25951532819ffa0f244b82f4
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113598
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101603
Bug 101603 depends on bug 113598, which changed state.
Bug 113598 Summary: [11/12/13 Regression] GCC internal compiler error since
r0-124275
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113598
What|Removed |Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111529
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114841
--- Comment #2 from Matheus Izvekov ---
I published
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2024/p3310r0.html
to address this problem, it has the most up-to-date wording.
FYI the inconsistent deduction examples from problem #1 crash
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86100
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:93765736815a049e14d985b758a213cfe60c1e1c
commit r15-827-g93765736815a049e14d985b758a213cfe60c1e1c
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93635
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9561cf550a66a89e7c8d31202a03c4fddf82a3f2
commit r15-828-g9561cf550a66a89e7c8d31202a03c4fddf82a3f2
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103368
--- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #8)
> I simply copied all the associated functions in trans-expr.cc from mainline
> and plonked them in 13-branch. That's why I said that I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115161
--- Comment #22 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #21)
gcc generates the following code for this C code:
> int main() {
> const __m128i su = _mm_set1_epi32(0x4f80);
> const __m128 sf = _mm_castsi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115219
Bug ID: 115219
Summary: ICE on conditionally noexcept class operator delete
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115219
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE on conditionally|[c++17+] ICE on depdendent
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115219
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115219
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.5
Summary|[c++17+] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115220
Bug ID: 115220
Summary: [15] RISC-V: newlib targets ICE during sink pass
triggered in verify_ssa
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115219
--- Comment #3 from Barnabás Pőcze ---
That reduced test case compiles fine for me. On CE, too. Am I missing some
compilation flags?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115220
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115219
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Barnabás Pőcze from comment #3)
> That reduced test case compiles fine for me. On CE, too. Am I missing some
> compilation flags?
Oh I reduced it with an older version but newer versions (GCC 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115221
Bug ID: 115221
Summary: [15 regression] ICE when building reiser4progs
(propagate_updated_value, at
gimple-range-cache.cc:1368)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115221
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Reducing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115220
--- Comment #2 from Edwin Lu ---
Created attachment 58283
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58283&action=edit
-freport-bug output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115220
--- Comment #3 from Edwin Lu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Can you provide the preprocessed source?
I attached the -freport-bug output. Please lmk if you need anything else!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115220
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Edwin Lu from comment #3)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > Can you provide the preprocessed source?
>
> I attached the -freport-bug output. Please lmk if you need anything else
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115221
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
```
typedef unsigned uint32_t;
int cde40_t;
void aal_test_bit();
uint32_t cde40_key_pol();
long cde40_offset_check(uint32_t pos) {
cde40_key_pol();
if (cde40_t)
return pos ?: 0 % 0;
}
void cde40_check_st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102345
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:28b508233a12c13295f960a2cb8a4864879acfb4
commit r15-830-g28b508233a12c13295f960a2cb8a4864879acfb4
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102345
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 102345, which changed state.
Bug 102345 Summary: [modules] Cannot define a module interface unit for
anything in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102345
What|Removed |Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115221
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
This one still ICEs and it is closer to the original source:
```
typedef unsigned uint32_t;
int cde40_t;
int offset;
void aal_test_bit();
uint32_t cde40_key_pol();
long cde40_offset_check(uint32_t pos) {
c
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo