https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
Bug ID: 109271
Summary: Unnecessary vectorization alias versioning check
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80198
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.4|10.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65917
Bug 65917 depends on bug 80198, which changed state.
Bug 80198 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] does not vectorize generic inplace
integer operation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80198
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 80198, which changed state.
Bug 80198 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] does not vectorize generic inplace
integer operation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80198
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
A related(?) case from the same PR is the following where one could argue
we should have propagated the equivalence.
void __attribute__((noinline)) generic(int * a, int * b, int c)
{
if (a == b) {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105208
--- Comment #1 from Martin Uecker ---
Still affects 12.x but seems to have disappeared on trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109267
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-Og generates empty |generates empty functions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109265
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |13.0
Component|middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109265
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Note it's probably enough to print what 'name' is on the failing assert and
maybe dump some context on the stmt we are processing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107822
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|14.0
Summary|[13 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107484
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-checking|accepts-invalid
Priority|P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99739
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:86111e7b3027de1029718e23ee5fab0ee011e191
commit r13-6845-g86111e7b3027de1029718e23ee5fab0ee011e191
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107443
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109137
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0d9e52675c009139a14182d92ddb446ba2feabce
commit r13-6846-g0d9e52675c009139a14182d92ddb446ba2feabce
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109247
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/WebKit/W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107405
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109272
Bug ID: 109272
Summary: RISCV: vbool*_t better opportunities of code
generation
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109258
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5450833e4f9993f81ac16cbbcf4e46881a519f85
commit r13-6847-g5450833e4f9993f81ac16cbbcf4e46881a519f85
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104713
James Addison changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jay+g...@jp-hosting.net
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98612
andysem at mail dot ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andysem at mail dot ru
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109268
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109188
--- Comment #15 from Costas Argyris ---
patch that makes symbol optional was pushed to master:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=08ef17c75777ef9e4e7ead132ccd7a6d03ae6020
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108865
--- Comment #29 from Costas Argyris ---
patch that makes symbol optional was pushed to master:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=08ef17c75777ef9e4e7ead132ccd7a6d03ae6020
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109273
Bug ID: 109273
Summary: [11/12/13 Regression] unaligned stp generated with
-mstrict-align
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109265
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109273
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103100
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109265
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 54740
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54740&action=edit
Reduced test-case
s390x-linux-gnu-gcc sgexx.F90 -c -O3
during GIMPLE pass: dom
sgexx.F90:14:23:
14 |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100955
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109274
Bug ID: 109274
Summary: ice in in_chain_p, at gimple-range-gori.cc:119
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109254
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 54741
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54741&action=edit
gcc13-pr109254.patch
Those patches break bootstrap though (in libobjc) and regress some
__builtin_apply*/__bui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109275
Bug ID: 109275
Summary: Bad error messages for interfaces describing
surrounding program unit
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99575
Tom Niget changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||niget.tom at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109265
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109274
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109265
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Perhaps the same bug as PR109274?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109258
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109231
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Tried valgrind on the cross d21 on x86_64 and didn't see anything.
Perhaps modify the makefiles such that it uses -fdump-tree-all -da already when
compiling typeinfo.lo?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109265
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Without USE:
module sgexx
integer,parameter :: r8 = selected_real_kind(12) ! 8 byte real
contains
SUBROUTINE SLACPY( UPLO, M, N, A, LDA, B, LDB )
END SUBROUTINE SLACPY
SUBROUTINE SLAR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109274
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
(gdb) p *vrel_ptr
$4 = {related = VREL_VARYING, name1 = , name2 = }
and we pass on NULL here:
666 if (op1_in_chain)
667 res = in_chain_p (vrel_ptr->op1 (), op1)
668
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106912
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ed626f18b189920aeed9974aded3f9cb6f25b543
commit r13-6849-ged626f18b189920aeed9974aded3f9cb6f25b543
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106912
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109231
--- Comment #21 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Tried valgrind on the cross d21 on x86_64 and didn't see anything.
> Perhaps modify the makefiles such that it uses -fdump-tree-all -da alrea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109137
--- Comment #20 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #19)
> The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0d9e52675c009139a14182d92ddb446ba2feabce
>
> commit r13-6846-g0d9e52675c0091
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109238
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0409aa5a2de9ce3164933814a4a7adc91f6acb96
commit r13-6850-g0409aa5a2de9ce3164933814a4a7adc91f6acb96
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109274
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I think:
--- gcc/gimple-range-gori.cc.jj 2023-03-23 15:25:47.060741116 +0100
+++ gcc/gimple-range-gori.cc2023-03-24 14:30:38.272043631 +0100
@@ -632,10 +632,11 @@ gori_compute::compute_operand_range (vra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109188
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108865
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jdx at o2 dot pl
--- Comment #30 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109270
Siddhesh Poyarekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109238
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109265
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
My PR109274 patch fixes this too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107769
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109265
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Adjusted testcase:
module pr109265
integer, parameter :: r8 = selected_real_kind (12)
contains
subroutine foo (b, c, d, e, f)
implicit none
logical :: b
real (kind = r8) :: c, d, e, f, i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109275
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109274
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109274
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stefansf at linux dot ibm.com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109265
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103628
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to HaoChen Gui from comment #5)
> The memory representation of IBM long double is not unique. It's actually
> the sum of two 64-bit doubles.
Yes, and the first of those two DP numbers is req
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109274
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #54742|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109274
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jakub at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109163
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7f1e15f743357e037d7c4f6f6000863c26f3dfc3
commit r13-6851-g7f1e15f743357e037d7c4f6f6000863c26f3dfc3
Author: David Malcolm
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97740
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.5
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105685
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97740
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka ---
A C++14 version that's more similar to the original testcase using a generic
lambda and dependent initializer:
struct A {
constexpr const int* get() const { return &m; }
private:
int m = 42;
} a;
struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105980
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] ICE |[11/12 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104949
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e8fec6998b656dac02d4bc6c69b35a0fb5611e87
commit r13-6852-ge8fec6998b656dac02d4bc6c69b35a0fb5611e87
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106069
--- Comment #35 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ping again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105481
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e2cdb1ddb5f6ace909358775e94bfe23046ad5a
commit r13-6853-g4e2cdb1ddb5f6ace909358775e94bfe23046ad5a
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108891
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Wilco Dijkstra :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1f641d6aba284e0c277e6684cd6b2c73591cd14d
commit r13-6855-g1f641d6aba284e0c277e6684cd6b2c73591cd14d
Author: Wilco Dijkstra
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108891
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106069
--- Comment #36 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #34)
> What is the state of this PR? I see patches posted in August, but don't see
> anything committed...
I've seen some patch submissions and pings in February an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
Bug ID: 109276
Summary: ICE: in assign_stack_local_1, at function.cc:429 with
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
--- Comment #1 from Max Aehle ---
Created attachment 54746
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54746&action=edit
source code of minimal example
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
--- Comment #2 from Max Aehle ---
Created attachment 54747
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54747&action=edit
output with additional flag -v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
--- Comment #3 from Max Aehle ---
Created attachment 54748
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54748&action=edit
preprocessed source produced with -freport-bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
--- Comment #4 from Max Aehle ---
Created attachment 54749
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54749&action=edit
produces with -save-temps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
--- Comment #5 from Max Aehle ---
Created attachment 54750
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54750&action=edit
produced with -save-temps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
Max Aehle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #54745|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.1.0, 13.0
Summary|ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
A workaround is to do:
long long int digit __attribute__((aligned(8)));
Note manually setting the digit alignment to 4 does not cause an ICE for GCC
10.4 either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109175
--- Comment #5 from Mathieu Malaterre ---
c-reduce(d) ugly version:
% cat demo3.cc
struct d {
using b = float &;
};
template using c = d::b;
struct e {
using b = c;
};
template struct j;
template using h = typename j::b;
template struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> This started to ICE with r11-508-gdfa4fcdba374ed44 in the newly added pass
> there,
> and since r11-2259-g0a9d711df36b42b6494b73 it ICEs similarly like on the
> trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85877
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0257ba766443f11cf61c52db9b480337e44b48c8
commit r11-10594-g0257ba766443f11cf61c52db9b480337e44b48c8
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109186
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b722050fe8e7f06a3e653f290a39ccdc4d03174
commit r11-10595-g4b722050fe8e7f06a3e653f290a39ccdc4d03174
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99036
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2055702e8d492be6e978fa93a7bfefd358d5d9e3
commit r11-10596-g2055702e8d492be6e978fa93a7bfefd358d5d9e3
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99036
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85877
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dca8e28c990547648543175de9b6e05356f77e8a
commit r10-11264-gdca8e28c990547648543175de9b6e05356f77e8a
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109186
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b9f6e7e234bab6ef8b5425c3e8b88bf8dfbc5089
commit r10-11265-gb9f6e7e234bab6ef8b5425c3e8b88bf8dfbc5089
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32630
Bug 32630 depends on bug 85877, which changed state.
Bug 85877 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at
fold-const.c:2449
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85877
What|Removed |Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85877
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109186
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109175
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced all the way removing all of the classes showing exactly what I thought
it was:
```
void *ao();
float *aq(long t) {
if (t)
return nullptr;
return static_cast(ao());
}
float v;
void at(long t)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106969
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bbf2424c57c2e13d1a972c4ef4e871c3119b9cb4
commit r13-6856-gbbf2424c57c2e13d1a972c4ef4e871c3119b9cb4
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106969
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] member |[12 Regression] member
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109277
Bug ID: 109277
Summary: [13 Regression] type_traits:1417:30: error: invalid
use of incomplete type ‘class v8::internal::WasmArray’
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109277
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109275
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-03-24
Ever confirme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109175
--- Comment #7 from Jan Wassenberg ---
Thanks, I will be changing the code to add a nullptr check.
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo