https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104260
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
There is also
PUSH_INSERT_PASSES_WITHIN (pass_build_ssa_passes)
...
NEXT_PASS (pass_rebuild_cgraph_edges);
NEXT_PASS (pass_warn_access, /*early=*/true);
POP_INSERT_PASSES ()
where pass_rebui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104261
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i?86|i?86-*-*
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104263
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104266
Bug ID: 104266
Summary: Temporaries with protected destructor are erroneously
permitted
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104263
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Note we have an abnormal edge from BB2 to the abnormal dispatcher (missed
optimization, we should get rid of it), but the last stmts in the abnormal
edge sources are debug vs. non-debug stmts (but neither a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103790
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c9c48ab7bad9fe5e096076e56a60ce0a5a2b65f7
commit r12-6910-gc9c48ab7bad9fe5e096076e56a60ce0a5a2b65f7
Author: Andre Vehreschild
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104263
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104263
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] |[10/11/12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104265
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104267
Bug ID: 104267
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in vect_schedule_slp_node, at
tree-vect-slp.c:7144 since r12-5613-g32ede1083fad4b68
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104267
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104263
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
OK, so with the abnormal edges the issue is that DCE1 removes the recursive
call to foo () (because the function is "wrongly" pure) which causes us to
clear
cfun->calls_setjmp but then any further gimple_pu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104263
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
I'm testing a patch to gimple_purge_dead_abnormal_call_edges, leaving the
store-merging issue to Jakub.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104267
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104258
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b16a3dea1d1bfa3dde556af84b3592140320b605
commit r12-6912-gb16a3dea1d1bfa3dde556af84b3592140320b605
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104258
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0d87092f8897fe6e0a86a566bf3c6a924db152c6
commit r11-9522-g0d87092f8897fe6e0a86a566bf3c6a924db152c6
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104258
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104268
Bug ID: 104268
Summary: 390: inefficient vec_popcnt for 16-bit for z13
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104267
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
pr91003.f90:8:13: note: -->vectorizing SLP node starting from: _61 =
.COND_MUL (_202, j_42(D), bnrm2_60(D), 0.0);
pr91003.f90:8:13: missed: could not find an appropriate vector mask type.
pr91003.f9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104263
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104263
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Untested fix for the store-merging bug.
FWIW it looks good to me, thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104237
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:430dca620fa3d03e53f6771a2b61d3f0ebb73756
commit r12-6914-g430dca620fa3d03e53f6771a2b61d3f0ebb73756
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104237
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] Emitted |[11 Regression] Emitted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104142
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103790
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:26e237fb5b83582b30ef7c5a388bc4e968a5a289
commit r12-6915-g26e237fb5b83582b30ef7c5a388bc4e968a5a289
Author: Andre Vehreschild
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104142
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104172
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10 Regression] ppc64le
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103830
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
To clarify myself - the testcase is invoking UB, 'volatile' doesn't make a
difference here. That we get the DSE as a second-order effect is unfortunate
at most, in other places we try to preserve volatile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103830
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
A fix in the source would be:
void MyClass::call() {
volatile char * volatile null = nullptr;
*null = 1; /* line 26 */
}
which then compiles to
movq$0, -8(%rsp)
movq-8(%r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103830
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103830
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #9 from Bernd Edling
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104151
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103788
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104263
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b6f04276e3d1f20817ed37b2e26e43bd12cc0d2
commit r12-6917-g5b6f04276e3d1f20817ed37b2e26e43bd12cc0d2
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104267
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ec306582fd60e5b76f07eb81c9ed2415d9a3590
commit r12-6918-g9ec306582fd60e5b76f07eb81c9ed2415d9a3590
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104267
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103341
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e272cf95ba048fde60b21aee046c9ca9c9264425
commit r12-6919-ge272cf95ba048fde60b21aee046c9ca9c9264425
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103341
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104269
Bug ID: 104269
Summary: Bogus -Wuse-after-free seen in xen
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimiza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103489
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c7d8ca8317981c2eb21eb1e85e0f55d3f71aff1
commit r11-9523-g2c7d8ca8317981c2eb21eb1e85e0f55d3f71aff1
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103596
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:08f594465fa9b6a4ea1e3816cfecf256e883ff53
commit r11-9524-g08f594465fa9b6a4ea1e3816cfecf256e883ff53
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103489
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103035
Bug 103035 depends on bug 103489, which changed state.
Bug 103489 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE with -O3 in operator[], at vec.h:889
since r12-5394-g0fc859f5efcb4624
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103489
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103616
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I can not reproduce ICE on this week GCC. Probably it was fixed (or switched
off) by some recent RA patch.
As for the second issue (code generation for function foo), I thought for some
time how it coul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104255
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103483
--- Comment #21 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Yes, the wording is dreadful. Yes we need a better way to express to the user
the paths followed and how they impacted the analysis.
As for suppressing. There's not a great option here, which isn't a hug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104270
Bug ID: 104270
Summary: -Wanalyzer-use-of-uninitialized-value is incorrectly
suppressed by -ftrivial-auto-var-init=
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104228
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178
--- Comment #26 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> make costs in a way that IRA/LRA prefer re-materialization of constants
> from the constant pool over spilling to GPRs (if that's possible at all -
> Vlad?)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101783
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102449
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104228
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The .y var is added into the s function with:
#0 add_decl_as_local (decl=) at
../../gcc/fortran/trans-decl.cc:257
#1 0x00c054f8 in gfc_finish_var_decl (decl=, sym=0x3e16a00) at ../../gcc/fortran/tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104266
Jiang An changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||de34 at live dot cn
--- Comment #1 from Jian
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178
--- Comment #27 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #17)
> So in .reload we have (with unpatched trunk)
>
> 401: NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK 6
> 462: ax:DF=[`*.LC0']
> REG_EQUAL 9.850689972416730997792
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94801
dragan.mladjenovic at syrmia dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dragan.mladjenovic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104228
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92752
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103616
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
#c0 doesn't ICE on the trunk since
r12-5944-ga7acb6dca941db2b1c135107dac3a34a20650d5c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103676
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] |[10/11 Regression] internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101391
--- Comment #8 from Gaius Mulley ---
Is it okay to close this PR as I've git committed some regression tests to
check that cgetopt and (other modules) are present and visible to the linker?
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-cvs/2022-January/359
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104271
Bug ID: 104271
Summary: 538.imagick_r run-time at -Ofast -march=native
regressed by 26% on Intel Cascade Lake server CPU
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103171
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor ---
I have proposed a patch on the mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-January/589429.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70230
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:90c31ff339015ddd89ac519656fbd23a36ee6271
commit r12-6922-g90c31ff339015ddd89ac519656fbd23a36ee6271
Author: Allan McRae
Date: Fri Jan 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104269
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99175
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host|hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa*-*-hpux*
Build|hpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104269
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104263
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a591c71b41e18e4ff86852a974592af4962aef57
commit r12-6923-ga591c71b41e18e4ff86852a974592af4962aef57
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104263
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] |[10/11 Regression]
|'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99175
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|testsuite |c++
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99175
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |testsuite
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102204
--- Comment #3 from Ye Luo ---
I tried today's main 3f0fcda37f58d4108feb67de08f181a32bcb6388.
This issue persists. Any chance this will be resolved in 12 release?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104269
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95424
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c2b610e7c6c89fd422c5c31f01023bcddf3cf4a5
commit r12-6924-gc2b610e7c6c89fd422c5c31f01023bcddf3cf4a5
Author: Zhao Wei Liew
Date: Fri Jan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104253
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Michael Meissner from comment #4)
> Created attachment 52306 [details]
> Patch to use the correct names for __ibm128 converts if long double is IEEE
> 128-bit
>
> The problem was internally the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104272
Bug ID: 104272
Summary: finalizer gets called during allocate
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95424
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
Stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19987
Bug 19987 depends on bug 95424, which changed state.
Bug 95424 Summary: Failure to optimize division with numerator of 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95424
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70230
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104255
--- Comment #3 from qingzhe huang ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #2)
> The error message is obscure, but it seems what GCC has issue with here is
> the use of the function parameter seq2 in the trailing return type occurring
> outsi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104273
Bug ID: 104273
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/pr103526.c (test for bogus
messages, line 31)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104274
Bug ID: 104274
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/pr97029.c (test for excess
errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101891
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-01-28
Stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104253
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Conversion from __ibm128 to float/double etc. are done differently, and for si
<-> if named tf we want to use di instead.
So, shouldn't we just add
+ set_conv_libfunc (sfix_optab, DImode, mode, "__fixtf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92752
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e971990cbda091b4caf5e1a5bded5121068934e4
commit r12-6926-ge971990cbda091b4caf5e1a5bded5121068934e4
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92752
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11 Regression] Bogus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104275
Bug ID: 104275
Summary: Os does not apply return value optimization while O2
and O3 does
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104177
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104275
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |ipa
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104253
--- Comment #8 from Michael Meissner ---
Yes, you are right. I didn't remember which functions were generated by the
compiler, but I just did all of the conversion functions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104177
--- Comment #14 from Luke Dalessandro ---
Thanks for the information Iain.
Is there something short-term where gcc could provide an "unimplemented"
failure or warning diagnostic for requests for coroutine frames with extended
alignment?
This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104228
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99175
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host|hppa*-*-hpux* |
Build|hppa*-*-hpux*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103514
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb3ac1985a5332fa811a62844adb33ca140bd4ba
commit r12-6928-gcb3ac1985a5332fa811a62844adb33ca140bd4ba
Author: Navid Rahimi
Date: Fri Jan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103514
Navid Rahimi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101135
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 52311
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52311&action=edit
Patch that regtests ok.
The patch suggested by the reporter is rather close to this one.
We need t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104253
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #52306|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104255
--- Comment #4 from qingzhe huang ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #2)
>
> error: use of parameter outside function body before ‘)’ token
>
> due to 'e' being used outside of an unevaluated context within the signature
> of the f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104270
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104273
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103872
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo