https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104227
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104228
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE |[9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104237
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Emitted binary code changes |[11/12 Regression] Emitted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104233
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104233
--- Comment #7 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Pushed the fix as logical after checking on aarch64-apple-darwin.
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=8769f32b645eb08b9f07ec3171cc21c3420f8616
Please let me know if this fixes SPARC/Sola
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104189
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104238
Bug ID: 104238
Summary: dwarf DW_AT_const_value causes overflow in readelf
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104196
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104188
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:192e4a9fa0880ef153631d5b0de864bc4bbb6a91
commit r12-6874-g192e4a9fa0880ef153631d5b0de864bc4bbb6a91
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104188
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44d28c67b484fe3be7b693108fc03cbe6aa05329
commit r11-9512-g44d28c67b484fe3be7b693108fc03cbe6aa05329
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104238
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That looks like a binutils bug to me.
When gcc is emitting the DW_AT_const_value, it doesn't know if it is signed or
unsigned, CONST_INT it uses is always signed.
So it emits
.sleb128 -9223372036854775808
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99932
--- Comment #14 from Tom de Vries ---
An observation when playing around with vector-length-128-4.c: there are two
ways in which I can make the example pass.
1. add barrier.sync.aligned 0 or membar.cta after first broad-cast receive
2. unroll l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99932
--- Comment #15 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #14)
> An observation when playing around with vector-length-128-4.c:
Another observation:
...
$L11:
ld.u64 %r108,[%r109];
st.u64 [%r112],%r108;
setp.lt.u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104239
Bug ID: 104239
Summary: [12 Regression] immintrin.h or x86gprintrin.h headers
can't be included
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104239
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103941
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Another testcase where this occurs:
void foo (int *c, float *x, float *y)
{
c[0] = x[0] < y[0];
c[1] = x[1] < y[1];
c[2] = x[2] < y[2];
c[3] = x[3] < y[3];
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104125
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
The patch did not change the run-time (by more than could be attributed to
noise). I will take a *quick* look at what happened in October.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104240
Bug ID: 104240
Summary: SLP discovery does not consider swapping comparisons
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104240
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104239
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 52291
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52291&action=edit
gcc12-pr104239.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104240
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 52292
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52292&action=edit
untested patch
With this patch we then run into PR103941.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104241
Bug ID: 104241
Summary: [12 Regression] trunk 20220126 RTL error on
powerpc64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104242
Bug ID: 104242
Summary: Class with constructor from std::any is not copyable
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104242
--- Comment #1 from Fedor Chelnokov ---
The error message is
invalid use of incomplete type 'std::__conditional_t, std::__not_
> >' {aka 'struct std::is_copy_constructible'}
...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104241
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104241
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104242
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Summary|Class
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104241
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104238
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Please somebody file a bug at sourceware.org/bugzilla then with an assembler
testcase and close this bug as RESOLVED MOVED.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104214
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100740
Bug 100740 depends on bug 104214, which changed state.
Bug 104214 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr81196.c fails after r12-6844
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104214
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103171
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104187
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
For Gimple representation __builtin_always_inline(foo(x, y))
does not make very good sense since gimple is not nested and foo may return
void so there may not be any link between call and the builtin.
I see t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103171
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
@Martin: Can you please take a look?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103818
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103818
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104238
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-01-26
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15338
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101484
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104162
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> Btw, in VN it would be nice to handle
>
> struct S { int i; };
>
> int i;
> int bar (char *p)
> {
> char *q = p + 1;
> i = 1;
> char *r = (char *)&(((s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101484
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104196
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The above patch unfortunately causes ICE on -O2:
int a, b, c;
void
foo (void)
{
if (!c && !b)
a |= 1;
}
optimize_range_tests_cmp_bitwise in that case wants to optimize the:
[local count: 10737418
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104243
Bug ID: 104243
Summary: Optimization requires __sync_synchronize
Product: gcc
Version: 6.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104162
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 52293
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52293&action=edit
untested patch
Like this - it unfortunately regresses the diagnostic case in PR99673 again but
should leave e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94362
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e966a508e03fe28bfca65a1e60e579fa90355ea6
commit r12-6875-ge966a508e03fe28bfca65a1e60e579fa90355ea6
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104224
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ff3e2368d86c1bf7d1e8876a14e58c0d6617ffe
commit r12-6876-g9ff3e2368d86c1bf7d1e8876a14e58c0d6617ffe
Author: David Malcolm
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98829
Nemanja Boric changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nemanjab at amazon dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104243
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104243
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104243
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Thus I think the bug tens to be invalid..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104243
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104243
--- Comment #5 from A. Klitzing ---
Created attachment 52294
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52294&action=edit
assembler output
By the way... If idx is not initialized it will work, too.
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
int main(int argc,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94193
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8bcf835e0a4e3334e1c60f314ae6917ba648bdde
commit r12-6877-g8bcf835e0a4e3334e1c60f314ae6917ba648bdde
Author: Raoni Fassina Firmin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82207
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104235
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99935
--- Comment #9 from Nick Clifton ---
A revised patch to fix this PR has been prroposed on gcc-patches:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-January/589277.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98886
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
commit:
commit 7da259292bedb03ca9860c8e4fa77af2e527af6f (HEAD -> 22.01, origin/22.01)
Author: Mikael Ronstrm
Date: Wed Jan 26 13:45:37 2022 +0100
ndb_binlog.ndb_binlog_index hangs in debug mode
Found at github.com/mronstro/rondb in branch 22.01
Linux instance-20220126-1319 5.4.17-21
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100081
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Macleod ---
Looking back at this, I explained why its pathological, but I realize I wasn't
clear about a couple of things. So for the record :-)
> > [local count: 28382607]:
> > <...>
> > _571 = _61 >= _593;
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104206
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-01-26
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 52296
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52296&action=edit
perf annotate before and after the revision
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104245
Bug ID: 104245
Summary: abseil-cpp 20211102.0 fails with "internal compiler
error"
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104245
--- Comment #1 from Tomasz Kłoczko ---
gcc from rawhide
[tkloczko@ss-desktop SRPMS]$ rpm -q gcc-c++
gcc-c++-12.0.1-0.2.fc36.x86_64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104246
Bug ID: 104246
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-compare2.C -std=c++20
(test for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104247
Bug ID: 104247
Summary: Compiler warnings on 32-bit system
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: analyzer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104215
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
The kernel false positive is discussed in bug 104069 comment 13. I don't think
it's related to this issue but you're of course right that this warning isn't
immune to false positives. That's true for all wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104235
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:00d8321124123daf41f7c51526355a5a610cdeb8
commit r12-6879-g00d8321124123daf41f7c51526355a5a610cdeb8
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104235
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104245
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Can you please attach pre-processed source file (-E)?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104245
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
First disable the plugin and then add -save-temps to the command line and
remove -pipe and then the preprocessed source will be something *.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104245
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104248
Bug ID: 104248
Summary: armel: C11 atomics requires to be linked with
libatomic.a explicitly
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104248
--- Comment #1 from Mathieu Malaterre ---
In case that help, cmake instructions for the test case is:
```
project(p C)
set(CMAKE_C_STANDARD 11)
add_library(foo STATIC foo.c)
add_executable(prog prog.c)
target_link_libraries(prog foo)
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104238
--- Comment #4 from Todor Buyukliev ---
> When gcc is emitting the DW_AT_const_value, it doesn't know if it is signed
> or unsigned, CONST_INT it uses is always signed.
good, so this is as designed.
> That sleb128 value is certainly not too la
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104249
Bug ID: 104249
Summary: [12 regression] RTL failure with checks turned on
after r12-6848
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104248
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
This is a general problem with architectures not implementing all atomic
operations inline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18487
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36159
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68047
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70019
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70816
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104198
--- Comment #10 from rdapp at linux dot ibm.com ---
Created attachment 52297
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52297&action=edit
Tentative patch
I now have something that successfully bootstraps on s390x, PowerPC and SPARC
but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72783
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80806
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86199
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86568
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104227
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:27664d26a931606108981b46ac7bfedf7122
commit r11-9513-g27664d26a931606108981b46ac7bfedf7122
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86571
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87593
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88397
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88718
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88565
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89309
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98217
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102934
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98405
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104248
--- Comment #3 from Mathieu Malaterre ---
@Andreas the specific issue I am raising is the difference between the approach
of riscv vs armel. The riscv team is taking the responsability for putting the
missing `-latomic`, while armel expect the u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83976
--- Comment #5 from G. Steinmetz ---
Slightly shorter :
$ cat zz1.f90
program p
type t
end type
class(t), allocatable :: x
type(t) :: y
y = (x)
end
$ cat zz2.f90
program p
type t
end type
class(t) :: x
type(t) :: y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94004
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104213
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7bd1e1296cc36b558a27bbe09352c5c2aca4c5d5
commit r12-6880-g7bd1e1296cc36b558a27bbe09352c5c2aca4c5d5
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: T
1 - 100 of 201 matches
Mail list logo
