https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102602
Bug ID: 102602
Summary: [10/11/12 Regression] 32bit mips: Error: branch out of
range
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102602
--- Comment #1 from Adrian Bunk ---
Created attachment 51553
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51553&action=edit
Generated assembler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102603
Bug ID: 102603
Summary: Compile-time evaluation of indirection via dangling
pointer is not rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102535
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7646847df71e57edca5ec5b8c3c3dc4550dcb49d
commit r12-4181-g7646847df71e57edca5ec5b8c3c3dc4550dcb49d
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102587
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:604459a09585314841cdce4698893c656481691b
commit r12-4182-g604459a09585314841cdce4698893c656481691b
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102285
--- Comment #29 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:604459a09585314841cdce4698893c656481691b
commit r12-4182-g604459a09585314841cdce4698893c656481691b
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102285
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102587
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
pattern-init support for SVE vectors is still missing as well as maybe handling
aggregates with embedded SVE vectors if that's a thing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102528
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe ---
#include
struct simple {
struct promise_type {
void return_void() {}
std::suspend_never initial_suspend() { return {}; }
std::suspend_never final_suspend() noexcept { return {}; }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102604
Bug ID: 102604
Summary: arm v7m_extra_costs for SFmode inaccurate?
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102528
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102591
--- Comment #2 from Gabriel Ravier ---
memcpy can fail on unaligned memory ??? I used it specifically to avoid this
problem !
(also, LLVM's code, I am pretty sure, does not have any issue with alignment,
as it uses either AVX instructions which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102528
--- Comment #8 from Mathias Stearn ---
Sorry again about the confusion caused by my typo. I am not able to edit the
comment to make it clear that the comment#0 should be ignored. If that happens
again, would it be better for me to close the tick
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102605
Bug ID: 102605
Summary: address instruction from -fdump-tree-*-gimple doesn't
work with -fgimple
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92010
qingzhe huang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickhuang99 at hotmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102528
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Mathias Stearn from comment #8)
> Sorry again about the confusion caused by my typo. I am not able to edit the
> comment to make it clear that the comment#0 should be ignored. If that
> happens ag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102591
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102606
Bug ID: 102606
Summary: miscompilation of a program with large array in a
dead-code
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102606
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
Summary|miscompil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102606
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102605
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102602
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91356
--- Comment #11 from Niels Möller ---
Here's a bit more docs on using std::unique_ptr [[clang::trivial_abi]] with
clang and its C++ library.
https://libcxx.llvm.org//DesignDocs/UniquePtrTrivialAbi.html
As for "No, it needs co-operation between
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98930
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f3930418cb82000fae3cb4e98e870428800cf295
commit r12-4186-gf3930418cb82000fae3cb4e98e870428800cf295
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98930
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 98930, which changed state.
Bug 98930 Summary: ICE with static variable in template function used as
template argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98930
What|Removed |A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102540
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Macleod ---
> >
> > It would probably resolve an entire class of things where we don't
> > recognize an
> > equivalence between a cast and a bitmask of equivalent precision.
> >
> > This would also mean the reverse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102605
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> You need
>
> if (p_2(D) == _Literal (char *) &global[2])
>
> and of course you need to provide the
>
> char global[10];
>
> declaration. And then we sti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93389
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70331
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||klaus.doldinger64@googlemai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 93389, which changed state.
Bug 93389 Summary: Failure to detect UB in constexpr context
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93389
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102603
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70331
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fchelnokov at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 102603, which changed state.
Bug 102603 Summary: Compile-time evaluation of indirection via dangling pointer
is not rejected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102603
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102571
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 51554
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51554&action=edit
gcc12-pr102571.patch
Untested patch for the OpenMP optimization that will result in this bug not
triggering fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92010
--- Comment #12 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to qingzhe huang from comment #11)
> The testcase g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-uneval11.C still suffers a segment fault if
> run by compiler cc1plus with latest code.
Hmm, I can't reproduce that on latest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53164
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102604
--- Comment #1 from Richard Earnshaw ---
I wonder if it might be better to change this test to use -Os, since then the
cost model is much more consistent as it's based on size rather than speed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102605
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4f6dbe18374385b8199ca3d6121e37a1189b589
commit r12-4187-gd4f6dbe18374385b8199ca3d6121e37a1189b589
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102607
Bug ID: 102607
Summary: [modules] option -g results in undefined reference to
`typeinfo for type`
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: link
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102608
Bug ID: 102608
Summary: [12 regression] Recent change to VN causes bogus
Wuninitialized warnings & kernel build failures
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102566
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51551|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102608
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
old32_34 = .DEFERRED_INIT (4, 2, 0);
...
- _24 = .DEFERRED_INIT (4, 2, 0);
- __res ={v} _24;
+ __res ={v} old32_34;
# 68 "../arch/mips/include/asm/cmpxchg.h"
This is due to __typeof(*((volatile u32
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102608
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102507
Indu Bhagat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102609
Bug ID: 102609
Summary: [C++23] P0847R7 - Deducing this
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102566
--- Comment #15 from Thiago Macieira ---
Works now for the failing case. Additionally:
bool tbit(std::atomic &i)
{
return i.fetch_and(~CONSTANT, std::memory_order_relaxed) & (CONSTANT);
}
Will properly produce LOCK BTR (CONSTANT=2):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102566
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #14)
> Created attachment 51556 [details]
> The v5 patch
>
> Changes in v5:
>
> 1. Check SSA_NAME before SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI.
Why don't you just move this to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102610
Bug ID: 102610
Summary: [C++23] P2036R3 - Change scope of lambda
trailing-return-type
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102604
--- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon ---
Right, using -Os makes these tests pass (but vsqrt.f32 and vsqrt.f64 would
fail), but I'm still wondering about the purpose of vmla?
Rather than benchmarking, the costs may come from the Architecture
docu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102606
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102611
Bug ID: 102611
Summary: [C++23] P2128R6 - Multidimensional subscript operator
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92010
--- Comment #13 from qingzhe huang ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #12)
> (In reply to qingzhe huang from comment #11)
> > The testcase g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-uneval11.C still suffers a segment fault if
> > run by compiler cc1plus with l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102612
Bug ID: 102612
Summary: [C++23] P2242R3 - Non-literal variables (and labels
and gotos) in constexpr functions
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102612
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102613
Bug ID: 102613
Summary: [C++23] P2246R1 - Character encoding of diagnostic
text
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102614
Bug ID: 102614
Summary: [C++23] P2314R4 - Character sets and encodings
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102615
Bug ID: 102615
Summary: [C++23] P2316R2 - Consistent character literal
encoding
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102615
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102616
Bug ID: 102616
Summary: [C++23] P2334R1 - Add support for preprocessing
directives elifdef and elifndef
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102617
Bug ID: 102617
Summary: [C++23] P2360R0 - Extend init-statement to allow
alias-declaration
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102617
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||98940
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102616
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-05
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102490
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jakub at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102618
Bug ID: 102618
Summary: d-demangle: anonymous symbols are not being properly
skipped
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102606
--- Comment #4 from Karine EM ---
That would make sense, and I think it is also what happens when compiling the
example with Clang and -O0 since the compilation takes only a few seconds then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102619
Bug ID: 102619
Summary: [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in
gfc_conv_descriptor_dtype, at
fortran/trans-array.c:215
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102619
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #1 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102620
Bug ID: 102620
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in gfc_get_array_span, at
fortran/trans-array.c:865
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102620
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102621
Bug ID: 102621
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in convert_nonlocal_reference_op,
at tree-nested.c:1166
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102477
--- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka ---
Created attachment 51557
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51557&action=edit
another testcase, failing at -O
$ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O testcase.c
during RTL pass: expand
testcase.c: In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100557
--- Comment #2 from Luke Dalessandro ---
Still failing in trunk, here's a CE link to the preprocessed source
https://godbolt.org/z/YPfTGnT5f.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102620
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102607
--- Comment #1 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña ---
A workaround is to define `B`'s destructor as
`constexpr virtual ~B() { }`.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102566
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51556|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102566
--- Comment #18 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #16)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #14)
> > Created attachment 51556 [details]
> > The v5 patch
> >
> > Changes in v5:
> >
> > 1. Check SSA_NAME before SSA_NAME_OCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102566
--- Comment #19 from Thiago Macieira ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #17)
> Created attachment 51558 [details]
> The v6 patch
>
> Please try this.
Confirmed for all inputs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102547
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4c470c376b4cb82c9a0b7e8a4b88c44d5e4289d
commit r12-4196-gd4c470c376b4cb82c9a0b7e8a4b88c44d5e4289d
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102622
Bug ID: 102622
Summary: Wrong code with -O3 for skylake-avx512 and
icelake-server
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102623
Bug ID: 102623
Summary: Failure to detect destructed scalar objects in
consteval function
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102547
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Bob Steagall from comment #4)
> I have applied this tentative change to line 23436 of gcc/cp/pt.c from the
> gcc-11.2.0 source tarball, and can confirm that the test case compiles for
> me.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102547
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] g++ 11. |[11 Regression] g++ 11. ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4aabb9ac284fea307aa70bb8ae4bdce298461bc7
commit r10-10169-g4aabb9ac284fea307aa70bb8ae4bdce298461bc7
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dea2e6c7b5af2ec620fd94d824f006440907a34d
commit r10-10170-gdea2e6c7b5af2ec620fd94d824f006440907a34d
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102458
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
Status|ASSI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102623
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102582
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102595
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102548
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:737f95bab557584d876f02779ab79fe3cfaacacf
commit r12-4198-g737f95bab557584d876f02779ab79fe3cfaacacf
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102496
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5fec46a0b4a94190209c81f4091a0369a056727d
commit r11-9073-g5fec46a0b4a94190209c81f4091a0369a056727d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102515
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dcf70cb0d85d04ff680a361e32d79c326ae8b3fc
commit r11-9074-gdcf70cb0d85d04ff680a361e32d79c326ae8b3fc
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102548
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e1edbce89a93dde8653666eaf402d58dda43e3b0
commit r11-9075-ge1edbce89a93dde8653666eaf402d58dda43e3b0
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92010
--- Comment #14 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to qingzhe huang from comment #13)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #12)
> > (In reply to qingzhe huang from comment #11)
> > > The testcase g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-uneval11.C still suffers a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102548
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE |[9/10 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92010
--- Comment #15 from qingzhe huang ---
>>Might be better to open a separate PR for this as it
seems to be a latent bug.
thanks, I will file a new bug.
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Sent: October 5, 2021 5:05 PM
To: nickhuan...@hotmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102624
Bug ID: 102624
Summary: testcase lambda-uneval11.C causes cc1plus segment
fault
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92010
--- Comment #16 from qingzhe huang ---
> Ah yeah, I can reproduce the crash when invoking cc1plus directly and also
> when
> passing -Q to the driver. Might be better to open a separate PR for this as
> it
> seems to be a latent bug.
just open
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102485
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Paul Clarke from comment #2)
> GCC putting the base ".machine" directive at the beginning of the file makes
> any command-line use of "-many" (-Wa,-many) be ignored. Is that OK?
If peopl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102548
--- Comment #10 from Steven Boswell II ---
Great work! Thanks!
The patch seems to apply to gcc 10 also, but I haven't built the result yet.
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
