https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102184
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #1 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102178
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102184
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102182
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102185
Bug ID: 102185
Summary: d: STRING_CSTs converted back into StringExp include
null pointer in length
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102186
Bug ID: 102186
Summary: [12 Regression] Broken bootstrap:
soft-fp/half.h:62:1: error: unable to emulate ‘HF’
since
r12-3308-ge42d2d2a20f2bb59928bc895ec9f46503a1b5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102186
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-09-03
Priority|P3
: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.0 20210903 (experimental) (GCC)
$ /dev/shm/objdir2/./gcc/xgcc -B/dev/shm/objdir2/./gcc/
-B/home/marxin/bin/gcc/i586-suse-linux/bin/ emu.i
emu.i:1:1: error: unable to emulate ‘HF’
1 | float HFtype __attribute__((mode(HF)));
| ^
compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.0 20210903 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102182
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
After emit libcall in convert_to_mode, it failed maybe_emit_unop_insn, so all
insns deleted, but from here is already overrided, it seems to be a bug.
if (icode != CODE_FOR_nothing)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102186
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
A patch is posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-September/578746.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102024
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e902136b310ee17d4b49eb42d9d5e487d5dcf4a1
commit r12-3324-ge902136b310ee17d4b49eb42d9d5e487d5dcf4a1
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102154
--- Comment #15 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #14)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #13)
> > Is this also the cause of several libstdc++ FAILs on ppc64le?
>
>
> Yes.
>
> I have asked for reversio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102024
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The generic support is now committed, each backend can decide on what to do
using those flags. That decision should be guided by psABI if it is clear on
those matters, or otherwise ideally the psABIs shoul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102187
Bug ID: 102187
Summary: Ada LTO bootstrap broken on x86_64 since
r12-2927-g29020d0527512a
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102188
Bug ID: 102188
Summary: Over widening detection doesn't work when no range
information
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimiza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102187
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101947
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102102
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91442
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91442
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to paul.luckner from comment #2)
> integer, allocatable :: i(:)
> i = [1]
Is that PR77504?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100832
Jan-Benedict Glaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102189
Bug ID: 102189
Summary: error: unrecognized command-line option '-fno-[...]';
did you mean '-ftree-[...]'?
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102190
Bug ID: 102190
Summary: Syntax error reported in associate construct
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101157
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102191
Bug ID: 102191
Summary: Can't return prvalue with potentially-throwing
destructor during constant evaluation
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102192
Bug ID: 102192
Summary: Curious '-O2'-only '-Wmaybe-uninitialized' diagnostics
for 'libgomp.oacc-fortran/routine-10.f90'
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101904
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:47543e5f9d1fc502be79f91c87cbeb6eda17e641
commit r12-3346-g47543e5f9d1fc502be79f91c87cbeb6eda17e641
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101947
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ---
It's the DW_AT_byte_size expression in:
(gdb) p debug_dwarf_die (die)
DIE 1041: DW_TAG_structure_type (0x739f06e0)
abbrev id: 51 offset: 1041 mark: 1
DW_AT_name: "exp_dist__rpc_target"
DW_AT_byte_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102193
Bug ID: 102193
Summary: DLL linking with a external referenced DLL
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102173
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101960
康桓瑋 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hewillk at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from 康桓瑋
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94630
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Michael Meissner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d9f215aa59cca00c862a14d3ee90e0b0ee4ed56f
commit r11-8954-gd9f215aa59cca00c862a14d3ee90e0b0ee4ed56f
Author: Michael Meis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102194
Bug ID: 102194
Summary: Incorrect explicit instantiation of constexpr variable
accepted
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64867
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102193
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-09-03
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102195
Bug ID: 102195
Summary: Missing DW_TAG_typedef when using qualified variable
of typedef'd array
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102195
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102189
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102113
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:95553bfcc3a69afc2a2bc02aeafac6e92d3dea1e
commit r11-8957-g95553bfcc3a69afc2a2bc02aeafac6e92d3dea1e
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101349
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f826c257b6fb64868fd12a52291d1b6f85e1689a
commit r11-8958-gf826c257b6fb64868fd12a52291d1b6f85e1689a
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102196
Bug ID: 102196
Summary: -Wmaybe-uninitialized: Maybe generate helpful hints?
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102195
--- Comment #2 from Indu Bhagat ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I think this is a dup of bug 8354.
Possible. It looks like two distinct symptoms, but seem to be originating from
the same underlying issue. I don't have enough e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102193
--- Comment #2 from Ricardo Santos Pereira ---
thanks
BW
Em sex., 3 de set. de 2021 às 16:02, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> escreveu:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102193
>
> Andrew Pinski changed:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101933
--- Comment #2 from Paul Jackson ---
I tried to work around the problem, and it's even worse than I expected. You
can replace dll.cc with the following and observe the same crash.
That means that even if I want to do manual memory management wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102196
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Component|middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102197
Bug ID: 102197
Summary: ABI to pass and return 32-bit FP vectors
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101933
--- Comment #3 from Paul Jackson ---
Maybe I'm missing something, but even this dll crashes for me now. So it seems
like it has nothing to do with global variables or static storage. That sucks,
it means that I just can't use C++ in dlls. Or is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102188
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102196
--- Comment #2 from Jan-Benedict Glaw ---
Declaration and possibly uninitialized usage are shown. Ie for said Binutils, I
get these messages:
microblaze-{elf,linux}
[all 2021-09-03 18:17:30] depbase=`echo config/tc-mic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99215
--- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe ---
also :
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-cvs/2021-September/352947.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-cvs/2021-September/352948.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-cvs/2021-September/352949.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102196
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
tc-microblaze.c case:
if (exp.X_op != O_constant)
as_warn (_("Symbol used as immediate for shift instruction"));
else
{
output = frag_more (isize);
immed = ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102107
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2484f7a4b0f52e6ed04754be336f1fa6fde47f6b
commit r12-3353-g2484f7a4b0f52e6ed04754be336f1fa6fde47f6b
Author: Segher Boessenkool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102107
--- Comment #16 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(Hopefully) fixed on trunk, but it needs backports.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102196
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102198
Bug ID: 102198
Summary: Unused and nonsensical template instantiations used
for return type inference end up in the output
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102196
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102162
--- Comment #32 from deller at gmx dot de ---
Fixed in Linux kernel by declaring the extern int32 as char:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c42813b71a06a2ff4a155aa87ac609feeab76cf3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57485
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-06-01 00:00:00 |2021-9-3
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81085
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82139
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-09-04
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81357
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85819
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Last reconfirmed|2018-05-1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52034
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52034
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52034
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89984
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> The problem is here:
> (define_insn_and_split "@xorsign3_1"
> [(set (match_operand:MODEF 0 "register_operand" "=Yv")
> (unspec:MODEF
> [(match
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88476
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Severity|normal
68 matches
Mail list logo
