[Bug gcov-profile/100751] __gcov_dump and __gcov_reset usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100751 --- Comment #2 from Gejoe --- Created attachment 50866 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50866&action=edit sample-prog.c file that may be useful for gcov usage test The original sample source file.

[Bug c++/100723] [9/10/11] ICE in tsubst when using std::variant in templated class using CTAD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100723 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10/11] ICE in tsubst |[9/10/11] ICE in tsubst

[Bug fortran/100724] -fwhole-program breaks module use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100724 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug debug/100725] dwarf error with --whole-program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100725 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Dave Love from comment #2) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > > Those binutils are too old for dwarf5. > > When the linker doesn't print any diagnostics, that isn't a big deal, but

[Bug tree-optimization/100727] [12 Regression] Recent change to WITH_SIZE_EXPR handling breaks mn10300-elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100727 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |12.0 Status|NEW

[Bug c/100729] Inconsistency in -Wformat-extra-args when first-to-check is 0 and format string is NULL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100729 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/100731] [11/12 Regression] GCC 11 fails to build using GCC 4.8 because of missing includes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100731 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|GCC 11 fails to build using |[11/12 Regression] GCC 11

[Bug tree-optimization/100732] [11/12 Regression] ICE with -Wall: in ao_ref_init_from_ptr_and_range, at tree-ssa-alias.c:824 since r11-959-gb825a22890740f34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100732 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/100733] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure for pr85213.c at -O1 -fdisable-tree-phiopt2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100733 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug other/100735] -fno-trampolines doc wrongly implies it affects C, C++ etc.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100735 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Please post patches to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/100738] Gimple failed to simplify ((v4si) ~a) < 0 ? c : d to ((v4si)a) >= 0 ? c : d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100738 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/100746] NRVO should not introduce aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100746 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug tree-optimization/80740] Aliasing with the return value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80740 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||antoshkka at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/80740] Aliasing with the return value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80740 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/100735] -fno-trampolines doc wrongly implies it affects C, C++ etc.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100735 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/52869] [DR 1207] "this" not being allowed in noexcept clauses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52869 Sven Suursoho changed: What|Removed |Added CC||spam+gcc at alt dot ee --- Comment #20 f

[Bug libgomp/100747] Possibly Wrong Permissions in "liboffloadmic"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100747 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Component|other

[Bug testsuite/100748] [12 regression] 30_threads/jthread/95989.cc fails after r12-843

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100748 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug testsuite/100749] [12 regression] gcc.dg/pch/valid-1.c fails after r12-949

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100749 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug c++/100731] [11/12 Regression] GCC 11 fails to build using GCC 4.8 because of missing includes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100731 --- Comment #4 from Harald van Dijk --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) Yes, including is enough to get the build to pass. My last point in comment #2, however, means that that leaves things in an inconsistent state and that the r

[Bug c++/100731] [11/12 Regression] GCC 11 fails to build using GCC 4.8 because of missing includes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100731 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 25 May 2021, harald at gigawatt dot nl wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100731 > > --- Comment #4 from Harald van Dijk --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from commen

[Bug gcov-profile/100751] __gcov_dump and __gcov_reset usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100751 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug c++/100731] [11/12 Regression] GCC 11 fails to build using GCC 4.8 because of missing includes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100731 --- Comment #6 from Harald van Dijk --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5) > At this point a minimal fix is prefered - in principle the file > should be a valid source to any C++ 11 capable host compiler, not > just GCC. The mainta

[Bug tree-optimization/100509] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE at -O3: in fold_convert_loc with variable (attribute) alias of different types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100509 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3870fe246f442d795ef2270c74f56dda9d0be26c commit r11-8463-g3870fe246f442d795ef2270c74f56dda9d0be26c Author: Richard Biener

[Bug ipa/100513] [10/11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in lookup_page_table_entry) for bootstrap-O3 since r11-6411-gae99b315ba5b9e1c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100513 --- Comment #26 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0a8a95003e7763ece4886e771f71385966e229b commit r11-8464-gd0a8a95003e7763ece4886e771f71385966e229b Author: Richard Biene

[Bug tree-optimization/100519] [11 Regression] ICE in insert_stmt_after, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:1452

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100519 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:edd7bbe0e96a0d45d6ae142c5809ef1cae6c0999 commit r11-8465-gedd7bbe0e96a0d45d6ae142c5809ef1cae6c0999 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/100492] [10/11 Regression] wrong code at -O3 (generated code hangs)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100492 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9b3852d998bd4ae68f51311441feea13103971e3 commit r11-8462-g9b3852d998bd4ae68f51311441feea13103971e3 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/100519] [11 Regression] ICE in insert_stmt_after, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:1452

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100519 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to fail|

[Bug tree-optimization/100727] [12 Regression] Recent change to WITH_SIZE_EXPR handling breaks mn10300-elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100727 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- So it's fixed with diff --git a/gcc/calls.c b/gcc/calls.c index f3da1839dc5..74a5070605e 100644 --- a/gcc/calls.c +++ b/gcc/calls.c @@ -2397,6 +2397,7 @@ initialize_argument_information (int num_actuals AT

[Bug target/100734] [12 Regression] /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/include-fixed/stdlib.h:291:8: internal compiler error: in from_mode_char, at attribs.h:304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100734 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Possibly a dup of PR100727?

[Bug libgomp/100747] Possibly Wrong Permissions in "liboffloadmic"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100747 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libgomp/100747] Possibly Wrong Permissions in "liboffloadmic"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100747 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think the configure scripts during build are run through $(SHELL) $$s/$$module_srcdir/configure ... from the toplevel makefile, so it doesn't care if it has executable permissions or not. Doesn't hurt to c

[Bug c++/100752] New: [11/12 Regression]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100752 Bug ID: 100752 Summary: [11/12 Regression] Product: gcc Version: 11.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug c++/52869] [DR 1207] "this" not being allowed in noexcept clauses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52869 --- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely --- Oh dear. It started to fail with r11-289. I've created Bug 100752.

[Bug c++/100752] [11/12 Regression] error: cannot call member function ‘void S::f()’ without object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100752 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.3.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/99928] [OpenMP] reduction variable in combined target construct wrongly mapped as firstprivate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99928 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3a81735c1c8cea4323dcb912b7a8879b54aa3bc0 commit r12-1031-g3a81735c1c8cea4323dcb912b7a8879b54aa3bc0 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug tree-optimization/100727] [12 Regression] Recent change to WITH_SIZE_EXPR handling breaks mn10300-elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100727 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:316bdb2e8970a461f2ae1a7183262d18a72adab3 commit r12-1032-g316bdb2e8970a461f2ae1a7183262d18a72adab3 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug libgomp/100747] Possibly Wrong Permissions in "liboffloadmic"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100747 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2c3202e6f8a95362384022edf5d93839682df5ba commit r12-1034-g2c3202e6f8a95362384022edf5d93839682df5ba Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/100727] [12 Regression] Recent change to WITH_SIZE_EXPR handling breaks mn10300-elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100727 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libgomp/100747] Possibly Wrong Permissions in "liboffloadmic"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100747 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/100752] [11/12 Regression] error: cannot call member function ‘void S::f()’ without object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100752 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/97969] [9/10/11/12 Regression][ARM/Thumb] Certain combo of codegen options leads to compilation infinite loop with growing memory use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97969 Przemyslaw Wirkus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||przemyslaw.wirkus at arm dot com --

[Bug target/97969] [9/10/11/12 Regression][ARM/Thumb] Certain combo of codegen options leads to compilation infinite loop with growing memory use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97969 --- Comment #24 from Richard Biener --- So is this now fixed on trunk and the GCC 11 branch? Please update the summary and known-to-work/fail accordingly,

[Bug target/97969] [9/10/11/12 Regression][ARM/Thumb] Certain combo of codegen options leads to compilation infinite loop with growing memory use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97969 --- Comment #25 from Przemyslaw Wirkus --- Yes, it was applied to GCC 11 (then trunk) but we were waiting for GCC 11 release so I can backport at least to GCC 10. After backport I guess we can close this PR. PS: Updated "known to work/fail". C

[Bug target/100711] Miss optimization for pandn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100711 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #4) > > Even w/ canonical RTL, i think a combine splitter is also needed here, the > > canonical RTL only helps combine/forwprop to match more possibility but > > w

[Bug fortran/100724] -fwhole-program breaks module use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100724 --- Comment #5 from Dave Love --- Thanks for the explanation. Could the manual entry for -fwhole-program just be amended to clarify that it's a fallback for when a linker plugin isn't available for -flto. That may be what it was intended to sa

[Bug gcov-profile/100751] __gcov_dump and __gcov_reset usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100751 --- Comment #4 from Gejoe --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > > For the second time and then onwards, __gcov_dump() invocation (by giving > > 'g' character during the a.out run) doesn't happen. > > Yes, one can call __gcov_dump onl

[Bug libgomp/100753] New: Implement in_reduction clause on target construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100753 Bug ID: 100753 Summary: Implement in_reduction clause on target construct Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug c++/100710] static_cast to derived* of base* pointing to non-static data member of base type not rejected in constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100710 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-05-25 Status|UNCONFI

[Bug c++/100710] static_cast to derived* of base* pointing to non-static data member of base type not rejected in constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100710 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Confirmed. Not a regression.

[Bug gcov-profile/100751] __gcov_dump and __gcov_reset usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100751 --- Comment #5 from Gejoe --- Running the program: ./a.out g When g is passed, return value is 8 When is passed, return value is 0 r When r is passed, return value is 8 When is passed, return value is 0 << the program is still running, wait

[Bug target/99960] MVE: Wrong code storing V2DI vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99960 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Alex Coplan : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:59eb00c08db6683f6a69e3b9fd2743f00e187951 commit r10-9867-g59eb00c08db6683f6a69e3b9fd2743f00e187951 Author: Alex Coplan Date:

[Bug target/99960] MVE: Wrong code storing V2DI vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99960 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/100751] __gcov_dump and __gcov_reset usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100751 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- > So, I understand that __gcov_dump could be used only after doing all the > testing with the application ,i.e- towards the end to get the > profile/coverage info. Am I right? Yes, and you don't need to call

[Bug gcov-profile/100751] __gcov_dump and __gcov_reset usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100751 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- > Looking at line 25, it doesn't show the line is hit (by giving 'r' character > during a.out run) nor are the counter values reset for the other lines. The > count of 4,3,2 are seen for some lines because of

[Bug target/99592] arm: internal compiler error using arm_neon.h with -pg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99592 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ebd5e86c0f41dc1d692f9b2b68a510b1f6835a3e commit r12-1039-gebd5e86c0f41dc1d692f9b2b68a510b1f6835a3e Author: Martin Liska Date: Wed

[Bug tree-optimization/92860] [9/10/11/12 regression] Global flags affected by -O settings are clobbered by optimize attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860 --- Comment #42 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ebd5e86c0f41dc1d692f9b2b68a510b1f6835a3e commit r12-1039-gebd5e86c0f41dc1d692f9b2b68a510b1f6835a3e Author: Martin Liska Date: Wed

[Bug target/100734] [12 Regression] /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/include-fixed/stdlib.h:291:8: internal compiler error: in from_mode_char, at attribs.h:304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100734 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug libgomp/100573] [OpenMP] 'omp target teams' fails with nvptx and GCN offloading: FAIL libgomp.c-c++-common/for-3.c + for-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100573 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 50867 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50867&action=edit gcc12-pr100573.patch Lightly tested patch.

[Bug c++/100731] [11/12 Regression] GCC 11 fails to build using GCC 4.8 because of missing includes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100731 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7a5e9a58fbe27d8b8f04cd18bc6e1dd736e3cd12 commit r12-1041-g7a5e9a58fbe27d8b8f04cd18bc6e1dd736e3cd12 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug c++/100754] New: Order of multiple inheritance can lead to illegal code jump

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100754 Bug ID: 100754 Summary: Order of multiple inheritance can lead to illegal code jump Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/100666] [9/10/11/12 Regression] warning: ignoring return value of 'constexpr _Tp&& std::forward(typename std::remove_reference<_Tp>::type&) [with _Tp = std::nullptr_t; ...]', declared with at

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100666 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ad52d89808a947264397e920d7483090d4108f7b commit r12-1043-gad52d89808a947264397e920d7483090d4108f7b Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug fortran/100755] New: Error with fortran object (v11.1.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100755 Bug ID: 100755 Summary: Error with fortran object (v11.1.0) Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/100755] Error with fortran object (v11.1.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100755 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libgomp/100573] [OpenMP] 'omp target teams' fails with nvptx and GCN offloading: FAIL libgomp.c-c++-common/for-3.c + for-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100573 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > Lightly tested patch. Just quick manually testing "for-3.c" (I tried -O0 and -O3): * With nvptx offloading, it compiles + links – but at run time, I get on two

[Bug libgomp/100573] [OpenMP] 'omp target teams' fails with nvptx and GCN offloading: FAIL libgomp.c-c++-common/for-3.c + for-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100573 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- I didn't have the nvidia binary module loaded and cuda installed when doing the light testing, now I've installed that and see FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/for-3.c execution test FAIL: libgomp.c/

[Bug tree-optimization/100756] New: vect: Superfluous epilog created on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100756 Bug ID: 100756 Summary: vect: Superfluous epilog created on s390x Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-o

[Bug target/100340] Bootstrap fails with Clang 12.0.5 (XCode 12.5)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100340 --- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe --- JFTR the Apple OSS folks comment: "I checked with the clang team — it appears this was an unintentional consequence of an upstream change: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75203. This difference between debug vs non

[Bug target/100757] New: arm: ICE (unrecognizable insn) with MVE VPSELQ_S

/src/gcc/configure --prefix=/data_sdb/toolchain/cc1s/arm --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-bootstrap --target=arm-eabi Thread model: single Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 12.0.0 20210525 (experimental) (GCC) $ cat test.c extern int a[]; int n; void foo(int x, _Bool b

[Bug c++/100731] [11/12 Regression] GCC 11 fails to build using GCC 4.8 because of missing includes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100731 --- Comment #8 from Harald van Dijk --- I take it that means there's no need for me to continue with what Richard asked me to do? At any rate, it looks like this fix won't be enough for GCC 12, but that's an issue with the environment, not GCC

[Bug target/100757] [12 Regression] arm: ICE (unrecognizable insn) with MVE VPSELQ_S

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100757 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/100757] [12 Regression] arm: ICE (unrecognizable insn) with MVE VPSELQ_S

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100757 --- Comment #2 from Alex Coplan --- Could be, I'm bisecting it now...

[Bug c++/100731] [11/12 Regression] GCC 11 fails to build using GCC 4.8 because of missing includes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100731 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- r230324 changed the dependency for std::to_string from _GLIBCXX_USE_C99 to _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_STDIO, which means it's enabled for more targets (you don't need the full C99 math library, for example!) That ch

[Bug target/100626] [11/12 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault (during RTL pass: split1) since r11-165-geb72dc663e9070b2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100626 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6be2c12e37b167890d68587086a2186358b64c02 commit r11-8468-g6be2c12e37b167890d68587086a2186358b64c02 Author: Uros Bizjak Date

[Bug c++/100731] [11/12 Regression] GCC 11 fails to build using GCC 4.8 because of missing includes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100731 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/100626] [11/12 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault (during RTL pass: split1) since r11-165-geb72dc663e9070b2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100626 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/100734] [12 Regression] /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/include-fixed/stdlib.h:291:8: internal compiler error: in from_mode_char, at attribs.h:304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100734 --- Comment #5 from John David Anglin --- Breakpoint 1, attr_access::from_mode_char ( c=) at ../../gcc/gcc/attribs.h:304 304 gcc_unreachable (); (gdb) bt #0 attr_access::from_mode_char ( c=) at ../../gcc/gcc/attribs.h:304

[Bug libgomp/100573] [OpenMP] 'omp target teams' fails with nvptx and GCN offloading: FAIL libgomp.c-c++-common/for-3.c + for-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100573 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libgomp/100573] [OpenMP] 'omp target teams' fails with nvptx and GCN offloading: FAIL libgomp.c-c++-common/for-3.c + for-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100573 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- With incremental --- gcc/omp-offload.c.jj2021-05-25 13:43:01.341137265 +0200 +++ gcc/omp-offload.c 2021-05-25 20:07:01.934506823 +0200 @@ -2696,8 +2696,16 @@ pass_omp_target_link::execute (functio

[Bug middle-end/100734] [12 Regression] /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/include-fixed/stdlib.h:291:8: internal compiler error: in from_mode_char, at attribs.h:304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100734 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/100758] New: __builtin_cpu_supports does not (always) detect "sse2"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100758 Bug ID: 100758 Summary: __builtin_cpu_supports does not (always) detect "sse2" Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Co

[Bug middle-end/100734] [12 Regression] /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/include-fixed/stdlib.h:291:8: internal compiler error: in from_mode_char, at attribs.h:304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100734 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > > Possibly a dup of PR100727? > > I think it is unrelated. > > The problem is the fix for PR 100619, sets the at

[Bug gcov-profile/100751] __gcov_dump and __gcov_reset usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100751 --- Comment #8 from Gejoe --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6) > Yes, __gcov_reset is supposed to be called at the beginning when an > application wants to start > profiling. Again, you don't need to call it manually. But reset comes

[Bug c++/100716] member function template parameter not printed in candidate list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100716 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) --- I'd like to revise my opinion above. dump_template_decl should never print the template parameter list of functions. I.e. it should be 'template f()' not 'template f()'. Because it's also declared wit

[Bug middle-end/100755] Error with fortran object (v11.1.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100755 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug middle-end/100734] [12 Regression] /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/include-fixed/stdlib.h:291:8: internal compiler error: in from_mode_char, at attribs.h:304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100734 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor --- The plus character should always be followed by a nonempty string. John, can you please attach a translation unit to see if by chance I can reproduce with a cross-compiler? In parallel, I wonder if there's

[Bug middle-end/100734] [12 Regression] /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/include-fixed/stdlib.h:291:8: internal compiler error: in from_mode_char, at attribs.h:304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100734 --- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to John David Anglin from comment #5) > Breakpoint 1, attr_access::from_mode_char ( > c=) > at ../../gcc/gcc/attribs.h:304 > 304 gcc_unreachable (); This error says that &c is null.

[Bug fortran/100724] -fwhole-program breaks module use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100724 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka --- > Could the manual entry for -fwhole-program just be amended to clarify that > it's > a fallback for when a linker plugin isn't available for -flto. That may be > what it was intended to say, but it's not cl

[Bug libstdc++/96088] Range insertion into unordered_map is less effective than a loop with insertion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96088 François Dumont changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Resolution|---

[Bug libgomp/100573] [OpenMP] 'omp target teams' fails with nvptx and GCN offloading: FAIL libgomp.c-c++-common/for-3.c + for-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100573 --- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #9) > not found name: 'test_d_normal._omp_fn.0.kd' I think the problem is the following: (a) working: foo() #pragma target bar() Here, 'foo._omp_fn.0' as as

[Bug fortran/100662] intrinsic::ieee_arithmetic fails on aarch, powerpc architectures on FreeBSD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662 --- Comment #11 from ripero84 at gmail dot com --- Thank you very much for the information and your help.

[Bug libgomp/100573] [OpenMP] 'omp target teams' fails with nvptx and GCN offloading: FAIL libgomp.c-c++-common/for-3.c + for-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100573 --- Comment #14 from Alexander Monakov --- I would break in gdb on cuModuleGetFunction and x/s $rdx to print the failing symbol (it's the third argument to the function). It seems the "inner" entrypoint (which your patch attempted to nullif

[Bug libgomp/100573] [OpenMP] 'omp target teams' fails with nvptx and GCN offloading: FAIL libgomp.c-c++-common/for-3.c + for-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100573 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #13) > (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #9) > > not found name: 'test_d_normal._omp_fn.0.kd' > > I think the problem is the following: > > (a) working: > foo

[Bug c++/96555] "template argument involves template parameter(s)" with dot or arrow operator in partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96555 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libgomp/100573] [OpenMP] 'omp target teams' fails with nvptx and GCN offloading: FAIL libgomp.c-c++-common/for-3.c + for-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100573 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #14) > I would break in gdb on cuModuleGetFunction and > > x/s $rdx > > to print the failing symbol (it's the third argument to the function). > > It seems t

[Bug fortran/92065] [9/10/11/12 Regression] internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92065 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libgomp/100573] [OpenMP] 'omp target teams' fails with nvptx and GCN offloading: FAIL libgomp.c-c++-common/for-3.c + for-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100573 --- Comment #17 from Alexander Monakov --- Yes, I'd agree normally it's present in the offload table, but ideally if you're trying to stub out the call, it should not be present in the offload table. I think Tobias is saying that on GIMPLE this

[Bug libgomp/100573] [OpenMP] 'omp target teams' fails with nvptx and GCN offloading: FAIL libgomp.c-c++-common/for-3.c + for-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100573 --- Comment #18 from Tobias Burnus --- I think the problem is: create_omp_child_function(omp_context*, bool) ... 1916 DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl) = DECL_ATTRIBUTES (current_function_decl); The code removes then 'omp declare simd' but not 'omp

[Bug fortran/100551] [11/12 Regression] Passing return value of intrinsic to class(*) dummy argument can cause segfaults

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100551 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:de55a48960d2f08266cba1222e233507015dd620 commit r11-8469-gde55a48960d2f08266cba1222e233507015dd620 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/100551] [11/12 Regression] Passing return value of intrinsic to class(*) dummy argument can cause segfaults

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100551 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

  1   2   >