https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66146
--- Comment #39 from Libor Bukata ---
(In reply to Libor Bukata from comment #38)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #34)
> > Untested sketch of a solution for Solaris and BSDs:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99069
Bug ID: 99069
Summary: Failure to optimize bool selection pattern
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99070
Bug ID: 99070
Summary: ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2670
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99070
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99060
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38474
--- Comment #94 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 50165
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50165&action=edit
patch experiment
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #93)
> I think I'd go for more chains by default, at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99070
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99060
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5ee5415af8691640b0f7a5332b78d04ba309f4f0
commit r11-7186-g5ee5415af8691640b0f7a5332b78d04ba309f4f0
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Thu Fe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96564
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98689
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37150
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2012-10-06 07:54:57 |2021-2-11
--- Comment #30 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48696
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Last recon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98998
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
As this is a post-reload splitter, I guess one can't call
arm_legitimize_address on the force_const_mem's address because that would
create pseudos (and it doesn't seem to do anything with SYMBOL_REFs anyway)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98998
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
--- gcc/config/arm/arm.md.jj2021-01-04 10:25:44.404170742 +0100
+++ gcc/config/arm/arm.md 2021-02-11 12:50:26.049604711 +0100
@@ -9216,6 +9216,11 @@
else
{
rtx mem = force_c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99060
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3bc79d7b5d22c07a337b6399e08c1252d55ea5e0
commit r10-9357-g3bc79d7b5d22c07a337b6399e08c1252d55ea5e0
Author: Paul Thomas
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98998
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Thanks for looking at this, and sorry for not having got to
it before now. I've been spending most of the past week fighting
the WRF thing.
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> --- g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98998
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Thanks, will test it.
No idea what to do for testcase though, lost in all the incompatible options
and can't find a single gcc.target/arm/ test with -mpure-code in dg-*options.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99060
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:be28e7adf7586d9d0fe77ce175014b04184f5891
commit r9-9231-gbe28e7adf7586d9d0fe77ce175014b04184f5891
Author: Paul Thomas
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99060
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97847
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98897
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff6903288d96aa1d28ae4912b1270985475f3ba8
commit r11-7188-gff6903288d96aa1d28ae4912b1270985475f3ba8
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Thu Fe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66146
--- Comment #40 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Libor Bukata from comment #39)
> (In reply to Libor Bukata from comment #38)
> > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #34)
> > > Untested sketch of a solution for Solaris and BSDs:
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99058
--- Comment #8 from Brad Spencer ---
Everything you've said makes sense to me. The proposed documentation changes
would help a lot. IMO, they are a good idea and would have helped (and will
continue to help) me.
I agree that the C++11/14/17 st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97742
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99070
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.0|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99069
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, but phiopt2 turns it into
bool f (bool x, bool y)
{
bool _5;
bool _6;
[local count: 1073741824]:
_5 = x_2(D) & y_3(D);
_6 = -_5;
return _6;
and we end up with
_Z1fbb:
.LFB0:
.cf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98910
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw ---
> (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #2)
>> Unfortunately, even with your patch Solaris bootstrap is still broken:
>>
>
> Sorry, I've just been
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99071
Bug ID: 99071
Summary: [modules] ICE with initializer_list & iostream
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99071
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98998
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 50168
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50168&action=edit
Assembler output from broken revision
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93695
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99072
Bug ID: 99072
Summary: [modules] Compiling header unit with partial
preprocessing (-E -fdirectives-only) twice causes CRC
mismatch
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host|x86_64-pc-linux-gnu |x86_64-pc-linux-gnu,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96166
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98772
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Joel Hutton :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4af29981ab57ad7ef4467e371e4145cce9c16eaa
commit r11-7189-g4af29981ab57ad7ef4467e371e4145cce9c16eaa
Author: Joel Hutton
Date: Thu Fe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94713
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98772
Joel Hutton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 98772, which changed state.
Bug 98772 Summary: Widening patterns causing missed vectorization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98772
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95000
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
gcc version 11.0.0 20210210 (experimental) [master revision
bd0e37f68a3:deed5164277:72932511053596091ad291539022b51d9f2ba418]
PASS for me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98931
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrea Corallo :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:38c5703449c0638618ba6896f0d039c3868ad4e0
commit r11-7190-g38c5703449c0638618ba6896f0d039c3868ad4e0
Author: Andrea Corallo
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96311
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
If I compare
void
foo ()
{
constexpr int used = 0;
[](auto unused)
{
return used;
};
}
void
bar ()
{
constexpr int used = 0;
[](int unused)
{
return used;
};
}
then in bar mark_exp_r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98931
akrl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to seurer from comment #5)
> I too am able to duplicate this on a native powerpc64 LE machine. Changing
> any of the compilation options (-Os -fno-forward-propagate -fschedule-insns
> -fno-tree-te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97582
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb168f779c87c1e0c37d22ea82dfb93ff8c873bc
commit r11-7191-gcb168f779c87c1e0c37d22ea82dfb93ff8c873bc
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97582
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE|[9/10 Regression] ICE tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82178
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82178
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98262
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Jager ---
I've now had the same `gcc_unreachable` reached when compiling code that uses
`-mpcrel` with a thread-local variable. It may be that `m68k_decompose_address`
doesn't properly handle all cases, or that somethin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99063
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f0da1c0cb7661ee9111bc475efddae80a026de34
commit r11-7192-gf0da1c0cb7661ee9111bc475efddae80a026de34
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99063
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE in |[9/10 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99073
Bug ID: 99073
Summary: Preprocessing with -CC adds unwanted junk
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: prepro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264
--- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Enabling -fno-forward-propagate triggers the problem.
seurer@genoa:~/gcc/git/build/gcc-10-test$ whichgcc
Now at commit g:a7eb97ad269b6509bd7b31ca373daea98e4d7e85, r10-135
seurer@genoa:~/gcc/git
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99033
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2dcdd15d0bafb9b45a8d7ff580217bd6ac1f0975
commit r11-7193-g2dcdd15d0bafb9b45a8d7ff580217bd6ac1f0975
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99033
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE in |[9/10 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99074
Bug ID: 99074
Summary: gcc 8 and above is crashing with dynamic_cast<>() on
null pointer with optimization level -O1 and above
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.1
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99075
Bug ID: 99075
Summary: Wrong classification of functions memchr and memcpy
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99074
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98910
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79246
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I don't see that error now, but do see these:
FAIL: 27_io/ios_base/failure/cxx11.cc (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/usr/bin/ld: Dwarf Error: found dwarf version '5', this reader only handles
versi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99058
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ce43c906049b828c0472d8499b52ac6233c869d0
commit r11-7194-gce43c906049b828c0472d8499b52ac6233c869d0
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79246
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And this one which is probably something minor but I haven't investigated:
FAIL: 30_threads/promise/requirements/lwg3466.cc (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/home/jwakely/build8/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99055
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Created attachment 50170
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50170&action=edit
Valgrind leak output with patch from comment #1 applied.
Attached is Valgrind leak output with the patch from co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, using the r10-135 compiler, seems things go wrong during RA.
In *.ira, we have:
(insn 35 34 217 2 (parallel [
(set (reg:DI 544 [ _29 ])
(minus:DI (reg:DI 542 [ _26 ])
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96264
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98897
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d3b9a3e70e634c7c48bb12bb35ec8219024f98b
commit r10-9358-g9d3b9a3e70e634c7c48bb12bb35ec8219024f98b
Author: Paul Thomas
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98897
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99070
acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |acsawdey at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99070
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
In my case (it was a cross-compiler from x86_64-linux)
../configure --target powerpc64-linux-gnu --disable-bootstrap
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99070
--- Comment #4 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
OK, I see the fail with -mcpu=power9. Looks like I botched something with
addressing and allowed D-form addresses when it should be DS-form. On power10
this would result in selection of a prefix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99075
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59048
AK changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hiraditya at msn dot com
--- Comment #17 from AK -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99041
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2432c47970024db6410708b582a901259dabaae1
commit r11-7196-g2432c47970024db6410708b582a901259dabaae1
Author: Peter Bergner
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99041
--- Comment #9 from Peter Bergner ---
Fixed on trunk.
I will check whether we need this on the GCC10 branch as well. I believe we
probably will.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95888
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:88cfd531c69b3c1fe7a3c183d83cfeacc8f69402
commit r11-7197-g88cfd531c69b3c1fe7a3c183d83cfeacc8f69402
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95888
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression]|[9/10 Regression]
|Reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99041
--- Comment #10 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #9)
> Fixed on trunk.
>
> I will check whether we need this on the GCC10 branch as well. I believe we
> probably will.
Confirmed, we need this on GCC10 as well. Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99076
Bug ID: 99076
Summary: Unclear error message when trailing angle bracket is
missing
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99076
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96474
Sokolov Viacheslav changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||soko.slav at yandex dot ru
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81866
--- Comment #8 from Sokolov Viacheslav ---
looks like the following is the same bug: https://godbolt.org/z/1vTqs3
template
struct A
{
template
struct B
{
};
};
A<>::B b;
results in (on trunk)
: In substitution of 'template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98959
--- Comment #15 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> The important difference from my auto-host.h to your auto-host.h which
> causes this ICE is that you don't have HAVE_LD_LARGE_TOC defined.
> Manually commenting
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96905
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97246
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95888
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:60dbb46b5b3c52d0483d676eabd4dfe32110e61b
commit r10-9360-g60dbb46b5b3c52d0483d676eabd4dfe32110e61b
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95888
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Summary|[9/10 Regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12277
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-01-11 00:00:00 |2021-2-11
Known to fail|7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99077
Bug ID: 99077
Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] Cannot build libstdc++ with
-fno-rtti
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99077
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99077
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
--- a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cxx11-ios_failure.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/cxx11-ios_failure.cc
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
__ios_failure(const char* s) : failure(s)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21433
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Created attachment 50171
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50171&action=edit
Proposed patch.
Patched to remove the CONSTRUCTOR code and replace it with an assert that it
doesn't come up. T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98959
--- Comment #16 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #14)
> We should definitely not be allowing the AltiVec "& ~16" flavors into these
> patterns. I'm not certain whether your fix is the best way to achieve that,
> but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98959
--- Comment #17 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #16)
> The question I have is, there are 2 expanders which I think we also need to
> guard with similar tests. They are vsx_load_ and vsx_store_.
> Segher, I assume
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99074
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21433
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87296
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443
Bug 88443 depends on bug 87296, which changed state.
Bug 87296 Summary: [8/9/10/11 Regression] -Wstringop-overflow false positive
due to using MEM_REF type of &MEM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87296
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87296
--- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor ---
I should note: The changes are too intrusive to backport.
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
