https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98024
Bug ID: 98024
Summary: [11 Regression] Big rnflow regression caused by
g:512c6ba04102295fccc62a173ee0086ca733c920
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98024
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97589
--- Comment #23 from Toon Moene ---
The segfault at GFORTRAN_NUM_IMAGES=64 might be due to the fact that the
program doesn't contain a check whether the size of the boundary relaxation
zone (currently set to 4) is too large for the slabs.
The bo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90104
Sunil Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sunil.kumar3 at ltts dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90023
Sunil Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sunil.kumar3 at ltts dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97939
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Not sure how useful this is but all of the following toss the same ICE :
>
> long f(long arg){return arg + 4096;}
>
> long f(long arg){return arg - 4096;}
>
> long f(long arg){return 4096 +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85206
Sunil Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sunil.kumar3 at ltts dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98025
Bug ID: 98025
Summary: [11 Regression][CET] libphobos: dub segfaults when
built with gdc 11
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22326
--- Comment #16 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
> 2) mad2.c
>
> float foo (double x, float y, float z)
> {
>return ( y * fabs (x) + z );
> }
>
>
> mad2.c.098t.cunrolli:
>
> foo (double x, float y, float z)
> {
> double _1;
> d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97939
--- Comment #7 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
For i + 4095:
add %g1, 4095, %g1
For i + 4096:
sub %g1, -4096, %g1
For i + 4097:
sethi %hi(4195328), %g1
srlx%g1, 10, %g1
add %g2, %g1, %g1
SP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85199
Sunil Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sunil.kumar3 at ltts dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97939
--- Comment #8 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
But note that there is no issue with -fsanitize=undefined on
return i - (-4096);
So the cause is the transformation of i + 4096 to i - (-4096).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98024
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Stupid typo. Meh.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85336
Sunil Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sunil.kumar3 at ltts dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98026
Bug ID: 98026
Summary: optimization dependant on condition order
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90066
Sunil Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sunil.kumar3 at ltts dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98027
Bug ID: 98027
Summary: CET support is documented to be explicitly enabled,
however it's enabled by default
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97880
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f324479caf0ac326534f4fcf72cb12991ccddb3d
commit r11-5489-gf324479caf0ac326534f4fcf72cb12991ccddb3d
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88101
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bf0a63a1f47525d1c466dbb84616dcb72010affa
commit r11-5490-gbf0a63a1f47525d1c466dbb84616dcb72010affa
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85225
Sunil Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sunil.kumar3 at ltts dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98027
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98028
Bug ID: 98028
Summary: __builtin_sub_overflow_p not folded to const when some
constraints are known
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98026
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||85316
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98025
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-* i?86-*-*
Target Milestone|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85276
Sunil Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sunil.kumar3 at ltts dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97936
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This one still fails sometimes on Solaris:
FAIL: 30_threads/semaphore/try_acquire_until.cc execution test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85349
Sunil Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sunil.kumar3 at ltts dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98028
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|__builtin_sub_overflow_p|[8/9/10/11 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98018
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98021
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab ---
> For '#warning "xxx"' they're the same
That is not true. There can be comments.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98022
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85201
Sunil Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sunil.kumar3 at ltts dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98023
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-27
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98024
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98022
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98024
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b6a7b72c6c91cc0d800a603a59e96fbcb07793ba
commit r11-5494-gb6a7b72c6c91cc0d800a603a59e96fbcb07793ba
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98024
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98021
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab ---
Also, the source may come from a different place than the directive.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98029
Bug ID: 98029
Summary: volatile triggers incorrect "warning: right-hand
operand of comma expression has no effect
[-Wunused-value]"
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97969
--- Comment #5 from Paul Sokolovsky ---
ktkac...@gcc.gnu.org:
Thanks for looking into this issue! Looking forward for the root cause to be
found. Given the minimized testcase which CReduce came to, my finger-in-the-sky
bet would be that it's a v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #35 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #20)
> Created attachment 49465 [details]
> Build log for s390x
Hello.
The s390x build failure is still preset. Can you please take a look?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98029
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98030
Bug ID: 98030
Summary: error message for enum definition without ';' could be
improved
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #36 from Eric Botcazou ---
> The s390x build failure is still preset. Can you please take a look?
This one looks unrelated to r11-4029 or other Ada changes. Do you know which
revision has introduced it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98030
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #1 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97459
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #49633|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98031
Bug ID: 98031
Summary: missing the error message of undeclared label
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98032
Bug ID: 98032
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE (segfault) on arm-linux-gnueabihf
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98033
Bug ID: 98033
Summary: ABA problem in atomic wait
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98034
Bug ID: 98034
Summary: std::atomic_signed_lock_free and
std::atomic_unsigned_lock_free not defined
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98034
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Also, we should probably be using a futex directly for unsigned, and for other
types with the same size and alignment as int (e.g. long on ilp32 targets).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98035
Bug ID: 98035
Summary: filesystem::exists("./") fails on Windows
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98035
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
*** Bug 98035 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98032
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
also works with the gcc-9 branch 20200911
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|tree-ssa|9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98032
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98036
Bug ID: 98036
Summary: gcc.target/i386/xop-hsubX.c is broken
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98036
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-*
--- Comment #1 from Richard Bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98027
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9df6c9c7a3936ff0a38a7066281842128cdd6914
commit r11-5499-g9df6c9c7a3936ff0a38a7066281842128cdd6914
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Fri Nov 27 05:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It looks like _stat and _wstat were fixed, but not _wstat64 which is what we
use.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97589
--- Comment #24 from Toon Moene ---
And I can reproduce the GFORTRAN_NUM_IMAGES=64 segfault:
(export
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/toon/compilers/install/coarray_native/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/11.0.0;
export GFORTRAN_NUM_IMAGES=64; echo ' &config nx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98032
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98032
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-reduction
--- Comment #4 from Ric
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98032
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Reduced test-case:
$ cat vcldemo.ii
namespace osl {
class Thread {
public:
virtual ~Thread();
virtual void join();
};
} // namespace osl
class SimpleReferenceObject {
protected:
virtual ~SimpleReference
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97459
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #49634|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98036
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 49637
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49637&action=edit
Testcase with emulated XOP instructions
This testcase without XOP insns also fails with "-O2 -msse" on 32bit targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98036
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-27
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #37 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 49638
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49638&action=edit
Fix for hppa-hpux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98036
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Something is wrong in [printf added by me]:
static int
check_sword2dword ()
{
int i, j, s, t, check_fails = 0;
for (i = 0; i < (NUM * 8); i = i + 8)
{
for (j = 0; j < 4; j++)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98037
Bug ID: 98037
Summary: ICE in dse.c:find_shift_sequence for large non-integer
modes
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98037
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98036
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Oh...
--cut here--
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/xop-hsubX.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/xop-hsubX.c
index f0fa9b312f2..dc7944d8bb7 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/xop-hsubX.c
+++ b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97969
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Bisection shows it started with g:8d2d39587d941a40f25ea0144cceb677df115040
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97589
--- Comment #25 from Toon Moene ---
BTW, the speed difference between the native and the OpenMPI based program is
staggering. For a 936x770x60 grid, the native run takes around 14 seconds
elapsed time, while the OpenMPI based one takes 2 minutes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97459
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 49639
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49639&action=edit
gcc11-pr97459-alt.patch
Variant version of the patch which avoids the final adjustment from unsigned to
signed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98031
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96863
--- Comment #6 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
In we see ICEs related to '[[no_unique_address]]' on chromium source code:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/757150 (a variant of #c4 example).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97424
--- Comment #6 from Florian Weimer ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #5)
> The above commit implements it as an analyzer warning. Should I close this
> out, or should we keep it open for the __builtin_warning approach?
Thanks for the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98017
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98025
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5dbab7b3f4d3a8298aeb8ecde1cfbc4b16913d28
commit r11-5506-g5dbab7b3f4d3a8298aeb8ecde1cfbc4b16913d28
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Fri No
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98025
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93082
--- Comment #4 from mcccs at gmx dot com ---
(In reply to Fabian Groffen from comment #3)
> The problem with this snippet is that it doesn't work on Frameworks, does
> it? At least for me, it seems it searches from usr/include only?
I'm not sure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98027
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97602
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Joseph Myers :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ccffd1298b5235b25ad05b89e3104fb2935fe27
commit r11-5507-g9ccffd1298b5235b25ad05b89e3104fb2935fe27
Author: Joseph Myers
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97602
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98038
Bug ID: 98038
Summary: ICE on invalid trying to recursively invoke a lambda
object with operator
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98038
--- Comment #1 from Alisdair Meredith ---
The following example code gives an internal compiler error, I suspect due to
the invalid attempt to call `operator()` recursively on the lambda object. Use
the -std=c++20 language flag:
#include
#incl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93082
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
I've also reported this to Apple as FB8919799 (and on openradar - why not?
https://openradar.appspot.com/radar?id=4952611266494464).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98039
Bug ID: 98039
Summary: Member function template with dependent return type
involving class's own name: wrong-mangling,
accepts-invalid
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
ne of them:
$ make -C /build/gcc-master/gcc check-c++ RUNTESTFLAGS="plugin.exp"
...
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes413
# of expected failures 2
/ssd/build/gcc-master/gcc/xg++ version 11.0.0 20201127 (experimental) (GCC)
make[1]: Leaving d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98021
--- Comment #7 from eggert at cs dot ucla.edu ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #5 and #6)
> There can be comments
> Also, the source may come from a different place than the directive.
For the unusual case where the #warning line
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98030
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
94 matches
Mail list logo
