https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96801
--- Comment #2 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
Can confirm. This is resolved with the mentioned commit. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96522
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 49137
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49137&action=edit
patch
The same holds true for copying alignment. I don't think SLSR is "safe" here
since it also picks a new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96285
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90629
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96579
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff7463172e564c5dd2432d7af8eaa0124cbd4af7
commit r11-2900-gff7463172e564c5dd2432d7af8eaa0124cbd4af7
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96579
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.0
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96810
Bug ID: 96810
Summary: This is a case that gcc shoud not compile
successfully, but gcc acts opposite.
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96811
Bug ID: 96811
Summary: Power: x**(negative integer) – use libgcc variant for
power raised to negative value?
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96810
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96744
--- Comment #9 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #7)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #2)
> >
> > > Need to add define_insn for movp2qi/movp2hi?
> >
> > Yes, this is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96744
--- Comment #10 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #3)
> Created attachment 49112 [details]
> Retune mask <-> general moves cost
>
> It looks to me that mask <-> general cost is too low, so the compiler now
> prefers thes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96797
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96811
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96812
Bug ID: 96812
Summary: gcc.dg/torture/pr90328.c FAILs with -fno-ivopts
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96805
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96813
Bug ID: 96813
Summary: [11 Regression] Broken bootstrap-lto-lean profiled
bootstrap since
r11-2883-gbf19cbc9cea6161f3deb63040601090828c44c53
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96744
--- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #9)
> > > However, the patch assumes that avx512vp2intersect implies mavx512dq,
> >
> > Let me check this part.
>
> Confirmed, avx512vp2intersect implies avx512dq.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25814
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94538
--- Comment #22 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:967a5f8e585a5d499870903849c0fa06c326547a
commit r9-8835-g967a5f8e585a5d499870903849c0fa06c326547a
Author: Christophe Lyon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96789
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
testcase from https://github.com/mirror/x264/blob/master/common/dct.c
where FENC_STRIDE is 16 and FDEC_STRIDE 32
pixel is unsigned char, dctcoef is unsigned short
static inline void pixel_sub_wxh( dctcoef
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96792
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94538
--- Comment #23 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f8bc014aa47a1b2056e89e50b0ce86ba64d93f3b
commit r10-8678-gf8bc014aa47a1b2056e89e50b0ce86ba64d93f3b
Author: Christophe Ly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94538
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96813
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Version|10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96813
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96796
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96728
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|pault at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96727
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|pault at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96726
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|pault at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96624
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assigne
11-2899-20200827080734-g989bc4ca2f2-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 11.0.0 20200827 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96522
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eb68d9d828f94d28afa5900fbf3072bbcd64ba8a
commit r11-2906-geb68d9d828f94d28afa5900fbf3072bbcd64ba8a
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96815
Bug ID: 96815
Summary: internal compiler error: in tsubst_pack_expansion, at
cp/pt.c:12928
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96816
Bug ID: 96816
Summary: bitset: debug mode: operator== ambiguous
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96816
--- Comment #1 from Jean-Michaël Celerier ---
gcc.godbolt.org link for easy repro: https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/WYbzfT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96816
--- Comment #2 from Jean-Michaël Celerier ---
I'd wager this is a result of C++20 operator<=> changes and operator==
synthesis.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96817
Bug ID: 96817
Summary: __cxa_guard_acquire unsafe against dynamically loaded
pthread
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96815
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96816
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96303
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeanmichael.celerier@gmail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95582
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
Is there any progress about this PR? It's still blocking Ada bootstrap.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96816
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jean-Michaël Celerier from comment #0)
> g++ does not, but I guess this still warrants checking ?
N.B. GCC does give an error if you compile with -Wpedantic -std=c++20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96814
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96355
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.1.0
Summary|[concepts] i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96355
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Robert Douglas from comment #1)
> I've also hit this issue in upgrading from 9.1 to 10.2
>
> I presume it run into the same issue, but if it helps, this more closely
> matches my use case:
> h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96817
--- Comment #1 from Yuxuan Shui ---
Example:
This program normally deadlocks when using linked pthread:
https://godbolt.org/z/Yrza4e
But it will throw recursive_init_error when using dlopen'd pthread:
https://godbolt.org/z/afMe5d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96817
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Dynamically loading libpthread breaks everything in libstdc++, it just isn't
supported.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96817
--- Comment #3 from Yuxuan Shui ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> Dynamically loading libpthread breaks everything in libstdc++, it just isn't
> supported.
But it has real use cases, e.g. writing a C++ OpenGL program that doesn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94958
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95582
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #11)
> Is there any progress about this PR? It's still blocking Ada bootstrap.
Can you check the patch from comment#6? I'm not 100% sure it's correct
but it can at m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96817
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
it's been always that way - but yes, people repeatedly fall into this trap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96814
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96812
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96817
--- Comment #5 from Yuxuan Shui ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> it's been always that way - but yes, people repeatedly fall into this trap
If there anything libstdc++, or maybe the middle man (Mesa in my case) can do,
to impro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96817
--- Comment #6 from Yuxuan Shui ---
I meant to say "Is there anything ... can do, to improve the situation?"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96817
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It will work when Glibc defines all the pthread functions in libc.so and
libpthread.so becomes empty. There's not really any way to make it work until
then that wouldn't pessimize programs that are entirely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96817
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I'm also going to start using Glibc's __libc_single_threaded instead of
__gthread_active_p() for deciding whether to use atomics for reference counting
in shared_ptr and the old std::string.
Once reference
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95582
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #11)
> > Is there any progress about this PR? It's still blocking Ada bootstrap.
>
> Can you check the patch from commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96817
--- Comment #9 from Yuxuan Shui ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> It will work when Glibc defines all the pthread functions in libc.so and
> libpthread.so becomes empty.
Won't that mean libstdc++ will always use the thread-safe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96768
--- Comment #1 from Christophe Lyon ---
This is related to comments 10,11,14,15 and 16 in the original PR94538.
In comment 14, Wilco suggested: "The best option is to do the same as
Cortex-M3: just switch off branch tables altogether and fall ba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96768
--- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon ---
Send patch proposal:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-August/552798.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96768
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-27
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96817
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Because it pessimizes single threaded programs. After we've made some other
changes that depend on a recent glibc, then we can avoid that pessimization.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96418
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Andre V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66146
Evgeny changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kisha-nik at mail dot ru
--- Comment #31 from E
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96817
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96817
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oh plus this for the aborted init case:
@@ -351,7 +366,17 @@ namespace __cxxabiv1
#ifdef _GLIBCXX_USE_FUTEX
// If __atomic_* and futex syscall are supported, don't use any global
// mutex.
+#if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95882
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c336eda750d4e7a0827fedf995da955d6d88d5ca
commit r11-2907-gc336eda750d4e7a0827fedf995da955d6d88d5ca
Author: Mark Eggleston
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25814
--- Comment #17 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #16)
> (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #15)
> > David, presumably you're not working on this at the moment?
> You're correct. Sorry about that. Switching bac
x-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r11-2899-20200827080734-g989bc4ca2f2-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 11.0.0 20200827 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96819
Bug ID: 96819
Summary: ICE when reading from libc++ 9
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96819
--- Comment #1 from Björn Fahller ---
Compilation error message is:
In file included from :1:
/opt/compiler-explorer/clang-9.0.0/include/c++/v1/tuple: In substitution of
'template template template using
_PreferTupleLikeConstructor = std::__1::
ftware/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 11.0.0 20200827 (experimental) [master revision
:1121fa585:3ae0cd94abc15e33dc06ca7a5f76f14b1d74129f] (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96820
--- Comment #1 from cnsun at uwaterloo dot ca ---
Not sure if this is a dup to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96730
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96819
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-27
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96819
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96819
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka ---
Looks like a dup of PR96805?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96819
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 49141
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49141&action=edit
Another preprocessed source
Using the attached file I get some other errors before the ICE. The attached
one
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96819
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #4)
> Looks like a dup of PR96805?
Seems to have started at the following commit though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96819
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/__functional_base:18,
from /usr/include/c++/v1/tuple:152,
from 96819.C:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/utility: In substitution of ‘templat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96819
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #4)
> > Looks like a dup of PR96805?
>
> Seems to have started at the following commit though.
And I don't see an IC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96819
--- Comment #9 from Patrick Palka ---
Is this with -std=c++20 or -std=c++17? From what I can tell r11-2747 adds a
fragment of code that is run only for c++20, and then r11-2748 makes it run for
c++17 as well. And only the first commit was backp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96819
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96805
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gccbugbjorn at fahller dot se
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96819
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And bisecting with -std=c++20 instead of -std=c++20 confirms it was r11-2747.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95882
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8323d09e82345a1ca39f6630cdd22ccf4ef38a84
commit r10-8679-g8323d09e82345a1ca39f6630cdd22ccf4ef38a84
Author: Mark Eggleston
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96787
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by William Schmidt :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:abca87c57847cd04f5e05935ff9ae5121c1ecb1d
commit r11-2908-gabca87c57847cd04f5e05935ff9ae5121c1ecb1d
Author: Bill Schmidt
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79097
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700
Bug 83700 depends on bug 79097, which changed state.
Bug 79097 Summary: coarray and pointer component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79097
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96787
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96811
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96818
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65146
--- Comment #24 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04df5e7de2f3dd652a9cddc1c9adfbdf45947ae6
commit r11-2909-g04df5e7de2f3dd652a9cddc1c9adfbdf45947ae6
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96811
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #2)
> For real x, gfortran does not generate a call to libgfortran function.
It does – as mentioned in my email reply but not only for 'int' integers:
integer(16) :: n
real :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96821
Bug ID: 96821
Summary: [concepts] Incorrect evaluation of concept with
ill-formed expression
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95882
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:042c58a4b8ba48fdf26c9003154e9d3b83d4c568
commit r9-8836-g042c58a4b8ba48fdf26c9003154e9d3b83d4c568
Author: Mark Eggleston
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95882
markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96821
--- Comment #1 from Daniil Dudkin ---
Considering the code below the correct output would be (without the
indentation):
Called with constant value
Called with non-const value
But the actual output is:
Called with constant value
Called wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96596
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Assignee|unassigned at gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96822
Bug ID: 96822
Summary: [11 regression] Starting with r11-2833 ICE in
decompose, at wide-int.h:984
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
