https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96735
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96744
Bug ID: 96744
Summary: [11 Regression] FAIL:
gcc.target/i386/avx512bitalgvl-vpopcntb-1.c execution
test
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96745
Bug ID: 96745
Summary: [concepts] internal compiler error: in
type_memfn_rqual, at cp/typeck.c:10389
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94851
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df2b78d407a3fe8685343f7249b9c31c7e3af44d
commit r11-2807-gdf2b78d407a3fe8685343f7249b9c31c7e3af44d
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94851
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96746
Bug ID: 96746
Summary: Type Casting in template function should not be
type-dependent if the type of the conversion result is
not type-dependent.
Product: gcc
Ver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96654
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
gcc doesn't seem very fond of using 2 different vector bitsizes at the same
time, so VEC_PACK_FIX_TRUNC_EXPR takes 2 vectors of 2 double and gives one
vector of 4 int. At the RTL level, we have a vec_concat:V4D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96747
Bug ID: 96747
Summary: -Wshadow accepts included extern variable shadowing
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96748
Bug ID: 96748
Summary: ICE in get_default_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:311
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96737
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from Dominique
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96748
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96733
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96748
--- Comment #2 from Manuel Lauss ---
Created attachment 49099
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49099&action=edit
gzipped testcase
Apologies, find the gzip compressed test source attached.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96748
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
variable and then the latter used
within '+=' or other operation.
The attached test code is composed to reveal the issue but is not meant to do
any job. The "#if" alternative in the code can be used to show how warning
disappears.
In a case of meaningful code which cause
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96749
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Bazhenov ---
Created attachment 49101
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49101&action=edit
statement-has-no-effect.cpp
Code snippet revealing the problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96750
Bug ID: 96750
Summary: 10-12% performance decrease in benchmark going from
GCC8 to GCC9/GCC10
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
17 matches
Mail list logo