https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94283
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c2133167ad58d15c2c2df0cb4fa3a3757603144e
commit r10-7365-gc2133167ad58d15c2c2df0cb4fa3a3757603144e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94317
Bug ID: 94317
Summary: gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h:13907: strange assignment ?
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93946
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to sandra from comment #9)
> Both the new test cases are failing on nios2 at -Os, -O2, and -O3. I've
> done some analysis, but I'm not sure exactly where the problem lies, and
> whether this is a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94123
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94308
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94307
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94311
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94316
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94303
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rookiezjz at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94317
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||srinath.parvathaneni at arm
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94313
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
This is likely because points-to computes the result of the string functions,
for example in g1 it computes
s_5 = { NULL STRING }
and somehow ref_maybe_used_by_stmt_p computes false for *s and f(s).
That's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94314
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94315
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94300
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1154b4d3c54e83d493cc66d1a30c410b9b3108a
commit r10-7366-gf1154b4d3c54e83d493cc66d1a30c410b9b3108a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94223
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:158cccea0d097d9f181bf4e35fdeb97865c960f7
commit r10-7367-g158cccea0d097d9f181bf4e35fdeb97865c960f7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94303
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f18995e23edc944af3a401d9d9d3320a9362652
commit r10-7368-g5f18995e23edc944af3a401d9d9d3320a9362652
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94300
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94223
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94303
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] Program |[8/9 Regression] Program
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93484
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c38daa7976886a59a3cd496b5c776d75f3cdb056
commit r10-7369-gc38daa7976886a59a3cd496b5c776d75f3cdb056
Author: Mark Eggleston
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81594
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Hi Mike,
Please explain (in the code!) why we need a peephole here, why we cannot
generate the faster code earlier? Or why we choose not to? Etc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94296
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Though, the testcase doesn't fail even with -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables
-fcompare-debug -fexceptions, , so I don't see how one can reproduce it in make
check, even
make check-gcc
RUNTESTFLAGS='--target_bo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94288
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3)
> > > thanks for the report. The reduced testcase at c#2 doesn't fire for m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94307
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94307
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> But isn't the default without -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error already
> calling
> a library routine that the kernel could override?
They don't want to impleme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94307
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Well, they could just make them alias of each other, that is not the big deal,
I guess they don't want to waste .rodata space on the data that provides the
details to those functions and waste .text on passin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94274
--- Comment #4 from z.zhanghaijian at huawei dot com ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Note that with binary operations you are eventually increasing register
> pressure up to a point where we need to spill so IMHO this should be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94280
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c8504ebef1d6a799600b8e5d255c704b7b3aa19c
commit r10-7370-gc8504ebef1d6a799600b8e5d255c704b7b3aa19c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94280
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94259
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0fb0240a051df91d3c24385d1d3c17548b266544
commit r10-7371-g0fb0240a051df91d3c24385d1d3c17548b266544
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94271
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10 Regression] lto1: |[8/9 Regression] lto1:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94271
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:724ec02c2c6d1b79788be77f68ebb6ca7b5b6acd
commit r10-7372-g724ec02c2c6d1b79788be77f68ebb6ca7b5b6acd
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93274
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:724ec02c2c6d1b79788be77f68ebb6ca7b5b6acd
commit r10-7372-g724ec02c2c6d1b79788be77f68ebb6ca7b5b6acd
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94259
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94314
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|[10 Regression] Opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94315
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94317
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94318
Bug ID: 94318
Summary: [10 Regression] endless loop building _sd_to_si.o on
powerpc-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94305
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94304
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94318
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94318
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Isn't that dup of PR94072?
Sorry, this one PR94042.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94318
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> > Isn't that dup of PR94072?
>
> Sorry, this one PR94042.
I don't have a good day. This link should be what I'm looki
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94318
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94308
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d5ad8ee04a78b576867fd78b2f25201ea6b4aae1
commit r10-7373-gd5ad8ee04a78b576867fd78b2f25201ea6b4aae1
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94296
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:780f1cfd8eef90f6f5ea84cf58aa97e07c0c2aa1
commit r10-7374-g780f1cfd8eef90f6f5ea84cf58aa97e07c0c2aa1
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94296
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94308
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94314
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> Yes, I remember we discussed the topic about the user-provided new/delete
> implementations. Can please Jason or Jonathan comment about the test-case?
The testca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94311
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94254
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at debian dot org
--- Comment #17
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94318
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94319
Bug ID: 94319
Summary: gcc/cp/coroutines.cc:2654: strange assignment ?
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94319
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94314
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse ---
I don't think we need heavy machinery linking new and delete (and if we did I'd
be tempted to store it in some global table rather than in the nodes). The most
important case is the global replacable functions,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94320
Bug ID: 94320
Summary: [OpenMP][Offloading] lto1 ICE during IPA pass: inline
– offline_size at gcc/ipa-inline-analysis.c:453
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94320
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94319
--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #1)
> git blame says:
>
> 49789fd08378 (Iain Sandoe 2020-01-18 11:54:46 + 2654) do_subtree = 0;
>
> Adding author.
indeed looks like a typo. thanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91027
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94321
Bug ID: 94321
Summary: gdc.dg/pr92216.d FAILs on 32-bit targets
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94311
--- Comment #3 from Mark Wielaard ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Err, but isn't this interpreting the dwarf from 'date'? So doesn't this
> mean that valgrind is "miscompiled" with --enable-lto rather than wrong
> debug?
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94321
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94322
Bug ID: 94322
Summary: Detected memory leaks while using clang
AddressSanitizer to build GCC
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94322
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
We're quite lazy in freeing all memory from generator tools (genhooks as you
report) but there are also known leaks in the driver when it comes to
command-line processing.
That is, not all memory leaks are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94289
--- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Hi all!
My first comment is not very clear so to elaborate a bit.
For assumed-rank arrays no temporary array descriptor with the correct bounds
is created like it is for assumed-shape arrays.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94259
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:68c4570a4dea8ed6fefaea50943fb74ea8f78319
commit r10-7375-g68c4570a4dea8ed6fefaea50943fb74ea8f78319
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94322
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94323
Bug ID: 94323
Summary: [10 Regression] g++: error: x.cpp: ‘-fcompare-debug’
failure since
r10-7359-g6e771c087b10d5b730240ea35478eab8694c9c5d
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94323
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94324
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94324
Bug ID: 94324
Summary: [10 regression] gfortran.dg/default_format_1.f90 etc.
FAIL on 32-bit Solaris/x86
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94325
Bug ID: 94325
Summary: [UBSAN] "invalid vptr" false positive for virtual
inheritance with -fno-sanitize-recover=all
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94317
--- Comment #3 from Srinath Parvathaneni
---
Thanks David for reporting this issue, I'm working on it.
Could someone assign this to me, I could not do it myself.
Regards,
SRI.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94311
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #3)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> > Err, but isn't this interpreting the dwarf from 'date'? So doesn't this
> > mean that valgrind is "miscompiled"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94317
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |srinath.parvathaneni at
arm dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94317
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94326
Bug ID: 94326
Summary: g++: error: pack.ii: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure
(length)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94326
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94325
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.0, 9.3.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94327
Bug ID: 94327
Summary: Bind(c) argument attributes are incorrectly set
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94319
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:83dfa06cb5cff143113cb7d632c90a40edefade8
commit r10-7376-g83dfa06cb5cff143113cb7d632c90a40edefade8
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94327
--- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Created attachment 48113
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48113&action=edit
C code demonstrating problems.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94319
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93484
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dff885cdc00bbdccb5bb6277e4711093e3bbad1e
commit r9-8416-gdff885cdc00bbdccb5bb6277e4711093e3bbad1e
Author: Mark Eggleston
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94328
Bug ID: 94328
Summary: Logging of defects to file does not work with Asan and
Ubsan combined
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94328
--- Comment #1 from Gordon Mc ---
Created attachment 48115
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48115&action=edit
Makefile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94328
--- Comment #2 from Gordon Mc ---
Created attachment 48116
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48116&action=edit
Script to run the testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94281
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94329
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94329
Bug ID: 94329
Summary: gcc-9: error: use_only.f90: ‘-fcompare-debug’ failure
(length)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94325
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94328
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94328
--- Comment #4 from Gordon Mc ---
This seems to be specific to GCC - I just tested with clang 7.1.0, and it
behaves as I would expect it to (both Asan and Ubsan content went to the UABSAN
log file - none went to stderr)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94328
Gordon Mc changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||9.2.0
--- Comment #5 from Gordon Mc ---
Als
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94328
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Ok, let me take a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94317
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
I am not sure how much testing this code got before it was
put into git.
Can the author please indicate where the test cases for this code
are in the gcc trunk testsuite. I'll give them some exercise.
In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94328
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94281
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #48117|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94253
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin ---
Okay, the problem is the test lacks a '-fcommon' option.
The default was changed here:
2019-11-20 Wilco Dijkstra
PR85678
* common.opt (fcommon): Change init to 1.
* doc/invok
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94317
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
