[Bug target/91913] New: ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2211

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91913 Bug ID: 91913 Summary: ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2211 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/91910] Debug mode: there is a racing condition between destructors of iterator and the associated container.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91910 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/91885] [9/10 Regression] ICE when compiling SPEC 2017 blender benchmark with -O3 -fprofile-generate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91885 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Thu Sep 26 07:40:09 2019 New Revision: 276141 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276141&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Add TODO_update_ssa for SLP BB vectorization (PR tree-optimization/91885).

[Bug libstdc++/91910] Debug mode: there is a racing condition between destructors of iterator and the associated container.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91910 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Specifically, [res.on.data.races] p7 in the standard says we need to protect the container's internal state from data races.

[Bug tree-optimization/91885] [9 Regression] ICE when compiling SPEC 2017 blender benchmark with -O3 -fprofile-generate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91885 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.0 Summary|[9/10 Regression]

[Bug c/91914] New: Invalid strlen optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91914 Bug ID: 91914 Summary: Invalid strlen optimization Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee:

[Bug c++/91369] Implement P0784R7: constexpr new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91369 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 46946 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46946&action=edit gcc10-pr91369.patch Current WIP patch.

[Bug c++/91369] Implement P0784R7: constexpr new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91369 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Still need to add further testcase coverage and finish cookie support, but I ran into something that looks like a bug in the C++ standard. [dcl.constexpr]/3 says: if the function is a constructor or destruct

[Bug tree-optimization/91909] [10 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-4.c fails on armeb after r275898

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91909 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug c/91914] [9 Regression] Invalid strlen optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91914 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/91909] [10 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-4.c fails on armeb after r275898

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91909 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED Assigne

[Bug target/91912] [9/10 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:1004

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91912 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCON

[Bug target/91913] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2211

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91913 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCON

[Bug libstdc++/91910] Debug mode: there is a racing condition between destructors of iterator and the associated container.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91910 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Leon suggested using the _M_sequence pointer to access the mutex pool directly, instead of calling _M_sequence->_M_get_mutex() (which is undefined if _M_sequence is being destroyed). Combining that with so

[Bug ipa/91836] [10 Regression] Speed regression of 525.x264_r with -Ofast -march=native since r275982

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91836 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 91836, which changed state. Bug 91836 Summary: [10 Regression] Speed regression of 525.x264_r with -Ofast -march=native since r275982 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91836 What|Removed

[Bug preprocessor/71102] _Pragma("GCC warning ...") should concatenate string literals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71102 Stephan Bergmann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sbergman at redhat dot com --- Commen

[Bug c/91915] New warning for duplicate if condition in if-elseif-elseif chain

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91915 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/91915] New: New warning for duplicate if condition in if-elseif-elseif chain

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91915 Bug ID: 91915 Summary: New warning for duplicate if condition in if-elseif-elseif chain Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug d/91916] New: Maybe a dead code in socket.d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91916 Bug ID: 91916 Summary: Maybe a dead code in socket.d Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: d Assignee

[Bug rtl-optimization/91860] [10 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2279 with -Og -fipa-cp -g --param=max-combine-insns=3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91860 --- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka --- Created attachment 46947 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46947&action=edit different testcase $ riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -Og -fexpensive-optimizations -fno-tree-fre -g --param=max-co

[Bug tree-optimization/91901] unchanged stack array not optimized away in favor off constant pool entry

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91901 --- Comment #2 from Trass3r --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > The compiler doesn't know that printf doesn't modify the data you pass it to > so it cannot elide the automatic variable. Does it matter in this case? The data comes

[Bug tree-optimization/91909] [10 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-4.c fails on armeb after r275898

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91909 --- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 46948 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46948&action=edit Candidate patch The attached patch seems to fix it. Will give it a bit more testing.

[Bug c++/69718] [concepts] cc1plus segfault on invalid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69718 Jeff Chapman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jeff.chapman.bugs at gmail dot com --- C

[Bug c++/70862] [concepts] adding a concept-constrained version of a variable template causes multiple definition assembler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70862 Jeff Chapman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jeff.chapman.bugs at gmail dot com --- C

[Bug driver/69471] "-march=native" unintentionally breaks further -march/-mtune flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69471 --- Comment #13 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Sep 26 10:52:42 2019 New Revision: 276148 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276148&root=gcc&view=rev Log: driver: Also prune joined switches with negation When -m

[Bug tree-optimization/91909] [10 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-4.c fails on armeb after r275898

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91909 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 26 Sep 2019, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91909 > > --- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org > --- > Created attachment 46948

[Bug target/91912] [9/10 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:1004

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91912 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.4

[Bug tree-optimization/18374] [meta-bug] Argument and return value marshalling at tree level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18374 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/91913] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2211

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91913 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.4

[Bug libstdc++/87858] Building old multilib bootstrap GCC: stage1 32-bit libstdc++ fails to build after building 64-bit libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87858 --- Comment #2 from Matthew Krupcale --- I can confirm that I'm still observing this when building multilib bootstrap GCC 4.8.3 using GCC 9.2.1 on Fedora 30[1,2]. I tried to verify this issue when building GCC 6.4.1 (GLIBCXX_3.4.22, CXXABI_1.3.10

[Bug c/91915] New warning for duplicate if condition in if-elseif-elseif chain

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91915 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/91889] [10 Regression] error: call of overloaded ‘to_value_ptr(B*&)’ is ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91889 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |SUSPENDED --- Comment #9 from Marek Pola

[Bug libgomp/91917] New: OpenACC 'acc_set_cuda_stream' return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91917 Bug ID: 91917 Summary: OpenACC 'acc_set_cuda_stream' return type Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openacc Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c/91918] New: Const pointer argument to atomic_compare_exchange doesn't cause an error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91918 Bug ID: 91918 Summary: Const pointer argument to atomic_compare_exchange doesn't cause an error. Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug c/91918] Const pointer argument to atomic_compare_exchange doesn't cause an error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91918 --- Comment #2 from Maria Matejka --- Created attachment 46952 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46952&action=edit generated assembler code

[Bug c/91918] Const pointer argument to atomic_compare_exchange doesn't cause an error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91918 --- Comment #1 from Maria Matejka --- Created attachment 46951 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46951&action=edit preprocessed source file

[Bug c/91918] Const pointer argument to atomic_compare_exchange doesn't cause an error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91918 --- Comment #3 from Maria Matejka --- Created attachment 46953 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46953&action=edit Compiler output on gcc -v -save-temps

[Bug c/91918] Const pointer argument to atomic_compare_exchange doesn't cause an error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91918 --- Comment #4 from Maria Matejka --- This bug applies also on v9.2.0.

[Bug c++/91889] [10 Regression] error: call of overloaded ‘to_value_ptr(B*&)’ is ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91889 --- Comment #10 from Steve Ellcey --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #9) > I'll raise it with CWG; suspending until then. Not sure if it matters but there seem to be 8 instances of this problem in Boost (get_color, get_left, get_next, g

[Bug c++/91369] Implement P0784R7: constexpr new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91369 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > So, is the [class.dtor]/9 note just incorrect and should be removed, or > clarified somehow? I believe it shouldn't affect what actually is a literal > type or n

[Bug c++/91889] [10 Regression] error: call of overloaded ‘to_value_ptr(B*&)’ is ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91889 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |NEW --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill

[Bug c++/91889] [10 Regression] error: call of overloaded ‘to_value_ptr(B*&)’ is ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91889 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/91919] New: [10 Regression] arm-linux-eabi ICE with building kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91919 Bug ID: 91919 Summary: [10 Regression] arm-linux-eabi ICE with building kernel Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug tree-optimization/91914] [9 Regression] Invalid strlen optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91914 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug c/91915] New warning for duplicate if condition in if-elseif-elseif chain

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91915 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/91918] Const pointer argument to atomic_compare_exchange doesn't cause an error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91918 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- In general this sort of thing is undefined behavior under 7.1.4. It's valid to give an error in this case (as the types are wrong), but it's liable to be hard to do so in all cases for gen

[Bug tree-optimization/91914] [9 Regression] Invalid strlen optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91914 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Sep 26 16:17:22 2019 New Revision: 276156 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276156&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/91914 - Invalid strlen folding for offset into struct

[Bug libgomp/91917] OpenACC 'acc_set_cuda_stream' return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91917 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/91920] New: ggc 9.2.0 failing openmp compile on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91920 Bug ID: 91920 Summary: ggc 9.2.0 failing openmp compile on ppc64le Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/91920] ggc 9.2.0 failing openmp compile on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91920 --- Comment #1 from robert at robbieab dot com --- Created attachment 46955 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46955&action=edit Preprocessed copy of test-openmp.c

[Bug c/91920] ggc 9.2.0 failing openmp compile on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91920 Daniel Kolesa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc at octaforge dot org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/91896] [10 Regression] ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_stmt_copy, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1687

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91896 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Sep 26 16:54:51 2019 New Revision: 276158 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276158&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-09-25 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/91896

[Bug target/91897] Very poor optimization on large attribute vector_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91897 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug target/87243] FSF GCC needs to do something special (like using xcrun) on darwin18 to find system headers in SDK

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87243 Ken Cunningham changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ken.cunningham.webuse@gmail

[Bug c++/91921] New: Incomplete -Woverloaded-virtual warning when base class is in system header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91921 Bug ID: 91921 Summary: Incomplete -Woverloaded-virtual warning when base class is in system header Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug c++/91921] Incomplete -Woverloaded-virtual warning when base class is in system header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91921 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/91921] Incomplete -Woverloaded-virtual warning when base class is in system header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91921 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/91829] compatibility.cc: syntax error lea (%pc, _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE@GOTPC), a4 ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91829 Jon Daniel changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://cygwin.com/ml/cross

[Bug c++/91369] Implement P0784R7: constexpr new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91369 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #46946|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/91829] compatibility.cc: syntax error lea (%pc, _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE@GOTPC), a4 ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91829 --- Comment #2 from Jon Daniel --- Enabling only the COLDFIRE section in load_got seems to fix the compilation problem even without a coldfire cpu target. I'll try to figure out which lea move.l combo to use for a specific motorola target cpu.

[Bug target/91919] [10 Regression] arm-linux-eabi ICE with building kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91919 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/91919] [10 Regression] arm-linux-eabi ICE with building kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91919 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/91903] vec_ctf altivec intrinsic can cause ICE on powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91903 --- Comment #2 from Paul E. Murphy --- I tried this out on IBM's new AT13 compiler (GCC 9.2.1): /opt/at13.0/bin/powerpc64le-linux-gnu-gcc -c test.c during RTL pass: expand test.c: In function ‘test’: test.c:5:5: internal compiler error: in copy

[Bug preprocessor/49973] Column numbers count multibyte characters as multiple columns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49973 --- Comment #18 from Lewis Hyatt --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #17) > On Tue, 17 Sep 2019, lhyatt at gmail dot com wrote: > > > In any case, the underlying source of wcwidth() could easily be changed as a > > drop-in repl

[Bug target/91880] ICE: segfault in hwloop_optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91880 --- Comment #4 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jcmvbkbc Date: Thu Sep 26 20:51:27 2019 New Revision: 276166 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276166&root=gcc&view=rev Log: xtensa: fix PR target/91880 Xtensa hwloop_optimize segfau

[Bug c/91922] New: #pragma pack(push,4) does not align element on 32 bit boundary properly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91922 Bug ID: 91922 Summary: #pragma pack(push,4) does not align element on 32 bit boundary properly Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/91880] ICE: segfault in hwloop_optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91880 jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug tree-optimization/91885] [9 Regression] ICE when compiling SPEC 2017 blender benchmark with -O3 -fprofile-generate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91885 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/91885] [9 Regression] ICE when compiling SPEC 2017 blender benchmark with -O3 -fprofile-generate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91885 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from

[Bug libbacktrace/91908] New libbacktrace tests fail to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91908 --- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Thu Sep 26 22:19:47 2019 New Revision: 276168 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276168&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libbacktrace/91908 * pecoff.c (backtrace_initial

[Bug rtl-optimization/91860] [10 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2279 with -Og -fipa-cp -g --param=max-combine-insns=3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91860 --- Comment #5 from Jim Wilson --- The new testcase is essentially the same problem, but it is i1src this time not i2src, so just copying i2src earlier doesn't solve the problem, we also need a fix for i1src, or a fix elsewhere.

[Bug libbacktrace/91908] New libbacktrace tests fail to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91908 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/91871] iterator_to_const_iterator() in testsuite_hooks.h causes valid -Wreturn-stack-address warnings with LLVM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91871 --- Comment #7 from Brooks Moses --- Thanks, Jonathan! I've confirmed that this does indeed fix the warning with Clang trunk, and the test passes again.

[Bug libbacktrace/91908] New libbacktrace tests fail to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91908 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2019-09-26 6:26 p.m., ian at airs dot com wrote: > Should be fixed on trunk. Thanks Ian.

[Bug ipa/89924] [missed-optimization] Function not de-virtualized within the same TU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89924 --- Comment #6 from Kamlesh Kumar --- https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-09/msg01527.html

[Bug c++/91923] New: [9/10 Regression] Failure-to-SFINAE with class type NTTP in C++17

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91923 Bug ID: 91923 Summary: [9/10 Regression] Failure-to-SFINAE with class type NTTP in C++17 Product: gcc Version: 9.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/91923] [9/10 Regression] Failure-to-SFINAE with class type NTTP in C++17

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91923 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONFI

[Bug c++/91923] [9/10 Regression] Failure-to-SFINAE with class type NTTP in C++17

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91923 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- This patch implements that suggestion: diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c index e5d64989b32..bd8b2400b86 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/pt.c +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c @@ -25233,7 +25233,7 @@ invalid_nontype_parm_type_p (tr

[Bug libquadmath/91924] New: tgammal(- odd.5 ) has wrong sign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91924 Bug ID: 91924 Summary: tgammal(- odd.5 ) has wrong sign Product: gcc Version: 7.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libquadmath

[Bug tree-optimization/91909] [10 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-4.c fails on armeb after r275898

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91909 --- Comment #5 from Christophe Lyon --- I confirm that the proposed patch fixed the problem for me.

[Bug c/91918] Const pointer argument to atomic_compare_exchange doesn't cause an error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91918 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug target/91919] [10 Regression] arm-linux-eabi ICE with building kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91919 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug c/91922] #pragma pack(push,4) does not align element on 32 bit boundary properly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91922 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #1 from Richard

[Bug c++/91923] [9/10 Regression] Failure-to-SFINAE with class type NTTP in C++17

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91923 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.2.0 Target Milestone|---