[Bug middle-end/90694] incorrect representation of ADDR_EXPR involving a pointer to array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90694 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Just as a note - the tree/GIMPLE dumps are not C source code so this kind of "issues" are expected. Watch out for testsuite fallout.

[Bug middle-end/90694] incorrect representation of ADDR_EXPR involving a pointer to array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90694 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > Just as a note - the tree/GIMPLE dumps are not C source code so > this kind of "issues" are expected. Watch out for testsuite fallout. For the latter esp. te

[Bug tree-optimization/90697] ia64: segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass: dom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90697 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/90712] [10 regression] gcc.dg/rtl/aarch64/subs_adds_sp.c fails with ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90712 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |10.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug testsuite/90713] [10 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/gimplefe-40.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90713 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org Comp

[Bug testsuite/90713] [10 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/gimplefe-40.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90713 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug c++/26989] C++ front-end (and others parts of GCC) use the wrong check to see if hidden visibility is there

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26989 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c++/26989] C++ front-end (and others parts of GCC) use the wrong check to see if hidden visibility is there

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26989 --- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7) > Cc Iain who probably knows more about the Darwin linker. I'm pretty sure it > supports visibility now because LLVM's libc++ makes extensive use of > visibility at

[Bug debug/90716] [10 Regression] gcc generates wrong debug information at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90716 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Version|unknown

[Bug debug/90717] New: wrong stmt location for breakpoint, XFAIL gcc.dg/guality/pr90716.c -flto -fuse-linker-plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90717 Bug ID: 90717 Summary: wrong stmt location for breakpoint, XFAIL gcc.dg/guality/pr90716.c -flto -fuse-linker-plugin Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/90717] wrong stmt location for breakpoint, XFAIL gcc.dg/guality/pr90716.c -flto -fuse-linker-plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90717 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-debug CC|

[Bug d/90718] New: libphobos.phobos_shared/std/socket.d FAILs on 32-bit Solaris/SPARC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90718 Bug ID: 90718 Summary: libphobos.phobos_shared/std/socket.d FAILs on 32-bit Solaris/SPARC Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/90697] ia64: segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass: dom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90697 --- Comment #4 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > I can't reproduce this. Matthias, IIRC the debian version is not 8.3.0 but > patched - to which rev? That's currently SVN 20190428 (r270630), see [

[Bug d/90718] libphobos.phobos_shared/std/socket.d FAILs on 32-bit Solaris/SPARC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90718 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 46444 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46444&action=edit Proposed patch

[Bug d/90718] libphobos.phobos_shared/std/socket.d FAILs on 32-bit Solaris/SPARC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90718 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.2

[Bug testsuite/90713] [10 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/gimplefe-40.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90713 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/90608] Inline non-scalar minloc/maxloc calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90608 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #1) > Another, not mutually exclusive approach would be to make libgfortran LTO > clean so the more complex minloc etc calls could be pulled in. Interesti

[Bug c++/26989] C++ front-end (and others parts of GCC) use the wrong check to see if hidden visibility is there

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26989 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- The G++ code now uses: if (is_attribute_p ("visibility", name)) and the test that was failing uses: // { dg-require-visibility "" } which also depends on whether the attribute is supported: #

[Bug libfortran/77278] Use LTO for libgfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77278 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #5) > One thing we would also have to tackle is GFC_LOGICAL arguments. > C only has one bool type, which is (for gcc) equivalent to > logical(kind=1). We might just g

[Bug d/90719] New: libphobos.phobos_shared/std/file.d FAILs on 32-bit Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90719 Bug ID: 90719 Summary: libphobos.phobos_shared/std/file.d FAILs on 32-bit Solaris Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug d/90719] libphobos.phobos_shared/std/file.d FAILs on 32-bit Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90719 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.2

[Bug middle-end/32503] __builtin_pow[i] - vectorize for other exponents besides 2 and 0.5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32503 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2007-06-26 10:47:05 |2019-6-3 Blocks|

[Bug libfortran/77278] Use LTO for libgfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77278 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Sun, 2 Jun 2019, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77278 > > --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- ... > So, dt_parm_1 is still filled with info

[Bug d/90719] libphobos.phobos_shared/std/file.d FAILs on 32-bit Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90719 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 46445 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46445&action=edit Proposed patch

[Bug c++/26989] C++ front-end (and others parts of GCC) use the wrong check to see if hidden visibility is there

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26989 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/90697] ia64: segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass: dom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90697 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 3 Jun 2019, glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90697 > > --- Comment #4 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz fu-berlin.de> --- > (In repl

[Bug testsuite/90713] [10 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/gimplefe-40.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90713 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 3 Jun 2019, segher at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90713 > > Segher Boessenkool changed: > >What|Removed |Ad

[Bug testsuite/90713] [10 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/gimplefe-40.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90713 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Jun 3 09:03:48 2019 New Revision: 271855 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271855&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-06-03 Richard Biener PR testsuite/90713 * gcc.

[Bug testsuite/90713] [10 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/gimplefe-40.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90713 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/90681] [10 Regression] ICE in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations_1, at tree-vect-slp.c:2513 since r271704

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90681 --- Comment #4 from alejandro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: alejandro Date: Mon Jun 3 09:13:32 2019 New Revision: 271856 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271856&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix ICE in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations_1 This patc

[Bug ipa/90720] g++.dg/lto/alias-1 FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90720 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug ipa/90720] New: g++.dg/lto/alias-1 FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90720 Bug ID: 90720 Summary: g++.dg/lto/alias-1 FAILs Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ipa Assignee: u

[Bug target/88837] [SVE] Poor vector construction code in VL-specific mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88837 --- Comment #1 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: prathamesh3492 Date: Mon Jun 3 09:35:37 2019 New Revision: 271857 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271857&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-06-03 Prathamesh Kulkarni PR

[Bug debug/90716] [10 Regression] gcc generates wrong debug information at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90716 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/90716] [10 Regression] gcc generates wrong debug information at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90716 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Jun 3 10:17:16 2019 New Revision: 271858 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271858&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-06-03 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/90716

[Bug target/89803] Missing AVX512 intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89803 --- Comment #6 from Hongtao.liu --- Using "vector_operand" "vm" instead Index: gcc/config/i386/sse.md === --- gcc/config/i386/sse.md (revision 271853) +++ gcc/config/i386/sse.m

[Bug driver/90692] The "%{!shared:%:if-exists(default-manifest.o%s)}" spec option fails if gcc is installed in a path with spaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90692 --- Comment #1 from Olivier Michel --- The principle of this patch is that it breaks the recursion of the specs function evaluation as soon as a library file is expanded. This is needed because otherwise, the file path containing a space is broke

[Bug c/90721] New: [Bug] ./gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-apply-4.c test case getting fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90721 Bug ID: 90721 Summary: [Bug] ./gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-apply-4.c test case getting fail Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug middle-end/82853] Optimize x % 3 == 0 without modulo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82853 --- Comment #36 from Wilco --- (In reply to Orr Shalom Dvory from comment #35) > Hi, thanks for your respond. can someone mark this bug as need to be > improved? > Does anyone agree/disagree with my new proposed method? It's best to create a new

[Bug driver/90684] New alignment options incorrectly report error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90684 --- Comment #3 from Wilco --- Author: wilco Date: Mon Jun 3 11:27:50 2019 New Revision: 271864 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271864&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix alignment option parser (PR90684) Fix the alignment option parser to always a

[Bug rtl-optimization/90706] [9 Regression] Useless code generated for stack / register operations on AVR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90706 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |rtl-optimization Summary|U

[Bug target/90689] [10 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2310 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90689 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/90722] New: ICE with __builtin_convertvector with -msve-vector-bits=256

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90722 Bug ID: 90722 Summary: ICE with __builtin_convertvector with -msve-vector-bits=256 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug target/90723] New: pr88598-2.c segfaults with -msve-vector-bits=256

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90723 Bug ID: 90723 Summary: pr88598-2.c segfaults with -msve-vector-bits=256 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: t

[Bug target/90724] New: ICE with __sync_bool_compare_and_swap with -march=armv8.2-a+sve

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90724 Bug ID: 90724 Summary: ICE with __sync_bool_compare_and_swap with -march=armv8.2-a+sve Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug pch/61250] Random pch failures on x86_64-apple-darwin1(3|4).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61250 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-apple-darwin1(3|4) |x86_64-apple-darwin1(345678

[Bug c++/90725] New: implicitly used 'this' not diagnosed in static member fn declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90725 Bug ID: 90725 Summary: implicitly used 'this' not diagnosed in static member fn declaration Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/90686] Libstdc++ C++20 status table is missing entry for P1357R1 "Traits for [Un]bounded Arrays"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90686 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Mon Jun 3 13:23:03 2019 New Revision: 271867 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271867&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/90686 update C++2a library status docs PR libstdc++

[Bug middle-end/90726] New: exponential behavior on SCEV results everywhere

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90726 Bug ID: 90726 Summary: exponential behavior on SCEV results everywhere Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: mi

[Bug middle-end/90726] exponential behavior on SCEV results everywhere

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90726 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog Status|UNC

[Bug middle-end/64242] Longjmp expansion incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64242 --- Comment #24 from Wilco --- Author: wilco Date: Mon Jun 3 13:55:15 2019 New Revision: 271870 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271870&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix PR64242 - Longjmp expansion incorrect Improve the fix for PR64242. Various

[Bug libstdc++/90686] Libstdc++ C++20 status table is missing entry for P1357R1 "Traits for [Un]bounded Arrays"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90686 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Mon Jun 3 14:05:50 2019 New Revision: 271872 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271872&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/90686 update C++2a library status docs PR libstdc++

[Bug libstdc++/90686] Libstdc++ C++20 status table is missing entry for P1357R1 "Traits for [Un]bounded Arrays"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90686 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug d/90727] New: libphobos.phobos_shared/std/datetime/systime.d etc. FAIL on Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90727 Bug ID: 90727 Summary: libphobos.phobos_shared/std/datetime/systime.d etc. FAIL on Solaris Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug d/90727] libphobos.phobos_shared/std/datetime/systime.d etc. FAIL on Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90727 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.2

[Bug c/90728] New: False positive Wmemset-elt-size with zero size array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90728 Bug ID: 90728 Summary: False positive Wmemset-elt-size with zero size array Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug d/90729] New: libphobos.phobos_shared/std/math.d FAILs on Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90729 Bug ID: 90729 Summary: libphobos.phobos_shared/std/math.d FAILs on Solaris Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug d/90729] libphobos.phobos_shared/std/math.d FAILs on Solaris

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90729 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.2

[Bug target/90689] [10 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2310 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90689 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|2019-05-31 0

[Bug c++/83534] C++17: typeinfo for noexcept function lacks noexcept information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83534 Valentine changed: What|Removed |Added CC||v at vsamko dot com --- Comment #1 from Vale

[Bug target/90689] [10 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2310 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90689 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- rs6000.c does if (HAVE_AS_PLTSEQ && DEFAULT_ABI == ABI_ELFv2 && GET_CODE (func_desc) == SYMBOL_REF) { rtvec v = gen_rt

[Bug driver/90730] New: -fdump-tree-gimple-optimized-... accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90730 Bug ID: 90730 Summary: -fdump-tree-gimple-optimized-... accepted Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: driver

[Bug c++/90731] New: regression - noexcept broken for forward declarations with decltype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90731 Bug ID: 90731 Summary: regression - noexcept broken for forward declarations with decltype Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug driver/90730] -fdump-tree-gimple-optimized-... accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90730 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid --- Comment #1 from Marti

[Bug c++/83534] C++17: typeinfo for noexcept function lacks noexcept information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83534 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/90728] False positive Wmemset-elt-size with zero size array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90728 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/90731] regression - noexcept broken for forward declarations with decltype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90731 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONFI

[Bug c++/90732] New: regression - ICE with std::apply after variable length array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90732 Bug ID: 90732 Summary: regression - ICE with std::apply after variable length array Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c/90733] New: [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:6440

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90733 Bug ID: 90733 Summary: [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:6440 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libfortran/77278] Use LTO for libgfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77278 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig --- Created attachment 46446 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46446&action=edit LTO tree dump from simple test case So, I tried out a simple program: $ cat minloc.f90 program main real, di

[Bug c++/90734] New: [concepts] Pre-normalization substitution into constraints of templated function breaks subsumption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90734 Bug ID: 90734 Summary: [concepts] Pre-normalization substitution into constraints of templated function breaks subsumption Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/90735] New: missing location in -Wreturn-local-addr on a function with two return statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90735 Bug ID: 90735 Summary: missing location in -Wreturn-local-addr on a function with two return statements Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/90734] [concepts] Pre-normalization substitution into constraints of templated function breaks subsumption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90734 Casey Carter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Casey at Carter dot net --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug middle-end/90735] missing location in -Wreturn-local-addr on a function with two return statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90735 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor --- The output of the -fdump-tree-all-lineno option shows the correct location information in the a.c.007t.omplower dump: ;; Function f (f, funcdef_no=0, decl_uid=1909, cgraph_uid=1, symbol_order=0) f (int i, in

[Bug c++/90736] New: Bogus error with alignas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90736 Bug ID: 90736 Summary: Bogus error with alignas Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee

[Bug c++/90736] Bogus error with alignas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90736 --- Comment #1 from Matthew Beliveau --- Started with commit r261971

[Bug c++/90736] [9/10 Regression] Bogus error with alignas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90736 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONFI

[Bug libfortran/77278] Use LTO for libgfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77278 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On June 3, 2019 6:54:10 PM GMT+02:00, "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77278 > >--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig --- >Created attachment 46446 >

[Bug middle-end/90735] missing location in -Wreturn-local-addr on a function with two return statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90735 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- The problem is in this function in gimple-low.c: /* Lower a GIMPLE_RETURN GSI. DATA is passed through the recursion. */ static void lower_gimple_return (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, struct lower_

[Bug c/90737] New: wrong code returning address of a local converted to intptr_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90737 Bug ID: 90737 Summary: wrong code returning address of a local converted to intptr_t Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug c/90737] [8/9/10 Regression] inconsistent address of a local converted to intptr_t between callee and caller

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90737 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, wrong-code Known to work

[Bug bootstrap/89864] gcc fails to build/bootstrap with XCode 10.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864 --- Comment #99 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Mon Jun 3 19:13:46 2019 New Revision: 271881 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271881&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Darwin, backport fixes for PR 89864 (with 90379 included) 2019-06-03 Iain

[Bug rtl-optimization/90706] [9 Regression] Useless code generated for stack / register operations on AVR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90706 --- Comment #2 from Berni --- (In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #1) > (In reply to Berni from comment #0) > > pushing r0 does not make sense at all since it is by definition a temporary > > register that can freely be modified. Maybe it'

[Bug bootstrap/89864] gcc fails to build/bootstrap with XCode 10.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/90736] [9/10 Regression] Bogus error with alignas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90736 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- This compiles when the parm 'b' is not const.

[Bug middle-end/90694] incorrect representation of ADDR_EXPR involving a pointer to array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90694 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- Thanks for the heads up. I scanned the testsuite for the pattern but couldn't find any matching tests: $ find gcc/testsuite/ -type f | xargs grep "&\*[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z_0-9]*\[" | grep scan | wc -l 0 Please l

[Bug c/90737] [8/9/10 Regression] inconsistent address of a local converted to intptr_t between callee and caller

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90737 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/90738] New: [10 regression] gfortran.dg/pointer_array_10.f90 etc. FAIL

Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org CC: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Between 20190601 (r271838) and 20190603 (r271873), two fortran tests regressed: +FAIL

[Bug fortran/90738] [10 regression] gfortran.dg/pointer_array_10.f90 etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90738 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug tree-optimization/90739] New: [10 regression] Fortran pointer array tests fails after r271860

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90739 Bug ID: 90739 Summary: [10 regression] Fortran pointer array tests fails after r271860 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/90700] Wrong constraints for tuple(allocator_arg_t, const A&, const tuple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90700 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Mon Jun 3 22:31:45 2019 New Revision: 271887 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271887&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/90700 Fix constructor constraint for std::tuple * i

[Bug fortran/90738] [10 regression] gfortran.dg/pointer_array_10.f90 etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90738 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/90739] [10 regression] Fortran pointer array tests fails after r271860

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90739 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/90689] [10 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2310 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90689 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com Assignee|

[Bug target/90689] [10 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2310 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90689 --- Comment #6 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Tue Jun 4 00:13:07 2019 New Revision: 271895 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271895&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR90689, ICE in extract_insn on ppc64le PR target/90689 * c

[Bug target/90689] [10 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2310 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90689 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|amodra at gcc d

[Bug target/90721] [Bug] ./gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-apply-4.c test case getting fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90721 --- Comment #1 from Akhilesh Kumar --- One more observation same test case getting PASS on x86 root@akhilesh-ubuntu:/home/akhilesh.k/gcc-arm-src-snapshot-8.3-2019.03/gcc/testsuite# gcc ./gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-apply-4.c -flto -fgnu89

[Bug bootstrap/90544] Build failure on MINGW for gcc-9.1.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90544 Kuang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||master at a1983 dot com.cn --- Comment #2 from K

[Bug c++/90732] regression - ICE with std::apply after variable length array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90732 --- Comment #1 from Valentine --- Simpler example without any include's: === volatile int SIZE = 100; template void bar(T t, U... u) { t(u...); } template void foo(Ts&... out) { char buf[SIZE]; bar([&buf, &out...](auto&... x) { (x,

[Bug libfortran/77278] Use LTO for libgfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77278 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

  1   2   >