https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88030
Bug ID: 88030
Summary: ICE in calc_dfs_tree, at dominance.c:458
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88030
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88029
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88028
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88026
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87917
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 15 08:16:22 2018
New Revision: 266173
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266173&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-15 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/87917
* tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87917
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87462
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55102
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018, sandra at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55102
>
> sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87269
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Nathan?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88031
Bug ID: 88031
Summary: ice in vectorizable_reduction, at
tree-vect-loop.c:6953
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.0 |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87706
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87875
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #9)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> > Not also sure what happens if the executable and libraries don't need
> > executable stack and you later dlopen som
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88018
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 15 08:47:21 2018
New Revision: 266174
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266174&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/88018
* cfgrtl.c (fixup_abnormal_edges
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88030
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88024
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88029
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88031
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88031
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
Summary|ice in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87039
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86827
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
* Alexander Popov:
> Of course, there is a naive solution for this issue -- just skip stackleak
> instrumentation for acpi_duplicate_processor_id(). But it would be great to
> find
> out the reasons behind this compiler behavior. It might help to create a
> better
> solution.
Please show us the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86827
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Erhm, but even that doesn't handle all anti-ranges properly; right below, we
state:
/* The bounds need not be ordered. Set HIB to use as the index
of the larger of the bounds and LOB as the opposit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88030
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88030
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 15 10:42:15 2018
New Revision: 266175
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266175&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-15 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/88030
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88032
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88032
Bug ID: 88032
Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in operand_subword_force, at
emit-rtl.c:1793
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87015
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88018
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE in |[8 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87843
--- Comment #16 from Martin Liška ---
I don't see the miscompilation any longer, may I close it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87462
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87843
--- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka ---
> I don't see the miscompilation any longer, may I close it?
Yes, it was fixed by
* tree.c (fld_type_variant): Copy canonical type.
(fld_incomplete_type_of): Check that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85103
rdapp at linux dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdapp at linux dot ibm.com
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31377
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi George,
(In reply to George Ellery from comment #0)
> room = columns - 3 - MAX (col_width, item_width);
> if (room > columns)
> room = columns - 3 - MAX (col_width, item_width);
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 87843, which changed state.
Bug 87843 Summary: [9 Regression] SPEC miscompilation of 403.gcc and 502.gcc_r
benchmarks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87843
What|Removed |Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87843
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85103
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
: posix
gcc version 9.0.0 20181115 (experimental) [trunk revision 266173] (GCC)
$
$ gcctk -Os small.c
$
$ gcctk -O2 small.c
during RTL pass: reload
small.c: In function ‘main’:
small.c:17:1: internal compiler error: in
remove_some_program_points_and_update_live_ranges, at lra-lives.c:1179
17
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88006
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Thu Nov 15 13:23:23 2018
New Revision: 266181
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266181&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[debug/88006] -fdebug-types-section gives undefined ref
https://gcc.gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87462
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Fixed on gcc-8, r266181.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87462
--- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Thu Nov 15 13:23:23 2018
New Revision: 266181
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266181&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[debug/88006] -fdebug-types-section gives undefined ref
https://gcc.gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85103
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Pat Haugen from comment #3)
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #1)
> > Pat, can you try to figure out what value of min-speedup is neeed to recover
> > from this regression?
>
> Using r25
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88031
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 15 13:42:13 2018
New Revision: 266182
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266182&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-11-15 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/88031
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88031
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88029
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88029
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88011
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Hmpf. Somehow cut&pasting the GCD library part into the testcase doesn't work:
gcdbug.go:18:7: error: may not define methods on non-local type
func (z *Int) mYlehmerGCD(x, y, a, b *Int) *Int {
^
gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88015
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Nov 15 14:01:29 2018
New Revision: 266184
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266184&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
graphite: add missing dump_enabled_p checks (PR tree-optimization/88015
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88034
Bug ID: 88034
Summary: std::ws doesn't set failbit when the stream is already
at EOF
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88015
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #6 from David Malcol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87012
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88034
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59474
Matteo Italia changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matteo at mitalia dot net
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88006
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Thu Nov 15 14:31:35 2018
New Revision: 266185
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266185&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[debug/88006] -fdebug-types-section gives undefined ref
https://gcc.gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88032
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87462
--- Comment #9 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Thu Nov 15 14:31:35 2018
New Revision: 266185
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266185&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[debug/88006] -fdebug-types-section gives undefined ref
https://gcc.gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87462
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19165
--- Comment #25 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Nov 15 14:32:41 2018
New Revision: 266186
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266186&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Machine-readable diagnostic output (PR other/19165)
This patch implem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55102
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87751
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88035
Bug ID: 88035
Summary: missing _mm512_reduce_round_pd() et al
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
--- Comment #4 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
Thanks, the patch fixes the ICE on msp430-elf and the test now outputs:
> gcc.c-torture/compile/pr46534.c:17:3: error: size of string literal is too
> large
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87939
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Yeah, that is the goal. And you should either add msp430-*-* to dg-skip-if, or
do we have some effective targets for all targets with 16-bit size_t (or
perhaps < 32-bit), so that we could skip them all at on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87326
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88032
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88036
Bug ID: 88036
Summary: bogus "was not declared in this scope; did you mean
...?" fix-it when the declaration was ill-formed
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88036
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I realise this is non-trivial, because the erroneous declaration may not even
have been parsed as a declaration.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88036
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Slightly simpler testcase, that doesn't need the attribute to avoid the
-Wunused-variable warning:
int food = 0;
void* f()
{
undeclared_type fool;
return &fool;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88037
Bug ID: 88037
Summary: std::string pretty printer causes "virtual memory
exhausted" when used on uninitialized data
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
--- Comment #6 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Yeah, that is the goal. And you should either add msp430-*-* to dg-skip-if,
> or do we have some effective targets for all targets with 16-bit size_t (or
> p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88011
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For some yes. I assume not e.g. for nvptx as it has 64-bit size_t but can't
compile it for other reasons.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88037
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88038
Bug ID: 88038
Summary: ICE: in check, at tree-vrp.c:155: recipe for target
'all-stage3-isl' failed
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88038
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88039
Bug ID: 88039
Summary: gdc.test/compilable/ddoc12.d FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88040
Bug ID: 88040
Summary: gdc silently ignores -ffile-prefix-map
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88037
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Christian Walther from comment #0)
> +# multigigabyte string would run GDB out of memory.
> +return ptr.string(length = 100) + ('... (length: %d)' % length)
Instead of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88038
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ---
Build log is when testing r265361 from a couple weeks back.
Looking at recent history, the assert has been removed from the function since
then.
I'll trigger a rebuild to see if its still happening.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88041
Bug ID: 88041
Summary: gdc.test tests should include that prefix in test
names
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88031
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Thanks for testing GCC 9!
You are welcome.
Just an amateur project. I could get more serious about this,
given enough encouragement.
For example all of Fed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87475
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87836
--- Comment #11 from Gary Mills ---
Well, I got the same ICE when the compiler was built with -O0. It always seems
to happen during the configure tests, always this one:
configure:3662: checking for suffix of object files
configure:3684:
/expor
==+
| 9.0.0 20181115 (experimental) [trunk revision 266169] (aarch64-suse-linux)
GCC error:|
| output_operand: invalid address mode |
| Error detected around
/opt/gcc/gcc-20181115/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/rt_signals.adb:14:5|
This is the offending insn:
(insn 13 11 14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87989
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Kretz ---
Yes, looks like a duplicate of 86246.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87475
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88037
--- Comment #3 from Christian Walther ---
> It's possible somebody really wants to print the whole of their huge string
> (and has the memory to make it work).
Fair point. I figured that someone wanting to read a legitimately huge string
would r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88043
Bug ID: 88043
Summary: Runtime Error when calling deferred member function
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88044
Bug ID: 88044
Summary: [9 regression] gfortran.dg/transfer_intrinsic_3.f90
hangs after r266171
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87476
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88045
Bug ID: 88045
Summary: Call to std::accumulate causes gcov to crash
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87854
--- Comment #8 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> For some yes. I assume not e.g. for nvptx as it has 64-bit size_t but can't
> compile it for other reasons.
Ok, I'll make sure to check that.
The new error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61727
--- Comment #4 from Andi Kleen ---
This was originally about the #pragma simd in CIlk+, which has been removed.
But it lives on in #pragma omp simd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79393
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86246
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kretz at kde dot org
--- Comment #7 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87989
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
