[Bug tree-optimization/87325] determine_base_object does not consider consider address space of base expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87325 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 18 Sep 2018, amker at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87325 > > --- Comment #2 from bin cheng --- > Seems alloc_iv doesn't infer base object correct

[Bug c/87345] New: The compiler of the old version (for example: 4.9.3 version or 6.3.0 version) can stop the infinite cross-border loop, but the new version does not work.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87345 Bug ID: 87345 Summary: The compiler of the old version (for example: 4.9.3 version or 6.3.0 version) can stop the infinite cross-border loop, but the new version does not work.

[Bug c/87345] The compiler of the old version (for example: 4.9.3 version or 6.3.0 version) can stop the infinite cross-border loop, but the new version does not work.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87345 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/87345] The compiler of the old version (for example: 4.9.3 version or 6.3.0 version) can stop the infinite cross-border loop, but the new version does not work.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87345 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |c++ --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski -

[Bug c/87346] New: The compiler of the old version (for example: 4.9.3 version or 6.3.0 version) can stop the infinite cross-border loop, but the new version does not work.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87346 Bug ID: 87346 Summary: The compiler of the old version (for example: 4.9.3 version or 6.3.0 version) can stop the infinite cross-border loop, but the new version does not work.

[Bug target/87288] [8/9 Regression] Segfault after const_cast with "-O2 -ftree-loop-vectorize" but _without_ "-mavx"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87288 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.3.1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/87336] [8/9 regression] wrong output for pointer dummy assiocated to target actual argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87336 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug bootstrap/87338] gcc 8.2 fails to bootstrap on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87338 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Target|

[Bug c/87346] The compiler of the old version (for example: 4.9.3 version or 6.3.0 version) can stop the infinite cross-border loop, but the new version does not work.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87346 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/87342] [9 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 10 does not dominate use in block 8)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87342 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/87345] The compiler of the old version (for example: 4.9.3 version or 6.3.0 version) can stop the infinite cross-border loop, but the new version does not work.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87345 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 87346 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/87341] gfortran can not link executables: _edata: invalid version 21 (max 4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87341 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to mi+gcc from comment #4) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > > This is a binutils bug, in gold. > > --enable-gold > > > > Please report this to binutils instead. > > Is there a work-

[Bug c/87347] ICE in warn_for_abs at gcc/c/c-parser.c:9226 since r264368

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87347 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/87347] New: ICE in warn_for_abs at gcc/c/c-parser.c:9226 since r264368

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87347 Bug ID: 87347 Summary: ICE in warn_for_abs at gcc/c/c-parser.c:9226 since r264368 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/87345] The compiler of the old version (for example: 4.9.3 version or 6.3.0 version) can stop the infinite cross-border loop, but the new version does not work.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87345 --- Comment #4 from jingtian at loongson dot cn --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > *** Bug 87346 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** It might be because of the network, I submitted twice, sorry

[Bug c/87344] archival/libarchive/decompress_gunzip.c:1139:2: error: size of unnamed array is negative

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87344 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/87196] ICE in vectorizable_load, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8043

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87196 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- May I please ping this, can anybody reproduce that?

[Bug target/87344] archival/libarchive/decompress_gunzip.c:1139:2: error: size of unnamed array is negative, -mms-bitfields influences non-bitfield struct layout

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87344 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ABI Target|

[Bug target/87344] archival/libarchive/decompress_gunzip.c:1139:2: error: size of unnamed array is negative, -mms-bitfields influences non-bitfield struct layout

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87344 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/52991] [6/7/8 Regression] attribute packed broken on mingw32?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52991 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yellowriver2010 at hotmail dot com --- C

[Bug c++/87340] Stack overflow problem for c++filt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87340 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/87333] A stack overflow problem for c++filt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87333 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/87335] The stack overflow in function cplus_demangle_type in cp-demangle.c:2565 (c++filt -t)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87335 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug testsuite/87339] [9 Regression] gcc.dg/warn-abs-1.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87339 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/67513] ASAN: Not optimal shadow value check (unlikely condition checked in fast path)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67513 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|marxin at gcc dot

[Bug c/87348] Implement -Watomic-implicit-seq-cst

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87348 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c/87348] New: Implement -Watomic-implicit-seq-cst

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87348 Bug ID: 87348 Summary: Implement -Watomic-implicit-seq-cst Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Ass

[Bug c++/87335] The stack overflow in function cplus_demangle_type in cp-demangle.c:2565 (c++filt -t)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87335 --- Comment #2 from Cheng Wen --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > Is the input a valid C++ mangled name of not? Hi, This input is obtained through fuzzing technology. Our fuzzer get some test cases by mutating a valid input. This ca

[Bug tree-optimization/87349] New: [9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in useless_type_conversion_p or is_gimple_reg_type)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87349 Bug ID: 87349 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in useless_type_conversion_p or is_gimple_reg_type) Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/55588] Failure to diagnose non-template-id prefixed by keyword template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55588 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2017-08-21 00:00:00 |2018-9-18 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan

[Bug c++/87340] Stack overflow problem for c++filt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87340 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- No. None of them look valid.

[Bug c++/87333] A stack overflow problem for c++filt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87333 --- Comment #2 from Cheng Wen --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > Is the input a valid C++ mangled name of not? Hi, This input is obtained through fuzzing technology. Our fuzzer get some test cases by mutating a valid input. This ca

[Bug c++/87335] The stack overflow in function cplus_demangle_type in cp-demangle.c:2565 (c++filt -t)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87335 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- No, it's not a valid name. I can't reproduce a crash using the latest code from GCC though.

[Bug c++/87340] Stack overflow problem for c++filt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87340 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Then it would deserve something like segfault-on-invalid-input :) Or should I use ice-on-invalid-code?

[Bug c++/81880] thread_local static member template initialisation fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81880 Latimerius changed: What|Removed |Added CC||latimerius at seznam dot cz --- Comment #2

[Bug gcov-profile/85871] [8 Regression] g++.dg/gcov/gcov-8.C random failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85871 --- Comment #13 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Sep 18 09:32:09 2018 New Revision: 264387 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264387&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport r264363 2018-09-18 Martin Liska Backport from mainl

[Bug c/87347] ICE in warn_for_abs at gcc/c/c-parser.c:9226 since r264368

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87347 --- Comment #1 from Martin Jambor --- Bah, I should have thought about this. The following will fix it, I'll properly test it and submit a patch later this week. diff --git a/gcc/c/c-parser.c b/gcc/c/c-parser.c index 1766a256633..a96d15fef1d 10

[Bug c++/87350] New: NULL-Pointer problem in cplus-dem.c when executing program c++filt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87350 Bug ID: 87350 Summary: NULL-Pointer problem in cplus-dem.c when executing program c++filt Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/87350] NULL-Pointer problem in cplus-dem.c when executing program c++filt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87350 --- Comment #1 from Cheng Wen --- Created attachment 44714 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44714&action=edit POC1

[Bug c++/87350] NULL-Pointer problem in cplus-dem.c when executing program c++filt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87350 --- Comment #2 from Cheng Wen --- Created attachment 44715 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44715&action=edit POC2

[Bug c++/87335] The stack overflow in function cplus_demangle_type in cp-demangle.c:2565 (c++filt -t)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87335 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/87340] Stack overflow problem for c++filt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87340 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/87335] The stack overflow in function cplus_demangle_type in cp-demangle.c:2565 (c++filt -t)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87335 --- Comment #5 from Cheng Wen --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4) > Are you sure you attached the right file? When I try to demangle the > attachment it doesn't crash, the __cxa_demangle file returns -2, meaning the > name is not va

[Bug c++/80635] std::optional and bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80635 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/87333] A stack overflow problem for c++filt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87333 --- Comment #3 from Cheng Wen --- Created attachment 44716 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44716&action=edit POC1 I have the new POC to add. Please use the “c++filt < $POC ” to reproduce the bug. Please check it and debug it

[Bug c++/87333] A stack overflow problem for c++filt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87333 --- Comment #4 from Cheng Wen --- Created attachment 44717 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44717&action=edit POC2 I have the new POC to add. Please use the “c++filt < $POC ” to reproduce the bug. Please check it and debug it

[Bug c++/87335] The stack overflow in function cplus_demangle_type in cp-demangle.c:2565 (c++filt -t)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87335 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Cheng Wen from comment #5) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4) > > Are you sure you attached the right file? When I try to demangle the > > attachment it doesn't crash, the __cxa_de

[Bug gcov-profile/85871] g++.dg/gcov/gcov-8.C random failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85871 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/87350] NULL-Pointer problem in cplus-dem.c when executing program c++filt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87350 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/87335] The stack overflow in function cplus_demangle_type in cp-demangle.c:2565 (c++filt -t)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87335 --- Comment #7 from Cheng Wen --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6) Considering the memory size of different machines, maybe more 'P' is needed to trigger this bug in the input.

[Bug c++/87335] The stack overflow in function cplus_demangle_type in cp-demangle.c:2565 (c++filt -t)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87335 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- It still works for up to ten million characters: $ for i in `seq 1 10` ; do printf P ; done | /tmp/binutils/bin/c++filt -t ; echo PP $ for i in `seq 1 100` ; do printf P ; done | /tmp/binutils/bin/

[Bug c++/87350] NULL-Pointer problem in cplus-dem.c when executing program c++filt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87350 --- Comment #4 from Cheng Wen --- Yes. One input test case is "_GLOBAL_$D$__tf30___0__". Another input test case is "__thunk_0__0__$__H1". I see that you can you can reproduce this error. Do you know the reason for this bug?

[Bug c++/54052] g++ takes excessive time in opt and generate phase; can lead to Segmentation Fault when not enough memory available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54052 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2017-08-22 00:00:00 |2018-9-18 CC|redi at g

[Bug tree-optimization/87342] [9 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 10 does not dominate use in block 8)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87342 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Thanks, that's another case similar to PR87263 where we cannot use dominated_by_p_w_unex. But I think the error is in computation of max_rpo for BB 15 which is 6 instead of 13. Because we're supposed to ma

[Bug preprocessor/87351] New: misleading error message: missing binary operator before token "("

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87351 Bug ID: 87351 Summary: misleading error message: missing binary operator before token "(" Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/87338] gcc 8.2 fails to bootstrap on ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87338 --- Comment #3 from Jason Duerstock --- Yes. From the Debian build log: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-7&arch=ia64&ver=7.3.0-29&stamp=1536161281&raw=0

[Bug rtl-optimization/86882] [9 Regression] ICE in reg_overlap_mentioned_p, at rtlanal.c:1873

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86882 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassig

[Bug target/87330] ICE in scan_rtx_reg, at regrename.c:1097

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87330 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed

[Bug preprocessor/87351] misleading error message: missing binary operator before token "("

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87351 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug fortran/87352] New: Large stack usage with new gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352 Bug ID: 87352 Summary: Large stack usage with new gfortran Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug other/87353] New: gcc man page formatting issue due to leading spaces in .texi contents

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87353 Bug ID: 87353 Summary: gcc man page formatting issue due to leading spaces in .texi contents Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/87353] gcc man page formatting issue due to leading spaces in .texi contents

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87353 --- Comment #1 from Vincent Lefèvre --- The bug may be in contrib/texi2pod.pl as the following pod text is generated: Therefore, the G++ and driver automatically adds B<-shared-libgcc> whenever you build a shared library or a main executable, b

[Bug c++/87335] The stack overflow in function cplus_demangle_type in cp-demangle.c:2565 (c++filt -t)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87335 --- Comment #9 from Cheng Wen --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8) Hi Jonathan, I debugged with this POC again. I still think it's a problem. I will show you the debug process as follow. > $ gdb ./c++filt > Reading symbols from ./

[Bug fortran/87341] gfortran can not link executables: _edata: invalid version 21 (max 4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87341 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug middle-end/63155] [6/7/8/9 Regression] memory hog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63155 --- Comment #26 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Sep 18 13:26:05 2018 New Revision: 264388 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264388&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-18 Richard Biener PR middle-end/63155 * tr

[Bug fortran/87341] gfortran can not link executables: _edata: invalid version 21 (max 4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87341 mi+gcc at aldan dot algebra.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Res

[Bug fortran/87341] gfortran can not link executables: _edata: invalid version 21 (max 4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87341 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to mi+gcc from comment #7) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6) > > This sounds like > > > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23499 > > > > Please try binutils 2.31 branch. > > Actual

[Bug fortran/87341] gfortran can not link executables: _edata: invalid version 21 (max 4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87341 --- Comment #9 from mi+gcc at aldan dot algebra.com --- > I said binutils 2.31 branch, not 2.31 release. The work I'm doing is meant for eventual production use. The company has swallowed the use of free software, but using _unreleased_ versions

[Bug other/87353] gcc man page formatting issue due to leading spaces in .texi contents

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87353 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation Status|UNCON

[Bug c++/86881] [8, 9 regression] tree check fail with flag Wshadow-compatible-local

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86881 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Tue Sep 18 13:52:30 2018 New Revision: 264391 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264391&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PATCH c++/86881] -Wshadow-local-compatible ICE https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/

[Bug other/87353] gcc man page formatting issue due to leading spaces in .texi contents

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87353 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Also, "Therefore, the G++ and driver" is nonsense.

[Bug other/87353] gcc man page formatting issue due to leading spaces in .texi contents

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87353 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- This was introduced by r242433 https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/trunk/gcc/doc/invoke.texi?limit_changes=0&r1=242433&r2=242432&pathrev=242433

[Bug target/87104] missed &, == optimization makes Emacs ~0.4% slower on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87104 pipcet at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #44617|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug testsuite/87339] [9 Regression] gcc.dg/warn-abs-1.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87339 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/87341] gfortran can not link executables: _edata: invalid version 21 (max 4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87341 --- Comment #10 from mi+gcc at aldan dot algebra.com --- (In reply to mi+gcc from comment #9) > Is this it, for example: > > https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-08/msg00227.html Applied the patch to the 2.31 release, rebuilt/reinstal

[Bug other/87353] gcc man page formatting issue due to leading spaces in .texi contents

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87353 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug other/87353] gcc man page formatting issue due to leading spaces in .texi contents

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87353 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Sep 18 14:19:55 2018 New Revision: 264395 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264395&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR other/87353 fix formatting and grammar in manual The changes to invok

[Bug fortran/87341] gfortran can not link executables: _edata: invalid version 21 (max 4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87341 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to mi+gcc from comment #10) > (In reply to mi+gcc from comment #9) > > Is this it, for example: > > > > https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-08/msg00227.html > > Applied the patch to the 2.3

[Bug fortran/87341] gfortran can not link executables: _edata: invalid version 21 (max 4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87341 --- Comment #12 from mi+gcc at aldan dot algebra.com --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #11) > Please show the output of: > > $ objdump -T > /prod/pfe/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8/../../../../lib64/libgfortran. > so | grep corrupt Neit

[Bug target/87354] New: x86-64: 16- and 32-byte register variables cannot be put in XMM16/YMM16 and up without -mavx512vl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87354 Bug ID: 87354 Summary: x86-64: 16- and 32-byte register variables cannot be put in XMM16/YMM16 and up without -mavx512vl Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/87341] gfortran can not link executables: _edata: invalid version 21 (max 4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87341 --- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to mi+gcc from comment #12) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #11) > > Please show the output of: > > > > $ objdump -T > > /prod/pfe/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8/../../../../lib64/libgfortran.

[Bug c++/86881] [8, 9 regression] tree check fail with flag Wshadow-compatible-local

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86881 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Tue Sep 18 15:06:35 2018 New Revision: 264396 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264396&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [PATCH c++/86881] -Wshadow-local-compatible ICE https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/

[Bug c++/85137] [concepts] ICE with undeclared concept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85137 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|paolo.carlin

[Bug c++/86881] [8, 9 regression] tree check fail with flag Wshadow-compatible-local

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86881 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/87340] Stack overflow problem for c++filt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87340 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug fortran/87341] gfortran can not link executables: _edata: invalid version 21 (max 4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87341 --- Comment #14 from mi+gcc at aldan dot algebra.com --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13) > Please try binutils 2.31 branch from: > > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/ > binutils-2_31-branch I'm sorry,

[Bug fortran/87341] gfortran can not link executables: _edata: invalid version 21 (max 4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87341 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/86882] [9 Regression] ICE in reg_overlap_mentioned_p, at rtlanal.c:1873

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86882 --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Tue Sep 18 16:19:56 2018 New Revision: 264400 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264400&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Handle CLOBBER in reg_overlap_mentioned_p (PR86882) Combine will pu

[Bug rtl-optimization/86882] [9 Regression] ICE in reg_overlap_mentioned_p, at rtlanal.c:1873

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86882 --- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Tue Sep 18 16:24:58 2018 New Revision: 264401 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264401&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport PR86882 fix to 8 PR rtl-optimization/86882

[Bug rtl-optimization/86882] [9 Regression] ICE in reg_overlap_mentioned_p, at rtlanal.c:1873

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86882 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/85065] [concepts] ICE with invalid use of a concept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85065 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Sep 18 16:35:27 2018 New Revision: 264402 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264402&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2018-09-18 Paolo Carlini PR c++/85065 *

[Bug c++/85065] [concepts] ICE with invalid use of a concept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85065 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 85065, which changed state. Bug 85065 Summary: [concepts] ICE with invalid use of a concept https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85065 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/85954] [8/9 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:266

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85954 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Sep 18 17:54:20 2018 New Revision: 264404 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264404&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-18 Paul Thomas PR fortran/85954 * resolve.c (res

[Bug fortran/87336] [8/9 regression] wrong output for pointer dummy assiocated to target actual argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87336 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Sep 18 17:58:20 2018 New Revision: 264405 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264405&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-18 Paul Thomas PR fortran/87336 * trans-array.c

[Bug fortran/85954] [8/9 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:266

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85954 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/87355] New: missed comparison optimizations (grep DFA, x86-64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87355 Bug ID: 87355 Summary: missed comparison optimizations (grep DFA, x86-64) Product: gcc Version: 8.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug target/87355] missed comparison optimizations (grep DFA, x86-64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87355 --- Comment #1 from eggert at cs dot ucla.edu --- Created attachment 44721 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44721&action=edit Assembly-language output of 'gcc -O2 -S t.c'

[Bug tree-optimization/87355] missed comparison optimizations (grep DFA, x86-64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87355 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Component|t

[Bug fortran/86830] [8/9 Regression] Contiguous array pointer function result not recognized as contiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86830 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Tue Sep 18 19:16:24 2018 New Revision: 264407 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264407&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-18 Janus Weil Backport from trunk PR

  1   2   >