[Bug tree-optimization/85935] [8/9 Regression] [graphite] ICE in extract_affine, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:287

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85935 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jun 7 07:01:56 2018 New Revision: 261263 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261263&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-06-07 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/85935

[Bug c++/85885] internal compiler error, gimplify.c related

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85885 --- Comment #2 from Huiqun Zhou --- Hi， I've tried several version of gcc, here is a brief report: My OS: CentOS 7 update 5 Target code: lammps 16Mar2018 gcc versionresult 4.8.5fail 6.3.1success

[Bug tree-optimization/85935] [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE in extract_affine, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:287

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85935 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||9.0 Summary|[8/9 Regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/85964] [8/9 Regression] compile time hog w/ -O3 -ftracer -fno-guess-branch-probability

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85964 --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener --- On both trunk and branch the tracer induced issue is fixed and the backwards threading compile-time-hog remains (which may very well be a dup of PR69580).

[Bug tree-optimization/69615] 0 to limit signed range checks don't always use unsigned compare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69615 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 7 07:41:18 2018 New Revision: 261264 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261264&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/69615 * tree-ssa-reassoc.c (optimize_

[Bug tree-optimization/84353] [8/9 Regression] [graphite] ICE in set_codegen_error, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:206

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84353 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- I'm testing a cleanup/fix in this area but ultimatively we have no way of code-generating this 1:1 so unless we invent more magic pattern-matching a code-generating failure and thus late abort is the correct

[Bug middle-end/86078] Documentation: missing param default values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86078 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug driver/86077] gcc does not recognize --param key=value when surrounded by single quotes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86077 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- You can use alternative syntax --param=max-inline-insns-sinle=500 (note the space being replaced with a =).

[Bug tree-optimization/86076] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: location references block not in block tree)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86076 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||openmp Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/86075] dead store elimination defeats strlen optimization after memset zero followed by strcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86075 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/86073] -O3 arm generates calls to memset even for known at the compile time very small sizes (<=3)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86073 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/86072] Poor codegen with atomics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86072 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/86070] [7 regression] gfortran.dg/fmt_zero_digits.f90 segmentation fault starting with r261077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86070 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Known to work|

[Bug c++/86060] [6/7/8/9 Regression] g++ ICE at on with "c++03" in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:15459

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86060 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug preprocessor/86079] New: preprocessor fails to splice lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86079 Bug ID: 86079 Summary: preprocessor fails to splice lines Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: preprocessor

[Bug preprocessor/86079] preprocessor fails to splice lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86079 --- Comment #1 from jbeulich at novell dot com --- Interesting - with -P the problem goes away.

[Bug preprocessor/86079] preprocessor fails to splice lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86079 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- I don't see any difference in the preprocessor out with or without -P apart from the line comments.

[Bug preprocessor/86079] preprocessor fails to splice lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86079 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- Did you use -xassembler-with-cpp? Without that it's INVALID.

[Bug preprocessor/86079] preprocessor fails to splice lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86079 --- Comment #4 from jbeulich at novell dot com --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #3) > Did you use -xassembler-with-cpp? Without that it's INVALID. No, I did not, and the example given also is plain C code (minus the too many backslas

[Bug fortran/49213] [OOP] gfortran rejects structure constructor expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49213 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|un

[Bug preprocessor/86079] preprocessor fails to splice lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86079 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- It's not plain C since the stray backslashes are invalid.

[Bug fortran/49213] [OOP] gfortran rejects structure constructor expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49213 --- Comment #29 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Another very related test case: program p type tContainer class(*), allocatable :: x end type integer, parameter :: i = 0 type(tContainer) :: cont ! compiler error: Can't

[Bug preprocessor/86079] preprocessor fails to splice lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86079 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab --- In C mode, with line numbers, the newlines are required to preserve the line number of the tokens.

[Bug preprocessor/86079] preprocessor fails to splice lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86079 --- Comment #7 from jbeulich at novell dot com --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #5) > It's not plain C since the stray backslashes are invalid. As said - try with the stray ones removed, i.e. unsigned \ int \ u \ ; This _is_ valid C

[Bug preprocessor/86079] preprocessor fails to splice lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86079 --- Comment #8 from jbeulich at novell dot com --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #6) > In C mode, with line numbers, the newlines are required to preserve the line > number of the tokens. I don't think preserving line numbers is more i

[Bug preprocessor/86079] preprocessor fails to splice lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86079 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab --- There is no conformance bug because the standard does not specify a textual representation of the preprocessor phases. Also, your input is INVALID C anyway.

[Bug preprocessor/86079] preprocessor fails to splice lines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86079 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/85588] [6/7 Regression] -fwrapv miscompilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85588 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jun 7 10:10:00 2018 New Revision: 261269 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261269&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-06-07 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug middle-end/85567] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5797 when using sincos()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85567 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jun 7 10:10:00 2018 New Revision: 261269 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261269&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-06-07 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug tree-optimization/85597] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85597 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jun 7 10:10:00 2018 New Revision: 261269 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261269&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-06-07 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug c/86080] New: Using FLTO ends up in huge package size (jansson zeromq zlib)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86080 Bug ID: 86080 Summary: Using FLTO ends up in huge package size (jansson zeromq zlib) Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/86080] Using FLTO ends up in huge package size (jansson zeromq zlib)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86080 --- Comment #1 from Balazs Vinarz --- Created attachment 44244 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44244&action=edit zlib.7z

[Bug c/86080] Using FLTO ends up in huge package size (jansson zeromq zlib)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86080 --- Comment #2 from Balazs Vinarz --- Created attachment 44245 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44245&action=edit jansson.png

[Bug c/86080] Using FLTO ends up in huge package size (jansson zeromq zlib)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86080 --- Comment #4 from Balazs Vinarz --- Created attachment 44247 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44247&action=edit zlib.png

[Bug c/86080] Using FLTO ends up in huge package size (jansson zeromq zlib)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86080 --- Comment #3 from Balazs Vinarz --- Created attachment 44246 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44246&action=edit zeromq.png

[Bug tree-optimization/86072] Poor codegen with atomics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86072 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug c/86080] Using FLTO ends up in huge package size (jansson zeromq zlib)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86080 --- Comment #5 from Balazs Vinarz --- Link for the zeromq.7z: https://drive.google.com/open?id=15GwJ8EnlxYzFUHtzf30mf4gxqC74l1p6

[Bug pending/86081] New: expecting integer value - internal compiler error: Aborted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86081 Bug ID: 86081 Summary: expecting integer value - internal compiler error: Aborted Product: gcc Version: 5.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug c/86080] Using FLTO ends up in huge package size (jansson zeromq zlib)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86080 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug pending/86081] expecting integer value - internal compiler error: Aborted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86081 --- Comment #1 from ptdrnvqd at 10mail dot org --- either might be a factor: -floop-interchange -floop-strip-mine -floop-block

[Bug pending/86081] expecting integer value - internal compiler error: Aborted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86081 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug target/85684] output of instrinsic _xgetbv is wrongly overwritten

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85684 Fang Pengfei changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pffang at vip dot qq.com --- Comment #1 f

[Bug sanitizer/84761] AddressSanitizer is not compatible with glibc 2.27 on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84761 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jun 7 11:56:25 2018 New Revision: 261272 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261272&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-06-07 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug sanitizer/84761] AddressSanitizer is not compatible with glibc 2.27 on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84761 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.3.1, 8.1.0 Known to fail|

[Bug middle-end/85567] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.c:5797 when using sincos()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85567 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug target/85684] output of instrinsic _xgetbv is wrongly overwritten

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85684 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/85684] output of instrinsic _xgetbv is wrongly overwritten

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85684 --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > This has been fixed with r260135 on the trunk. > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-05/msg00515.html > Uros, are you going to backport at least the _xgetbv fix

[Bug target/85684] output of instrinsic _xgetbv is wrongly overwritten

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85684 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/86068] __cpp_transactional_memory is 210500

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86068 --- Comment #2 from Rasmus Villemoes --- The page https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html probably needs to be updated to say __cpp_transactional_memory >= 201500.

[Bug debug/84342] Location views breaks cross builds of arm including gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84342 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug target/63177] Powerpc no-vfa-vect-depend-2.c and no-vfa-vect-depend-3.c failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63177 --- Comment #12 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Thu Jun 7 13:59:37 2018 New Revision: 261275 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261275&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2018-06-06 Peter Bergner

[Bug target/63177] Powerpc no-vfa-vect-depend-2.c and no-vfa-vect-depend-3.c failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63177 --- Comment #13 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Thu Jun 7 14:01:57 2018 New Revision: 261276 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261276&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2018-06-06 Peter Bergner

[Bug c/85318] -Wc90-c99-compat does not warn about for loop initial declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85318 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug target/63177] Powerpc no-vfa-vect-depend-2.c and no-vfa-vect-depend-3.c failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63177 --- Comment #14 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Thu Jun 7 14:03:35 2018 New Revision: 261277 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261277&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2018-06-06 Peter Bergner

[Bug target/63177] Powerpc no-vfa-vect-depend-2.c and no-vfa-vect-depend-3.c failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63177 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/85536] ICE on procedure pointer assignment for subroutine with procedure pointer argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85536 --- Comment #2 from Tiziano Müller --- Ok, I got around to generate a backtrace from gfortran: [...] Starting program: /home/tiziano/tmp/gfortran/gcc/f951 ice_minimal_rep.f90 -quiet -dumpbase ice_minimal_rep.f90 -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -aux

[Bug target/85755] PowerPC Gcc's -mupdate produces inefficient code on power8/power9 machines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85755 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/85577] list-initialization chooses initializer-list constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85577 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86082] New: user-defined literals are not converted to the execution charset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86082 Bug ID: 86082 Summary: user-defined literals are not converted to the execution charset Product: gcc Version: 8.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/86082] user-defined literals are not converted to the execution charset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86082 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64 Host|

[Bug tree-optimization/86042] [8/9 Regression] missing strlen optimization after second strcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86042 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug tree-optimization/86043] strlen after memcpy partially overwriting a string not optimized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86043 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/85684] output of instrinsic _xgetbv is wrongly overwritten

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85684 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Thu Jun 7 16:37:01 2018 New Revision: 261283 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261283&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/85684 * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_

[Bug target/85684] output of instrinsic _xgetbv is wrongly overwritten

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85684 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/86083] New: handle non-constant assignments in strlen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86083 Bug ID: 86083 Summary: handle non-constant assignments in strlen Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: tree

[Bug fortran/85641] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE with string concatenate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85641 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Thu Jun 7 17:33:44 2018 New Revision: 261285 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261285&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-06-07 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/85641 Backport f

[Bug fortran/86045] ICE in reduce_binary_ac, at fortran/arith.c:1308

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86045 --- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Jun 7 17:53:11 2018 New Revision: 261286 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261286&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-06-07 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/86045

[Bug c++/84884] [DR 2244] [C++17] protected constructor and aggregate initialization of base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84884 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/86084] New: trunk/gcc/config/m32c/m32c.c:4368: suspicious comparison ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86084 Bug ID: 86084 Summary: trunk/gcc/config/m32c/m32c.c:4368: suspicious comparison ? Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug fortran/85641] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE with string concatenate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85641 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Thu Jun 7 18:13:33 2018 New Revision: 261289 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261289&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-06-07 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/85641 Backport f

[Bug fortran/85641] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE with string concatenate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85641 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] [F03] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Bug 68241 depends on bug 85641, which changed state. Bug 85641 Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] ICE with string concatenate https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85641 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/86045] ICE in reduce_binary_ac, at fortran/arith.c:1308

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86045 --- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Jun 7 18:17:49 2018 New Revision: 261290 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261290&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-06-07 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/86045

[Bug fortran/86045] ICE in reduce_binary_ac, at fortran/arith.c:1308

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86045 --- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Jun 7 18:39:30 2018 New Revision: 261291 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261291&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-06-07 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/86045

[Bug fortran/86045] ICE in reduce_binary_ac, at fortran/arith.c:1308

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86045 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/86051] internal compiler error: in conv_function_val, at fortran/trans-expr.c:3717

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86051 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Depends on|

[Bug c/85318] -Wc90-c99-compat does not warn about for loop initial declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85318 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu Jun 7 19:15:45 2018 New Revision: 261293 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261293&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/85318 * c-decl.c (check_for_loop_decls): Add -Wc90

[Bug c/85318] -Wc90-c99-compat does not warn about for loop initial declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85318 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/45879] strcpy returns unexpected result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45879 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/86085] New: I/O built-ins considered argument clobbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86085 Bug ID: 86085 Summary: I/O built-ins considered argument clobbers Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-opt

[Bug fortran/85631] [8/9 Regression] Runtime error message array bound mismatch with nonzero optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85631 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig --- The matmul inlining is only exposing a bug in reshape with allocatable variables. This also fails: $ cat a.f90 implicit none integer, parameter :: N=2 real, dimension(:,:), allocatable :: block_1 re

[Bug lto/86086] New: lto1: internal compiler error: in odr_types_equivalent_p, at ipa-devirt.c:1256

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86086 Bug ID: 86086 Summary: lto1: internal compiler error: in odr_types_equivalent_p, at ipa-devirt.c:1256 Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/86059] ICE in reduce_binary_ac, at fortran/arith.c:1308 (and others)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86059 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug middle-end/85620] Missing ENDBR after swapcontext

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85620 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX

[Bug target/81652] [meta-bug] -fcf-protection=full bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81652 Bug 81652 depends on bug 85620, which changed state. Bug 85620 Summary: Missing ENDBR after swapcontext https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85620 What|Removed |Added

[Bug lto/86086] lto1: internal compiler error: in odr_types_equivalent_p, at ipa-devirt.c:1256

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86086 --- Comment #1 from ptdrnvqd at 10mail dot org --- Created attachment 44249 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44249&action=edit redo -save-temps output for gcc 8.1.0, add flto to link flags

[Bug lto/86086] lto1: internal compiler error: in odr_types_equivalent_p, at ipa-devirt.c:1256

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86086 --- Comment #2 from ptdrnvqd at 10mail dot org --- same error when gcc 8.1.0, (even though added -flto missing in link flags earlier) gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/8/lto-wrapper OFF

[Bug lto/86086] lto1: internal compiler error: in odr_types_equivalent_p, at ipa-devirt.c:1256

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86086 --- Comment #3 from ptdrnvqd at 10mail dot org --- Created attachment 44250 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44250&action=edit gcc 8.1.0 output

[Bug libgomp/63327] Poor caret location in error mesage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63327 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/86087] New: ICE in rtl_verify_fallthru, at cfgrtl.c:2911 (error: verify_flow_info: Incorrect fallthru 8->9; error: wrong insn in the fallthru edge)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86087 Bug ID: 86087 Summary: ICE in rtl_verify_fallthru, at cfgrtl.c:2911 (error: verify_flow_info: Incorrect fallthru 8->9; error: wrong insn in the fallthru edge) Product: gcc

[Bug fortran/63514] functions containing volatile are considered pure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63514 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug libgomp/86088] New: #pragma omp parallel for freezes if other processes are running

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86088 Bug ID: 86088 Summary: #pragma omp parallel for freezes if other processes are running Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/82479] missing popcount builtin detection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82479 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski --- Latest patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg00358.html