https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83748
--- Comment #6 from Sumit ---
mstrict-align does not seems to help. Only aligning them forcefully does work.
ome_CardCfgPxfp_t xfpPecInfo __attribute__((aligned(4)));
ome_CardCfgPsfp_t sfpPecInfo __attribute__
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83575
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Wed Jan 10 08:19:52 2018
New Revision: 256420
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256420&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/83575
* predict.c (force_edge_cold): Handle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008
--- Comment #21 from sergey.shalnov at intel dot com ---
Thanks Richard for your comments.
Based on our discussion I've produced the patch attached and
run it on SPEC2017intrate/fprate on skylake server (with [-Ofast -flto
-march=skylake-avx512 -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83532
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83765
Bug ID: 83765
Summary: LTO bootstrap with Ada fails
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83765
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Doesn't seem to work :/
I guess making the old_die && declaration more prevalent might work.
Index: gcc/dwarf2out.c
===
--- gcc/dwarf2out.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008
--- Comment #23 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 43084
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43084&action=edit
SLP costing for constants/externs improvement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008
--- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018, sergey.shalnov at intel dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008
>
> --- Comment #21 from sergey.shalnov at intel dot com ---
> Thanks Richard for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008
--- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018, sergey.shalnov at intel dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008
>
> --- Comment #21 from sergey.shalnov at intel dot com ---
> Thanks Richard for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83766
Bug ID: 83766
Summary: Bug 67632 not fixed yet
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67632
Anthony Chuah changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||achuah at drwsg dot com
--- Comment #8 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83706
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
Yep, those rounding issues are anoying. It won't buy us any code quality but I
guess using sreals for change prob is most consistent way around. It seems
that sreals are quite prone to rounding issues :(.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67632
--- Comment #9 from Anthony Chuah ---
Forgot to add: this bug exists also for clang 5.0.0.
% clang++ -std=c++11 --gcc-toolchain=/path/to/gcc t.o x.cc
/tmp/x-063634.o: In function `copy(std::unordered_map,
std::equal_to, std::allocator > > const&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83726
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43085
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43085&action=edit
gcc8-pr83726.patch
Actually, because *movdi_aarch64 can handle any (DImode) CONST_INT operand,
there is no reas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83756
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-reduction
--- Comment #6 from Ric
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83764
Adam Lackorzynski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adam at os dot
inf.tu-dresden.de
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83760
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67632
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab ---
*** Bug 83766 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83766
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81702
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lesliezhai at llvm dot org.cn
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83764
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83765
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83723
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Do you perhaps have the unreduced preprocessed source + full command line?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83765
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83765
>
> Eric Botcazou changed:
>
>What|Removed |Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008
--- Comment #24 from sergey.shalnov at intel dot com ---
Richard,
The latest "SLP costing for constants/externs improvement" patch generates the
same code as baseline for the test example.
Are you sure that "num_vects_to_check" should 1 if vector
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83189
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
The fix at updating time is to promote to non-guessed 0 when it is demanded.
Index: tree-ssa-loop-manip.c
===
--- tree-ssa-loop-manip.c (rev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83761
--- Comment #1 from Sebastian Huber ---
Created attachment 43086
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43086&action=edit
Makefile to build the cross GCC
Use
make clone
make install/bin/bfin-rtems5-ld
make install/bin/bfin-rtems5-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008
--- Comment #25 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018, sergey.shalnov at intel dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008
>
> --- Comment #24 from sergey.shalnov at intel dot com ---
> Richard,
> The lat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83765
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||derodat at adacore dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83687
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008
--- Comment #26 from sergey.shalnov at intel dot com ---
Sorry, did you meant "arm_sve.h" on ARM?
In this case we have machine specific code in common part of the gcc code.
Should we make it as machine dependent callback function because having
"n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008
--- Comment #27 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018, sergey.shalnov at intel dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83008
>
> --- Comment #26 from sergey.shalnov at intel dot com ---
> Sorry, did you mea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83740
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jb at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82831
--- Comment #31 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Jan 10 10:54:20 2018
New Revision: 256422
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256422&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Clean up partitioning in try_optimize_cfg (PR bootstrap/82831).
2018-01-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82831
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81616
--- Comment #43 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Wed Jan 10 11:02:55 2018
New Revision: 256424
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256424&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/81616
* i386.c (ix86_vectorize_builtin_gather):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81918
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #55 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #54 from Richard Biener ---
> Created attachment 43075
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43075&action=edit
> Updated patch with SHT_GROUP and extended
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83740
--- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Wed Jan 10 11:34:45 2018
New Revision: 256426
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256426&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 83740 Wrong string length type in bounds check
This patch fixes up the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83740
--- Comment #6 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Should be fixed by r256425 (and r256426). Gerhard, can you verify whether the
ICE you reported also goes away, given that neither me nor Jakub in #c3 were
able to reproduce it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.0 |6.5
Summary|[8 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83726
--- Comment #6 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Steve Ellcey from comment #4)
> This looks like the same thing as PR 83632.
It likely is, I don't see it failing with my patch. Older compilers don't
appear to like the Fortran syntax...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83532
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #1)
> Does this help? Seems we omit adjustment when producing partial function
> clone.
>
> Index: tree-inline.c
> ===
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83762
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83763
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
A workaround might be in dwarf2out_function_decl push/pop the decl_die_table
like with a "simple" undo stack:
Index: gcc/dwarf2out.c
===
--- g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83706
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #6)
> Yep, those rounding issues are anoying. It won't buy us any code quality but
> I guess using sreals for change prob is most consistent way around. It
> seems that s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83744
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83746
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83745
Bug ID: 83745
Summary: Errors using the max intrinsic in a PDT length
parameter expression for a function result
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: RESOLVED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83746
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
*** Bug 83745 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
I'm quite sure older GCC must be somehow affected - or I'm really curious how
they are not.
While the patch fixes the dwarf for the small C testcase it doesn't fix the
pr41616-1.c execute fail. The dwarf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Isn't that related to PR68860, where because of LTO breaking
DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGINs we don't emit the more advanced DWARF extensions (or
DWARF5) stuff, like DW_OP_GNU_parameter_ref etc.?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83718
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 43087
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43087&action=edit
test-case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83718
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|marxin at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #56 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
>
> --- Comment #55 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83157
>
> --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Isn't that related to PR68860, where becau
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #34 from Eric Gallag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83753
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Jan 10 13:07:54 2018
New Revision: 256427
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256427&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Don't use permutes for single-element accesses (PR83753)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83753
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81791
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83475
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81997
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83687
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83767
Bug ID: 83767
Summary: -Wsuggest-override suggests to mark as override in
methods marked as final
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83767
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78010
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||albert.astals.cid at kdab dot
com
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81067
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81167
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81184
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81327
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81535
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81550
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81184
--- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon ---
Note that I posted a related patch some time ago:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg01477.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83753
--- Comment #4 from Vidya Praveen ---
Thanks for fixing this, Richard!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83765
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 10 14:23:29 2018
New Revision: 256428
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256428&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-01-10 Richard Biener
PR debug/83765
* dwarf2ou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81635
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81657
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83054
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83055
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> One another test-case with a bit different back-trace:
>
> $ g++
> /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p789a.C
> /dev/null -Wsuggest-f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81843
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81917
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82249
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|diagnostic |rejects-valid
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82362
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82425
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82425
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 10 14:41:34 2018
New Revision: 256429
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256429&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-01-10 Richard Biener
PR debug/82425
* gcc.dg/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82514
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82604
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82682
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82728
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82770
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78768
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 10 14:51:07 2018
New Revision: 256430
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256430&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-01-10 Richard Biener
PR testsuite/78768
* gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82249
--- Comment #5 from Benjamin Buch ---
The code is accepted by clang since version 4.0. Older versions probably don't
support constexpr lambdas.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82824
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #30
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82965
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82982
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 236 matches
Mail list logo