https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81974
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81975
--- Comment #1 from Michał Dominiak ---
I have made a mistake in the original testcase in the original email, here's a
correction email sent to the reflector:
http://lists.isocpp.org/core/2017/08/2828.php.
Barry's minimization of the failing cod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81857
--- Comment #3 from Petr Ovtchenkov ---
Created attachment 42042
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42042&action=edit
proposed test for issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2017-08/msg00036.html
May be worth to add (see issu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
[...]
> They are created that way to make my life easier. They are supposed to be
> valid
> ELF objects and they are according to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79200
tommapson at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Race-Condition in Address |Race-Condition in Address
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63943
Vincent Lefèvre changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79200
--- Comment #6 from tommapson at gmx dot de ---
(Since I do not know whether this is a bug in the realtime-kernel or the
compiler, I also reported it in the kernel bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196767).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67371
Benjamin Buch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||benni.buch at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81979
Bug ID: 81979
Summary: [8 Regression] Assembler messages: Error: can't
resolve `.got2' {.got2 section} - `.LCF0'
{.text.unlikely section}
Product: gcc
Version: 8.
On 16/08/17 18:38, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2017, Eric Gallager wrote:
>> I see Richi redid all his 7.2 release changes; does that imply that
>> the server restore is now complete?
>
> No, there's still a search process ongoing to identify corrupted or
> missing files by comparison wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81747
--- Comment #8 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Fri Aug 25 12:21:00 2017
New Revision: 251349
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251349&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR81747, ICE in operator[]
PR rtl-optimization/81747
* cse.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81747
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81921
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Fri Aug 25 12:32:54 2017
New Revision: 251351
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251351&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Retabify 2017-08-24 Richard Biener
PR target/81921
Modified:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81980
Bug ID: 81980
Summary: Spurious -Wmissing-format-attribute warning in 32-bit
mode
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81980
--- Comment #1 from sgunderson at bigfoot dot com ---
Forgot to say: Also present in trunk r251306 and all the way back to at least
4.8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81981
Bug ID: 81981
Summary: [8 Regression] -fsanitize=undefined makes a
-Wmaybe-uninitialized warning disappear
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81981
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81982
Bug ID: 81982
Summary: [arm] libstdc++ miscompiled, constant propagation is
broken on native arm
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81982
--- Comment #1 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 42044
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42044&action=edit
good ccp1 output from -fdump-tree-all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81982
--- Comment #2 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 42045
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42045&action=edit
bad ccp1 output from -fdump-tree-all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81982
--- Comment #3 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 42046
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42046&action=edit
last matching output (objsz1) from -fdump-tree-all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81982
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81931
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81983
Bug ID: 81983
Summary: sanitizer detects undefined runtime error in
libbacktrace
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81981
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Looks like the problem is that since that revision in .uninit there's
UBSAN_PTR (&t, 0);
and so the warning probably thinks that t escapes and so doesn't warn.
On 8/25/17, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 16/08/17 18:38, Joseph Myers wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Aug 2017, Eric Gallager wrote:
>>> I see Richi redid all his 7.2 release changes; does that imply that
>>> the server restore is now complete?
>>
>> No, there's still a search process ongoing to identify corrup
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81984
Bug ID: 81984
Summary: NULL string pointer dereferencing forces undefined
behaviour in libgfortran
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81985
Bug ID: 81985
Summary: several sanitizer undefined runtime errors in
sanitized libgfortran
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67858
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81986
Bug ID: 81986
Summary: sanitizer detects negation of large number in string.c
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
[...]
>>collect2: fatal error: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation
>>Fault]
>>compilation terminated.
>>ld: warning: file /var/t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77796
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60135
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63519
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63458
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81982
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81931
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78679
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58798
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68160
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66943
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, openmp
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79001
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81504
--- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri Aug 25 15:08:30 2017
New Revision: 251355
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251355&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-08-25 Bill Schmidt
PR target/81504
* config/rs6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80572
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On August 25, 2017 4:14:05 PM GMT+02:00, "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
>
>--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81987
Bug ID: 81987
Summary: ICE in verify_ssa with -O3 -march=skylake-avx512
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81988
Bug ID: 81988
Summary: [7/8 Regression] sparc64: emits STD instruction with
odd register
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81816
--- Comment #2 from Igor Venevtsev ---
Created attachment 42048
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42048&action=edit
simple reproducer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81816
--- Comment #3 from Igor Venevtsev ---
Created attachment 42049
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42049&action=edit
Proposed so-called 'patch';)
I've got an idea to replace target construct by its body in outer context. It
fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81932
--- Comment #18 from Martin Sebor ---
GDB already has a C++ parser. It just isn't good enough. It understands that
B and B are one and the same type but it interprets
A<2> and A<2u> as distinct. In my view, this is not just a limitation but a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81607
--- Comment #13 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Aug 25 16:31:50 2017
New Revision: 251358
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251358&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81607
* cp-gimplify.c (cp_fold): If folding exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81607
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797
--- Comment #9 from Misty De Meo ---
My VM has two cores, and repros this problem.
I reported this to Apple, who assigned the bug ID rdar://33924943. It was
reported to me that Apple engineers believed it was fixed in the latest beta,
but it is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81988
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41423
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68571
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79204
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81851
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81871
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81519
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Santos ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> Ok, so I've briefly investigated source code and providing such information
> is definitely not a simple task :/
Sorry for my late response and thanks for looking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81504
--- Comment #9 from Bill Schmidt ---
Fixed on trunk so far. Will commit backport in about a week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81989
Bug ID: 81989
Summary: Should -finstrument-control-flow -mcet generate ENDBR
for function with __attribute__ ((naked))?
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81990
Bug ID: 81990
Summary: Should -finstrument-control-flow -mcet generate ENDBR
for function with __attribute__ ((interrupt))?
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81833
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81833
--- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt ---
The "altivec_vsumsws" pattern for little endian isn't working as intended.
This needs to be rewritten. So does the "altivec_vsum2sws" pattern. I'll work
on a patch early next week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81986
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69020
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69433
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
68 matches
Mail list logo