https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79452
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79483
Bug ID: 79483
Summary: [7 Regression] [graphite] ICE: verify_ssa failed
(error: definition in block 31 does not dominate use
in block 28)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79483
--- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha ---
int tc, ag;
int
yv (void)
{
int bt[2];
int cu;
bt[0] = 0;
for (tc = 0; tc < 2; ++tc)
{
cu = bt[tc];
for (ag = 0; ag < 2; ++ag)
bt[ag] = 0;
}
return cu;
}
% gcc-7.0.0-alpha2017
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79396
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79483
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79471
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79461
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79481
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The SDM (at least 325462-061) doesn't mention these.
Though: https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/523825
and LLVM has them too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79484
Bug ID: 79484
Summary: Segfault when executing a test in Power8
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79483
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79456
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79481
--- Comment #2 from Wenzel Jakob ---
I agree that the docs from Intel are not particularly consistent. In this case,
the hardware has dedicated instructions for these type of gathers, so it would
make sense for a matching intrinsic to be part of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79457
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79464
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79462
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||sh
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79459
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79461
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79463
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
Summary|ice for -g with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79464
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79471
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79478
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79469
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79460
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79472
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79481
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79472
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79472
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
GCC 6:
void frobulate_for_gcc(uint32_t) (uint32_t v)
{
const char * s;
:
switch (v_2(D)) , case 0: , case 1: , case 2: >
:
goto ();
:
goto ();
:
# s_1 = PHI <"foo"(2), "bar"(3), "spam"(4), 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79472
--- Comment #4 from Yuri Kunde Schlesner ---
Note that, while this particular example uses a noreturn call, the same pattern
applies to any switch where the default case is the only one which has code
that can't be transformed into a table. For e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79433
--- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #19)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #16)
> > Even if we moved our headers to separate directories, it wouldn't make
> > __has_include sufficient..
>
> Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79482
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65656
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mocramis at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43027
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
dup of PR 70811?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70811
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Looks similar to PR 78657 and PR 60875
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78657
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This does seem like a dup of either PR 70811 or PR 60875
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79485
Bug ID: 79485
Summary: Bind(c) and module procedure renaming causes wrong
procedure to be called
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79474
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79476
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Julian Andres Klode from comment #0)
> According to cpp, all functions expand to the same code.
The difference is where the _Pragma is handled.
> This used to work at some point a long time a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79481
--- Comment #4 from Wenzel Jakob ---
I think that's right. Clang e.g. also does this:
#define _mm512_prefetch_i32gather_ps(index, addr, scale, hint) ({\
__builtin_ia32_gatherpfdps((__mmask16) -1, \
(__v16si)(__m512
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79300
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
I've got one similar:
$ cat tc.cpp
#define MOZALLOC_THROW_BAD_ALLOC_IF_HAS_EXCEPTIONS throw(std::bad_alloc)
MOZALLOC_THROW_BAD_ALLOC_IF_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
$ g++ tc.cpp
tc.cpp:1:52: error: expected unqualified-i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79475
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79460
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79460
--- Comment #5 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> > In this case it is complete unrolling that can estimate the non-vector code
> > to constant fold but no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79347
--- Comment #6 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to amker from comment #5)
> Testing a patch, will send for review soon if no failures.
After patching, # of mismatches in profile is improved from:
tramp3d-v4.cpp.157t.ifcvt:296
tramp3d-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79478
prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||prathamesh3492 at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79486
Bug ID: 79486
Summary: [7 Regression]
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79486
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79433
--- Comment #21 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #20)
> A solution that only work for GCC isn't a very good solution, because the
> whole point of the feature-test macros is to have portable checks that work
> across
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79472
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
We can indeed ignore what the default: case does, but only if all the other
case labels form a contiguous range (i.e. there are no gaps in which the
default would need to be supplied).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341
--- Comment #51 from Dominik Vogt ---
With r245382 plus the patch from comment 43, only the failure in null-deref-1.c
is left.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #31
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79483
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
It's gone with ISL 0.18 (and w/ --param graphite-min-loops-per-function=1)
because it does not process any transformation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79471
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] valgrind |valgrind error for
|err
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79471
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Feb 13 13:13:21 2017
New Revision: 245385
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245385&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Replace XALLOCAVEC with XCNEWVEC (PR c/79471).
2017-02-13 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79486
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Feb 13 13:13:29 2017
New Revision: 245386
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245386&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/79486 use lvalues in result_of expressions
PR libst
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79471
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.0
Known to fail|7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79487
Bug ID: 79487
Summary: Invalid _Decimal32 comparison on s390x
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79341
Dominik Vogt changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79488
Bug ID: 79488
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE from lambda that has invalid return
type
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79488
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.3.1
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79486
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79487
--- Comment #1 from Dominik Vogt ---
It seems that the pass ccp1 eliminates all information about the type of "min"?
Before ccp1:
_Decimal32 min;
...
if (min_8 != tem.1_3)
After ccp1:
if (tem.1_3 != -9223372036854775808)
(Or is there
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79479
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79489
Bug ID: 79489
Summary: Strange static branch prediction for n != 0
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66135
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79490
Bug ID: 79490
Summary: ICE when compiling CATCH unit testing framework header
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79472
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 40726
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40726&action=edit
gcc7-pr79472-wip.patch
Untested WIP patch. I believe I still don't handle the PHIs right in the
non-standard d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79490
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79461
--- Comment #2 from Morris Hafner ---
I can see that the ice-on-invalid-code tag was set. This is only true in C++14
mode, because constexpr lambdas are part of the current C++17 draft (see Bug
70979).
The code is also accepted by the current cla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79483
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79479
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Generalized extended testcase:
int
fn1 (long x)
{
if (0)
return __INT_MAX__ + 1;
if (x || 0)
return __INT_MAX__ + 1; /* { dg-warning "integer overflow" } */
if (1 || 0)
return __INT_MAX__
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79472
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Seems even unpatched switchconf isn't able to deal with virtual phis:
void foo (int);
void
f1 (int v, int w)
{
int i;
if (w)
{
foo (23);
i = 129;
}
else
switch (v)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79348
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 13 15:38:33 2017
New Revision: 245389
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245389&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/79348
* config/abi/post/x86_64-linux-gnu/bas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79450
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 13 15:39:59 2017
New Revision: 245390
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245390&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/79388
PR rtl-optimization/79450
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79388
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 13 15:39:59 2017
New Revision: 245390
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245390&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/79388
PR rtl-optimization/79450
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79487
--- Comment #2 from Dominik Vogt ---
Ah, no, the first Rtl pass that produces an incorrect expression is Cse1.
Before:
--
(insn 22 21 23 3 (set (reg:SD 75)
(const_double:SD -9223372036854775808 [N/A])) "decimal32.c":23 1121
{movsd}
(ins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79490
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I can only reproduce this with -fsyntax-only, not when compiling.
Reducing now with C-Reduce
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79449
--- Comment #1 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: acsawdey
Date: Mon Feb 13 16:00:22 2017
New Revision: 245392
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245392&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-13 Aaron Sawdey
PR target/79449
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79490
--- Comment #4 from Vadim Zeitlin ---
I thought it would be simpler to use the URL I provided to download the real
header rather than downloading and uncompressing the attachment (it had to be
compressed due to its size), but, sure, here it is if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79490
--- Comment #5 from Vadim Zeitlin ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> I can only reproduce this with -fsyntax-only, not when compiling.
Oops, you're right, really sorry about not realizing this. I was actually
testing warning gen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79490
--- Comment #3 from Vadim Zeitlin ---
Created attachment 40727
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40727&action=edit
Compressed preprocessed source of a trivial example
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79490
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79479
--- Comment #3 from Bruno Haible ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2)
> int
> fn1 (long x)
> {
> if (0)
> return __INT_MAX__ + 1;
>
> if (x || 0)
> return __INT_MAX__ + 1; /* { dg-warning "integer overflow" } */
>
> if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79403
--- Comment #5 from Dominik Vogt ---
Fixed, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79358
Dominik Vogt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79403
Dominik Vogt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79491
Bug ID: 79491
Summary: Possibly inefficient code for the inner product of two
vectors
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79348
--- Comment #12 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Feb 13 16:47:35 2017
New Revision: 245394
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245394&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
x32: Update baseline_symbols.txt
PR libstdc++/79348
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69148
--- Comment #10 from Dominik Vogt ---
(In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #8)
> I prepared a patch for the distro builds. Any reason that this can't go to
> the gcc-5-branch?
Ping?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79491
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
Did you benchmark it on some unaligned x and y then? Would you care to share
the results?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79492
Bug ID: 79492
Summary: odd behaviour triggered on applying log function
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79449
acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79443
--- Comment #5 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Mon Feb 13 17:37:02 2017
New Revision: 245397
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245397&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/79443
libgo: fix some s390x tests
Add `+buil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79443
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79348
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79479
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
I might, but the front ends, where the warning is taking place, can't see that
the function always returns early.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79388
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79493
Bug ID: 79493
Summary: Bad diagnostic when referring to inner type that does
not exist
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79296
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Mon Feb 13 17:42:31 2017
New Revision: 245398
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245398&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79296 - ICE mangling localized template instantiation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79494
Bug ID: 79494
Summary: ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2330
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79495
Bug ID: 79495
Summary: ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2213
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
