https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77283
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jan 13 08:11:01 2017
New Revision: 244392
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244392&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-13 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/77283
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59461
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ---
> This is a notoriously hard topic to address. All instructions affect the
> full 64-bit register including those that do 32-bit arithmetic i.e. they
> will set/clear the upper bits to replicate bit-31.
So t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77283
--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jan 13 08:47:57 2017
New Revision: 244394
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244394&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-13 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/77283
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79079
--- Comment #3 from Kito Cheng ---
Hi Jakub:
Thank your review, your are right, I might change all gen_lowpart to
convert_modes to deal with all other TRULY_NOOP_TRUNCATION == false case, in
RISC-V and MIPS64 only TRULY_NOOP_TRUNCATION(64, 32) i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79080
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59461
--- Comment #10 from Matthew Fortune ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #9)
> > This is a notoriously hard topic to address. All instructions affect the
> > full 64-bit register including those that do 32-bit arithmetic i.e. they
> > wil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46542
Bug 46542 depends on bug 43174, which changed state.
Bug 43174 Summary: Teaching SCEV about ADDR_EXPR causes regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43174
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43174
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77508
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77568
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77629
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78200
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71737
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78304
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76731
--- Comment #11 from Wenzel Jakob ---
Searching through the intrinsics guide (e.g.
https://software.intel.com/sites/landingpage/IntrinsicsGuide/#text=gather_ps),
I see "void *" for all gather scatter intrinsics and "const void *" for all
gather i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78334
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78887
--- Comment #8 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Fri Jan 13 10:08:50 2017
New Revision: 244402
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244402&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/78887
* asan.c (asan_needs_odr_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78361
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #1 from Richard Bie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78363
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78384
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79076
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78559
--- Comment #7 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> So do you think combiner should throw away the REG_EQUAL note in that case,
> or something different?
It's invalid after transformation, so should be d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59461
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ---
> So are the upper bits for SPARC completely undefined? That would then be the
> major distinction between MIPS and SPARC. The upper bits are defined for MIPS
On the contrary, they are always defined since
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70696
--- Comment #9 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Fri Jan 13 10:22:21 2017
New Revision: 244407
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244407&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2017-01-13 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79058
--- Comment #13 from Andreas Krebbel ---
(In reply to Andreas Krebbel from comment #12)
> The splitter probably is the reason why the early clobber has been added.
> Handling the SImode part separately requires that the source reg does not
> matc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70697
--- Comment #4 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Fri Jan 13 10:39:52 2017
New Revision: 244413
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244413&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2017-01-13 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78932
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78361
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78411
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78469
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78411
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
> Not sure what to do here but certainly adding -ftree-loop-if-convert fixes
> the testcase.
I'd do just that...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78488
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Priority|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78495
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78488
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
clang version 4.0.0 (trunk 291659) accepts this with -std=c++1z as well as
-std=c++14 and -std=c++11.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78411
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jan 13 11:34:40 2017
New Revision: 244427
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244427&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-13 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/78411
* gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78529
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78608
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78361
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78626
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78663
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-apple-darwin10
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78690
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78727
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79069
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78751
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78839
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79081
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78840
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78894
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78897
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79058
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79050
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78983
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78990
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79077
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79080
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78411
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77848
Bug 77848 depends on bug 78411, which changed state.
Bug 78411 Summary: [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr45685.c
scan-assembler-times cmov 6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78411
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79082
Bug ID: 79082
Summary: -Wformat-truncation inconsistent behaviour
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79050
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Either remove or munge somehow so that LTO is not upset about it.
Perhaps the same langhook could even resolve PR77754. Though that PR is a
total mess and I'm lost what to do there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78979
--- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Jan 13 12:09:13 2017
New Revision: 244428
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244428&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Only declare gets for C++ < 2014 on Solaris (PR libstdc++/78979)
PR li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78361
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 13 12:18:42 2017
New Revision: 244432
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244432&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR78361 recognise noexcept functions as referenceable
2017-01-13 Jonath
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78983
--- Comment #2 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Well, this issue more difficult than it looks. I do not presume a solution will
be ready for gcc 7.0. So I do not expect to hold the target milestone.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78361
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79043
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Jan 13 12:56:54 2017
New Revision: 244435
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244435&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Reload global options when strict aliasing is dropped (PR ipa/79043).
201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79043
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Fixed on trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79082
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #33 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
Jeff,
> Still here and following from afar; I'm not using solaris much these days, but
> it always brightens my day when I get an email re this bug and some level of
> progress is made
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78253
--- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon ---
Author: clyon
Date: Fri Jan 13 13:09:30 2017
New Revision: 244437
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244437&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-13 Christophe Lyon
Backport from mainline r244320.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78626
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78253
--- Comment #7 from Christophe Lyon ---
Author: clyon
Date: Fri Jan 13 13:11:07 2017
New Revision: 244438
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244438&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-11 Christophe Lyon
Backport from mainline r244320.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78253
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79058
--- Comment #14 from Dominik Vogt ---
Isn't this more or less the same problem as the Avr issue?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78883
On Avr, the register allocator would allow r31:HI if the expression is a
paradoxical subreg of me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78979
--- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth ---
Fixed for gcc 7.1.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79077
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
IMO bugs in new features are not regressions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
--- Comment #3 from neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com ---
Why is this tagged with 'ice-on-invalid-code'? What is invalid about the code?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71166
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69558
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |
Known to work|4.7.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79061
--- Comment #6 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Created attachment 40514
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40514&action=edit
Untested fix 1.
The fix I'm testing now. With this patch trivial example works and attached
testcase doesn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79061
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Comment on attachment 40514
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40514
Untested fix 1.
But DECL_SOURCE_FILE is not the main input file of the TU that contains it, if
e.g. a variable is define
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47931
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79083
Bug ID: 79083
Summary: GCC incorrectly compiles calls to constexpr static
methods via a non-constexpr variable
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78604
--- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to amker from comment #3)
> For function sign_lt and uns_lt, the change causes worse code generation
> unfortunately. Take uns_lt as example, the difference in optimized dump is
> So pow
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66295
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
--- Comment #5 from neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com ---
Here's a more complete example that avoids the ICE.
It gives correct results with 6.3:
5 fubar
5 fubar
But incorrect results with 7.0:
5 fubar
0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77508
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79058
--- Comment #15 from Dominik Vogt ---
There's some code to reload such paradoxical subregs in
lra-constraints.c:simplify_operand_subreg():
/* Force a reload for a paradoxical subreg. For paradoxical subreg,
IRA allocates hardreg to the i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78397
--- Comment #4 from Alexandre Martins
---
Unfortunatly, it's not crashing into the __aeabi_read_tp function, but into the
dynamic linker of freebsd (rtld-elf). For info, this function is located into
the libc on freebsd.
Must the dynamic linker
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78389
--- Comment #1 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ville
Date: Fri Jan 13 14:46:25 2017
New Revision: 244439
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244439&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/78389
* include/bits/list.tcc (merge(list&&)):
Adju
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71406
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78389
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71166
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78604
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79058
--- Comment #16 from Dominik Vogt ---
Or rather this one which avoids triggering an assertion failure in
in_hard_reg_set_p ():
diff --git a/gcc/lra-constraints.c b/gcc/lra-constraints.c
--- a/gcc/lra-constraints.c
+++ b/gcc/lra-constraints.c
@@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79075
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jan 13 14:57:33 2017
New Revision: 20
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=20&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Define cxx11-abi effective target for libstdc++ tests
PR libstdc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71190
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
Do you have still Markus the pre-processed source files available on the
machine? Can you give me access?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71076
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo