https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78781
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
Assignee|una
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78935
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Workaround (4) in the original submission is mistakenly redundant.
What is "Workaround (4)"?
> It's an interestingly fragile ICE that disappears with seemingly
> minor changes to the code. For ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78948
Bug ID: 78948
Summary: constexpr if instantiating too eagerly
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78949
Bug ID: 78949
Summary: incorrect "unused variable" warning with SSE2
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78933
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78933
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Dec 29 10:35:33 2016
New Revision: 243960
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243960&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add RejectNegative for a c option.
PR c/78933
* g++.dg/pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78892
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78950
Bug ID: 78950
Summary: "confused by earlier errors, bailing out" without
previous errors, when having duplicate constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78949
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78950
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77482
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yannick at tedworld dot de
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78949
prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||prathamesh3492 at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78949
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78949
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78949
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 40428
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40428&action=edit
gcc7-pr78949.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78951
Bug ID: 78951
Summary: Attributes allowed in an incorrect position
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66735
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 70385, which changed state.
Bug 70385 Summary: Lambda capture by reference of const reference fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70385
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66735
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nikb at bougalis dot net
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70385
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78935
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78935
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Please try again with the patch in:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-12/msg00314.html
>
> applied. On my system I see no issue anymore.
Same thing here (darwin).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78904
--- Comment #14 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Dec 29 21:41:07 2016
New Revision: 243968
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243968&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/78904
* config/i386/i386.md (*extvqi):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71977
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70754
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70754
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #40429|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71977
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 40431
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40431&action=edit
Proposed patch to fix the problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78952
Bug ID: 78952
Summary: Combine does not convert 8-bit sign-extract to a
zero-extract for QImode operations
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78953
Bug ID: 78953
Summary: Errors in compiling Spec 2006 for power9
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78953
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78944
--- Comment #1 from Ivan Sorokin ---
In addition to the reported crash on _Z3fooAv32pM, there are two other seeming
unrelated crashes: _Z1f7729646840 and _Z1fDpDF02s4o.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78952
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78890
TC changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from TC ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78935
--- Comment #6 from Damian Rouson ---
Workaround (4) was supposed to be "when both allocations are moved into the
main program."
34 matches
Mail list logo