[Bug target/78007] Important loop from 482.sphinx3 is not vectorized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78007 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 9 08:19:05 2016 New Revision: 241992 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241992&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-11-09 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/78007

[Bug ipa/78268] New: [7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78268 Bug ID: 78268 Summary: [7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug target/78253] [5/6/7 Regression] [ARM] call weak function instead of strong when called through pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78253 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC|

[Bug target/78254] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr77822.C -O3 -g (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78254 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- The question is whether this is invalid RTL, in which case we should guard against this in the RTL verifier (if we had one). Maybe the pattern should constrain the operand properly?

[Bug ipa/78268] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78268 --- Comment #1 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #0) > Either r241990 or r241989 causes a new ICE during Firefox build: > > /home/trippels/gecko-dev/rdf/base/rdfutil.cpp:111:1: internal compiler > err

[Bug target/78255] [5/6/7 regression] Indirect sibling call causing wrong code generation for ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78255 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug testsuite/78256] [7 Regression] test case gcc.dg/pr35691-1.c fails starting with its introduction in r241915

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78256 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |testsuite Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/78257] missing memcmp optimization with constant arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78257 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug ipa/78268] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78268 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/78258] [7 Regression] ICE in compare_values_warnv, at tree-vrp.c:1218

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78258 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid CC|

[Bug fortran/78259] [7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_subcomponent_assign, at fortran/trans-expr.c:7330

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78259 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug target/78262] [7 Regression] wrong code with -fschedule-insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78262 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/78268] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78268 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- This happens on ppc64le. Doesn't seem to reproduce on X86.

[Bug debug/78265] Excess emission of debug info for ODR used global variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78265 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/78263] Compile failure with AltiVec library on PPC64le and -std=c++11 flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78263 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64le-*-* --- Comment #3 from Ric

[Bug tree-optimization/78248] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78248 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Still can't reproduce. Can you please paste output of gcc-trunk -Os small.c --verbose and it would be usefull to paste output of -S. Thanks

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 78007, which changed state. Bug 78007 Summary: Important loop from 482.sphinx3 is not vectorized https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78007 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug target/78007] Important loop from 482.sphinx3 is not vectorized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78007 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78193] [7 regression] g++.dg/concepts/inherit-ctor3.C etc. FAIL at r241765

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78193 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- > This looks related to the ABI and was introduced by: > > r241765 | jason | 2016-11-02 02:50:29 +0100 (Wed, 02 Nov 2016) | 53 lines > > Implement P0136R1, Rewording inheriting constructors. The pr

[Bug c++/78269] New: FAIL: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type11.C and FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type9.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78269 Bug ID: 78269 Summary: FAIL: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type11.C and FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type9.C Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug middle-end/78261] vect pass only vectorizes half of the array in gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68532.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78261 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/78269] FAIL: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type11.C and FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type9.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78269 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target|arm, aarch64|arm, aarch64, x86_64-*-* St

[Bug ipa/78268] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78268 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/78257] missing memcmp optimization with constant arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78257 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Assig

[Bug fortran/71894] [OOP] ICE in gfc_add_component_ref, at fortran/class.c:227

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71894 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Wed Nov 9 09:22:52 2016 New Revision: 241993 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241993&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-11-09 Janus Weil PR fortran/71894 * cla

[Bug tree-optimization/78248] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78248 --- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6) > Still can't reproduce. Can you please paste output of > gcc-trunk -Os small.c --verbose It fails for me: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. main

[Bug fortran/71894] [OOP] ICE in gfc_add_component_ref, at fortran/class.c:227

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71894 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug tree-optimization/78248] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78248 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #7) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6) > > Still can't reproduce. Can you please paste output of > > gcc-trunk -Os small.c --verbose > > It fails for me: > > P

[Bug tree-optimization/78248] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78248 --- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak --- Created attachment 4 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4&action=edit --verbose-asm assembly

[Bug tree-optimization/78248] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78248 --- Comment #10 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8) > I've already tried running the test-case in valgrind. But I can't see the > problem :) May you please paste -S file and --verbose output? Done. What I find itere

[Bug testsuite/78256] [7 Regression] test case gcc.dg/pr35691-1.c fails starting with its introduction in r241915

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78256 --- Comment #2 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: prathamesh3492 Date: Wed Nov 9 09:46:13 2016 New Revision: 241994 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241994&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-11-09 Prathamesh Kulkarni PR

[Bug testsuite/78256] [7 Regression] test case gcc.dg/pr35691-1.c fails starting with its introduction in r241915

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78256 --- Comment #3 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Bill, could you please confirm if r241994 fixes the test-cases for you ? Thanks, Prathamesh

[Bug middle-end/35691] Missed (a == 0) && (b == 0) into (a|(typeof(a)(b)) == 0 when the types don't match

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35691 prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||prathamesh3492 at gcc

[Bug target/78254] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr77822.C -O3 -g (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78254 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- The expression would be undefined at runtime, so it doesn't matter if we generate an unspecified result.

[Bug tree-optimization/78248] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78248 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Unfortunately I don’t know the answers to the questions. I am under OS X 10.12.1 (aka darwin16.1) and Xcode 8.1. /usr/lib/libc.dylib points to libSystem.B.dylib. Dominique > Le 9 nov. 2016 à 08:54, m

[Bug c/78270] New: ice in gimplify_switch_expr, at gimplify.c:2272

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 40001 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40001&action=edit gzipped C source code The attached code, when compiled by gcc trunk dated 2

[Bug c/78270] ice in gimplify_switch_expr, at gimplify.c:2272

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78270 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Reduced code typedef struct { } bdaddr_t; struct mgmt_cp_read_local_oob_ext_data { __u8 type } fn1() { struct mgmt_cp_read_local_oob_ext_data *cp; switch (cp->type) &(bdaddr_t) {}

[Bug debug/78271] New: Fortran, additional pointer type for deferred length strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78271 Bug ID: 78271 Summary: Fortran, additional pointer type for deferred length strings Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug debug/78271] Fortran, additional pointer type for deferred length strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78271 --- Comment #1 from Bernhard Heckel --- Created attachment 40003 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40003&action=edit Debug info Icc

[Bug testsuite/78256] [7 Regression] test case gcc.dg/pr35691-1.c fails starting with its introduction in r241915

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78256 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug fortran/46459] ICE (segfault): Invalid read in compare_actual_formal [error recovery]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46459 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug tree-optimization/78248] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78248 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12

[Bug target/78254] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr77822.C -O3 -g (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78254 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- Author: schwab Date: Wed Nov 9 10:40:00 2016 New Revision: 241996 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241996&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/78254 * config/m68k/m68k.md: Reject out-of-range bit pos in bi

[Bug tree-optimization/78248] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78248 --- Comment #14 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 40005 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40005&action=edit good combine dump

[Bug target/78254] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr77822.C -O3 -g (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78254 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/78248] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78248 --- Comment #13 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 40004 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40004&action=edit bad combine dump

[Bug libstdc++/64735] std::future broken on armel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735 --- Comment #9 from Pauli --- atomicity.h uses exactly same builtins if _GLIBCXX_ATOMIC_BUILTINS is set 1. Difference include check for __gthread_active_p check and annotations for race detector. Annotations are empty macros in default build. Sam

[Bug sanitizer/78270] [7 Regression] ICE in gimplify_switch_expr, at gimplify.c:2272

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78270 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UNCO

[Bug sanitizer/78270] [7 Regression] ICE in gimplify_switch_expr, at gimplify.c:2272

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78270 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Targe

[Bug c++/78269] FAIL: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type11.C and FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type9.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78269 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/78269] FAIL: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type11.C and FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type9.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78269 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Author: thopre01 Date: Wed Nov 9 10:50:21 2016 New Revision: 241997 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241997&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-11-09 Thomas Preud'homme gcc/testsuite/ PR testsu

[Bug c++/78269] FAIL: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type11.C and FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type9.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78269 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|thopre01 at

[Bug c++/78269] FAIL: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type11.C and FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type9.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78269 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Marking the bug as NEW again because g++.dg/cpp1z/noexcept-type11.C still needs fixing

[Bug fortran/46459] ICE (segfault): Invalid read in compare_actual_formal [error recovery]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46459 --- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #8) > As mentioned by Harald, the patch in comment 1 works well and is close to > obvious. I verified that it regtests cleanly. Adapted to current trunk it looks li

[Bug fortran/60777] [F03] RECURSIVE function rejected in specification expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60777 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|un

[Bug tree-optimization/78272] New: [7 Regression] ICE in unshare_expr_without_location while building 471.omnetpp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78272 Bug ID: 78272 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in unshare_expr_without_location while building 471.omnetpp Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug tree-optimization/78272] [7 Regression] ICE in unshare_expr_without_location while building 471.omnetpp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78272 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.2.1 Target Milestone|--

[Bug tree-optimization/78272] [7 Regression] ICE in unshare_expr_without_location while building 471.omnetpp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78272 --- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Started with r241990

[Bug libstdc++/78273] New: The transparent version of {map,set}::count should call _M_count_tr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78273 Bug ID: 78273 Summary: The transparent version of {map,set}::count should call _M_count_tr Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/78274] New: Rejected specialization in different namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78274 Bug ID: 78274 Summary: Rejected specialization in different namespace Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c+

[Bug sanitizer/61978] implement blacklist for sanitizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61978 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11

[Bug rtl-optimization/78200] [7 Regression] 429.mcf of cpu2006 regresses in GCC trunk for avx2 target.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78200 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- So RTL expansion ends up in /* If jumps are cheap and the target does not support conditional compare, turn some more codes into jumpy sequences. */ else if (BRANCH_COST (o

[Bug ipa/78268] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78268 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug tree-optimization/78272] [7 Regression] ICE in unshare_expr_without_location while building 471.omnetpp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78272 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/78200] [7 Regression] 429.mcf of cpu2006 regresses in GCC trunk for avx2 target.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78200 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- OTOH we _do_ have initial RTL (insn 167 166 168 20 (set (reg:CCGOC 17 flags) (compare:CCGOC (reg/v:DI 217 [ red_cost ]) (const_int 0 [0]))) "pbeampp.c":42 -1 (nil)) (jump_insn 168

[Bug rtl-optimization/78200] [7 Regression] 429.mcf of cpu2006 regresses in GCC trunk for avx2 target.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78200 --- Comment #11 from Venkataramanan --- Hi Richard On haswell machine original run time for -O3 -max2 -mprefer-avx2 real2m35.325s user2m35.257s sys 0m0.070s Changing the assembly from .L98: jle .L97 cmpl

[Bug c++/78263] Compile failure with AltiVec library on PPC64le and -std=c++11 flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78263 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/78275] New: [avr] at43usb320 in wrong multilib set.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78275 Bug ID: 78275 Summary: [avr] at43usb320 in wrong multilib set. Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/78275] [avr] at43usb320 in wrong multilib set.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78275 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr Priority|P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/78200] [7 Regression] 429.mcf of cpu2006 regresses in GCC trunk for avx2 target.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78200 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- Btw, I see with -mavx2 addq(%r9), %rax jns .L90 .L90: je .L92 cmpl$2, 24(%rdx) je .L91 thus there is no extra cmpq $0, %rdi in the predecesso

[Bug fortran/78259] [7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_subcomponent_assign, at fortran/trans-expr.c:7330

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78259 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug ipa/78258] [7 Regression] ICE in compare_values_warnv, at tree-vrp.c:1218

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78258 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug rtl-optimization/78200] [7 Regression] 429.mcf of cpu2006 regresses in GCC trunk for avx2 target.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78200 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- When I compare GCC 6 (r241818) against trunk (r241997) with -Ofast -march=native (on Haswell) I get 429.mcf 9120230 39.7 S9120240 38.0 * 429.mcf 9120

[Bug tree-optimization/78257] missing memcmp optimization with constant arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78257 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- 'f0' function is optimized out as of r242000

[Bug c/77750] [7 Regression] gcc build not working with -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77750 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug tree-optimization/77719] [7 Regression] ICE in pp_string, at pretty-print.c:955

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77719 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/60777] [F03] RECURSIVE function rejected in specification expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60777 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- I think the patch in comment 1 actually does not work as expected (due to a spurious semicolon). However, this variant seems to work well and regtests cleanly: Index: gcc/fortran/expr.c =

[Bug middle-end/71762] [5/6/7 Regression] ~X & Y to X < Y doesn't work for uninitialized values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71762 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 f

[Bug libstdc++/78276] New: regex_search is slow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78276 Bug ID: 78276 Summary: regex_search is slow Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee

[Bug testsuite/78256] [7 Regression] test case gcc.dg/pr35691-1.c fails starting with its introduction in r241915

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78256 --- Comment #5 from Bill Seurer --- Looks good on power, too. Thanks!

[Bug tree-optimization/78248] [7 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78248 --- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool --- Hi, could you try https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-11/msg00775.html ? And sorry for the breakage.

[Bug testsuite/78256] [7 Regression] test case gcc.dg/pr35691-1.c fails starting with its introduction in r241915

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78256 prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Reso

[Bug ipa/78268] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78268 Yuri Rumyantsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ysrumyan at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/71762] [5/6/7 Regression] ~X & Y to X < Y doesn't work for uninitialized values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71762 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #7 fr

[Bug middle-end/77718] [7 Regression] expand_builtin_memcmp swaps args

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77718 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 9 16:21:45 2016 New Revision: 242007 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242007&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/77718 * builtins.c (expand_builtin_memcmp): Form

[Bug middle-end/77718] [7 Regression] expand_builtin_memcmp swaps args

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77718 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug debug/78265] Excess emission of debug info for ODR used global variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78265 --- Comment #2 from David Blaikie --- A side note/commentary: Producing debug info for global variable declarations at all is an interesting choice. If the whole program is built with debug info*, the global variable's definition will have debug

[Bug fortran/65173] ICE while compiling wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65173 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Compiling the test in comment 0 with and instrumented gfortran I get pr65173.f90:7:45: real*8, dimension(256), allocatable :: x 1 Error: Allocatable

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #1) > Eh, mine. > > typedef void (^os_trace_payload_t)(xpc_object_t xdict) looks very strange, > it seems that it's an Objective-C declaration, right? It's declaring

[Bug fortran/65173] ICE while compiling wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65173 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Note that the tests z1.f90 and z8.f90 fail in a different way: pr65173_3.f90:3:39: character(:), allocatable :: x(n) 1 Error: Allocatable component of st

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #4 from Maxim Ostapenko --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3) > (In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #1) > > Eh, mine. > > > > typedef void (^os_trace_payload_t)(xpc_object_t xdict) looks very strange, > > it seems that

[Bug fortran/77680] [5/6/7 Regression] [F03] ICE in ctor_for_folding, at varpool.c:419

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77680 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- extern char **environ; #endif -#if defined(__has_include) && __has_include() +#if defined(__has_include) && __has_include() && defined(__clang__) #define SANITIZER_OS_TRACE 1 #include #else is preappr

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #6 from Maxim Ostapenko --- Created attachment 40007 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40007&action=edit Untested fix. Attaching untested fix. Dominique, could you try it?

[Bug libstdc++/78273] The transparent version of {map,set}::count should call _M_count_tr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78273 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/60500] [5/6/7 Regression] Spurious warning on derived type initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60500 --- Comment #12 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Well, the change introduced by r241885 is quite complicated. It may cause major regressions. I don't recommend backporting it.

[Bug c++/78274] Rejected specialization in different namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78274 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

  1   2   >