https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71622
--- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #8)
> cc1plus doesn't stop in gdb, for some reason. Instead, it prints:
>
> painting/qdrawhelper.cpp: In function ‘void
> qt_bitmapblit_quint16(QRasterBuffer*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63319
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
valgrind --track-origins=yes --trace-children=yes g++ ...
will probably also print a backtrace.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71622
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
valgrind --track-origins=yes --trace-children=yes g++...
will probably also print a backtrace.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71622
--- Comment #11 from Thiago Macieira ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #9)
> Yes. Just invoke cc1plus directly.
> (Add -v to the gcc invocation and then copy & paste the cc1plus command
> line, that is printed out.
That's what I'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71630
Bug ID: 71630
Summary: ICE on valid C++14 code with variable templates: in
get, at cgraph.h:395
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63319
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||milla.pohjanheimo at qt dot io
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71622
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71622
--- Comment #13 from Thiago Macieira ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #10)
> valgrind --track-origins=yes --trace-children=yes g++...
> will probably also print a backtrace.
First error:
==32645== Conditional jump or move depen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63319
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WORKSF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71622
--- Comment #14 from Thiago Macieira ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #12)
> (In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #11)
> > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #9)
> > > Yes. Just invoke cc1plus directly.
> > > (Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71622
--- Comment #15 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
All these bogus valgrind warnings can be suppressed if you configure gcc
with --enable-valgrind-annotations.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71622
--- Comment #16 from Thiago Macieira ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #15)
> All these bogus valgrind warnings can be suppressed if you configure gcc
> with --enable-valgrind-annotations.
That's good to know, but Valgrind didn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71631
Bug ID: 71631
Summary: Wrong constant folding
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63319
--- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Thiago, if you can parse Jakub's suggestion from comment 3 (I can't), you
could give it a try.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63319
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #8)
> Thiago, if you can parse Jakub's suggestion from comment 3 (I can't), you
> could give it a try.
The intent was to see 1 preprocessed file attached (the he
-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160623 (experimental) [trunk revision 237726] (GCC)
$:
$: timeout -s 9 30 gcc-trunk -O3 small.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71618
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #7)
> Okay, I updated the Wiki. I would have liked to have added a link to the
> --help option in the manual but, unfortunately, the anchors in it change
> from o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71567
--- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Artem from comment #6)
> Is there any way to indicate such kind of errors during compilation.
> I tried to add options -Wall -Waggressive-loop-optimizations for compilation
> code from the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71560
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4)
> Please let me know if you're planning to make these
> changes, otherwise I can give it a whirl.
Unfortunately I don't have time for this. Please go ahea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71633
Bug ID: 71633
Summary: [7 regression][CHKP] internal compiler error: in
inline_call
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71634
Bug ID: 71634
Summary: Invalid write with in mark_loops_for_removal
(ira-build.c:2256) with --param ira-max-loops-num=0
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71632
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71619
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Jun 23 11:04:35 2016
New Revision: 237730
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237730&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR middle-end/71619
PR middle-end/71619
* predict.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71619
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63359
--- Comment #11 from Jeremy ---
int32_t n;
asm( "str %1,[%0],#4" : "+r" (ptr) : "r" (n) : "memory" );
Caught me until I just happened to examine the assembler.
Of course %w1 works - but then I need SEPARATE code for 32-bit ARM and for
aarch64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71632
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71631
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71631
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71625
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71632
--- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The commit if-converts below loop:
:
# b.5_38 = PHI <0(3), _10(7)>
# d_40 = PHI
# ivtmp_17 = PHI <5(3), ivtmp_37(7)>
_6 = (long unsigned int) b.5_38;
_7 = _6 * 8;
_8 = _5 + _7;
_9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71632
--- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
As in optimized dump:
:
c.1_1 = c;
_85 = *c.1_1;
_87 = *_85;
iftmp.0_88 = d_27(D) < _87 ? 1.0e+0 : 0.0;
_90 = MEM[(double *)_85 + 8B];
iftmp.0_91 = iftmp.0_88 < _90 ? 1.0e+0 : 0.0;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71625
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
strlen is pure, not const, since its result depends on memory pointed to
by its argument, not just the value of the pointer itself. See
extend.texi: "Note that a function that has pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71602
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #9 from vrie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71632
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
In any case, this looks to me like expansion or TER bug.
The problem in this case is that expand_cond_expr_using_cmove
expands the tree arguments:
op00 = expand_normal (gimple_assign_rhs1 (srcstmt));
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71631
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63359
--- Comment #12 from Richard Earnshaw ---
We considered that, but it won't work. For example, in ILP32 address registers
need to use the X form, but are still 32-bits in size. There are other cases
as well where a W or X form is required but th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71625
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71625
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
*** Bug 71303 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71296
Bug 71296 depends on bug 71303, which changed state.
Bug 71303 Summary: missing strlen optimization for strings initialized via a
braced-init-list
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71303
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71303
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71567
--- Comment #8 from Artem ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #7)
> See https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FAQ#misoptimization
>
> and https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html#Warning-Options
Thank you for the links.
However
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71560
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56069
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63359
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71635
Bug ID: 71635
Summary: gcc-go fails to link golang-googlecode-net
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71635
--- Comment #1 from Dan Horák ---
original Fedora bug is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349371
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
--- Comment #17 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jun 23 15:58:05 2016
New Revision: 237735
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237735&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-23 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran/48852
* i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69526
--- Comment #19 from rdapp at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #18)
>
The match.pd patch is slowly assuming shape... Two things however I'm still
unsure about:
1.
An existing rule in match.pd checks for over
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71631
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71631
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36159
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66232
--- Comment #10 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Jun 23 16:30:43 2016
New Revision: 237736
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237736&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
i386: Access external function via GOT slot for -fno-plt
i386 psA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67400
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Jun 23 16:30:43 2016
New Revision: 237736
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237736&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
i386: Access external function via GOT slot for -fno-plt
i386 psAB
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71488
--- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Jun 23 16:58:54 2016
New Revision: 237738
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237738&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/71488
* gcc.target/i386/i386
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71625
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1)
> (In reply to Renlin Li from comment #0)
> > char array[] = "abc";
> > return __builtin_strlen (array);
>
> There are DUPs for this part.
Well, this actually i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60014
--- Comment #6 from Fredrik Hallenberg ---
Reconfirmed with gcc 6.1.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71625
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71636
Bug ID: 71636
Summary: Missed optimization in variable alignment test
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63319
--- Comment #10 from Thiago Macieira ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #8)
> > Thiago, if you can parse Jakub's suggestion from comment 3 (I can't), you
> > could give it a try.
>
> T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71636
--- Comment #1 from Richard Henderson ---
Oh, and I meant to mention -- if the target doesn't have an andnot
insn, both formulations are identical in complexity and minimal path.
Which might suggest *always* performing the transformation at a
hi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71488
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |tree-optimization
--- Comment #13 from Uro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55501
Gerhard Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57284
Gerhard Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71623
Gerhard Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71637
Bug ID: 71637
Summary: -Wmisleading-indentation only triggered when using
integrated cpp
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71585
--- Comment #3 from Julian Stecklina ---
Is there the hope of having at least workaround here?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71637
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69526
--- Comment #20 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to rdapp from comment #19)
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #18)
> >
>
> The match.pd patch is slowly assuming shape... Two things however I'm still
> unsure about:
>
> 1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60014
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, easyhack
Last reconf
-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160623 (experimental) [trunk revision 237733
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48925
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852
Bug 48852 depends on bug 48925, which changed state.
Bug 48925 Summary: Code cleanup in write_float.def
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48925
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71639
--- Comment #1 from Frank Bergemann ---
Created attachment 38754
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38754&action=edit
test program main.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71639
Bug ID: 71639
Summary: [5.2.0] c++11 list initializer and std::transform -
error?
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71639
--- Comment #2 from Frank Bergemann ---
it works on Solaris 5.10
SunOS ### 5.10 Generic_142900-05 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V890
\Frank
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71639
--- Comment #3 from Frank Bergemann ---
But on solaris i only had gcc-4.7.2 yet
\Frank
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71639
--- Comment #4 from Frank Bergemann ---
The problem is on Linux
Linux ### 2.6.32-358.55.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 06:57:07 EST 2014 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
\Frank
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71639
--- Comment #5 from Frank Bergemann ---
I also tested on HP-UX with gcc-4.7.2.
HP-UX ### B.11.31 U ia64 4035416745 unlimited-user license
And it's also ok on HP-UX:
hpux03 506> ./test
using push_back():
==
1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
1, 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69526
rdapp at linux dot vnet.ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|6.0 |unknown
--- Comment #21
81 matches
Mail list logo
