https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71578
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71318
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |target
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71578
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #12)
> The "Once gcc is able ..." part in the comment implies that simply returning
> different mode based on the incoming rtx code argument won't work. OTOH,
> this is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Anyway, to make progress for KNL, would you be ok with a patch containing just
the ix86_fp_cmp_code_to_pcmp_immediate hunk tweaked so that it emits the same
thing as %D, and as a follow-up we can try to hand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559
--- Comment #17 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15)
> Anyway, to make progress for KNL, would you be ok with a patch containing
> just the ix86_fp_cmp_code_to_pcmp_immediate hunk tweaked so that it emits
> the same t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71574
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71583
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71573
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71589
Bug ID: 71589
Summary: Atomic operation on a non-atomic variable
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71194
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71590
Bug ID: 71590
Summary: G++ template function initialize with wrong type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67865
dominik.stras...@onespin-solutions.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71584
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71579
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Your example has undefined behaviour, the requirements in the standard are
requirements on your use of the trait. If you use it wrong it doesn't work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71584
--- Comment #2 from Jeff Bai ---
Here you go.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71584
--- Comment #3 from Jeff Bai ---
Created attachment 38730
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38730&action=edit
Temporary .ii file for MixerWorkerThread.cpp (the invoking file)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71584
--- Comment #4 from Jeff Bai ---
I compressed the .ii file with tar.xz as the original file is larger than
1000KB.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71578
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #2)
> > Started with r237556:
> >
> > commit 1176073cc1a63f14198c3ba0a02c8f5a52442c2f
> > Author: marxin
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71588
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71103
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jun 20 11:01:13 2016
New Revision: 237589
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237589&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/71103
* config/avr/avr.md (movqi): Handle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71103
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jun 20 11:20:27 2016
New Revision: 237591
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237591&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2016-06-20 trunk r237589, r236558.
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71578
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #4)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #2)
> > > Started with r237556:
> > >
> > > commit 1176
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71584
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71584
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71092
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeffbai at aosc dot xyz
---
oog --without-ppl --without-isl
--build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
--target=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --with-ld=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld
--with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-237587-checking-yes-rtl-df-nographite-amd64
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160620 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71529
--- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Mon Jun 20 11:35:02 2016
New Revision: 237592
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237592&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline r237484.
2016-06-15 Ilya
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71588
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization
Assignee|una
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71103
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jun 20 11:55:11 2016
New Revision: 237593
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237593&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2016-06-20 trunk r237589, r236558.
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71549
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
A patch i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71103
--- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jun 20 12:02:36 2016
New Revision: 237594
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237594&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2016-06-20 trunk r237589, r236558.
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71588
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 38731
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38731&action=edit
gcc7-pr71588.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55203
--- Comment #13 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> Which are the relevant classes? It seems to me that we want to tag almost
> everything except a few RAII types such as std::lock_guard and
> std::unique_lock, w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70477
ecloud changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s at ecloud dot org
--- Comment #5 from ecloud
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71103
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71591
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71529
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71591
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 38732
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38732&action=edit
gcc7-pr71591.patch
Untested patch to do that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71581
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70477
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59861
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71592
Bug ID: 71592
Summary: Add some facilities for compile-time check
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71593
Bug ID: 71593
Summary: initializing array with mixed constant and variable
size results in error
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: tri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71580
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71581
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 38733
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38733&action=edit
gcc7-pr71581.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52305
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
--- Comment #6 from David B. Robins ---
Created attachment 38734
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38734&action=edit
Test case (for gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/inherit)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
--- Comment #7 from David B. Robins ---
I have verified that the pr71571.C test case attached does expose the bug on
trunk and that it passes with the above fix. (Note "-O2 -fno-inline" are
required to ensure a crash; see earlier comment; in 4.3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71592
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71576
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71594
Bug ID: 71594
Summary: ice in maybe_legitimize_operand, at optabs.c:6893
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71576
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71594
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71594
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
--- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to David B. Robins from comment #7)
> I have verified that the pr71571.C test case attached does expose the bug on
> trunk and that it passes with the above fix.
Great, thanks for the report a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #8)
> all that's "stopping" optimizations.
Bad choice of words, I meant "all that's needed to stop optimizations from
making choices that would not expose th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69507
--- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Mon Jun 20 15:46:09 2016
New Revision: 237606
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237606&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/69507 - bogus warning: ISO C does not allow __alignof__ (expression)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71590
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160620 (experimental) [trunk revision 237587] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -Os -c small.c
$ gcc-6.1 -O2 -c small.c
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 -c small.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71576
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
s/properly/.
Anyway, the thing is that we use
cp_lvalue_kind lvalue = real_lvalue_p (expr);
and test the various clk_* bits from it, but this returns clk_none if
lvalue_kind has clk_class or clk_rvalueref set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55203
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
--- Comment #10 from David B. Robins ---
My apologies, I saw the example you pointed at was from torture/ but
missed/forgot that you had also wanted the new test there. I moved the file to
torture and removed -O2 -fno-inline and I didn't get the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58646
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||editing101 at aol dot com
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994
Bug 16994 depends on bug 71593, which changed state.
Bug 71593 Summary: initializing array with mixed constant and variable size
results in error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71593
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71593
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71338
--- Comment #4 from DJ Delorie ---
Sure, the only dependencies might be on binutils/gdb releases, but they support
it and they're independent of gcc releases anyway.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71103
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71570
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
--- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to David B. Robins from comment #10)
> My apologies, I saw the example you pointed at was from torture/ but
> missed/forgot that you had also wanted the new test there. I moved the file
> to t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71596
Bug ID: 71596
Summary: gcc bootstrap fails due to segv in genrecog
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71596
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71596
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71597
Bug ID: 71597
Summary: Confusing warning for incompatible enums
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71598
Bug ID: 71598
Summary: Wrong optimization with aliasing enums
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71596
--- Comment #2 from Sergey ---
( may be related to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70902 ? )
- genrecog crashes with segv if built with gcc@r235523 and later after emitting
first 32k of its output -- stack trace below;
- it's genre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
--- Comment #12 from David B. Robins ---
Note that it does still need -fno-inline.
I know why it doesn't crash with -O0: there is a text-section constant inserted
after the thunk, and it's inlined at higher optimization levels. The
instruction s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71194
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Jun 20 18:46:43 2016
New Revision: 237612
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237612&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-20 Tobias Burnus
fortran/71194
* trans-expr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71599
Bug ID: 71599
Summary: An extra unrelated move when compiling
compare_exchange_strong
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
|WORKSFORME |---
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
>David, in the future please use an --enable-checking=valgrind compiler
>for valgrind testing.
Righto. I tried a build of today's (20160620) gcc trunk with this flag you
recommend.
I got
==16199== Conditional j
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jun 20 19:17:12 2016
New Revision: 237614
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237614&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/71559
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_fp_cmp_code_to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70825
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66867
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dhowells at redhat dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66867
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jianjin2016 at fb dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66867
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoeppe at google dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66713
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71599
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71600
Bug ID: 71600
Summary: [7 regression] test case gcc.dg/gnu89-const-expr-1.c
fails starting with r237581
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
--- Comment #13 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Author: hp
Date: Mon Jun 20 20:01:20 2016
New Revision: 237615
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237615&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/71571
* config/cris/cris.c (cris_asm_output_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
--- Comment #14 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Author: hp
Date: Mon Jun 20 20:02:03 2016
New Revision: 237616
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237616&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/71571
* g++.dg/torture/pr71571.C: New test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71600
--- Comment #1 from Bill Seurer ---
Also this test case:
FAIL: gcc.dg/gnu99-static-1.c (test for errors, line 14)
line 14:
void g0(void) { __alignof__(f0()); } /* { dg-error "__alignof__
\\(expression\\)" } */
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71181
--- Comment #5 from François Dumont ---
Author: fdumont
Date: Mon Jun 20 20:04:25 2016
New Revision: 237617
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237617&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-20 François Dumont
PR libstdc++/71181
* in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71600
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
--- Comment #15 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to David B. Robins from comment #12)
> Note that it does still need -fno-inline.
I almost missed.
> I know why it doesn't crash with -O0: there is a text-section constant
> inserted after th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71601
Bug ID: 71601
Summary: ICE on conditional expression between DFP / non-DFP
float
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55917
--- Comment #15 from Howard Hinnant ---
To help clarify my proposal, here is a patch:
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/thread.cc
b/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/thread.cc
index 906cafa..cfca178 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/thread.cc
+++ b/lib
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
