[Bug other/69821] -fdebug-prefix-map doesn't affect gcc command line switches in DWARF DW_AT_producer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69821 --- Comment #3 from hongxu jia --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Patches should be sent to gcc-patches@. Got it //Hongxu

[Bug tree-optimization/69776] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong optimization with aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69776 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Feb 15 08:42:38 2016 New Revision: 233418 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233418&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-02-15 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/69776

[Bug tree-optimization/69776] [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong optimization with aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69776 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.0 Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regress

[Bug lto/69655] [6 Regression] libgomp lto failures: segfault in cgraph_node::mark_force_output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69655 --- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Mon Feb 15 09:30:31 2016 New Revision: 233419 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233419&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Don't mark offload symbols with force_output in ltrans 2016-02-

[Bug lto/69655] [6 Regression] libgomp lto failures: segfault in cgraph_node::mark_force_output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69655 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug lto/67709] ICE: in estimate_function_body_sizes, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:2489 on x86_64-apple-darwin*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67709 --- Comment #10 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- pinged: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg00964.html

[Bug tree-optimization/69783] [6 Regression] Loop is not vectorized after r233212

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69783 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Feb 15 09:40:01 2016 New Revision: 233420 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233420&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-02-15 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/69783

[Bug tree-optimization/69822] New: [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in get_rename, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:1202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69822 Bug ID: 69822 Summary: [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in get_rename, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:1202 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/69822] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in get_rename, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:1202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69822 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Known to work|

[Bug target/68273] [5/6 Regression] Wrong code on mips/mipsel due to (invalid?) peeking at alignments in function_arg.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273 --- Comment #31 from Richard Biener --- eipa_sra introduces the remaining SSA name with non-default alignment via #0 make_ssa_name_fn (fn=0x768bb5e8, var=, stmt=) at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk3/gcc/tree-ssanames.c:311 #1 0x000

[Bug tree-optimization/69823] New: internal compiler error: in create_pw_aff_from_tree, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:445

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69823 Bug ID: 69823 Summary: internal compiler error: in create_pw_aff_from_tree, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:445 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug tree-optimization/69820] [6 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O3 option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69820 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCO

[Bug c++/69534] [6 Regression] openjade is miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69534 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/68191] s390x Linux Split Stacks support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68191 --- Comment #3 from Marcin Kościelnicki --- All three patches (glibc, gold, gcc) have landed. Anything left to do here?

[Bug target/69706] internal compiler error: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2246

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69706 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- It's a bug in the original implementation of the SPARC 64-bit calling conventions dating back to 1998: /* There's no need to check this_slotno < SPARC_FP_ARG_MAX. If it wasn't

[Bug c/69819] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have array_type in function_args_iter_init, at tree.h:4536

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69819 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/69371] UNRESOLVED: special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc compilation failed to produce executable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69371 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug target/69671] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vpmovqb-1.c scan-assembler-times vpmovqb[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+[^\n]*%xmm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}{z}(?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69671 --- Comment #18 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #17) > (In reply to ktkachov from comment #16) > > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15) > > > Yeah, my preference is to back out the cse.c one-lin

[Bug target/69671] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vpmovqb-1.c scan-assembler-times vpmovqb[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+[^\n]*%xmm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}{z}(?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69671 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #18) > Ok, if that's the case then we should XFAIL the gcc.target/arm/wmul-1.c and > gcc.target/arm/wmul-2.c tests and fix the AVX patterns for GCC 7 so that the > cse.c ch

[Bug c++/69534] [6 Regression] openjade is miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69534 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- We for example have tem_23->hasFinalizer_ = 1; ... MEM[(struct Object *)interp_8(D) + 16B].next_ = tem_23; MEM[(struct &)tem_23] ={v} {CLOBBER}; which means that tem_23 escapes through memory pointe

[Bug tree-optimization/69811] A gcc folding issue at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69811 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/69752] Reload removing instruction with side-effect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69752 --- Comment #3 from Bernd Schmidt --- Author: bernds Date: Mon Feb 15 12:04:13 2016 New Revision: 233423 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233423&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Don't make something with an autoinc an equivalencing insn (PR69752).

[Bug c++/69534] [6 Regression] openjade is miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69534 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/69648] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O -mtune=winchip-c6 -fPIC -fexpensive-optimizations -msse4 @ i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69648 --- Comment #13 from Bernd Schmidt --- Author: bernds Date: Mon Feb 15 12:06:44 2016 New Revision: 233424 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233424&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Avoid removing sets of a pseudo PIC register in LRA. PR rtl-opt

[Bug c++/69797] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in operator[], at vec.h:714

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69797 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c/69796] [6 Regression] ICE on invalid code in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:83

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69796 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug libstdc++/69794] [5/6 Regression] std::regex_search match failure with regex object with flags grep|icase

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69794 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug bootstrap/69791] ICE in ultimate_transparent_alias_target, at varasm.c:1263

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69791 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* --- Comment #1 from Richard

[Bug rtl-optimization/69806] [6 Regression][SH] Combine doesn't see constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69806 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug driver/69805] [6 Regression] ICE in greater_than_spec_func, at gcc.c:9722

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69805 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/69804] [5/6] ICE with -fsanitize=undefined -fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69804 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/69802] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc ICE at -O1 and above on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu with “seg fault”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69802 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/69800] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr61034.C -std=gnu++98 scan-tree-dump-times optimized "free" 4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69800 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69801] [6 Regression] gcc ICE on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "operand_equal_p"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69801 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/69811] [5/6 Regression] A gcc folding issue at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69811 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug tree-optimization/69811] [5/6 Regression] A gcc folding issue at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69811 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Note that with 4.9 GENERIC still has if ((char *) "a" + 1 == 0B) but gimplification "simplifies" this to if (&MEM[(void *)"a" + 1B] == 0B) goto ; else goto ; which we eventually fold during CFG clean

[Bug tree-optimization/69823] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in create_pw_aff_from_tree, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:445

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69823 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/69783] [6 Regression] Loop is not vectorized after r233212

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69783 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69719] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69719 Bug 69719 depends on bug 69783, which changed state. Bug 69783 Summary: [6 Regression] Loop is not vectorized after r233212 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69783 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/69822] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in get_rename, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:1202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69822 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target|aarch64 |aarch64, x86_64-*-* Priority|

[Bug other/69821] -fdebug-prefix-map doesn't affect gcc command line switches in DWARF DW_AT_producer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69821 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69804] [5/6] ICE with -fsanitize=undefined -fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69804 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/69820] [6 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O3 option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69820 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c/69819] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have array_type in function_args_iter_init, at tree.h:4536

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69819 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment #3 from

[Bug c/69819] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have array_type in function_args_iter_init, at tree.h:4536

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69819 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug tree-optimization/69732] Vectorization runtime alias check due to failed dependence analysis

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69732 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|6.0 |--- Summary|[6 Regression] M

[Bug other/69821] -fdebug-prefix-map doesn't affect gcc command line switches in DWARF DW_AT_producer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69821 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug tree-optimization/69802] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc ICE at -O1 and above on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu with “seg fault”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69802 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 37692 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37692&action=edit gcc6-pr69802.patch Untested fix.

[Bug testsuite/69586] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-21.c for target defaulting to short enum

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69586 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #3 from

[Bug tree-optimization/69595] [6 Regression] Bogus -Warray-bound warning due to missed optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69595 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Feb 15 13:49:42 2016 New Revision: 233425 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233425&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-02-15 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/69595

[Bug c/69796] [6 Regression] ICE on invalid code in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:83

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69796 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/69824] New: [4.9/5/6 Regression] internal compiler error in unshare_body

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69824 Bug ID: 69824 Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression] internal compiler error in unshare_body Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug c++/69797] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in operator[], at vec.h:714

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69797 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 37693 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37693&action=edit gcc6-pr69797.patch Untested fix.

[Bug testsuite/69586] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-21.c for target defaulting to short enum

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69586 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- So first half of a patch is Index: gcc/tree-vrp.c === --- gcc/tree-vrp.c (revision 233418) +++ gcc/tree-vrp.c (working copy) @@ -544

[Bug c/69825] New: False -Wdiv-by-zero warning when it should be short-circuited

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69825 Bug ID: 69825 Summary: False -Wdiv-by-zero warning when it should be short-circuited Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/69820] [6 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O3 option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69820 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug tree-optimization/69823] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in create_pw_aff_from_tree, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:445

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69823 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/69822] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in get_rename, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:1202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69822 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug c/69824] [4.9/5/6 Regression] internal compiler error in unshare_body

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69824 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/69825] False -Wdiv-by-zero warning when it should be short-circuited

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69825 --- Comment #1 from Dr. David Alan Gilbert --- Oops, forgot to mention; this is on fedora 23 x86-64.

[Bug c/69825] False -Wdiv-by-zero warning when it should be short-circuited

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69825 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug c/69824] [4.9/5/6 Regression] internal compiler error in unshare_body

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69824 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c/69824] [4.9/5/6 Regression] internal compiler error in unshare_body

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69824 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biene

[Bug tree-optimization/69811] [5/6 Regression] A gcc folding issue at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69811 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug libstdc++/69794] [5/6 Regression] std::regex_search match failure with regex object with flags grep|icase

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69794 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/69819] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have array_type in function_args_iter_init, at tree.h:4536

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69819 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/69796] [6 Regression] ICE on invalid code in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:83

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69796 --- Comment #2 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi, I believe this happens because of setting TREE_TYPE (decl) to error_mark_node in c_parser_translation_unit(): FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (incomplete_record_decls, i, decl) if (DECL_SIZE (dec

[Bug c++/69826] New: problem with cilkplus pragma and preprocessor variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69826 Bug ID: 69826 Summary: problem with cilkplus pragma and preprocessor variable Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug other/69821] -fdebug-prefix-map doesn't affect gcc command line switches in DWARF DW_AT_producer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69821 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug other/69821] -fdebug-prefix-map doesn't affect gcc command line switches in DWARF DW_AT_producer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69821 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- It is not a regression and is user visible change, so I think changing it just in GCC 6 is sufficient.

[Bug target/68191] s390x Linux Split Stacks support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68191 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69820] [6 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O3 option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69820 --- Comment #4 from Vsevolod Livinskiy --- Test case also cause internal compiler error when it is compiled for knl. > g++ -march=knl -O3 repr.cpp repr.cpp: In function ‘void foo()’: repr.cpp:23:45: internal compiler error: in ix86_expand_sse_cm

[Bug ipa/69589] [6 Regression] ICE in initialize_node_lattices, at ipa-cp.c:971

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69589 --- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to kugan from comment #11) > In remove_unreachable_nodes, just before ipa-cp, this node becomes local > (address taken is false and local.local = true). After that, when > ipa_propagate_frequency i

[Bug fortran/40165] Excessive warnings for REAL DO loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40165 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69820] [6 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O3 option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69820 --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- knl ICE: int a[100], b[100]; short c[100]; void fn1() { for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++i) b[i] = a[i] * (bool)c[i]; }

[Bug tree-optimization/69820] [6 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O3 option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69820 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug tree-optimization/69820] [6 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O3 option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69820 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 37694 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37694&action=edit gcc6-pr69820.patch As for the ICE, the following patch works for me. VI_512 iterator is only used in the vcond

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 Joakim Tjernlund changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joakim.tjernlund at infinera dot c

[Bug c/69798] ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in c_parser_braced_init, at c/c-parser.c:4338

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69798 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgomp/69555] libgomp.c++/target-6.C fails because of undefined behaviour

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69555 --- Comment #8 from Jiong Wang --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > { > try > { > ... > D.2689 = (sizetype) D.2477; > D.2690 = D.2689 + 1; > D.2691 =

[Bug tree-optimization/69820] [6 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O3 option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69820 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- As for the wrong-code, we used to emit: ... vect_cst_.23_105 = { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 }; vect_cst_.24_106 = { 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 }; vect_cst_.25_107

[Bug driver/66293] Support -Weverything to enable all warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66293 Jean-Michaël Celerier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jeanmichael.celerier@gmail.

[Bug c++/69534] [6 Regression] openjade is miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69534 --- Comment #10 from Kamil Dudka --- It makes sense to me. Thanks for the explanation!

[Bug tree-optimization/69827] New: [5 Regression] sincos not done

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69827 Bug ID: 69827 Summary: [5 Regression] sincos not done Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/69827] [5 Regression] sincos not done

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69827 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug tree-optimization/69776] [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong optimization with aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69776 --- Comment #8 from Alexander Cherepanov --- --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- > Actually the middle-end memory model makes this valid and FREs redundant store > elimination breaks it. And function boundaries are not an obstacle for validi

[Bug tree-optimization/69820] [6 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O3 option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69820 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/69827] [5 Regression] sincos not done

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69827 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-unknown-cygwin Component

[Bug driver/66293] Support -Weverything to enable all warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66293 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/69363] ICE when doing a pragma simd reduction with max

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69363 iverbin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iverbin at gcc dot gnu.org -

[Bug c/28901] -Wunused-variable ignores unused const initialised variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28901 Josh Triplett changed: What|Removed |Added CC||josh at joshtriplett dot org --- Comment

[Bug c/28901] -Wunused-variable ignores unused const initialised variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28901 --- Comment #24 from Josh Triplett --- Also, even the documentation seems unfortunate: "In C++ this is normally not an error since const variables take the place of #defines in C++." Why would C code not do this too? The GCC documentation shoul

[Bug c++/68890] [5/6 Regression] ICE in verify_ctor_sanity, at cp/constexpr.c:2113

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68890 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c/69828] New: result of shift operation has wrong type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69828 Bug ID: 69828 Summary: result of shift operation has wrong type Product: gcc Version: 4.8.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/69828] result of shift operation has wrong type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69828 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/69824] [4.9/5/6 Regression] internal compiler error in unshare_body

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69824 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org Assi

[Bug target/69738] PowerPC built-in __builtin_addg6s should be enabled on 64-bit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69738 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug driver/66293] Support -Weverything to enable all warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66293 --- Comment #5 from Jean-Michaël Celerier --- > In my experience, options like -Weverything tend to be too noisy to be > generally useful for projects of non-trivial size. It's always possible to run -Weverything -Wno-foo -Wno-bar to remove unw

[Bug c/69828] result of shift operation has wrong type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69828 --- Comment #2 from Tom Ace --- My apologies. I read the language spec before posting but I didn't read carefully enough. I agree with your resolution of the report as invalid. Thanks for the fast response.

[Bug c++/69826] problem with cilkplus pragma and preprocessor variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69826 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- What does the CILK+ documentation say about the pragma and using macros. I do know that not all pragma want to process macros in them.

  1   2   >