[Bug c++/54430] [C++11] For-Loop: Scope of iterating variable begins too early

2015-08-09 Thread akim.demaille at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54430 Akim Demaille changed: What|Removed |Added CC||akim.demaille at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug c++/54430] [C++11] For-Loop: Scope of iterating variable begins too early

2015-08-09 Thread akim.demaille at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54430 --- Comment #5 from Akim Demaille --- FWIW, it's on StackOverflow since May 2013. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16407212/identifier-with-the-same-name-in-both-expression-and-declaration-of-range-based

[Bug bootstrap/67158] ICE dwarf2out.c:19910/gen_inlined_subroutine_die, at : Compiling gcc6.0 with gcc6.0 -flto

2015-08-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67158 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libfortran/66936] io/unix.c gratuitously uses S_IRWXG and S_IRWXO on the basis that umask() is available

2015-08-09 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/67164] New: [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class ‘expression’, have ‘exceptional’ (argument_pack_select) in tree_operand_check, at tree.h:3356

2015-08-09 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67164 Bug ID: 67164 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class ‘expression’, have ‘exceptional’ (argument_pack_select) in tree_operand_check, at tree.h:3356

[Bug c++/67164] ICE: tree check: expected class ‘expression’, have ‘exceptional’ (argument_pack_select) in tree_operand_check, at tree.h:3356

2015-08-09 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67164 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6 Regression] ICE: tree|ICE: tree check: expected

[Bug c++/67164] ICE: tree check: expected class ‘expression’, have ‘exceptional’ (argument_pack_select) in tree_operand_check, at tree.h:3356

2015-08-09 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67164 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ldionne.2 at gmail dot com --- Com

[Bug c++/67159] [c++concepts] Segfault while diagnosing constraint violation

2015-08-09 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67159 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Casey Carter from comment #3) > Thanks once again, Jason. Procedural question: now that c++-concepts has > landed on trunk, should I be tagging bug reports differently? i.e., > Version=6.0 and ma

[Bug other/67165] New: please enable libbacktrace to work with compressed debug sections

2015-08-09 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67165 Bug ID: 67165 Summary: please enable libbacktrace to work with compressed debug sections Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/67166] New: Inconsistency between static data members and static functions when using multiple inheritance

2015-08-09 Thread anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67166 Bug ID: 67166 Summary: Inconsistency between static data members and static functions when using multiple inheritance Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/67165] please enable libbacktrace to work with compressed debug sections

2015-08-09 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67165 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/67163] g2 generates incorrect decl_line

2015-08-09 Thread dehao at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67163 --- Comment #4 from dehao at gcc dot gnu.org --- Right, in -g2 binary debug info, the decl_file is pointing to the header file in which the function is declared. However, if the definition is available, it makes more sense to point decl_file and d

[Bug libfortran/66936] io/unix.c gratuitously uses S_IRWXG and S_IRWXO on the basis that umask() is available

2015-08-09 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936 --- Comment #15 from Steve Kargl --- On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 08:53:36AM +, fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Kai, as mingw maintainer, can you comment? Why did this issue appear recently? > And does the patch seem OK to you? > See comme

[Bug libfortran/66936] io/unix.c gratuitously uses S_IRWXG and S_IRWXO on the basis that umask() is available

2015-08-09 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936 --- Comment #16 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- Author: fxcoudert Date: Sun Aug 9 16:43:42 2015 New Revision: 226750 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226750&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libfortran/66936 * io/unix.c (__MINGW32_

[Bug libfortran/66936] io/unix.c gratuitously uses S_IRWXG and S_IRWXO on the basis that umask() is available

2015-08-09 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug rtl-optimization/67145] [6 Regression] associativity from psuedo-reg ordering

2015-08-09 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67145 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/67145] [6 Regression] associativity from psuedo-reg ordering

2015-08-09 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67145 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- Note that r224768 was specifically about keeping register order (association and commutation) when simplify_plus_minus does not simplify an expression, because ordering matters for machine insn matching when an

[Bug tree-optimization/67153] [5/6 Regression] integer optimizations 53% slower than std::bitset<>

2015-08-09 Thread ncm at cantrip dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67153 --- Comment #3 from ncm at cantrip dot org --- Created attachment 36159 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36159&action=edit bitset, but using an inlined container adapter, not lambdas, and slow This version compiles just as bad

[Bug c/39121] strange behavior in chained operations

2015-08-09 Thread frankhb1989 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39121 frankhb1989 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||frankhb1989 at gmail dot co

[Bug fortran/64022] [F2003][IEEE] ieee_support_flag does not handle kind=10 and kind=16 REAL variables

2015-08-09 Thread uros at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64022 --- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Mon Aug 10 05:13:01 2015 New Revision: 226755 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226755&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR fortran/64022 * gfortran.dg/ieee/large_4.f90: