https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65089
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65665
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65665
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Hello.
I've just sent patch to mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg00108.html
May I ask you for testing if it survives on your target?
Thanks,
Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65205
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65665
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I've just sent patch to mailing list:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg00108.html
>
> May I ask you for testing if it survives on your target?
After an incremental update with the pat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65581
--- Comment #14 from Rainer Emrich ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 03.04.2015 01:31, schrieb hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org:
> --- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka --- the
> compiled code (test.s) is identical to what LTO path prod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64986
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> JFTR: starting with a revision in the range (221618:221635] this fails
> somewhat similarly for cris-elf; the simulator reports an invalid memory
> access (any optimization level, different addresses
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65637
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35221
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35221&action=edit
patch for autopar-1.exe
For autopar-1.c, the original loop has a loop phi:
# s.5_20 = PHI
After
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64986
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Further reduced test:
program test
implicit none
type t
integer :: ii
end type t
type, extends(t) :: v
real, allocatable :: rr(:)
end type v
type(v) :: b(3)
b = func7() ! scala
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Reopening, something is wrong with the testcase:(In reply to Paul Thomas
> from comment #11)
> > Fixed on trunk, aka 5.0.0
>
> The added testcase fails with valgrind due to memory errors, please see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64944
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65443
--- Comment #15 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Submitted updated patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg00115.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64066
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65665
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> Hello.
>
> I've just sent patch to mailing list:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg00108.html
>
> May I ask you for testing if it survives on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64763
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63858
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65634
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Sutton ---
Created attachment 35222
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35222&action=edit
Proposed solution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65634
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Sutton ---
Confirmed and fixed 221854, but I'd like a maintainer to look at the attached
patch.
The bug was caused by asking for TYPE_NOTHROW_P on the function return type
instead of the function type. Strangely, this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59016
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I have tested on trunk (5.0) the following variant
--- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/interface.c2015-03-25 14:07:04.0 +0100
+++ gcc/fortran/interface.c2015-03-30 10:05:08.0 +0200
@@ -1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57519
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #7)
> Created attachment 34064 [details]
> Code generated for the testcase by "g++ -gdwarf-2 -dA -O0
> -fno-merge-debug-strings imported-decl-2.C -S -fverbose-a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65666
Bug ID: 65666
Summary: [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr64378.C -O2
-flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partitio n=none
(internal compiler error)
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65666
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65665
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65667
Bug ID: 65667
Summary: [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/pr57101.C
-std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65667
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65637
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35224
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35224&action=edit
current state of patch series
Current state of patch series. Passes libgomp graphite.exp, libgomp c.e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65665
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> Hello.
>
> I've just sent patch to mailing list:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg00108.html
>
> May I ask you for testing if it survives o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65667
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65667
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65636
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Sutton ---
Created attachment 35225
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35225&action=edit
Proposed solution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65636
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Sutton ---
Confirmed and with a tentative fix in r221856.
Certain type declarations occurring at namespace scope are not given C++
language extensions, so when we try to pass those through tsubst_decl, the
specializati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65660
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
Performance seems to be back at Apr 2
Apr 2, 2015 16:20 UTC
(Values: Base: 164.gzip: 1562, 175.vpr: 2384, 176.gcc: 2873, 181.mcf: 3743,
186.crafty: 2922, 197.parser: 2002, 252.eon: 4144, 255.vortex: 3345, 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65660
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
32bit runs still shows regression between
Feb 10, 2015 17:03 UTC
(Values: Base: 164.gzip: 1478, 176.gcc: 3065, 181.mcf: 5127, 186.crafty:
2013, 197.parser: 2057, 252.eon: 2604, 255.vortex: 3062, 256.bzip2:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65635
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Sutton ---
Confirmed and fixed in r221857.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59016
--- Comment #10 from drikosev at otenet dot gr ---
Created attachment 35226
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35226&action=edit
altered patch for the regressions reported in comment 9
Hi Dominiq,
In a slightly altered patched,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64085
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64085
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Apr 3 17:23:27 2015
New Revision: 221858
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221858&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2015-04-03 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/64085
* lambda.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076
--- Comment #55 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Fri Apr 3 18:09:13 2015
New Revision: 221859
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221859&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/65076
* ipa-inline.c (edge_badness): Add combined size to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65655
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65655
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Fri Apr 3 18:19:53 2015
New Revision: 221860
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221860&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/65655
* ipa-inline-analysis.c (edge_set_predicate): Do not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65660
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On April 3, 2015 6:22:48 PM GMT+02:00, "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65660
>
>--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
>Performance seems to be back
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65668
Bug ID: 65668
Summary: gcc does not know how to use __eabi_uldivmod properly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
URL: https://gist.github.com/mrvn/0c79b146f74c28da401f
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57580
Ben Webb changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ben at salilab dot org
--- Comment #5 from Be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65614
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #35168|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65614
--- Comment #4 from David Edelsohn ---
Comment on attachment 35227
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35227
Proposed patch to fix the problem
The FLOAT_EXTEND cost should be based on the processor tuning, not the ISA.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65669
Bug ID: 65669
Summary: Don't emit debug info for fake_ostream version of cerr
(and others)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65669
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65089
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65654
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
OK, it reproduces for me. The size difference is 2
Caller size is:
Inline summary for set_laplace_on_hex_vector/158341 inlinable
self time: 1602
global time: 1602
self size: 43
global
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65654
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
I am testing the following:
Index: ipa-inline-transform.c
===
--- ipa-inline-transform.c (revision 221859)
+++ ipa-inline-transform.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65648
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Fri Apr 3 20:25:01 2015
New Revision: 221861
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221861&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/65648
* ipa-inline-transform.c (inline_call): Skip sanity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65654
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |6.0
Summary|[5 Regression] 447.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65637
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #4)
> Created attachment 35224 [details]
> current state of patch series
>
> Current state of patch series. Passes libgomp graphite.exp, libgomp c.exp
> and gcc auto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65669
--- Comment #2 from Doug Evans ---
I was wondering if one could just do a strip --strip-debug of globals_io.o in
the Makefile.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65670
Bug ID: 65670
Summary: [5 Regression] missing libstdc++ symbols on
powerpc64le-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65089
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
The patch eliminates the issue for all three of the BOZ cases. What I do not
understand is why passing the pointer p to strlen causes a problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65089
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Le 4 avr. 2015 à 00:25, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
> a écrit :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65089
>
> --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
> The patch eliminates the issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65670
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64le-linux-gnu |powerpc64le-linux-gnu,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65240
--- Comment #17 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Fri Apr 3 23:16:26 2015
New Revision: 221862
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221862&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/65576
PR target/65240
* config/rs6000/predicates.md (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65576
--- Comment #8 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Fri Apr 3 23:16:26 2015
New Revision: 221862
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221862&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/65576
PR target/65240
* config/rs6000/predicates.md (z
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65576
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65657
--- Comment #2 from Doug Goldstein ---
I can confirm the same issue affects gcc 4.9.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65550
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65671
Bug ID: 65671
Summary: Assembly failure (invalid register operand) with -O3
-mavx512vl
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
64 matches
Mail list logo
