[Bug c/63303] Pointer subtraction is broken when using -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63303 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||aarch64 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/63306] New: [4.9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in analyze_functions()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63306 Bug ID: 63306 Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in analyze_functions() Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/63306] [4.9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in analyze_functions()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63306 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2014-9-19 Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/63244] [4.9 regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63244 --- Comment #11 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #10) > The testcase from comment 4 started segfaulting with r202298. I've opened PR63306 for this issue.

[Bug c/63301] inconsistency on wchar_t and wint_t types and sizes for diverse architectures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63301 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/63294] ICE allocattion of array of type of type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63294 --- Comment #2 from Valery Weber --- the problem is the same as 61952

[Bug fortran/63294] ICE allocattion of array of type of type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63294 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/61952] ICE allocattion of array of type of type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61952 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- *** Bug 63294 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/62662] [4.9/5 Regression] Miscompilation of Qt on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62662 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Krebbel --- Author: krebbel Date: Fri Sep 19 09:14:59 2014 New Revision: 215381 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215381&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-09-19 Andreas Krebbel PR target/62662 * config/s390/s

[Bug c++/60420] [C++11] Bogus "error: ‘const’ qualifiers cannot be applied to ‘int&’" with lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60420 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/62662] [4.9/5 Regression] Miscompilation of Qt on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62662 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Krebbel --- Author: krebbel Date: Fri Sep 19 09:20:38 2014 New Revision: 215383 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215383&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-09-19 Andreas Krebbel PR target/62662 * config/s390/s

[Bug c++/58328] [C++11] bogus: error: constructor required before non-static data member for

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58328 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini --- Thus, I'm going to add to the testsuite both testcases as ill-formed and closing the bug.

[Bug middle-end/63186] [4.9/5 Regression] Undefined .L* symbols because of fnsplit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63186 --- Comment #5 from Dan Horák --- Jan, can you backport the fix also to 4.9? It is causing a problem in Fedora where at least one build is failing due this problem.

[Bug c++/58328] [C++11] bogus: error: constructor required before non-static data member for

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58328 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/58328] [C++11] bogus: error: constructor required before non-static data member for

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58328 --- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Sep 19 09:34:14 2014 New Revision: 215386 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215386&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-09-19 Paolo Carlini PR c++/58328 * g++.dg/cpp0

[Bug c++/61951] -Wextra switch produce warning: parameter 'ptr' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-parameter]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61951 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/63307] New: [4.9/5 Regression] Cilk+ breaks -fcompare-debug bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63307 Bug ID: 63307 Summary: [4.9/5 Regression] Cilk+ breaks -fcompare-debug bootstrap Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug c++/63295] Insane memory use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63295 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||memory-hog Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c++/63308] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63308 Bug ID: 63308 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/63308] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63308 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/63309] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63309 Bug ID: 63309 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug fortran/63152] needless initialization of local pointer arrays.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63152 --- Comment #3 from vondele at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vondele Date: Fri Sep 19 10:28:00 2014 New Revision: 215387 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215387&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-09-19 Joost VandeVondele PR fortran/63152 *

[Bug fortran/63152] needless initialization of local pointer arrays.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63152 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/60421] std::this_thread::sleep_for doesn't sleep for all arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60421 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/31247] std::vector::iterator::value_type is accessible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31247 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #10) > that's exactly what you'll test, since iterator_traits is not guaranteed to > be sfinae-friendly. N.B. that's changed for C++14. I'm still not motivated to im

[Bug libstdc++/48101] obscure error message with std::set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48101 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/51008] GTHR - extend interface with __gthread_recursive_mutex_destroy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51008 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/51618] synchronous futures are slow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51618 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug c++/62046] A catch in a class, without any try, compiles fine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62046 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini --- I think it can be reduced like this: void foo() { } catch (...); class bar { void foo() { } catch (...); }; we reject only the former.

[Bug libstdc++/53626] [C++11] move assignment for ifstream

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53626 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/56437] basic_string assumes that allocators are default-constructible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56437 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/56785] std::tuple of two elements does not apply empty base class optimization when one of its elements is a std::tuple with two elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56785 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/57953] no C++11 compliant std::ios_base::failure found

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57953 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/55394] Using call_once without -lpthread compiles without warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55394 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- related to PR 58929

[Bug libstdc++/58929] condition_variable does not wait without -pthread

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58929 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- related to PR 55394

[Bug target/60624] creation of working linux sparc32 kernel fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60624 Waldemar Brodkorb changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59192 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #7 from Jonath

[Bug libstdc++/59987] [C++11]: Missing ios_base::hexfloat format specifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59987 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/60176] [C++11] void return value in std::list<>::insert() c++1 should be an iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60176 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Version|unknown

[Bug libstdc++/60278] string::erase() (and other containers) does not take const_iterators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60278 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/60396] Missing time_get<>::get() functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60396 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/60333] type_traits make_signed, make_unsigned missing support for long long enumerations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60333 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/63309] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63309 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/63309] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63309 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- *** Bug 63308 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/63308] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63308 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/31247] std::vector::iterator::value_type is accessible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31247 --- Comment #16 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #15) > I'm still not motivated to implement this request though. It would break too much code. If people really insisted (which they don't), I believe it would be sa

[Bug c++/58192] G++ emits incorrect code when passing enum classes as function parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58192 --- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > That is to be determined. Either it might be an x86_64 bug in passing such > types, or FE issue, middle-end. Please note that the error also occurs with -m32, so

[Bug ada/63310] New: Ada bootstrap error with -fcompare-debug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63310 Bug ID: 63310 Summary: Ada bootstrap error with -fcompare-debug Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada

[Bug ada/63310] Ada bootstrap error with -fcompare-debug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63310 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.2

[Bug libstdc++/54354] TODO extended iomanip manipulators std::get_time and std::put_time (C++11, section 27.7.5)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54354 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug c++/58192] G++ emits incorrect code when passing enum classes as function parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58192 --- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak --- Looking at dumps, obtained with -m32 -O1, we have following sequence before the call to _ZN2S1Ut_3setE3Foo: _.dfinit: (insn 7 3 8 2 (parallel [ (set (reg:SI 88) (lshiftrt:SI (reg/v

[Bug c/63301] inconsistency on wchar_t and wint_t types and sizes for diverse architectures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63301 --- Comment #2 from Marcos Diaz --- Sorry, I expressed wrong the issue I was reporting, What I want to ask is the following: Is it ok that the wchar_t is a long int and the wint_t is just an int?

[Bug libstdc++/58266] gcc-4.7.3: memleaks reported by valgrind

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58266 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/60662] simple use of call_once throws a system_error exception, but not if sleep_for is called beforehand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60662 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Probably related to PR 55394

[Bug libstdc++/61041] Cannot create std::tr1::variate_generator from variate_generator::engine(); engine_value_type error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61041 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/61426] [C++11] std::deque requires more from allocator than the standard provides.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61426 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/62169] map iterators under _GLIBCXX_DEBUG diverge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62169 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/44882] Bogus types in references with mismatched commons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44882 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #14 from Domi

[Bug libstdc++/54392] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] std::string::assign() fails to update length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54392 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||24882 Target Milestone|4.8.4

[Bug libstdc++/53221] [C++11] basic_string lacks "copy/move constructors" with allocator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53221 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||24882 Target Milestone|---

[Bug libstdc++/61458] std::aligned_storage is bigger than expected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61458 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/58968] Powerpc -mlra cannot compile ormas1.f in gamess Spec 2006 with -m32 -mcpu=power7 -O3 -mlra -w -ffast-math -funroll-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58968 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #5 from Domin

[Bug c/53874] -Wswitch-enum not properly working with bitfields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53874 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/55963] std::vector fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55963 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/48101] obscure error message with std::set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48101 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||corey at octayn dot net --- Comment #2

[Bug target/56993] power gcc built 416.gamess generates wrong result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56993 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/63303] Pointer subtraction is broken when using -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63303 --- Comment #2 from mikulas at artax dot karlin.mff.cuni.cz --- Jakub Jelinek: I know, but the problem happened in perfectly valid program. Suppose that you do: char *p = malloc(0x2000); - the allocator allocates the array at 0x7000. The

[Bug c++/63306] [4.9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in analyze_functions()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63306 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c/63303] Pointer subtraction is broken when using -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63303 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libstdc++/60940] general operations on atomic types do not work with atomic integral typedefs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60940 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug libstdc++/60555] std::system_category().default_error_condition() doesn't map system errno values to std::generic_category()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60555 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug c++/62219] [c++11] Spurious error for lambda in a friend function of a class template with a default template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62219 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini --- I think I had in mind c++/60605

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 --- Comment #5 from Venkataramanan --- We got inspired by this bug. https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400 It happens at -O0 now.

[Bug c++/58192] G++ emits incorrect code when passing enum classes as function parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58192 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- When I compile: #ifdef CHAR typedef unsigned char Foo; #else enum class Foo : unsigned char { FOO }; #endif unsigned int v1, v2; __attribute__((noinline, noclone)) static void foo (Foo a) { v1 = (unsigned

[Bug c/63301] inconsistency on wchar_t and wint_t types and sizes for diverse architectures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63301 Joel Sherrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joel at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 f

[Bug ipa/61998] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with -Wsuggest-final-types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61998 --- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Author: trippels Date: Fri Sep 19 14:44:09 2014 New Revision: 215392 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215392&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ipa/61998 Fix crash -Wsuggest-final-types crash -Wsuggest-fin

[Bug ipa/61998] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with -Wsuggest-final-types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61998 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/63311] New: [4.9/5 Regression] -O1 optimization introduces valgrind warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63311 Bug ID: 63311 Summary: [4.9/5 Regression] -O1 optimization introduces valgrind warning Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/63312] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/float128-exact-underflow.c -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63312 Bug ID: 63312 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/float128-exact-underflow.c -O0 execution test Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/56993] power gcc built 416.gamess generates wrong result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56993 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 33517 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33517&action=edit Here is my spec 2006 patch I need this patch on x86.

[Bug ipa/63313] New: ICE in ipa-comdats.c:371

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63313 Bug ID: 63313 Summary: ICE in ipa-comdats.c:371 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ipa Assignee

[Bug testsuite/63305] ASan reported heap-buffer-overflow in gcc.target/i386/avx256-unaligned-load{store}-7.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63305 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/63303] Pointer subtraction is broken when using -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63303 --- Comment #4 from mikulas at artax dot karlin.mff.cuni.cz --- ... and another related problem (try this on 32-bit system): #include #include int main(void) { short *a = malloc(0x5000 * sizeof(short)); short *b = a + 0x500

[Bug c/63303] Pointer subtraction is broken when using -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63303 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to mikulas from comment #4) > ... and another related problem (try this on 32-bit system): > > #include > #include > > int main(void) > { > short *a = malloc(0x5000 * sizeof(short));

[Bug c/63303] Pointer subtraction is broken when using -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63303 --- Comment #6 from mikulas at artax dot karlin.mff.cuni.cz --- "you really can't have an object bigger than half of the address space in C/C++" - where does the standard claim this? If this is true, we should change malloc so that it doesn't allo

[Bug c/63303] Pointer subtraction is broken when using -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63303 --- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Yes, I consider it a bug in malloc that it produces objects 2GB or more in size on 32-bit systems (because of the one-past-end address, the largest size that can't produce undefined behavio

[Bug debug/63300] 'const volatile' sometimes stripped in debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63300 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/63303] Pointer subtraction is broken when using -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63303 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to mikulas from comment #6) > Regarding pointer difference, the C standard says this: > > When two pointers are subtracted, both shall point to elements of the same > array object, or one past the

[Bug target/63312] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/float128-exact-underflow.c -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63312 --- Comment #1 from Joseph S. Myers --- Created attachment 33519 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33519&action=edit Untested patch Please try this patch. As I noted in my patch posting, the issue is that there is no ia64 def

[Bug ada/63310] Ada bootstrap error with -fcompare-debug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63310 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/63286] [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101014-2 cp_lto_20101014-2_0.o assemble, * after r215196

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63286 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I am testing: > Index: tree.c > ... AFAICT the patch in comment 1 does not fix the PR.

[Bug c/63303] Pointer subtraction is broken when using -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63303 --- Comment #9 from mikulas at artax dot karlin.mff.cuni.cz --- > See what I wrote, any object size bigger than half of address space really > isn't supportable, because then (char *) (P) - (char *) (Q) might not fit into > ptrdiff_t. There is no

[Bug middle-end/63244] [4.9 regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63244 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug libstdc++/63314] New: valarray mask/indices refers to temporary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63314 Bug ID: 63314 Summary: valarray mask/indices refers to temporary Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: libstd

[Bug debug/63300] 'const volatile' sometimes stripped in debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63300 --- Comment #2 from Mark Wielaard --- Sorry about that. I added an explicit testcases (gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/const-volatile.c and gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/restrict.c) explicitly to catch such issue. But apparently they didn't trigger t

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 Venkataramanan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|WONTFIX

  1   2   >