[Bug c/56989] wrong location in error message

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56989 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu May 1 07:08:19 2014 New Revision: 209969 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209969&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/56989 * c-typeck.c (default_conversion): Use better location

[Bug c/56989] wrong location in error message

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56989 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/43245] add option to control "discarding qualifiers" warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43245 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu May 1 07:16:10 2014 New Revision: 209970 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209970&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/43245 * doc/invoke.texi: Document -Wdiscarded-qualifiers. c-

[Bug c/43245] add option to control "discarding qualifiers" warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43245 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/29467] -ansi -pedantic accepts _Bool without diagnostic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29467 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu May 1 07:21:07 2014 New Revision: 209971 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209971&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/29467 * c-decl.c (declspecs_add_type): Pedwarn if boolean ty

[Bug c/29467] -ansi -pedantic accepts _Bool without diagnostic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29467 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/43395] Gcc warns label as local variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43395 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu May 1 07:29:38 2014 New Revision: 209973 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209973&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/43395 c/ * c-typeck.c (c_finish_return): Distinguish between

[Bug c/43395] Gcc warns label as local variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43395 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/60257] Incorrect column number and confusing message in -Woverride-init

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60257 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu May 1 07:35:05 2014 New Revision: 209974 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209974&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/60257 * c-typeck.c (warning_init): Add location_t parameter.

[Bug c/60257] Incorrect column number and confusing message in -Woverride-init

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60257 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/60915] confusing diagnostic from attribute on function definition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60915 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu May 1 07:40:26 2014 New Revision: 209975 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209975&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/60915 * c-parser.c (c_parser_declaration_or_fndef): Give bet

[Bug c/60915] confusing diagnostic from attribute on function definition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60915 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/60871] [4.9/4.10 Regression] internal compiler error: in possible_polymorphic_call_targets, at ipa-devirt.c:1510

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60871 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka --- This is yet another case where get_binfo_at_offset incorrectly returns NULL (wich is in there for long time, but before we started sanity check it just led to missed optimizations). In class D there is base C7

[Bug ipa/60871] [4.9/4.10 Regression] internal compiler error: in possible_polymorphic_call_targets, at ipa-devirt.c:1510

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60871 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug target/61024] New: nios2-rtems4.11 build of 4.9.0 fails on FreeBSD 10 c++ (clang).

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61024 Bug ID: 61024 Summary: nios2-rtems4.11 build of 4.9.0 fails on FreeBSD 10 c++ (clang). Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/61025] New: [4.10 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_this_image_1.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61025 Bug ID: 61025 Summary: [4.10 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_this_image_1.f90 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/61025] [4.10 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_this_image_1.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61025 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.9.0 |4.10.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/61026] New: sh-rtems4.11 build of 4.9.0 fails on FreeBSD 10 c++ (clang).

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61026 Bug ID: 61026 Summary: sh-rtems4.11 build of 4.9.0 fails on FreeBSD 10 c++ (clang). Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug testsuite/61025] [4.10 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_this_image_1.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61025 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-05/msg0.html.

[Bug ipa/60965] [4.10 Regression] IPA: Devirtualization versus placement new

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka --- I am testing the attached patch. Index: ipa-devirt.c === --- ipa-devirt.c(revision 209913) +++ ipa-devirt.c(working copy) @@ -1137,

[Bug driver/60968] [4.9 Regression] Bootstrap fails on mingw32 with -dumpspecs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60968 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Starke --- Created attachment 32720 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32720&action=edit gdb output with backtrace for -falign-functions I have tried building GCC 4.9.0 with other optimizations enabled

[Bug target/61026] sh-rtems4.11 build of 4.9.0 fails on FreeBSD 10 c++ (clang).

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61026 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- I think the C++ headers (, and ) need to be included before the GCC headers that poison malloc. The actual culprit is but there's no guarantee the others don't use malloc.

[Bug ada/61027] New: gnatcmd gets SIGABRT during exception handling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61027 Bug ID: 61027 Summary: gnatcmd gets SIGABRT during exception handling Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada

[Bug driver/61028] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] -g3 -g leads to spurious warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61028 Bug ID: 61028 Summary: [4.9/4.10 Regression] -g3 -g leads to spurious warnings Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug fortran/41137] inefficient zeroing of an array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41137 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.4, 4.7.3, 4.8.2, 4.9.0 Kn

[Bug target/49423] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] [arm] internal compiler error: in push_minipool_fix

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423 --- Comment #26 from jules at gcc dot gnu.org --- The testcase I previously had for this bug no longer reproduces since LRA was enabled by default on ARM. So, it's possible the bug is now dormant, or indeed fixed. The difference in the postreload d

[Bug fortran/41137] inefficient zeroing of an array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41137 --- Comment #18 from Joost VandeVondele --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #17) > With -O3, I get the same timings for the test in comment 1 since gcc 4.6.4. > Could this PR be closed as FIXED or did I miss something in the discus

[Bug fortran/51260] PARAMETER array with constructor initializer: Compile-time simplify single element access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51260 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/60737] rs6000 expand_block_clear uses word stores on double word pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60737 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED Version|4.8.3

[Bug sanitizer/61021] [4.9 regression] libsanitizer fails to build with old glibc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61021 --- Comment #3 from Sandra Loosemore --- Patch sent to llvm-commits. For now I can unblock my work by applying the patch locally, but this isn't something we'd want to carry around permanently and have to apply to future versions of GCC, especial

[Bug c/61029] New: Bogus conversion warnings are issued on a sign change "a = -a;" operation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61029 Bug ID: 61029 Summary: Bogus conversion warnings are issued on a sign change "a = -a;" operation Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivia

[Bug middle-end/60102] powerpc fp-bit ices at dwf_regno

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60102 Cesar Philippidis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cesar at codesourcery dot com --- Com

[Bug c/61029] Bogus conversion warnings are issued on a sign change "a = -a;" operation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61029 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/60102] powerpc fp-bit ices at dwf_regno

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60102 Sandra Loosemore changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at codesourcery dot com --- Com

[Bug c/61029] Bogus conversion warnings are issued on a sign change "a = -a;" operation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61029 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Chichkov --- Ah. Yes. You are correct. It doesn't look like it is being truncated to 0, as the following code: #include #include int main() { short int a = SHRT_MIN; printf("%d\n", a); a = -a; p

[Bug fortran/41137] inefficient zeroing of an array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41137 --- Comment #19 from Thomas Koenig --- Also see PR 55858.

[Bug target/61030] New: PowerPC 128 bit integer divide

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61030 Bug ID: 61030 Summary: PowerPC 128 bit integer divide Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target A

[Bug target/61030] PowerPC 128 bit integer divide

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61030 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc*-*-* Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c/61029] Bogus conversion warnings are issued on a sign change "a = -a;" operation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61029 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org Res

[Bug c++/40752] -Wconversion generates false warnings for operands not larger than target type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40752 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dchichkov at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug fortran/60956] error reading (and writing) large text files in gfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60956 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/60890] Performance regression in 4.8 for memory postinc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60890 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug libstdc++/61023] set/map move assignment doesn't move (or copy) the comparator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61023 --- Comment #4 from Nevin Liber --- Good point about the Standard. However, the current behavior for move assignment breaks the invariant of the container, since the comparator is what enforces the insertion ordering and element equivalence. Tak

[Bug target/61031] New: [4.10 Regression] ICE building libjava (verify_flow_info failed)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61031 Bug ID: 61031 Summary: [4.10 Regression] ICE building libjava (verify_flow_info failed) Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/61026] sh-rtems4.11 build of 4.9.0 fails on FreeBSD 10 c++ (clang).

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61026 Joel Sherrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joel at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug fortran/61002] Can't divide by 0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61002 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/61002] Can't divide by 0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61002 --- Comment #4 from Fred Krogh --- No objection here. I had just missed -fno-range-check, see comment 1.

[Bug fortran/61002] Can't divide by 0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61002 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/60956] error reading (and writing) large text files in gfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60956 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/61032] New: rs6000 code gen suffers from lack of address_cost

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61032 Bug ID: 61032 Summary: rs6000 code gen suffers from lack of address_cost Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/61032] rs6000 code gen suffers from lack of address_cost

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61032 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- This is a code quality regression from gcc-4.7.2

[Bug debug/61033] New: Infinite loop in variable tracking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61033 Bug ID: 61033 Summary: Infinite loop in variable tracking Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug

[Bug rtl-optimization/60947] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Unable to handle kernel paging request (linux kernel 2.6.28.9) with gcc 4.9 release

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60947 --- Comment #11 from YuFan --- any update? Do I need to provide other information?

[Bug c/60784] Spurious -Wmissing-field-initializers warning for anonymous structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60784 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri May 2 05:40:38 2014 New Revision: 209998 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209998&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/60784 * c-typeck.c (push_init_level): Set constructor_design

[Bug c/60784] Spurious -Wmissing-field-initializers warning for anonymous structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60784 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/59758] [4.9/4.10 Regression] bootstrap failure in libsanitizer/asan on sparc-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59758 David S. Miller changed: What|Removed |Added CC||davem at davemloft dot net --- Comment

[Bug sanitizer/59758] [4.9/4.10 Regression] bootstrap failure in libsanitizer/asan on sparc-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59758 --- Comment #9 from David S. Miller --- The next problem you'll run into is that the shmid additions for sparc weren't done correctly in the patch. Where you see 's64', it should be 'long', and where you see 'u64' it should be 'unsigned long'. I

[Bug sanitizer/59758] [4.9/4.10 Regression] bootstrap failure in libsanitizer/asan on sparc-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59758 --- Comment #10 from David S. Miller --- Created attachment 32723 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32723&action=edit Fix for libsanitizer build on sparc This adjusted patch fixes the build for me.