[Bug c++/59554] Errors with const and volatile in templates.

2013-12-19 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59554 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/59545] Signed integer overflow issues

2013-12-19 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59545 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug target/52794] gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr52027.c fails on x86_64/i386-apple-darwin*

2013-12-19 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52794 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I confirm that this PR is fixed by r206070, see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-12/msg01811.html and http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-12/msg01813.html.

[Bug bootstrap/59536] [4.9 regression] internal compiler error: in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2376 breaks m68k-linux bootstrap

2013-12-19 Thread amker.cheng at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59536 --- Comment #10 from bin.cheng --- The offending loop before IVOPT is like: : # var_index_1889 = PHI <1(924), var_index_983(923)> # var_index.250_1269 = PHI <1(924), var_index.250_1959(923)> if (var_index.250_1269 < _1237) goto ; el

[Bug fortran/46991] [OOP] polymorphic assumed-size actual arguments

2013-12-19 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46991 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/59536] [4.9 regression] internal compiler error: in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2376 breaks m68k-linux bootstrap

2013-12-19 Thread amker.cheng at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59536 bin.cheng changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at codesourcery dot com,

[Bug bootstrap/59536] [4.9 regression] internal compiler error: in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2376 breaks m68k-linux bootstrap

2013-12-19 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59536 --- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab --- -fno-auto-inc-dec avoids the crash. Dup of #52306?

[Bug bootstrap/59536] [4.9 regression] internal compiler error: in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2376 breaks m68k-linux bootstrap

2013-12-19 Thread amker.cheng at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59536 --- Comment #13 from bin.cheng --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #12) > -fno-auto-inc-dec avoids the crash. Dup of #52306? It looks like, AFAICT. Only this time it's blocking bootstrap :(

[Bug middle-end/52306] ICE in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2158

2013-12-19 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52306 --- Comment #23 from Andreas Schwab --- *** Bug 59536 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug bootstrap/59536] [4.9 regression] internal compiler error: in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2376 breaks m68k-linux bootstrap

2013-12-19 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59536 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/59203] config/cris/cris.c:2491: possible typo ?

2013-12-19 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59203 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #1) > Thanks for catching, yep, s/t1/t2/ there. You are welcome. > Not sure why you mean by code rework, looks otherwise clear to me. I am not familiar with th

[Bug c++/59555] New: bogus error: template with C linkage with preprocessed c++ file

2013-12-19 Thread amker.cheng at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59555 Bug ID: 59555 Summary: bogus error: template with C linkage with preprocessed c++ file Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/59535] [4.9 regression] -Os code size regressions for Thumb1/Thumb2 with LRA

2013-12-19 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59535 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

2013-12-19 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #32 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > > Would it be possible to post the fix? TIA. > > Committed upstream as > > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=196779&view=rev > > Feel free to commit the exact same change to gcc > > or wait

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

2013-12-19 Thread kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #33 from Kostya Serebryany --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #32) > > > > Would it be possible to post the fix? TIA. > > > Committed upstream as > > > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=196779&view=rev > > > Feel

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

2013-12-19 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #34 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Feel free to commit the exact fix as in ... Sorry, no write access.

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

2013-12-19 Thread kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #35 from Kostya Serebryany --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #34) > > Feel free to commit the exact fix as in ... > > Sorry, no write access. Give me 1-2 hours. Just in case, please verify that the patch still works

[Bug rtl-optimization/59535] [4.9 regression] -Os code size regressions for Thumb1/Thumb2 with LRA

2013-12-19 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59535 --- Comment #12 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #11) > (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #9) > > (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #5) > > > I think major problem is in wrong alternat

[Bug tree-optimization/50955] [4.7 Regression] IVopts incorrectly rewrite the address of a global memory access into a local form.

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50955 --- Comment #20 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to bin.cheng from comment #19) > > > > >not about an iv use appearing in memory reference while not marked as > > >address_p, and can be fixed by revise the existing check condition, is > > >it tr

[Bug tree-optimization/40635] bogus name and location in 'may be used uninitialized' warning

2013-12-19 Thread philipp at marek dot priv.at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635 philipp at marek dot priv.at changed: What|Removed |Added CC||philipp at marek dot priv.at

[Bug other/59545] Signed integer overflow issues

2013-12-19 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59545 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug libstdc++/59436] [4.9 Regression] FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++200x/stdc++.cc (test for excess errors)

2013-12-19 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59436 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- I've looked at dozens of the failures, except for one they were all about an expected TREE_VEC being written as 0s (i.e. ERROR_MARK) in the PCH file, the one exception was TREE_LIST instead of TREE_VEC. But

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

2013-12-19 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #36 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Give me 1-2 hours. > Just in case, please verify that the patch still works on Mac 10.6 > (I don't have access to 10.6) Already done: see comment 27. Anyway, I guarantee a quick feedback!-)

[Bug testsuite/59556] New: Floating-point __sec_reduce_add tests not robust in face of contraction

2013-12-19 Thread bhaveet.shah at arm dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59556 Bug ID: 59556 Summary: Floating-point __sec_reduce_add tests not robust in face of contraction Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancem

[Bug tree-optimization/40635] bogus name and location in 'may be used uninitialized' warning

2013-12-19 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635 --- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to philipp from comment #4) > I have this or a very similar problem with debian amd64 4:4.8.2-1: > > main.c: In function ‘main’: > main.c:1231:23: error: ‘rv’ may be used uninitialized in this

[Bug middle-end/52306] ICE in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2158

2013-12-19 Thread mikpelinux at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52306 --- Comment #24 from Mikael Pettersson --- So where does that leave us? Disable -fauto-inc-dec by default, or try to make m68k work with LRA (which hopefully should avoid this reload bug)?

[Bug libstdc++/59557] [4.8/4.9 Regression]

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59557 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Known to work|

[Bug libstdc++/59557] New: [4.8/4.9 Regression]

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59557 Bug ID: 59557 Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee:

[Bug tree-optimization/40635] bogus name and location in 'may be used uninitialized' warning

2013-12-19 Thread philipp at marek dot priv.at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635 --- Comment #6 from philipp at marek dot priv.at --- I'm trying to get a minimized file via creduce. In case you have an experienced guess please look at src/main.c from github.com:ClusterLabs/booth.git 44b06e6d3c9c81d287020fe017a05f1386ae5e

[Bug libstdc++/59557] [4.8/4.9 Regression]

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59557 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chris at bubblescope dot net,

[Bug tree-optimization/40635] bogus name and location in 'may be used uninitialized' warning

2013-12-19 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635 --- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to philipp from comment #6) > I'm trying to get a minimized file via creduce. > > In case you have an experienced guess please look at src/main.c from >github.com:ClusterLabs/booth.git >

[Bug tree-optimization/40635] bogus name and location in 'may be used uninitialized' warning

2013-12-19 Thread philipp at marek dot priv.at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635 --- Comment #9 from philipp at marek dot priv.at --- Created attachment 31480 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31480&action=edit main.c not much use because of includes.

[Bug tree-optimization/40635] bogus name and location in 'may be used uninitialized' warning

2013-12-19 Thread philipp at marek dot priv.at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635 --- Comment #8 from philipp at marek dot priv.at --- I forgot to say that the uninitialized "rv" is in query_get_string_answer(). I've got a reduced main.c - but sadly there are still includes to other files, so it won't help that much. I'll atta

[Bug c++/59558] New: [MSP430-gcc] CPU setup, pre start program

2013-12-19 Thread jkroby at p3r dot info
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59558 Bug ID: 59558 Summary: [MSP430-gcc] CPU setup, pre start program Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/40635] bogus name and location in 'may be used uninitialized' warning

2013-12-19 Thread philipp at marek dot priv.at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635 --- Comment #10 from philipp at marek dot priv.at --- Well, I've found the culprit, so it's not that important to me anymore. Getting a completely wrong code location is the problem - you don't know what to fix, and have to do some kind of search.

[Bug tree-optimization/59387] [4.9 Regression] wrong code (hangs) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu

2013-12-19 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59387 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Summa

[Bug middle-end/52306] [4.8/4.9 regression] ICE in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2158

2013-12-19 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52306 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org S

[Bug middle-end/52306] [4.8/4.9 regression] ICE in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2158

2013-12-19 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52306 --- Comment #26 from Andreas Schwab --- What does that mean, it's too late?

[Bug tree-optimization/59387] [4.9 Regression] wrong code (hangs) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu

2013-12-19 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59387 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Seems it is SCCP that breaks this. We have a loop like: : c.2_10 = (unsigned char) c_lsm.11_20; _11 = c.2_10 + 255; c.3_12 = (char) _11; _14 = b_f1_lsm.12_7 + 1; : # c_lsm.11_20 = PHI # b_f1_

[Bug middle-end/52306] [4.8/4.9 regression] ICE in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2158

2013-12-19 Thread amker.cheng at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52306 bin.cheng changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker.cheng at gmail dot com --- Comment #27

[Bug tree-optimization/59387] [4.9 Regression] wrong code (hangs) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu

2013-12-19 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59387 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Note already the chrec is {c_lsm.11_15, +, -1}_2 with char type everywhere (but the 2 which is int, but that is irrelevant), so the information that the decrement was performed carefully in non-wrapping type i

[Bug fortran/59104] Wrong result with SIZE specification expression

2013-12-19 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/38183] Useless move to memory when passing small structs to functions

2013-12-19 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38183 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/59519] [4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in slpeel_update_phi_nodes_for_guard1, at tree-vect-loop-manip.c:486

2013-12-19 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59519 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug bootstrap/47016] bootstrap on darwin needs much more disk space than expected to complete

2013-12-19 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47016 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Any reason to keep this PR open?

[Bug boehm-gc/18135] gctest (boehm-gc) uses the installed libgcc_s on darwin

2013-12-19 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18135 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Posted more than three years ago: > Andrew, > Do you still see this issue with current gcc trunk since... Any reason to keep this PR open?

[Bug tree-optimization/59519] [4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in slpeel_update_phi_nodes_for_guard1, at tree-vect-loop-manip.c:486

2013-12-19 Thread amker.cheng at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59519 bin.cheng changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker.cheng at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 f

[Bug tree-optimization/59413] wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes

2013-12-19 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59413 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug libstdc++/59557] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Miscompilation after libstdc++ change

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59557 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug lto/59543] [4.9 Regression] lto1: fatal error: Cgraph edge statement index out of range

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59543 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto Priority|P3

[Bug target/38183] Useless move to memory when passing small structs to functions

2013-12-19 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38183 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- Works on Linux/x86-64 with GCC 4.8.

[Bug gcov-profile/59542] [4.9 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed during Firefox build with 'gold'

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59542 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug sanitizer/59009] libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

2013-12-19 Thread kcc at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009 --- Comment #37 from Kostya Serebryany --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #36) > > Give me 1-2 hours. > > Just in case, please verify that the patch still works on Mac 10.6 > > (I don't have access to 10.6) > > Already done: see

[Bug bootstrap/59541] [4.9 Regression] Revision 206070 breaks bootstrap on darwin

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59541 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/59559] New: ICE: invalid RTX sharing in expmed.c:expand_divmod

2013-12-19 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59559 Bug ID: 59559 Summary: ICE: invalid RTX sharing in expmed.c:expand_divmod Product: gcc Version: 4.8.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug rtl-optimization/59535] [4.9 regression] -Os code size regressions for Thumb1/Thumb2 with LRA

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59535 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization, ra Priori

[Bug bootstrap/59528] Profiledbootstrap should use stage1 compiler during stagefeedback

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59528 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener

[Bug middle-end/59471] [4.9 Regression] ICE using vector extensions (non-top-level BIT_FIELD_REF, IMAGPART_EXPR or REALPART_EXPR)

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59471 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- The reason I added this verification is that code does not expect those to appear at non-outermost handled-component. a V_C_E around a vector type B_F_R should have been split into two different stmts with a

[Bug middle-end/59471] [4.9 Regression] ICE using vector extensions (non-top-level BIT_FIELD_REF, IMAGPART_EXPR or REALPART_EXPR)

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59471 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug middle-end/59471] [4.9 Regression] ICE using vector extensions (non-top-level BIT_FIELD_REF, IMAGPART_EXPR or REALPART_EXPR)

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59471 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug gcov-profile/59527] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in fixup_reorder_chain, at cfgrtl.c:3739 during PGO Firefox build

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59527 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug middle-end/59521] __builtin_expect not effective in switch

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59521 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug target/59516] [4.9 Regression] Multiple definition of `X' / of `non-virtual thunk to X' errors with LTO

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59516 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org Target Mile

[Bug fortran/59493] [OOP] ICE: Segfault on Class(*) pointer association

2013-12-19 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59493 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/59515] -Og doesn't generate out-of-line copies of inline functions like -O0 does

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59515 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/58344] [4.9 Regression] ICE with segfault at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

2013-12-19 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58344 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milesto

[Bug driver/59512] Incomplete output files when compiler is killed

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59512 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/59469] [4.8/4.9 Regression] LLVM build failure with gcc LTO

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59469 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 --- Comment #23 from Richard Biener

[Bug rtl-optimization/59511] [4.9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr36222-1.c scan-assembler-not movdqa with -mtune=corei7

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59511 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug debug/59510] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in vt_expand_var_loc_chain, at var-tracking.c:8212 with -O2 -g --param=large-stack-frame-growth=1

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59510 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/59560] New: Resolution generic procedure of derived types fail

2013-12-19 Thread klaas_giesbertz at hotmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59560 Bug ID: 59560 Summary: Resolution generic procedure of derived types fail Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/59501] [4.9 Regression] Vector Gather with GCC 4.9 2013-12-08 Snapshot

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59501 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Known to work|

[Bug bootstrap/59496] [4.9 Regression] Bootstrap fails on powerpc-apple-darwin9 after r205685

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59496 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug testsuite/59494] [4.9 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-mgrid-resid.f scan-tree-dump-times optimized "vect_[^\\n]*\\+ " 13

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59494 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener

[Bug fortran/59560] Resolution generic procedure of derived types fail

2013-12-19 Thread klaas_giesbertz at hotmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59560 --- Comment #1 from klaas_giesbertz at hotmail dot com --- Sorry, the 2nd argument of Init of UseBase in the 1st test should have been target instead of pointer. In that case 'program Test' becomes the same as in the 2nd test.

[Bug fortran/59561] New: [4.9 Regression] warning: iteration 4 invokes undefined behavior

2013-12-19 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59561 Bug ID: 59561 Summary: [4.9 Regression] warning: iteration 4 invokes undefined behavior Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/59561] [4.9 Regression] warning: iteration 4 invokes undefined behavior

2013-12-19 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59561 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug middle-end/59285] [4.9 Regression] gcc.dg/builtin-unreachable-6.c:17:1: internal compiler error: in rtl_verify_fallthru, at cfgrtl.c:2862

2013-12-19 Thread yufeng at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59285 Yufeng Zhang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yufeng at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 f

[Bug libstdc++/59557] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Miscompilation after libstdc++ change

2013-12-19 Thread chris at bubblescope dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59557 --- Comment #2 from Chris Jefferson --- Investigating

[Bug tree-optimization/59519] [4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in slpeel_update_phi_nodes_for_guard1, at tree-vect-loop-manip.c:486

2013-12-19 Thread amker.cheng at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59519 --- Comment #4 from bin.cheng --- First clue. b_lsm.11_13 is recognized as chrec {1, +, 1}_2 with the patch, thus the loop can be vectorized now. : : # b.4_30 = PHI # prephitmp_28 = PHI # b_lsm.11_13 = PHI # ivtmp_46 = PHI c.1

[Bug libstdc++/59557] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Miscompilation after libstdc++ change

2013-12-19 Thread chris at bubblescope dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59557 --- Comment #3 from Chris Jefferson --- Can I just confirm I am testing this code correctly? caj@caj-laptop ~/Downloads> g++ BVH_Example.cpp -O0 caj@caj-laptop ~/Downloads> ./a.out Brute force distance = 0.00428018, calls = 1 BVH distance

[Bug c/59562] New: __builtin_assume_aligned loses constness when used as initializer element

2013-12-19 Thread stoeps at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59562 Bug ID: 59562 Summary: __builtin_assume_aligned loses constness when used as initializer element Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug libstdc++/59557] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Miscompilation after libstdc++ change

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59557 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Chris Jefferson from comment #3) > Can I just confirm I am testing this code correctly? > > caj@caj-laptop ~/Downloads> g++ BVH_Example.cpp -O0 > caj@caj-laptop ~/Downloads> ./a.out > Brute forc

[Bug middle-end/52306] [4.8/4.9 regression] ICE in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2158

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52306 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug debug/54694] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: in dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2out.c:2387

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54694 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4

[Bug fortran/52370] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Spurious "may be used uninitialized" warning for check of optional argument

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52370 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4

[Bug middle-end/58746] [4.9 Regression] Incorrect warning with -Waggressive-loop-optimizations

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58746 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug c++/59115] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with invalid template parameter

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59115 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4

[Bug fortran/58007] [4.7/4.9 Regression] [OOP] ICE in free_pi_tree(): Unresolved fixup - resolve_fixups does not fixup component of __class_bsr_Bsr_matrix

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58007 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4

[Bug fortran/59198] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE on cyclically dependent polymorphic types

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59198 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4

[Bug fortran/59414] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] ICE in in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor on ALLOCATE inside SELECT TYPE

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59414 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.3

[Bug c++/59224] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] std::uncaught_exception returns true while constructing exception.

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59224 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4

[Bug libfortran/59513] [4.7/4.8/4.9] Fortran runtime error: Sequential READ or WRITE not allowed after EOF marker, possibly use REWIND or BACKSPACE

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59513 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4

[Bug fortran/59561] [4.9 Regression] warning: iteration 4 invokes undefined behavior

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59561 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug fortran/58007] [4.7/4.9 Regression] [OOP] ICE in free_pi_tree(): Unresolved fixup - resolve_fixups does not fixup component of __class_bsr_Bsr_matrix

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58007 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug middle-end/59559] ICE: invalid RTX sharing in expmed.c:expand_divmod

2013-12-19 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59559 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/58410] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Bogus uninitialized variable warning for allocatable derived type array function result

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58410 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug middle-end/58344] [4.9 Regression] ICE with segfault at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58344 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/59115] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with invalid template parameter

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59115 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

[Bug middle-end/58746] [4.9 Regression] Incorrect warning with -Waggressive-loop-optimizations

2013-12-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58746 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

  1   2   >