[Bug gcov-profile/57121] undefined reference to gcov_merge_init and gcov_merge_add

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57121 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug pch/57242] precompiled headers ignored unless the .gch and TU's are compiled with certain combinations of -g flag

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57242 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/57288] cfi_restore should precede cfi_def_cfa_offset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57288 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-linux-gnu Status|UNC

[Bug middle-end/57436] Linux kernel gives file system corruption when built with gcc 4.8.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57436 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/40986] [4.7/4.8/4.9 regression] Assert_Failure sinfo.adb:360, error detected at a-unccon.ads:23:27

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40986 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.4 |4.7.4 Summary|[4.6 regression]

[Bug target/50807] [avr] Constructor writing to RAM for variable in Flash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50807 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |target Target Milestone|4.6.4

[Bug lto/50293] -flto fails if GCC is installed in directory with space in path name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50293 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.6 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/41025] v4.3.3, 4.4.1, etc -ftracer sometimes fails by "is already defined"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41025 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/44984] gcc passes unsigned instead of int for printf width/precision (warnings generated)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44984 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/46822] printf( "%f" ) segv when called from pthread_once

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46822 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/48563] EOF not at EOL

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48563 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/49233] Please un-deprecate rvalues in memory constraints

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49233 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/7881] Cannot compile gcc on Tru64 4G or 5.X if gnu libiconv is installed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7881 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/40014] GGC build on Solaris 8 system fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40014 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/42932] unknown endianness, Solaris 10 SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42932 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/59037] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE when accessing invalid element (nelts + 1) of vector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59037 --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to vries from comment #4) > Tentative patch: > ... > diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c > index 93b8970..6f2b4fb 100644 > --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c > +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-

[Bug middle-end/57436] Linux kernel gives file system corruption when built with gcc 4.8.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57436 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Radke --- I moved away from XFS file system and so can't reproduce it anymore. The bug should be in XFS code probably triggering a change in gcc behavior. Feel free to close this one. note: we had a similar issue in li

[Bug c++/59032] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE incrementing vector type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59032 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/54427] Expose more vector extensions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54427 --- Comment #15 from Marc Glisse --- Related PRs involving || and && for vectors: PR 57198 and PR 58845. PR 58845 contains information about having a sequence point in the gimplification of those operators.

[Bug ipa/59008] [4.9 Regression] ICEs in try_make_edge_direct_simple_call / propagate_controlled_uses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59008 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/59032] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE incrementing vector type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59032 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- I wonder if it would take more than replacing: inc = integer_one_node; with something like: inc = VECTOR_TYPE_P (argtype) ? build_one_cst (argtype) : intege

[Bug rtl-optimization/59064] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-ivdep-1.c (test for bogus messages, line )

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59064 Bug ID: 59064 Summary: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-ivdep-1.c (test for bogus messages, line ) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug fortran/59065] New: questionable bounds for unassociated allocatable/pointer arrays?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065 Bug ID: 59065 Summary: questionable bounds for unassociated allocatable/pointer arrays? Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/49376] ICE when compiling linux kernel on mipsel

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49376 Aurelien Jarno changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/58712] [4.9 Regression] issues found by --enable-checking=valgrind

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58712 octoploid at yandex dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug driver/57525] cc1.exe: fatal error: help-dummy: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57525 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Target|avr | Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/59066] New: Segmentation fault.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59066 Bug ID: 59066 Summary: Segmentation fault. Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unass

[Bug middle-end/15996] __builtin_longjmp just after another __builtin_longjmp fails with null dereferencing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15996 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/59066] Segmentation fault.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59066 --- Comment #1 from Alexandre Hamez --- I managed to reduce the code causing the segfault of gcc to ~1200 lines, but there are certainly still a lot of useless lines (coming from ).

[Bug target/57982] GetModuleHandle in __register_frame_info causes abort on unload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57982 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/59066] Segmentation fault.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59066 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|blocker |normal

[Bug c++/59066] C+11, 'using' instead of 'typedef' causes a segmentation fault.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59066 Alexandre Hamez changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Segmentation fault. |C+11, 'using' instead of

[Bug target/57288] cfi_restore should precede cfi_def_cfa_offset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57288 --- Comment #2 from Mike Sharov --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Can you attach the preprocessed source which is used to create this assembly > file? I'm afraid not. This call has been created by a gigantic collection of template

[Bug sanitizer/59067] New: libsanitizer doesn't build with binutils 2.17.50.0.6 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59067 Bug ID: 59067 Summary: libsanitizer doesn't build with binutils 2.17.50.0.6 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug sanitizer/59068] New: libsanitizer doesn't build on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with Linux 2.6.18

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59068 Bug ID: 59068 Summary: libsanitizer doesn't build on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with Linux 2.6.18 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/49892] Error in configure test xgcc in x86_64-apple-darwin11.0.0/libgcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49892 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > Bug in the compiler originally used so closing as invalid. Just to note that Apple finally back ported the llvm-gcc bug fix in Xcode 4.6.1 or later upon their swit

[Bug tree-optimization/58921] [4.9 Regression] ICE with segfault on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58921 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug bootstrap/34881] Bootstrap fails on building libstdc++: can't find file for: -lgcc_s.10.4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34881 --- Comment #3 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> --- On 11/09/2013 06:02 PM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34881 > > Andrew Pinski changed: > > What|Removed

[Bug other/38077] strict aliasing is not controllable via the option pragma or is not documented that way

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38077 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de --- Co

[Bug middle-end/38318] moving the allocation of temps out of loops.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38318 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/38318] moving the allocation of temps out of loops.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38318 --- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #6) > Marc, I think your recently posted patch: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg01049.html > could fix the problem with the testcase subroutine S1, eve

[Bug preprocessor/47756] Warning for #include " " instead of < >

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47756 Olaf van der Spek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALI

[Bug ada/57902] Bugbox in Ada 95 mode, at ada/gcc-interface/decl.c:342

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57902 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #30507|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/59065] questionable bounds for unassociated allocatable/pointer arrays?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/38318] moving the allocation of temps out of loops.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38318 --- Comment #8 from Joost VandeVondele --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #7) > (In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #6) > > Marc, I think your recently posted patch: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg01049.html > >

[Bug preprocessor/47756] Warning for #include " " instead of < >

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47756 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- The C++ standard has a note saying: in general programmers should use the < > form for headers provided with the implementation, and the " " form for sources outside the control of the implementati

[Bug target/48155] Reload doesn't handle subreg properly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48155 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/59069] New: Bogus error wording for passing array to scalar dummies with user-defined operator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59069 Bug ID: 59069 Summary: Bogus error wording for passing array to scalar dummies with user-defined operator Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keyword

[Bug c++/59070] New: Captured object is being moved from the lambda on returning it.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59070 Bug ID: 59070 Summary: Captured object is being moved from the lambda on returning it. Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/38318] moving the allocation of temps out of loops.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38318 --- Comment #9 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #8) > Marc, looks like the fortran FE changed a lot since this bug was filed, and > there is no explicit allocate anymore, in fact the variable is created on > stack

[Bug middle-end/38318] moving the allocation of temps out of loops.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38318 --- Comment #10 from Joost VandeVondele --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #9) > > Ok. If you used __builtin_abort instead of _gfortran_os_error, I think my > current patch would handle it. It is hard for gcc to guess that > _gfortran_os

[Bug c++/59070] Captured object is being moved from the lambda on returning it.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59070 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/59070] Captured object is being moved from the lambda on returning it.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59070 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/59070] Captured object is being moved from the lambda on returning it.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59070 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > And it works perfectly with > gcc version 4.8.3 20131029 (prerelease) (GCC) > gcc version 4.9.0 20131002 (experimental) (GCC) and gcc version 4.7.4 20131030

[Bug middle-end/38318] moving the allocation of temps out of loops.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38318 --- Comment #11 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #10) > (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #9) > > Ok. If you used __builtin_abort instead of _gfortran_os_error, I think my > > current patch would handle it. It

[Bug c++/59070] Captured object is being moved from the lambda on returning it.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59070 Sarfaraz Nawaz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|WORKSFORME

[Bug middle-end/38318] moving the allocation of temps out of loops.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38318 --- Comment #12 from Joost VandeVondele --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #11) > So S2 cannot call free (or realloc) on the pointer and then exit or call > longjmp or do an infinite loop or anything like that in fortran? Maybe we'll > nee

[Bug middle-end/57436] Linux kernel gives file system corruption when built with gcc 4.8.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57436 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/57288] cfi_restore should precede cfi_def_cfa_offset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57288 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/52862] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE convert_to_pointer, at convert.c:50

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52862 --- Comment #10 from Kai Tietz --- Author: ktietz Date: Sun Nov 10 19:24:43 2013 New Revision: 204650 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204650&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR plugin/52862 * configure.ac: Adding for exported symbols ch

[Bug plugins/52872] --enable-plugin; incorrect test for "exported symbols" and "-rdynamic" in gcc/configure.ac

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52872 --- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz --- Author: ktietz Date: Sun Nov 10 19:27:38 2013 New Revision: 204651 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204651&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fixed typo about bug-number ... PR plugin/52872 * configure.ac

[Bug c++/59070] Captured object is being moved from the lambda on returning it.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59070 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug plugins/52872] --enable-plugin; incorrect test for "exported symbols" and "-rdynamic" in gcc/configure.ac

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52872 --- Comment #9 from Kai Tietz --- Author: ktietz Date: Sun Nov 10 19:29:34 2013 New Revision: 204652 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204652&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Merged from trunk PR plugins/52872 * configure.ac: Adding for expor

[Bug java/44876] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44876 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug plugins/52872] --enable-plugin; incorrect test for "exported symbols" and "-rdynamic" in gcc/configure.ac

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52872 --- Comment #10 from Kai Tietz --- Author: ktietz Date: Sun Nov 10 19:32:42 2013 New Revision: 204653 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204653&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Merged from trunk PR plugins/52872 * configure.ac: Adding for expo

[Bug tree-optimization/42970] Missed unused function return value elimination

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42970 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug target/46891] Can't build libquadmath for i386-elf target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46891 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug plugins/52872] --enable-plugin; incorrect test for "exported symbols" and "-rdynamic" in gcc/configure.ac

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52872 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/50338] ICE Linking with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50338 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/47015] gcc/gengtype.c: undefined references

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47015 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/50646] configure detects big endian on little endian system.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50646 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/51156] build glibc-2.11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51156 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/42970] Missed unused function return value elimination

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42970 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from

[Bug c/49548] integer comparison

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49548 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/51622] GCC generates bad code that generate big executable sizes when using _Decimal*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51622 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/59065] questionable bounds for unassociated allocatable/pointer arrays?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065 --- Comment #2 from Vittorio Zecca --- g95: complains about deallocated array passed to LBOUND Intel ifort: 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0

[Bug c/52708] suboptimal code with __builtin_constant_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52708 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug middle-end/53496] gcc segfaults when compiling glib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53496 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/53906] Runtime crash on ARM linux when using std::thread

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53906 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/48318] Memory access error by "build/genhooks"?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48318 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/24000] wrong constants allocation for altivec data type on PPC little-endian

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24000 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|WAITING

[Bug other/25943] Options added to collect2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25943 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/50366] Still got failed assertion in lto_varpool_replace_node

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50366 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/59071] New: sse2 intrinsics and constant expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59071 Bug ID: 59071 Summary: sse2 intrinsics and constant expressions Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/53649] ICE when using 'C' x86 asm constraint

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53649 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/50643] Suppress cc1: warnings being treated as errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50643 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/54841] Bad optimization on stack fill before call on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54841 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/57571] linux kernel function memcpy() execute with low efficiency on Intel Ivybridge platform

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57571 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/53966] procmail build deadloop on _autotst & -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53966 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Also we need a self contained testcase to go any further on this problem.

[Bug tree-optimization/54982] false unitialized warning about store_flag in tree-ssa-loop-im.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54982 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/57970] segfault in sched-deps.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57970 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|other |rtl-optimization Severity|major

[Bug c/52862] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE convert_to_pointer, at convert.c:50

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52862 --- Comment #11 from Kai Tietz --- (In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #10) Please ignore commit-message ... wrong bug-number

[Bug c++/59032] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE incrementing vector type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59032 --- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- > We already support v=v+1, so it wouldn't be a large extension. Hmm, indeed. If found some code in cp_builld_binary_op marked with this comment: ... /* In case when one of the operands of the bin

[Bug fortran/59065] questionable bounds for unassociated allocatable/pointer arrays?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/58028] [4.9 Regression] Several failures in libgomp.graphite after revision 200946

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58028 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenther at suse dot de --- Comme

[Bug c++/58990] G++ generates duplicate labels for linux 32-bit when optimization+LFS is enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58990 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug driver/55651] gcc hangs when "-Wp," is passed on the command line

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55651 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/59032] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE incrementing vector type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59032 --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to vries from comment #4) > I've tried to do something similar in cp_build_unary_op. Tentative patch: That seems very complicated. We know the arguments, so we know which has to be converted to what.

[Bug rtl-optimization/57970] segfault in sched-deps.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57970 --- Comment #2 from Chris King --- If you don't want proposed patches attached to bug reports, then I suggest you remove the text "proposed patch" which is next to the "Add an attachment" link.

  1   2   >