[Bug bootstrap/56554] stage2 ./intl: error: C compiler cannot create executables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56554 Douglas Mencken changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgcc/57256] Building for arm-elf with CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-mabi=aapcs-linux fails in libgcc/crtstuff.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57256 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/57270] std::is_function ignores function ref-qualifiers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57270 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug bootstrap/57266] [4.9 regression] comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions in fold_binary_loc breaks m68k bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57266 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson --- My m68k bootstrap has now recompiled fold-const.c + your patch three times without warnings or errors. Thanks for the quick fix.

[Bug target/57261] [4.9 regression] libgcc_s.so always linked on Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57261 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED URL|

[Bug libgcc/57256] Building for arm-elf with CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-mabi=aapcs-linux fails in libgcc/crtstuff.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57256 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug gcov-profile/57269] [4.7 Regression] ICE in gcov_open, at gcov-io.c:82

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57269 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/57268] [4.9 Regression] c nested loops hang compiler in sched-deps.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57268 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/57267] [4.9 regression] -flto-partition=none : symbol is already defined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57267 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org Target Mile

[Bug bootstrap/57266] [4.9 regression] comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions in fold_binary_loc breaks m68k bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57266 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug middle-end/57235] [4.9 Regression] ICE verify_ssa failied

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57235 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/57269] [4.7 Regression] ICE in gcov_open, at gcov-io.c:82

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57269 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/57271] New: ARM: gcc generates insufficient alignment for memory passed as extra argument for function return large composite type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57271 Bug ID: 57271 Summary: ARM: gcc generates insufficient alignment for memory passed as extra argument for function return large composite type Product: gcc Version:

[Bug c++/57271] ARM: gcc generates insufficient alignment for memory passed as extra argument for function return large composite type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57271 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/57271] ARM: gcc generates insufficient alignment for memory passed as extra argument for function return large composite type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57271 --- Comment #2 from java4ada at yahoo dot com --- I don't know if ABI dictates it but from observation the stack is aligned to 8-byte for the largest primitive type "double" (or long long). I configure it on Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit with the following

[Bug rtl-optimization/57067] Missing control flow edges for setjmp/longjmp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57067 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- The RTL except.c:can_nonlocal_goto () function does not consider setjmp. Does Index: gcc/except.c === --- gcc/except.c(revision 198867)

[Bug libstdc++/57272] New: node-based containers don't use allocator's pointer type internally

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57272 Bug ID: 57272 Summary: node-based containers don't use allocator's pointer type internally Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/56780] --disable-install-libiberty still installs libiberty.a

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56780 --- Comment #3 from Matthew Burgess --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > I suggest pinging the gcc-patches list about your patch at > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00167.html and CC Ian as he is > a maintainer for li

[Bug tree-optimization/55761] process_assignment assumes -1 can be created

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55761 Paulo J. Matos changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/55761] process_assignment assumes -1 can be created

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55761 --- Comment #10 from Marc Glisse --- Oups, I didn't notice you had already worked on this. Please don't hesitate to post (and ping) your patch to gcc-patches next time. Also, I didn't touch tree-tailcall.c, that might still be needed...

[Bug tree-optimization/55761] process_assignment assumes -1 can be created

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55761 --- Comment #11 from Paulo J. Matos --- No worries Marc, that's fine. The most important thing is that's fixed. I did post the patch to patches@ but haven't actually pinged. I tend to forget about them myself. Thanks for sorting it out.

[Bug tree-optimization/55761] process_assignment assumes -1 can be created

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55761 --- Comment #12 from Paulo J. Matos --- Also, I haven't touched tree-tailcall.c on my patches but I can't see why you would need to do it.

[Bug libstdc++/57273] New: stringstream str initialization fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57273 Bug ID: 57273 Summary: stringstream str initialization fails Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug libstdc++/57273] stringstream str initialization fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57273 collette changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |4.6.3 --- Comment #1 from collette --- I use

[Bug libstdc++/57273] stringstream str initialization fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57273 --- Comment #2 from collette --- Just tested with gcc-4.8.0 compiled from scratch and the bug is still here.

[Bug libstdc++/57273] stringstream str initialization fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57273 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/57273] stringstream str initialization fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57273 --- Comment #4 from collette --- Oups. OK, I just tested with intel c++ compiler and the behavior is the same. Where is this behavior defined ?

[Bug libstdc++/57273] stringstream str initialization fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57273 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- [stringbuf.members]/3

[Bug gcov-profile/35568] missing gcov data spoils other files.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35568 David Claessens changed: What|Removed |Added CC||david.claessens@bestsorting

[Bug libstdc++/57273] stringstream str initialization fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57273 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Which also explains that you can make the inserted characters append to the buffer using std::ios::ate e.g. std::stringstream tmpLabel(std::ios::ate|std::ios::out); or using an ostringstream std::ostri

[Bug libstdc++/57273] stringstream str initialization fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57273 --- Comment #7 from collette --- Thanks for these informations. Sorry for the noise.

[Bug gcov-profile/57234] gcov 4.7.3 segfaults when reading Clang's .gc* files.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57234 --- Comment #3 from Magnus Reftel --- I understand that gcov has no reason to handle coverage files written by anything other than its matching GCC version, but is a segfault a valid response to reading a malformed input file?

[Bug target/57264] cld not emitted when string instructions used, and '-mcld' on command line

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57264 --- Comment #7 from thutt at vmware dot com --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #6) > (In reply to thutt from comment #5) > > > > Does the same error exist in the 4.8 branch, or any other forward moving > > branch? > > No, 4.8 and newer bra

[Bug c++/53903] [C++11] Incompatible exception-specification allowed if member explicitly-defaulted after first declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53903 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Version|4.7.1

[Bug target/57264] cld not emitted when string instructions used, and '-mcld' on command line

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57264 --- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to thutt from comment #7) > (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #6) > > (In reply to thutt from comment #5) > > > > > > Does the same error exist in the 4.8 branch, or any other forward moving > > >

[Bug c++/57274] New: [4.8/4.9 Regression] Bogus sequence-point warning in C++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57274 Bug ID: 57274 Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] Bogus sequence-point warning in C++ Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug tree-optimization/57275] New: Error in data dependence analysis during gather vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57275 Bug ID: 57275 Summary: Error in data dependence analysis during gather vectorization Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug middle-end/57276] New: Waste work in cgraph_edge_brings_all_agg_vals_for_node()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57276 Bug ID: 57276 Summary: Waste work in cgraph_edge_brings_all_agg_vals_for_node() Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement P

[Bug middle-end/57276] Waste work in cgraph_edge_brings_all_agg_vals_for_node()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57276 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini --- Note that normally patches go to gcc-patches.

[Bug tree-optimization/57275] [4.9 Regression] Error in data dependence analysis during gather vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57275 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/56782] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Regression with empty pack expansions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56782 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/55365] ICE in process_init_constructor_union, at cp/typeck2.c:1335

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55365 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/57041] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in lookup_field_1, at cp/search.c:376 (with dot-prefixed structure initialisation)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57041 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jasongross9+bugzilla@gmail.

[Bug tree-optimization/57275] [4.9 Regression] Error in data dependence analysis during gather vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57275 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- t.c:11: note: versioning for alias not supported for: can't determine dependence between b[i_12] and b[_4] this should cause vectorization to fail ... oops: Index: tree-vect-data-refs.c

[Bug middle-end/57276] Waste work in cgraph_edge_brings_all_agg_vals_for_node()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57276 Po-Chun Chang changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|enhancement |normal

[Bug c++/57274] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Bogus sequence-point warning in C++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57274 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/57274] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Bogus sequence-point warning in C++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57274 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |4.8.1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/57275] [4.9 Regression] Error in data dependence analysis during gather vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57275 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 f

[Bug other/41400] unwind table not properly populated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41400 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/57268] [4.9 Regression] c nested loops hang compiler in sched-deps.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57268 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug rtl-optimization/56833] [4.9 Regression] Valid register is over written by reload pass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56833 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/37736] Problem with designated initializer and template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37736 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/57041] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in lookup_field_1, at cp/search.c:376 (with dot-prefixed structure initialisation)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57041 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||simartin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c++/31952] parameters may be redeclared in a function try-block

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31952 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #9) > After Janis' patch (see Comment #6) in pushdecl_maybe_friend_1 we issue hard > errors for some kinds of shadowings but not for others. For comparison, > clang iss

[Bug c++/56998] [4.8 Regression] ICE in value_dependent_expression_p, at cp/pt.c:19598

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56998 --- Comment #3 from Raphael Kubo da Costa --- For reference, this was fixed in r198882: http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=28038d26df63ee5755da90bb563db4097a9deec0

[Bug libgcc/57277] New: arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi: armv6 libgcc -march=armv6: not found

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57277 Bug ID: 57277 Summary: arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi: armv6 libgcc -march=armv6: not found Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libgcc/57277] arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi: armv6 libgcc -march=armv6: not found

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57277 --- Comment #1 from Dominik Bittner --- Created attachment 30114 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30114&action=edit The top config.log

[Bug libgcc/57277] arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi: armv6 libgcc -march=armv6: not found

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57277 Dominik Bittner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/57278] New: -fno-if-conversion and -fno-if-conversion2 do not work as intended

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57278 Bug ID: 57278 Summary: -fno-if-conversion and -fno-if-conversion2 do not work as intended Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/57264] cld not emitted when string instructions used, and '-mcld' on command line

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57264 --- Comment #9 from thutt at vmware dot com --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #8) > (In reply to thutt from comment #7) > > (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #6) > > > (In reply to thutt from comment #5) > > > > > > > > Does the same e

[Bug lto/57267] [4.9 regression] -flto-partition=none : symbol is already defined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57267 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- This is fixed by http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-05/msg00695.html Honza

[Bug tree-optimization/57275] [4.9 Regression] Error in data dependence analysis during gather vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57275 --- Comment #4 from Andrey Turetskiy --- > - return false; > + return true; Isn't it too strong? Shouldn't it be like this: return !(DR_IS_READ (dra) && DR_IS_READ (drb)); Gather is a load operation. If another statement is loa

[Bug tree-optimization/57275] [4.9 Regression] Error in data dependence analysis during gather vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57275 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- There is: /* Independent data accesses. */ if (DDR_ARE_DEPENDENT (ddr) == chrec_known) return false; if (dra == drb || (DR_IS_READ (dra) && DR_IS_READ (drb))) return false; a few lines

[Bug target/57264] cld not emitted when string instructions used, and '-mcld' on command line

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57264 --- Comment #10 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to thutt from comment #9) > When the sample test program provided above was compiled with gcc 4.4, it > did not generate the stos instruction. However, each of 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7 > did generate the st

[Bug tree-optimization/57275] [4.9 Regression] Error in data dependence analysis during gather vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57275 --- Comment #6 from Andrey Turetskiy --- Oops, sorry.

[Bug middle-end/57278] -fno-if-conversion and -fno-if-conversion2 do not work as intended

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57278 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |middle-end --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pin

[Bug target/57260] Generated R_MIPS_GOT_MIPS relocation for direct function call while compiling with -O2 on MIPS N64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57260 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed

[Bug c++/57271] ARM: gcc generates insufficient alignment for memory passed as extra argument for function return large composite type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57271 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to java4ada from comment #2) > I don't know if ABI dictates it but from observation the stack is aligned to > 8-byte for the largest primitive type "double" (or long long). I think this is wrong th

[Bug c++/57279] New: [C++11] alias declaration fails to declare function types with cv-qualifiers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57279 Bug ID: 57279 Summary: [C++11] alias declaration fails to declare function types with cv-qualifiers Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug libgcc/57280] New: new crtbegin1.o for __EH_FRAME_BEGIN__

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57280 Bug ID: 57280 Summary: new crtbegin1.o for __EH_FRAME_BEGIN__ Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgcc

[Bug target/57260] Generated R_MIPS_GOT_MIPS relocation for direct function call while compiling with -O2 on MIPS N64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57260 --- Comment #11 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 30116 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30116&action=edit Candidate patch Here's the patch I'm testing. Lee, could you check that it fixes the original li

[Bug libgcc/57280] new crtbegin1.o for __EH_FRAME_BEGIN__

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57280 --- Comment #1 from Jan Kratochvil --- [patch update] Support .eh_frame in crt1 x86_64 glibc (PR libgcc/57280, libc/15407) http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-05/msg00775.html

[Bug c++/57274] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Bogus sequence-point warning in C++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57274 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/57243] Using auto in range based for with templated container in templated function requires extraneous template qualifier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57243 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/57271] ARM: gcc generates insufficient alignment for memory passed as extra argument for function return large composite type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57271 --- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw --- The ARM EABI only requires 8-byte alignment, as does Neon.

[Bug c++/57271] ARM: gcc generates insufficient alignment for memory passed as extra argument for function return large composite type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57271 --- Comment #5 from java4ada at yahoo dot com --- NEON instructions like vst/vld [:128] and [:256] need 16-byte and 32-byte alignment, respectively. Does it mean under ARM EABI both should be replaced with [:64] ? (Probably only at the cost of 1-2

[Bug target/57281] New: x86_64-linux loop fails to terminate at -O3 -m32

executes successfully. This is a regression from 4.8, where the code works at all optimizations levels. $ gcc-trunk -v ... Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu gcc version 4.9.0 20130514 (experimental) [trunk revision 198875] (GCC) $ gcc-trunk -O2 -m32 test.c $ ./a.out $ gcc-4.8 -O3 -m32 test.c

[Bug c++/57211] wrong line indicated in warning for synthesized method

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57211 Anthony Foiani changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anthony.foiani at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug c++/57211] wrong line indicated in warning for synthesized method

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57211 --- Comment #2 from Anthony Foiani --- I'm also seeing this bug, in version 4.7.2. Instead of trying to fix the line offset, I believe the right thing is to not emit this warning in this case at all. The parameter is certainly used, even if the

[Bug c++/50477] -Wunused-parameter should not warn about virtual method declarations with bodies

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50477 Anthony Foiani changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anthony.foiani at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug other/57282] New: Canadian cross on FreeBSD to MingW32 fails with unknown warning "-Wno-narrowing" is build gcc is too old

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282 Bug ID: 57282 Summary: Canadian cross on FreeBSD to MingW32 fails with unknown warning "-Wno-narrowing" is build gcc is too old Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1

[Bug other/57282] Canadian cross on FreeBSD to MingW32 fails with unknown warning "-Wno-narrowing" as build gcc is too old

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57282 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/57059] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Host configuration of loose_warn breaks for build components for Canadian crosses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57059 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chris at contemporary dot net.au --- Com