http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55669
Bug #: 55669
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE : in
cgraph_mark_address_taken_node, at cgraph.c:1409
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55669
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-12-13 08:10:38 UTC ---
The testcase is too big (16MB). You can find it here:
http://trippelsdorf.de/testcase.tar.bz2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55670
Bug #: 55670
Summary: This isn't a pure virtual method.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2011-07-09 09:36:18 |2012-12-13 9:36:18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55671
Bug #: 55671
Summary: -Wconversion fails to warn for sign-conversion
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55630
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #160 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-12-13 09:52:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #159)
> > hal/Hal.gcda: 96.72%: num counts=30069, min counter=16389
> > hal/Hal.gcda: 97.50%: num counts=35296, min counter=10241
> >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55650
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-13
10:11:47 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 13 10:11:39 2012
New Revision: 194470
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194470
Log:
PR gcov-profile/55650
* coverag
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55650
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55630
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|ebot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55670
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-linux-gnu|
Status|UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55671
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55671
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-12-13
10:35:58 UTC ---
Surely this is by design, as documented:
Warnings about conversions between signed and unsigned integers are
disabled by default in C++ unless -Wsign-conversion is expli
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55671
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-12-13
10:37:34 UTC ---
This is a common idiom in C++ and shouldn't warn e.g.
static const size_type npos = -1;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55668
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-12-13
10:40:23 UTC ---
Very similar to PR 55576, the name foo<0> should be looked up in the scope of
A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55669
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55671
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-12-13
10:41:49 UTC ---
I agree, I suspected it was by the design. Since Manuel worked on this, let's
wait a bit before closing the Bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55667
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54718
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55158
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54570
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55478
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener 2012-12-13
10:46:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> As for the PRE issue - we indeed seem to not release SSA temporaries
> created by PRE. I'll look into that.
Fixed with
2012-12-13 Richard Bie
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55141
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55671
--- Comment #5 from loose at astron dot nl 2012-12-13 11:09:43 UTC ---
If this is by design, then the documentation is buggy. Here's a literal quote
form the man page of g++
-Wconversion
Warn for implicit conversions tha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55660
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener 2012-12-13
11:13:19 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Dec 13 11:13:13 2012
New Revision: 194473
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194473
Log:
2012-12-13 Richard Biener
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55660
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
Summary|[4.7/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55672
Bug #: 55672
Summary: [4.8 Regression] -fstack-check=generic ICEs in
print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:13868
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55672
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55671
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-12-13
11:25:37 UTC ---
It gives it as an example then says "Warnings about conversions between signed
and unsigned integers are disabled by default in C++ unless -Wsign-conversion
is explicitly enab
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55671
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2012-12-13
11:29:24 UTC ---
This is definitely by design, as the snippet I posted also clearly shows. The
documentation could be maybe improved I agree, but it's a very general issue
that it often gives mo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55498
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55671
--- Comment #8 from loose at astron dot nl 2012-12-13 12:03:02 UTC ---
OK, fine with me. It's only that I was caught by surprise that g++ did no
longer warn about sign conversion. I can definitely live with an explicit
-Wsign-conversion, tho
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #89 from Richard Biener 2012-12-13
12:06:57 UTC ---
Just to repeat, the ICEs are with checking enabled only (but possibly cover up
for wong-code).
I believe the correct solution will involve implementing the proposal for
int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51823
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
Summary|[
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55673
Bug #: 55673
Summary: [SPARC] Transposed before-after in
sparc_emit_membar_for_model()
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55674
Bug #: 55674
Summary: [4.8 Regression] >20% size increase of lto/pgo
binaries since r193747
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53852
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener 2012-12-13
12:59:45 UTC ---
Sven suggests sth like:
Index: gcc/graphite-dependences.c
===
--- gcc/graphite-dependences.c (revision 19447
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #161 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-12-13 12:59:59 UTC ---
I've opened a new bug for the binary size increase issue:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55674
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #24 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-12-13 13:12:00 UTC ---
> --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-12
> 22:21:57 UTC ---
> Created attachment 28942
> --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28942
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55671
--- Comment #9 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-12-13
13:24:51 UTC ---
Wsign-conversion was disabled for g++ by explicit request. I don't remember the
details and Google seems unable to find the relevant discussion in gcc-patches.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55674
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53476
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener 2012-12-13
13:49:47 UTC ---
Reduced testcase:
static int Wv10a __attribute__((weakref ("Wv10b")));
static int Wv10b __attribute__((weakref ("wv10")));
extern int wv10;
extern void abort (void);
i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55673
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||sparc*-*-*
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55652
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-13
14:35:22 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 13 14:35:12 2012
New Revision: 194479
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194479
Log:
PR c++/55652
* typeck2.c (merge
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55674
--- Comment #1 from Teresa Johnson 2012-12-13
14:45:01 UTC ---
I'm really surprised that using --param hot-bb-count-ws-permille=950 didn't
help, since even fewer things should look hot enough to inline than before the
revision.
Would yo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55674
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-12-13 14:46:31 UTC ---
In the tramp3d-v4 case, when I run with this simple debug patch:
diff --git a/gcc/predict.c b/gcc/predict.c
index 5d3de29..bf3a259 100644
--- a/gcc/predict.c
+++ b/gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55674
--- Comment #3 from Teresa Johnson 2012-12-13
14:49:19 UTC ---
Hi Markus,
Are you sure you have my subsequent fixes patched in, to make sure the
histogram is getting streamed through the LTO files? This was the
behavior I saw when I was
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55674
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-12-13 14:52:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Hi Markus,
>
> Are you sure you have my subsequent fixes patched in, to make sure the
> histogram is getting streamed through the LTO files?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55674
--- Comment #5 from Teresa Johnson 2012-12-13
15:02:55 UTC ---
Ok, I will download tramp3d-v4 right now and see what is going on. Can
you send me the full set of options you are using to compile it?
Teresa
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 6:52
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55674
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-12-13 15:06:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Ok, I will download tramp3d-v4 right now and see what is going on. Can
> you send me the full set of options you are using to compile it?
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #90 from Joost VandeVondele
2012-12-13 15:13:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #89)
> Just to repeat, the ICEs are with checking enabled only (but possibly cover up
> for wong-code).
I'm indeed worried that the release branche
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55675
Bug #: 55675
Summary: const iterator overload for vector modifiers missing
for C++11, e.g., iterator insert(const_iterator pos, T
const &t)
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53476
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener 2012-12-13
15:21:05 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Dec 13 15:20:57 2012
New Revision: 194481
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194481
Log:
2012-12-13 Richard Biener
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53476
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55675
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54577
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sbock at hsr dot ch
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55675
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-12-13
15:33:55 UTC ---
Thanks, Paolo. I couldn't find the relevant PR so suggested Sebastian should
file one to ensure it's not forgotten.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55508
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55674
--- Comment #7 from Teresa Johnson 2012-12-13
15:50:05 UTC ---
Reproduced. Looks like somehow my fix to stream this through LTO is
not working properly. I see that the min count is valid when
generating the .o file, but goes to zero when w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55652
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55665
--- Comment #6 from Jan Kratochvil
2012-12-13 16:02:48 UTC ---
Confirming the GDB regression is fixed in the today's results, thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55672
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55672
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55673
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55668
--- Comment #4 from Tudor Bosman 2012-12-13 18:01:04 UTC
---
Jonathan: thanks, yes, that looks like a dup. Closing this one.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55668
Tudor Bosman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55576
Tudor Bosman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tudorb at fb dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55576
--- Comment #11 from Tudor Bosman 2012-12-13 18:03:35
UTC ---
As I indicated in PR 55668, this has been broken since at least 4.1.2.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55673
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Macleod 2012-12-13
18:07:19 UTC ---
Yeah, there is already a PR for that which I have a patch to apply...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55492
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55673
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55674
--- Comment #8 from Teresa Johnson 2012-12-13
18:23:08 UTC ---
Dumb mistake in my previous fix to the lto support. Here is the patch
that fixes it, I will submit for review after regression testing
completes:
Index: lto-cgraph.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55161
gretay at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gretay at gcc dot gnu.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55676
Bug #: 55676
Summary: ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:423
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55674
--- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-12-13 19:10:40 UTC ---
*** Bug 55669 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55669
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolutio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55677
Bug #: 55677
Summary: Virtual inheritance, 'this' pointer used as
constructor parameter, parameter specialized in
derived method, generated binary dumps core
Classification
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55677
--- Comment #1 from x3n0m0rph59 at googlemail dot com 2012-12-13 20:33:46 UTC
---
Created attachment 28945
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28945
C++11 Program Source with cmake project file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53476
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka 2012-12-13 20:56:13
UTC ---
> (gdb) call debug_tree (node->symbol.decl)
> type size
> unit size
> align 32 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type 0x767f75e8 precision
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55492
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55678
Bug #: 55678
Summary: _Static_assert escapes tick marks just to make me mad
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55534
--- Comment #6 from Harald Anlauf 2012-12-13 21:11:20
UTC ---
Adding some prints, I found that the crash is probably due to
the actual order of invocation of some functions:
gfc_post_options, which calls gfc_cpp_post_options;
then gfc_c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55678
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Santos 2012-12-13
21:12:24 UTC ---
This appears to happen in the function
c_parser_static_assert_declaration_no_semi (gcc/c/c-parser.c) when it calls
"c_parser_peek_token (parser)->value", but I don't know gcc's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55492
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson 2012-12-13
21:16:50 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Thu Dec 13 21:16:45 2012
New Revision: 194490
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194490
Log:
PR middle-end/55492
* optab
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55492
--- Comment #6 from Richard Henderson 2012-12-13
21:17:55 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Thu Dec 13 21:17:52 2012
New Revision: 194491
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194491
Log:
PR middle-end/55492
* optab
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55492
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Statu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55674
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-12-13 22:14:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Please let me know how this affects the mozilla size.
Looks much better now:
39748288 hot-bb-count-ws-permille=999 (default)
34573408 hot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55679
Bug #: 55679
Summary: new asan tests from r194458 fail on
x86_64-apple-darwin10
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55674
--- Comment #11 from Teresa Johnson 2012-12-13
22:16:19 UTC ---
Do you happen to know what it was with lto/pgo before the change? Should be
roughly equivalent to hot-bb-count-ws-permille=970 from what I saw in your
profiles. What size incr
(/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/testsuite/gcc/./global-overflow-1.exe+0x0)
0x214a is located 0 bytes to the right of global variable 'YYY
(/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121213/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/asan/global-overflow-1.c)'
(0x2140) of size
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-12-13
22:20:25 UTC ---
Revision 156618 (2010-02-09) is OK.
Revision 157955 (2010-03-30) miscompiles the tests.
test
Executing on host: /sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121213/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/asan/global-overflow-1.c
-L/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #162 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-12-13 22:25:27 UTC ---
The libxul binary size issue is solved now.
During testing I came across another issue that looks similar
to the one Comment 146:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55674
--- Comment #12 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-12-13 22:35:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Do you happen to know what it was with lto/pgo before the change? Should be
> roughly equivalent to hot-bb-count-ws-permille=970 from what I s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55680
Bug #: 55680
Summary: [C++11] Member specialization with lambda is rejected
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-13 23:04:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> It seems I found yet another reincarnation of this bug (spotted in the wild,
> unfortunately):
Note: The patch in comment #1 does not seem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55671
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55589
--- Comment #4 from michael at talamasca dot ocis.net 2012-12-13 23:36:53 UTC ---
The patch doesn't compile. At __wrap_pthread_create, it starts erroring
because the pthread_t and pthread_attr_t types do not exist.
It appears that since
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55673
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou 2012-12-13
23:42:07 UTC ---
There is also a pasto in sync.md which disables the atomic_store pattern.
ple-darwin10
Generated with...
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1000/gcc-4.8-20121213/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/asan/global-overflow-1.c
-L/sw/src/fink.build/gcc48-4.8.0-1
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
