[Bug gcov-profile/55650] [4.8 Regression] Firefox profiledbuild: libxul.so: cannot map zero-fill pages: Cannot allocate memory

2012-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55650 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/55650] [4.8 Regression] Firefox profiledbuild: libxul.so: cannot map zero-fill pages: Cannot allocate memory

2012-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55650 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug c++/55652] [4.8 Regression] ICE (segfault) with templates and structs

2012-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55652 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug c++/55652] [4.8 Regression] ICE (segfault) with templates and structs

2012-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55652 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug tree-optimization/55079] [4.8 regression] false positive -Warray-bounds (also seen at -O3 bootstrap)

2012-12-12 Thread schwab at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55079 --- Comment #17 from Andreas Schwab 2012-12-12 09:32:47 UTC --- Author: schwab Date: Wed Dec 12 09:32:40 2012 New Revision: 194437 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194437 Log: PR tree-optimization/55079 * gcc.dg/

[Bug fortran/55633] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/f90-intrinsic-bit.f -Os execution test

2012-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55633 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-12 09:33:00 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 12 09:32:52 2012 New Revision: 194438 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194438 Log: PR fortran/55633 * tree-ssa-lo

[Bug libgcc/55451] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/fixed-point/unary.c

2012-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55451 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-12 09:39:01 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 12 09:38:56 2012 New Revision: 194439 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194439 Log: PR libgcc/55451 * fixed-bit.c (

[Bug middle-end/55481] [4.8 regression] -O2 generates a wrong-code infinite loop in C++Benchmark's simple_types_constant_folding int8 xor test

2012-12-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55481 --- Comment #16 from Richard Biener 2012-12-12 09:43:18 UTC --- Thanks Zdenek - I'll give the patch further testing.

[Bug middle-end/52640] [4.8 Regression] performance bottleneck: gcc/tree.c;value_member

2012-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640 --- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-12 09:43:39 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 12 09:43:33 2012 New Revision: 194441 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194441 Log: PR middle-end/52640 * varasm.c

[Bug middle-end/52640] [4.8 Regression] performance bottleneck: gcc/tree.c;value_member

2012-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libgcc/55451] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/fixed-point/unary.c

2012-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55451 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/55633] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/f90-intrinsic-bit.f -Os execution test

2012-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55633 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/55660] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE instead of some warning during lto build with supplied different options (-funsigned-char vs none)

2012-12-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55660 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug target/55659] [4.8 Regression] [SH] Build failure with ICE in dwarf2out_var_location, at dwarf2out.c:20748

2012-12-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55659 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug target/55659] [4.8 Regression] [SH] Build failure with ICE in dwarf2out_var_location, at dwarf2out.c:20748

2012-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55659 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-12 09:56:29 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 12 09:56:22 2012 New Revision: 194442 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194442 Log: PR target/55659 Revert 201

[Bug middle-end/43631] var-tracking inserts notes with non-NULL BLOCK_FOR_INSN in between basic blocks

2012-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43631 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-12 09:56:28 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 12 09:56:22 2012 New Revision: 194442 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194442 Log: PR target/55659 Revert 20

[Bug c++/55513] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Incorrect snprintf folding when building with -std=c++0x

2012-12-12 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55513 --- Comment #12 from Pawel Sikora 2012-12-12 09:57:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > Fixed in trunk. no backport to 4.7 branch?

[Bug middle-end/55658] bitfields and __attribute__((packed)) generate horrible code on x86_64

2012-12-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55658 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||!SLOW_UNALIGNED_ACCESS Kno

[Bug middle-end/43631] var-tracking inserts notes with non-NULL BLOCK_FOR_INSN in between basic blocks

2012-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43631 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXE

[Bug target/55657] [4.8 Regression] objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin12

2012-12-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55657 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 Summary|objc/o

[Bug target/55656] [4.8 Regression] objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin11

2012-12-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55656 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 Summary|objc/o

[Bug target/55654] [4.8 Regression] objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin10

2012-12-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55654 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 Summary|objc/o

[Bug target/55659] [4.8 Regression] [SH] Build failure with ICE in dwarf2out_var_location, at dwarf2out.c:20748

2012-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55659 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug driver/55651] gcc hangs when "-Wp," is passed on the command line

2012-12-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55651 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/55631] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Several ext/ headers can not be #included on their own

2012-12-12 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55631 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.3 Version|unkno

[Bug other/54324] [4.8 Regression] GCC install document does not list minimum required g++ version

2012-12-12 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54324 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-12-12 10:56:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > Another proposed patch. > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg00766.html I very strongly second what stevenb said: GCC 3.2 claims m

[Bug debug/54402] [4.8 Regression] var-tracking does not scale

2012-12-12 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402 --- Comment #19 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-12-12 11:07:21 UTC --- > --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-10 > 10:56:51 UTC --- > (In reply to comment #16) >> Not on Solaris/SPARC, unfortunately: there are still com

[Bug debug/54402] [4.8 Regression] var-tracking does not scale

2012-12-12 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402 --- Comment #20 from Rainer Orth 2012-12-12 11:10:03 UTC --- Created attachment 28935 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28935 sparc-sun-solaris2.10 testcase

[Bug fortran/55539] [4.8 Regression] -fno-sign-zero may generate output with the wrong sign

2012-12-12 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55539 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-12-12 11:16:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Strangely enough I needed to add some epsilon to 0.5 so that > the second test passes, because the exact value 0.5 appears > to get rounded down to 0 in for

[Bug target/55659] [4.8 Regression] [SH] Build failure with ICE in dwarf2out_var_location, at dwarf2out.c:20748

2012-12-12 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55659 --- Comment #5 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-12-12 11:18:39 UTC --- arm-elf and sh4-unknown-linux-gnu are built successfully with revision 194442. Thanks!

[Bug sanitizer/55661] New: options summary lists -fsanitize in wrong section

2012-12-12 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55661 Bug #: 55661 Summary: options summary lists -fsanitize in wrong section Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: documen

[Bug ada/55243] STAMP variable is not defined in t-avr

2012-12-12 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243 --- Comment #24 from Eric Botcazou 2012-12-12 11:35:07 UTC --- > What I don't understand is what is bad with Rolf's proposal of defining STAMP? We simply don't need to stamp anything for the gnattools. > Stamping is not that unusual in

[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla with LTO

2012-12-12 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 --- Comment #157 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2012-12-12 11:43:27 UTC --- With revision 193740 libxul's size is ~34MB, which is OK. (Unfortunately this new ICE happens with yesterdays gcc when linking libxul: /var/tmp/mozilla-central/content/base/

[Bug middle-end/55481] [4.8 regression] -O2 generates a wrong-code infinite loop in C++Benchmark's simple_types_constant_folding int8 xor test

2012-12-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55481 --- Comment #17 from Richard Biener 2012-12-12 13:07:26 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Dec 12 13:07:19 2012 New Revision: 19 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=19 Log: 2012-12-12 Zdenek Dvorak P

[Bug middle-end/55481] [4.8 regression] -O2 generates a wrong-code infinite loop in C++Benchmark's simple_types_constant_folding int8 xor test

2012-12-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55481 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/55662] New: SLP vectorization of sqrt fails if in a loop

2012-12-12 Thread vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
; less sqrtV.s gcc version 4.8.0 20121212 (experimental) [trunk revision 194442] (GCC) funny enough it works with arbitrary (inlined) functions of mine (instead of sqrtf) see computeA computeL does "vectorize", not in the way I expected! I really do not understand the code gen

[Bug c++/55663] New: [C++11] Alias template combined with constexpr function is considered non-const

2012-12-12 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55663 Bug #: 55663 Summary: [C++11] Alias template combined with constexpr function is considered non-const Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug target/55657] [4.8 Regression] objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin12

2012-12-12 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55657 --- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth 2012-12-12 14:06:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > I suppose these are all regressions? In the strict sense, no. These are due to changes in the Objective-C ABI in later darwin SDKs. I haven't checke

[Bug target/55656] [4.8 Regression] objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin11

2012-12-12 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55656 --- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2012-12-12 14:07:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > I suppose these are all regressions? In the strict sense, no. These are due to changes in the Objective-C ABI in later darwin SDKs. I haven't checke

[Bug target/55654] [4.8 Regression] objc/obj-c++ failures present under darwin10

2012-12-12 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55654 --- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth 2012-12-12 14:08:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > I suppose these are all regressions? In the strict sense, no. These are due to changes in the Objective-C ABI in later darwin SDKs. I haven't checke

[Bug c++/55664] New: Missing diagnostic "dependent using declaration resolved to type without 'typename'"

2012-12-12 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55664 Bug #: 55664 Summary: Missing diagnostic "dependent using declaration resolved to type without 'typename'" Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/55662] SLP vectorization of sqrt fails if in a loop

2012-12-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55662 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener 2012-12-12 14:18:04 UTC --- 27: not vectorized: no vectype for stmt: _4 = va[i_34]; scalar_type: float32x8_t The vectorizer does not handle loops that already have vector types. And basic-block vector

[Bug lto/55660] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE instead of some warning during lto build with supplied different options (-funsigned-char vs none)

2012-12-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55660 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener 2012-12-12 14:18:46 UTC --- Ok, the issue is we preload char_type_node anyway, as show by Index: gcc/tree-streamer.c === --- gcc/tree-str

[Bug debug/55665] New: [4.8 Regression] Missing DW_TAG_lexical_block PC range

2012-12-12 Thread jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com
: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: jan.kratoch...@redhat.com Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu This is a regression for GDB gdb.cp/abstract-origin.exp. PASS: gcc (GCC) 4.7.3 20121212

[Bug debug/55665] [4.8 Regression] Missing DW_TAG_lexical_block PC range

2012-12-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55665 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug c++/55664] Missing diagnostic "dependent using declaration resolved to type without 'typename'"

2012-12-12 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55664 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-12-12 15:41:21 UTC --- The template is never instantiated so no diagnostic is required. Even if you instantiate it I'm not sure the code is necessarily ill-formed, unles you use the name in a way

[Bug c++/55664] Missing diagnostic "dependent using declaration resolved to type without 'typename'"

2012-12-12 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55664 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-12-12 15:49:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > But it doesn't say the keyword typename *must* be used is s/used is/used if/

[Bug bootstrap/54718] [4.8 regression] ICE in remap_gimple_stmt, at tree-inline.c:1468

2012-12-12 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54718 --- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-12-12 15:53:49 UTC --- The extreme sparcv9 libgo compile times without -fno-var-tracking-assignments are handled in PR debug/54402, it seems. I haven't seen the ICE covered in t

[Bug tree-optimization/44776] FAIL: gcc.dg/matrix/transpose-3.c execution, -fprofile-use -fipa-matrix-reorg -fdump-ipa-matrix-reorg -O3 -fwhole-program

2012-12-12 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44776 Jack Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/55665] [4.8 Regression] Missing DW_TAG_lexical_block PC range

2012-12-12 Thread jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55665 --- Comment #1 from Jan Kratochvil 2012-12-12 16:00:45 UTC --- Created attachment 28936 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28936 gdb.cp/abstract-origin.cc from FSF GDB tree, for -O0 -g.

[Bug java/44495] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] ICE in java_mangle_resource_name, at java/mangle.c:658

2012-12-12 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44495 --- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-12-12 16:04:21 UTC --- > --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou 2012-12-11 > 08:32:07 UTC --- > Does this still occur? I had done some further investigate at that time and found tha

[Bug c++/55355] internal compiler error: in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:6415

2012-12-12 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/55665] [4.8 Regression] Missing DW_TAG_lexical_block PC range

2012-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55665 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/46837] induct compiled with -ffast-math -fschedule-insns -fsched-pressure -O3 ~30% slower

2012-12-12 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46837 Jack Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/55665] [4.8 Regression] Missing DW_TAG_lexical_block PC range

2012-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55665 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla with LTO

2012-12-12 Thread tejohnson at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 --- Comment #158 from Teresa Johnson 2012-12-12 18:59:56 UTC --- On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:43 AM, markus at trippelsdorf dot de wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 > > --- Comment #157 from Markus Trippelsdorf > 2012-

[Bug target/55666] New: Use scratch register to avoid save/restore of callee saved register

2012-12-12 Thread carrot at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55666 Bug #: 55666 Summary: Use scratch register to avoid save/restore of callee saved register Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: U

[Bug target/55666] Use scratch register to avoid save/restore of callee saved register

2012-12-12 Thread carrot at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55666 --- Comment #1 from Carrot 2012-12-12 19:48:30 UTC --- Created attachment 28938 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28938 testcase

[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla with LTO

2012-12-12 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 --- Comment #159 from Jan Hubicka 2012-12-12 20:35:37 UTC --- > hal/Hal.gcda: 96.72%: num counts=30069, min counter=16389 > hal/Hal.gcda: 97.50%: num counts=35296, min counter=10241 > hal/Hal.gcda: 98.28%: num

[Bug rtl-optimization/55667] New: [regression] -O1 enables frame pointer push to move around on x86_64

2012-12-12 Thread dflater at nist dot gov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55667 Bug #: 55667 Summary: [regression] -O1 enables frame pointer push to move around on x86_64 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status:

[Bug rtl-optimization/55667] [regression] -O1 enables frame pointer push to move around on x86_64

2012-12-12 Thread dflater at nist dot gov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55667 --- Comment #1 from David Flater 2012-12-12 20:45:01 UTC --- Created attachment 28940 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28940 log of build of test program

[Bug rtl-optimization/55667] [4.7 regression] -O1 enables frame pointer push to move around on x86_64

2012-12-12 Thread dflater at nist dot gov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55667 --- Comment #2 from David Flater 2012-12-12 21:25:27 UTC --- N.B., in the test program, the problem occurs in fn2 but not fn1.

[Bug debug/54402] [4.8 Regression] var-tracking does not scale

2012-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402 --- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-12 22:09:59 UTC --- Created attachment 28941 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28941 sparc hack I think on SPARC that is partly the fault of the sparc.md part of http://gcc.g

[Bug debug/54402] [4.8 Regression] var-tracking does not scale

2012-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402 --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-12 22:21:57 UTC --- Created attachment 28942 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28942 --param max-vartrack-reverse-op-size patch Another patch, to avoid adding reverse ops to V

[Bug debug/54402] [4.8 Regression] var-tracking does not scale

2012-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #28563|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libstdc++/55631] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Several ext/ headers can not be #included on their own

2012-12-12 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55631 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-12-12 23:01:51 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Wed Dec 12 23:01:40 2012 New Revision: 194457 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194457 Log: PR libstdc++/55631 * include/e

[Bug sanitizer/55508] many test cases fail using -fsanitize=address with internal compiler error: in expand_call_tm

2012-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55508 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-12 23:05:27 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 12 23:05:23 2012 New Revision: 194459 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194459 Log: PR sanitizer/55508 * builtin-at

[Bug debug/55665] [4.8 Regression] Missing DW_TAG_lexical_block PC range

2012-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55665 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-12 23:19:38 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 12 23:19:32 2012 New Revision: 194461 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194461 Log: PR debug/55665 * tree-inline.c

[Bug debug/55665] [4.8 Regression] Missing DW_TAG_lexical_block PC range

2012-12-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55665 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/55668] New: Incorrect lookup for template member of dependent template

2012-12-12 Thread tudorb at fb dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55668 Bug #: 55668 Summary: Incorrect lookup for template member of dependent template Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/55668] Incorrect lookup for template member of dependent template

2012-12-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55668 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-12-13 01:24:35 UTC --- I think there is a dup of this bug somewhere. Related to how sometimes we don't need to use template in some cases.

[Bug c++/55668] Incorrect lookup for template member of dependent template

2012-12-12 Thread tudorb at fb dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55668 --- Comment #2 from Tudor Bosman 2012-12-13 01:28:05 UTC --- It's hard to believe that I'm the first one to hit this problem, but my 10 minutes of searching haven't found any duplicates; perhaps my search-fu isn't up to par :)