[Bug c/54306] ARM iwmmxt2 commit adds imbalanced #endif in mmintrin.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54306 --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton 2012-08-19 07:10:01 UTC --- Created attachment 28049 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28049 Remove offending #endif

[Bug c/54306] ARM iwmmxt2 commit adds imbalanced #endif in mmintrin.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54306 --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton 2012-08-19 07:11:42 UTC --- Author: nickc Date: Sun Aug 19 07:11:35 2012 New Revision: 190511 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190511 Log: PR target/54306 * config/arm/mmintrin.h: Rem

[Bug libstdc++/54320] New: [c++11] range access to VLA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54320 Bug #: 54320 Summary: [c++11] range access to VLA Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/54306] ARM iwmmxt2 commit adds imbalanced #endif in mmintrin.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54306 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton 2012-08-19 07:13:25 UTC --- Hi Daniel, Thanks for catching this. It was a snafu, corrected with the obvious fix you suggested. Cheers Nick

[Bug libstdc++/54320] [c++11] range access to VLA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54320 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-08-19 07:17:04 UTC --- I don't think they can ever be as std::begin is defined as a template with one of the template arguments being the size of the array.

[Bug libstdc++/54320] [c++11] range access to VLA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54320 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-08-19 07:18:25 UTC --- See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5435

[Bug libstdc++/54320] [c++11] range access to VLA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54320 --- Comment #3 from vincenzo Innocente 2012-08-19 07:24:52 UTC --- int foo2(int N) { int v[N]; for ( auto a : v) if (a) return a; return 0; } works, though was similar to std::begin(v) std::end(v)

[Bug c++/54319] Assignment to rvalue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54319 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug target/54246] Bytemark FOURIER 54% slower with glibc 2.16

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54246 wbrana changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Bytemark FOURIER 54% slower |Bytemark FOURIER 54% slower |i

[Bug c++/54214] (corrected copyright notes in source file)please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or a GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/54321] New: ice in tree_low_cst at -O3

Component: c AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: dcb...@hotmail.com Created attachment 28050 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28050 C source code I just tried to compile the package fcron-3.0.6-5 on gcc-4.8 trunk dated 20120819 on an AMD x86_64

[Bug c/54321] ice in tree_low_cst at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54321 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot

[Bug libstdc++/54320] [c++11] range access to VLA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54320 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-08-19 11:29:15 UTC --- Would be an extension requiring front-end support. I don't think we want it.

[Bug libstdc++/54320] [c++11] range access to VLA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54320 vincenzo Innocente changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #5 from vinc

[Bug c++/54320] [c++11] range access to VLA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54320 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Compone

[Bug c++/54319] Assignment to rvalue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54319 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|aschepler at gmail dot com | --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-

[Bug c++/54320] [c++11] range access to VLA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54320 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2012-08-19 12:05:57 UTC --- Frankly I'm also not sure about the signature of the begin and end overloads themselves, is it even possible to tell apart VLAs??

[Bug c++/54276] Lambda in a Template Function Undefined Reference to local static

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54276 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|travis at gockelhut dot com | --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-

[Bug c++/54319] Assignment to rvalue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54319 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler 2012-08-19 12:13:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Daniel can you double check? Good that you ask. There must by some problem with my gcc installation, because I get different results from different contex

[Bug c++/54276] Lambda in a Template Function Undefined Reference to local static

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54276 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler 2012-08-19 12:14:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Daniel can you please double check this one too? Today I'm definitely seeing > the undefined reference. It seems that I need to fix my gcc installation as

[Bug c++/54319] Assignment to rvalue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54319 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/54276] Lambda in a Template Function Undefined Reference to local static

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54276 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/53488] Incorrect code generated when capturing a constant by reference in a lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53488 Jiří Paleček changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/52026] [c++0x] g++: Constexpr Variable Appears Uninitialized in Lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52026 --- Comment #5 from Jiří Paleček 2012-08-19 14:04:34 UTC --- *** Bug 53488 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/53488] Incorrect code generated when capturing a constant by reference in a lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53488 --- Comment #11 from Jiří Paleček 2012-08-19 14:11:22 UTC --- BTW I have proposed a patch that fixes this problem here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg01252.html. Please take a look at it.

[Bug c++/52026] [c++0x] g++: Constexpr Variable Appears Uninitialized in Lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52026 --- Comment #6 from Jiří Paleček 2012-08-19 14:13:44 UTC --- BTW I have proposed a patch that fixes this problem here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg01252.html. Please take a look at it.

[Bug c++/52026] [c++0x] g++: Constexpr Variable Appears Uninitialized in Lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52026 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2012-08-19 14:38:36 UTC --- Do you have a copyright assignment on file?

[Bug fortran/54298] Add warning when doing equal/nonequal floating-point comparisons

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54298 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig 2012-08-19 15:05:49 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Aug 19 15:05:41 2012 New Revision: 190516 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190516 Log: 2012-08-19 Thomas König PR fortran/54298

[Bug fortran/54322] New: [OOP] Wrong TARGET-attribute handling with CLASS IS/TYPE IS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54322 Bug #: 54322 Summary: [OOP] Wrong TARGET-attribute handling with CLASS IS/TYPE IS Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/52026] [c++0x] g++: Constexpr Variable Appears Uninitialized in Lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52026 --- Comment #8 from Jiří Paleček 2012-08-19 15:38:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > Do you have a copyright assignment on file? I don't know what you're talking about, so probably no. (BTW which file?)

[Bug c++/54323] New: Friend function declaration not correctly identified with CRTP + enable_if

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54323 Bug #: 54323 Summary: Friend function declaration not correctly identified with CRTP + enable_if Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCO

[Bug fortran/54298] Add warning when doing equal/nonequal floating-point comparisons

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54298 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/54302] Add optional warning when declaring a identifier in a nested scope, which matches on otherwise available one

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54302 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/54301] Add optional warning if pointer assigning a local variable to a nonlocal pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54301 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/54301] Add optional warning if pointer assigning a local variable to a nonlocal pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54301 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2012-08-19 17:27:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > If the target has the SAVE attribute or is allocatable, we shouldn't warn. Why shouldn't one warn for ALLOCATABLE? See first exam

[Bug middle-end/54321] [4.8 Regression] ice in tree_low_cst at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54321 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Component|c

[Bug c++/54214] (corrected copyright notes in source file)please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or a GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214 --- Comment #19 from Denis Kolesnik 2012-08-19 18:15:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #18) > Gcc cannot alter results of an SQL query, it's a bug in your program. This is > the wrong place to get help debugging your code. You are right: I conside

[Bug other/54324] New: GCC install document does not list minimum required g++ versions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54324 Bug #: 54324 Summary: GCC install document does not list minimum required g++ versions Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/54214] (corrected copyright notes in source file)please help to determine whether it is an PostgreSQL error or a GCC error (combobox and SQL data sorting)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54214 --- Comment #20 from Denis Kolesnik 2012-08-19 18:21:08 UTC --- sure: I found, that the bug is if I use "limit 1" clause. It is surelly a bug.

[Bug c++/54325] New: C++11 uniform initialization syntax for argument-less abstract base class constructor fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54325 Bug #: 54325 Summary: C++11 uniform initialization syntax for argument-less abstract base class constructor fails Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1

[Bug target/54308] [4.8 regression] build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308 --- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-08-19 18:29:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > I was unable to build 4.1.2-27.fc7 from the SRPM. I'm not sure it would have helped, seeing as the breakage was in rs6000-specific parts. > So, I've g

[Bug other/54326] New: GCC does not build with G++ version 3.4.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54326 Bug #: 54326 Summary: GCC does not build with G++ version 3.4.0 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug middle-end/54321] [4.8 Regression] ice in tree_low_cst at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54321 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/54327] New: Segmentation fault in init_ggc

Component: c AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: dcb...@hotmail.com I just tried to compile the package httrack-3.43.9-5 on gcc-4.8 trunk dated 20120819 on an AMD x86_64 box. The compiler said htslib.c: In function 'treathead': htslib.c:1246:6: interna

[Bug c/54327] Segmentation fault in init_ggc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54327 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman 2012-08-19 20:14:08 UTC --- Created attachment 28052 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28052 gzipped C source code

[Bug middle-end/54321] [4.8 Regression] ice in tree_low_cst at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54321 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug other/54326] GCC does not build with G++ version 3.4.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54326 --- Comment #1 from Gary Funck 2012-08-19 20:54:51 UTC --- Don't know if this is relevant, but a recent thread on the clang-dev list explored the differences between GCC and clang in the handling of const and constexpr. "clang vs GCC error case:

[Bug c/52991] attribute packed broken on mingw32?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52991 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug target/28896] -fstack-limit-symbol and m68k and non 68020

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896 Larry Baker changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #28048|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c/54327] [4.8 Regression] Segmentation fault in init_ggc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54327 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/54327] [4.8 Regression] Segmentation fault in init_ggc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54327 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Component|c

[Bug middle-end/54327] [4.8 Regression] Segmentation fault in init_ggc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54327 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot

[Bug fortran/54301] Add optional warning if pointer assigning a local variable to a nonlocal pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54301 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2012-08-20 05:47:55 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Mon Aug 20 05:47:46 2012 New Revision: 190522 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190522 Log: 2012-08-20 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/54

[Bug fortran/54301] Add optional warning if pointer assigning a local variable to a nonlocal pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54301 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/54328] New: capture pointer by value is not correct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54328 Bug #: 54328 Summary: capture pointer by value is not correct Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: