[Bug c/53410] [4.8 Regression] ICE in build_int_cst_wide, at tree.c:1219

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53410 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug lto/53426] [lto with ipa-pta]: ICE:create_variable_info_for at ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-structalias.c:5581

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53426 vincenzo Innocente changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.1 Summary|[lto]:

[Bug middle-end/53408] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in get_initial_def_for_induction, at tree-vect-loop.c:3222

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53408 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug c/53410] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in build_int_cst_wide, at tree.c:1219

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53410 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-21 08:53:39 UTC --- Created attachment 27453 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27453 gcc48-pr53410.patch Untested fix. 4.7 branch will need only a subset of these, because there intege

[Bug middle-end/53409] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: vector VEC(vec_void_p,base) index domain error, in vinfo_for_stmt at tree-vectorizer.h:630

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53409 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug other/53430] Attempting to build gcc on FC 16 x86_64 produces error message.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53430 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-05-21 08:48:53 UTC --- User configuration error. You need to install the 32-bit glibc devel rpm, or to --disable-multilib when configuring gcc.

[Bug rtl-optimization/53422] reduce the size of CODE_LABEL rtl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53422 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-21 09:25:00 UTC --- Patches should be posted to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org.

[Bug tree-optimization/53419] loop incorrectly optimized to endless loop at -O2 for table delimited by extern addresses (x86-32)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53419 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-21 09:30:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > > extern func_ptr_t init_array_begin[1]; > > > extern func_ptr_t init_array_end[1]; > > > > The array sizes say they are siz

[Bug middle-end/53432] New: [4.8] ICE failed to reclaim unneeded function in same comdat group

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53432 Bug #: 53432 Summary: [4.8] ICE failed to reclaim unneeded function in same comdat group Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/51071] [4.7 Regression] ICE in gimple_has_side_effects, at gimple.c:2513

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51071 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-21 08:40:42 UTC --- Do you have a testcase for that?

[Bug other/53430] Attempting to build gcc on FC 16 x86_64 produces error message.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53430 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/53410] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in build_int_cst_wide, at tree.c:1219

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53410 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-21 09:34:52 UTC --- Looks good to me.

[Bug tree-optimization/53395] [4.8 Regression] The LAPACK functions i(d|s)amax are more than two times slower after revision 187183

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53395 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-21 09:39:51 UTC --- Note that if-conversion does not fold to not destroy valid gimple RHS and to avoid canonicalizing the condition. Producing a MAX_EXPR is certainly fine of course ... (I'm to blame

[Bug lto/53407] ICE compiling pcre-8.21 in function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa.c:1002

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53407 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug middle-end/53411] [4.8 Regression] ICE in move_unallocated_pseudos

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53411 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug c/53410] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in build_int_cst_wide, at tree.c:1219

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53410 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-21 10:11:52 UTC --- Created attachment 27457 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27457 gcc47-pr53410.patch 4.7 version of the patch.

[Bug libstdc++/53429] complex::{imag,real} should be marked alwaysinline to guarantee libstdc++ binary compatibility between C++98 and C++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53429 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/53407] ICE compiling pcre-8.21 in function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa.c:1002

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53407 --- Comment #3 from rainer-gccbugs at 7val dot com 2012-05-21 09:45:21 UTC --- Created attachment 27456 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27456 preprocessed source

[Bug c/53418] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE at gimplify.c:7773

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53418 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org Comp

[Bug middle-end/53409] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: vector VEC(vec_void_p,base) index domain error, in vinfo_for_stmt at tree-vectorizer.h:630

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53409 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-21 09:37:38 UTC --- Created attachment 27455 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27455 gcc48-pr53409.patch Untested fix.

[Bug lto/53407] ICE compiling pcre-8.21 in function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa.c:1002

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53407 --- Comment #4 from rainer-gccbugs at 7val dot com 2012-05-21 09:50:27 UTC --- It turns out a single source file is sufficient to trigger the ICE: Compile: $ g++ -v -save-temps -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -O3 -mtune=core2 -march=core2 -fomit-frame-pointe

[Bug c/53410] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in build_int_cst_wide, at tree.c:1219

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53410 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.7.1

[Bug middle-end/53428] [4.8 Regression] 403.gcc in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled by LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53428 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/53398] feature request: option for overloaded methods order in vtable compatibility with msc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53398 --- Comment #2 from Roman Wieczorek 2012-05-21 10:18:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > I think if we provide an option for this, we are > going to have people abuse this. The risk i see here is about compatibility of gcc compiled libraries w

[Bug tree-optimization/53419] loop incorrectly optimized to endless loop at -O2 for table delimited by extern addresses (x86-32)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53419 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9 f

[Bug rtl-optimization/53422] reduce the size of CODE_LABEL rtl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53422 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug c/53433] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:424 during bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433 Bug #: 53433 Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:424 during bootstrap Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Stat

[Bug lto/53407] ICE compiling pcre-8.21 in function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa.c:1002

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53407 --- Comment #5 from rainer-gccbugs at 7val dot com 2012-05-21 10:59:55 UTC --- 4.7 works

[Bug target/53399] "*ffs" pattern generates wrong code with BMI enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53399 --- Comment #11 from Yukhin Kirill 2012-05-21 11:02:07 UTC --- > > Please test the attached patch. The patch checks CCCmode for TARGET_BMI in ffs > patterns. Hi Uros, seems your patch fixes the problem, here is piece of asm from testcase: ...

[Bug middle-end/53432] [4.8 Regression] ICE failed to reclaim unneeded function in same comdat group

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53432 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/53426] [4.8 Regression] ICE:create_variable_info_for at ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-structalias.c:5581

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53426 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto Status|WAITING

[Bug target/53435] New: (ix86_expand_vec_perm) and (ix86_expand_vec_perm) do not pass arguments to avx2_permvar8s[f,i] correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53435 Bug #: 53435 Summary: (ix86_expand_vec_perm) and (ix86_expand_vec_perm) do not pass arguments to avx2_permvar8s[f,i] correctly Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version:

[Bug c/53433] [4.8 Regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:424 during bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2012-05-21 11:07:49 UTC --- Only happened with bootstrap-lto.

[Bug target/53435] (ix86_expand_vec_perm) and (ix86_expand_vec_perm) do not pass arguments to avx2_permvar8s[f,i] correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53435 --- Comment #2 from Yukhin Kirill 2012-05-21 12:17:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > > gcc.c-torture/execute/vshuf-v* and gcc.dg/torture/pr45720.c fail. > This occurs on AVX2-capable HW

[Bug middle-end/51071] [4.7 Regression] ICE in gimple_has_side_effects, at gimple.c:2513

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51071 --- Comment #6 from pageexec at freemail dot hu 2012-05-21 11:41:10 UTC --- Created attachment 27458 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27458 test case for gcc 4.6.x this is a compressed test case (would be too big to attach other

[Bug target/53416] Wrong code when optimising loop involving _rdrand32_step

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53416 --- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-21 12:32:04 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Mon May 21 12:31:45 2012 New Revision: 187709 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187709 Log: Use unspec_volatile on rdrand_1 gcc/ P

[Bug middle-end/53433] [4.8 Regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:424 during lto-bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2012-05-21 11:36:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Btw, I cannot reproduce it. Yes, this probably depends on the C-library being used. I'm running (recent trunk): # /lib/libc.so.6 GNU C Library develo

[Bug middle-end/53433] [4.8 Regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:424 during lto-bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org Co

[Bug lto/53407] [4.6 Regression] ICE compiling pcre-8.21 in function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa.c:1002

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53407 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, lto Sta

[Bug c++/53434] New: Compiler decides declaration/expression ambiguity too soon.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53434 Bug #: 53434 Summary: Compiler decides declaration/expression ambiguity too soon. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/53435] (ix86_expand_vec_perm) and (ix86_expand_vec_perm) do not pass arguments to avx2_permvar8s[f,i] correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53435 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Ivchenko 2012-05-21 11:46:35 UTC --- Created attachment 27460 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27460 proposed patch for fixing

[Bug tree-optimization/53436] New: Volatile behaves strange with OpenMP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53436 Bug #: 53436 Summary: Volatile behaves strange with OpenMP Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/53419] loop incorrectly optimized to endless loop at -O2 for table delimited by extern addresses (x86-32)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53419 --- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-21 11:29:13 UTC --- Btw, it does not change it to an endless loop but the exit test to if (n_init > 1) thus only an endless loop in case there is more than one element.

[Bug middle-end/53433] [4.8 Regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:424 during lto-bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-21 11:25:08 UTC --- Btw, I cannot reproduce it.

[Bug middle-end/53408] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in get_initial_def_for_induction, at tree-vect-loop.c:3222

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53408 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.0 Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8

[Bug middle-end/53408] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in get_initial_def_for_induction, at tree-vect-loop.c:3222

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53408 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-21 12:46:04 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon May 21 12:45:59 2012 New Revision: 187710 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187710 Log: 2012-05-21 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug target/53425] No warnings are given for -mno-sse

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53425 --- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-21 12:48:43 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Mon May 21 12:48:38 2012 New Revision: 187711 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187711 Log: Warn passing SSE argument ABI change for -m6

[Bug target/53416] Wrong code when optimising loop involving _rdrand32_step

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53416 --- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-21 12:59:58 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Mon May 21 12:59:53 2012 New Revision: 187712 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187712 Log: Use unspec_volatile on rdrand_1 gcc/ B

[Bug target/53416] Wrong code when optimising loop involving _rdrand32_step

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53416 --- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-21 13:07:16 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Mon May 21 13:07:11 2012 New Revision: 187713 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187713 Log: Use unspec_volatile on rdrand_1 gcc/ B

[Bug target/53416] Wrong code when optimising loop involving _rdrand32_step

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53416 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/53425] No warnings are given for -mno-sse

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53425 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/53435] (ix86_expand_vec_perm) and (ix86_expand_vec_perm) do not pass arguments to avx2_permvar8s[f,i] correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53435 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2012-05-21 13:13:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Created attachment 27460 [details] > proposed patch for fixing Please submit it to gcc-patches mailing list.

[Bug regression/53437] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53437 Bug #: 53437 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c -O0 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug tree-optimization/53426] [4.8 Regression] ICE:create_variable_info_for at ../../gcc-trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-structalias.c:5581

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53426 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2012-05-21 13:40:05 UTC --- > Hum. IPA-PTA ... yeah ... :/ > > Mine I guess (note ipa-pta is experimental). > > Honza - we are trying to access the varinfo for > _ZTIN5boost16exception_detail19error_info_injector

[Bug c/53418] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE at gimplify.c:7773

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53418 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/53437] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53437 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/53410] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in build_int_cst_wide, at tree.c:1219

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53410 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-21 14:25:13 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon May 21 14:25:03 2012 New Revision: 187715 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187715 Log: PR tree-optimization/53410 * fold-const.c (

[Bug tree-optimization/53366] wrong code generation by tree vectorizer using AVX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53366 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-21 14:29:19 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon May 21 14:29:11 2012 New Revision: 187717 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187717 Log: PR tree-optimization/53366 * tree-vect-slp.

[Bug fortran/53148] [4.7 Regression] Incorrect intrinsic function parsing on labeled statements when compiled w/ -ffrontend-optimize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53148 --- Comment #7 from Joseph S. Myers 2012-05-21 14:42:40 UTC --- Author: jsm28 Date: Mon May 21 14:42:26 2012 New Revision: 187718 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187718 Log: PR c/53148 * c-typeck.c (build_conditiona

[Bug middle-end/53409] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: vector VEC(vec_void_p,base) index domain error, in vinfo_for_stmt at tree-vectorizer.h:630

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53409 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-21 14:27:21 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon May 21 14:27:10 2012 New Revision: 187716 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187716 Log: PR tree-optimization/53409 * tree-vect-loop

[Bug c++/51184] Abstract class in function return type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51184 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-21 15:12:22 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon May 21 15:12:13 2012 New Revision: 187720 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187720 Log: /cp 2012-05-21 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/51184] Abstract class in function return type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51184 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/53438] [4.7 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 --- Comment #1 from William J. Schmidt 2012-05-21 15:17:49 UTC --- Created attachment 27462 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27462 Unreduced testcase

[Bug c++/40821] C++ compiler accepts __attribute__ with missing parens

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40821 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/40821] C++ compiler accepts __attribute__ with missing parens

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40821 --- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-21 15:12:24 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon May 21 15:12:13 2012 New Revision: 187720 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187720 Log: /cp 2012-05-21 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug tree-optimization/53438] [4.7 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 --- Comment #2 from William J. Schmidt 2012-05-21 15:21:19 UTC --- Whoops, left off the compile command: g++ -o YarrPattern.o -S -O3 ./YarrPattern.ii

[Bug tree-optimization/53438] New: [4.7 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 Bug #: 53438 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/53433] [4.8 Regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:424 during lto-bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug c/53418] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE at gimplify.c:7773

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53418 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug libstdc++/53429] complex::{imag,real} should be marked alwaysinline to guarantee libstdc++ binary compatibility between C++98 and C++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53429 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey Yasskin 2012-05-21 15:30:45 UTC --- Richard, I'm not asking that it be possible to link together code compiled in C++98 and C++11 mode. I'm asking that gcc be able to build in C++11 mode at all. If libstdc++.so exposed

[Bug c++/53361] Could not convert ‘{0, 0, 0}’ from ‘’ to ‘std::array’

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53361 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/53399] "*ffs" pattern generates wrong code with BMI enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53399 --- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-21 15:46:34 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Mon May 21 15:46:25 2012 New Revision: 187722 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187722 Log: PR target/53399 * config/i386/i386.

[Bug c++/53439] New: g++ generates buggy code with optimisation flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53439 Bug #: 53439 Summary: g++ generates buggy code with optimisation flags Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug target/53399] "*ffs" pattern generates wrong code with BMI enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53399 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED URL|

[Bug libstdc++/53429] complex::{imag,real} should be marked alwaysinline to guarantee libstdc++ binary compatibility between C++98 and C++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53429 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-21 15:59:44 UTC --- Before fiddling with always inline, I would rather add 3 overloads of operator<< for float, double and long double, using __rep instead of real and imag. But I don't have a strong opin

[Bug c++/53159] Missing narrowing check

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53159 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/53132] Missing top level in diagnostic's instantiation stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53132 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug middle-end/53411] [4.8 Regression] ICE in move_unallocated_pseudos

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53411 --- Comment #3 from Bernd Schmidt 2012-05-21 16:52:06 UTC --- Odd. The following is in 190r.asmcons: (insn 39 51 141 3 (set (reg:DI 135 [ D.1745 ]) (sign_extend:DI (reg:SI 132 [ j ]))) regehr.c:22 122 {*extendsidi2_rex64} (expr_list

[Bug middle-end/53411] [4.8 Regression] ICE in move_unallocated_pseudos

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53411 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from H

[Bug c/53418] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE at gimplify.c:7773

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53418 --- Comment #5 from Joseph S. Myers 2012-05-21 16:47:47 UTC --- Author: jsm28 Date: Mon May 21 16:47:32 2012 New Revision: 187726 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187726 Log: PR c/53418 * c-typeck.c (build_conditiona

[Bug java/52815] class.c:2815:53: error: 'JCR_SECTION_NAME' was not declared in this scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52815 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/13822] enable -fomit-frame-pointer or at least -momit-frame-pointer by default on x86/dwarf2 platforms

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13822 Dan Nicolaescu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug other/53430] Attempting to build gcc on FC 16 x86_64 produces error message.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53430 --- Comment #3 from George R. Goffe 2012-05-21 17:14:25 UTC --- Thank you for this information. I'm not terribly conversant with the internals with GCC so please let me ask this question. This system is x86_64 and I'm presuming that the GCC bui

[Bug java/52815] class.c:2815:53: error: 'JCR_SECTION_NAME' was not declared in this scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52815 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin 2012-05-21 16:27:55 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Mon May 21 16:27:40 2012 New Revision: 187724 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187724 Log: PR java/52815 * class.c (emit_registe

[Bug bootstrap/52700] lib* configure fails on --enable-symvers=gnu-versioned-namespace.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52700 --- Comment #4 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-05-21 17:34:39 UTC --- Author: bkoz Date: Mon May 21 17:34:25 2012 New Revision: 187728 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187728 Log: 2012-05-21 Benjamin Kosnik PR libstdc+

[Bug fortran/53389] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] -frealloc-lhs: memory leak when assigning array function result to allocatable array, where one of its supplied arguments is itself an array function resul

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53389 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-05-21 16:16:24 UTC --- If one duplicates "filler" and renames it to inner/outer with the call: x=outer(inner(y, real(2*i)), real(i)) one sees four calls to gfc_conv_procedure_call for: outer, inner, outer

[Bug rtl-optimization/53422] reduce the size of CODE_LABEL rtl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53422 --- Comment #3 from Dan Nicolaescu 2012-05-21 16:53:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > The reason for the extra fields in BARRIER and CODE_LABEL is to make it > possible for a BARRIER or CODE_LABEL to be turned into > INSN/JUMP_INSN/CALL_INSN.

[Bug target/53440] New: [arm] generic thunk code fails for method which uses '...'

--enable-languages=c++ --disable-shared --disable-libmudflap --disable-libssp --enable-checking Thread model: posix gcc version 4.8.0 20120521 (experimental) [trunk revision 187727] (GCC) $ ./xgcc -B. ~/t.cc /home/ryan/t.cc:18:1: error: generic thunk code fails for method 'virtual void Test::Log(const char*, ...)' which uses '...' }}; ^

[Bug target/53440] [arm] generic thunk code fails for method which uses '...'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53440 --- Comment #1 from Ryan Mansfield 2012-05-21 18:04:03 UTC --- Created attachment 27463 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27463 test case

[Bug bootstrap/52700] lib* configure fails on --enable-symvers=gnu-versioned-namespace.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52700 --- Comment #5 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-05-21 18:14:07 UTC --- Author: bkoz Date: Mon May 21 18:14:01 2012 New Revision: 187730 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187730 Log: 2012-05-21 Benjamin Kosnik PR libstdc++/52

[Bug other/53430] Attempting to build gcc on FC 16 x86_64 produces error message.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53430 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-05-21 18:20:15 UTC --- On x86_64 GCC defaults to a "multilib" compiler, meaning one that can produce code for both x84_64 and x86 i.e both 64-bit and 32-bit objects. In order to do that it needs 32-bit gl

[Bug other/53430] Attempting to build gcc on FC 16 x86_64 produces error message.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53430 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-05-21 18:23:17 UTC --- P.S. You could have asked on the gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org mailing list. Since it's one of the most widely-used distros it's safe to assume that GCC builds on F16 x86_64 for everyone else

[Bug bootstrap/52700] lib* configure fails on --enable-symvers=gnu-versioned-namespace.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52700 Benjamin Kosnik changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53132] Missing top level in diagnostic's instantiation stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53132 --- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-05-21 18:45:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Manuel, any idea what is going on here? Not much. The instantiation context starts from the input_location, and that is pointing to ../include/c++/4.7

cine castiga

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&hl=ro&v=_Sl3Ox7RMnE To unsubscribe please send email to unsubscr...@cc.psd-prahova.ro

[Bug bootstrap/53183] [4.7/4.8 Regression] libgcc does not always figure out the size of double/long double

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53183 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-21 18:56:53 UTC --- Author: pinskia Date: Mon May 21 18:56:35 2012 New Revision: 187732 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187732 Log: 2012-05-21 Andrew Pinski PR bootstrap

[Bug c++/53159] Missing narrowing check

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53159 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-21 19:26:32 UTC --- Essentially the problem is that check_narrowing doesn't know how to handle type conversion operators or anything more sophisticated than just scalars as init and gives up. The issue sh

[Bug regression/53442] New: llvm 2.9 tblgen executable possibly miscompiled with gcc 4.7.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53442 Bug #: 53442 Summary: llvm 2.9 tblgen executable possibly miscompiled with gcc 4.7.0 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug regression/53442] llvm 2.9 tblgen executable possibly miscompiled with gcc 4.7.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53442 --- Comment #1 from ncahill_alt at yahoo dot com 2012-05-21 19:52:57 UTC --- In case it is of interest, here is the generating command for the tblgen executable. I don't know how to turn this into a test case as it seems to use only pregenerated c

[Bug target/53440] [arm] generic thunk code fails for method which uses '...'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53440 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-21 18:55:04 UTC --- Someone needs to implement the thunk functionality for arm.

  1   2   >