http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52446
Bug #: 52446
Summary: GCC 4.7.0 can't build some templates, but gcc4.6
branch svn can
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42118
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52446
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52446
xunxun changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52446
--- Comment #3 from xunxun 2012-03-01 08:10:48
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This is an expected and documented change.
>
> See http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/porting_to.html (Name lookup changes).
Thanks. I will report it to CodeBlocks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52446
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52446
xunxun changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52446
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52445
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-01
08:54:51 UTC ---
I'd say the problem is that add_or_mark_expr hasn't been properly adjusted for
MEM_REFs, it ignores the offset of the MEM_REFs altogether.
Before MEM_REF, this function would just trac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52445
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-01
09:01:59 UTC ---
Not to mention that in this exact case, even if was always non-trapping, I
doubt it will ever be an optimization to "optimize"
if (len_1(D) > 1)
goto ;
else
goto ;
:
MEM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52445
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-01
09:14:42 UTC ---
The quick fix that would IMHO brings us back to pre-161655 decisions would be
just to store also the offset and size into the hash table entries and use them
as a requirement for the l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2012-03-01
09:23:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 26799
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26799
Patch for TYPE(*)
Patch for TYPE(*). The patch should be feature complete (i.e. everything should
wo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52433
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-03-01
09:35:41 UTC ---
Ah yes, thanks for the link.
(In reply to comment #7)
> Joke aside: Would it be useful to connect this issue with CWG 1402?
I think you just did, with that link :)
I'm still going
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52443
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52407
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52443
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-03-01
10:20:20 UTC ---
Or rather
/* Allow conversions pointer type to integral type only if
there is no sign or zero extension involved.
For targets were the precision of pt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52443
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2012-03-01
10:23:34 UTC ---
Err ...
/* Allow conversions pointer type to integral type only if
there is no sign or zero extension involved.
For targets were the precision of ptro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52443
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52445
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52445
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-03-01
10:47:25 UTC ---
Ok with
+ && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (exp, 0)) == SSA_NAME
+ && host_integerp (TREE_OPERAND (exp, 1), 0))
also checking that int_size_in_bytes does not return -1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52447
Bug #: 52447
Summary: Application crashes on SLES11 when using
libstdc++.so.6.0.10 but runs fine with 6.0.8
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52445
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-01
10:50:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Ok with
>
> + && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (exp, 0)) == SSA_NAME
> + && host_integerp (TREE_OPERAND (exp, 1), 0))
>
> also checking that int_size_i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52448
Bug #: 52448
Summary: [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] cselim broken with calls
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52447
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.3.2
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wake
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52447
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-03-01
11:14:26 UTC ---
Also, nothing will happen without a testcase to reproduce the problem, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52448
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52447
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52406
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.7.1
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52447
--- Comment #4 from John Unsworth
2012-03-01 11:49:12 UTC ---
Can you confirm that applications built on Red Hat with:
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.6/specs
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52448
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Michael Matz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52447
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-*
--- Comment #5 from Richard G
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52417
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenthe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52448
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52445
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52447
--- Comment #6 from John Unsworth
2012-03-01 12:16:18 UTC ---
The application is 32 bit and we build on a 32 bit linux Linux version
2.6.9-89.ELsmp. We are running on 64 bit SLES11.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52443
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-03-01
12:26:25 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 1 12:26:20 2012
New Revision: 184739
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184739
Log:
2012-03-01 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52443
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52445
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26800|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52430
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52448
--- Comment #3 from Michael Matz 2012-03-01 12:56:40
UTC ---
Created attachment 26802
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26802
candidate fix
This fixes the problem by remembering the last seen call and checking if
it's before or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52449
Bug #: 52449
Summary: check-abi picks up wrong baseline_symbols.txt with
--with-cpu=default32 configs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52449
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52388
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-03-01
13:16:27 UTC ---
Modifying acats/run_all.sh to pass -v to host_gnatmake when compiling
widechr.adb, and to log the previous gcc call, showed:
Generating support files...gcc -c cd300051.c
...
gnatl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51785
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-01
13:30:26 UTC ---
f17 doesn't include glibc 2.16, just patched glibc 2.15, which doesn't have
these header changes yet.
The thing I don't like on the last patch is that it hardcodes configure time
test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52443
--- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-01
13:36:08 UTC ---
Yes, thanks. It works now :-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52417
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26796|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51785
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51785
--- Comment #22 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-03-01
13:50:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> Wouldn't an unconditional
>
> #if _GNU_SOURCE
> extern char *gets (char *__s);
> using ::gets;
> #endif
>
> work as well?
extern "C" or extern "C+
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52448
--- Comment #4 from Michael Matz 2012-03-01 14:10:08
UTC ---
Bah, no. That won't generally work. In particular it might be calls that
don't necessarily dominate the "non-trapping" stmt that make it trapping
again:
*X = a;
if (cond)
free_ever
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52445
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-01
14:13:13 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 1 14:13:06 2012
New Revision: 184743
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184743
Log:
PR tree-optimization/52445
* tree-ssa-phio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52268
--- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth 2012-03-01
14:15:14 UTC ---
Chris Lattner kindly pointed out that the initial tis support for darwin was
added in r105381.
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20100531/102158.html...
[llv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47481
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48100
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48668
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51582
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50138
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51092
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50052
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51737
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49821
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46798
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50210
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45402
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48670
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50951
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48600
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47435
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49485
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51826
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45978
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52326
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51138
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50063
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47581
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51619
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50852
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44688
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47936
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46639
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52445
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51775
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44495
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49140
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47471
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52062
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47679
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47889
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #31 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50444
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48949
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49775
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50484
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo