--- Comment #18 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-22 01:36
---
Thats what I get for late nite fun! :) Initializing x gives a clean valgrind
check.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29568
>> REGRESSION: friend function declared in class not visible in same class
>> scope.
# cat s.i
class P {
friend P A(long);
friend P B(long c) { return A(c); };
};
# for ver in 3.3.6 3.4.6 4.1.1
> do
> gcc-config i686-pc-linux-gnu-$ver >/dev/null 2>&1
> source /etc/
>
> >> REGRESSION: friend function declared in class not visible in same class
> >> scope.
>
> # cat s.i
> class P {
> friend P A(long);
> friend P B(long c) { return A(c); };
> };
This is not a bug as friends don't inject into the namespace according to the
C++ standard, you ca
--- Comment #19 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-22 01:55
---
I noticed with ifort that with recl=25, a severe run time error is given for
exceeding the record length. gfc happily proceeds and this is not related to
the patch. Hmm, have we dropped an error check somewhere
--- Comment #2 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-11-22 03:59 ---
What exactly do you expect the code to do?
foo();
leads to an instantiation of foo with
T= int()()
i.e. reference to "no-arg function returning int". From
thereon I am a bit confused what exactly you intend to
do i
--- Comment #1 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-11-22 04:05 ---
Confirmed. I thought the type to which typeid is applied needs to be complete,
but I can't find anything like this in the standard.
W.
--
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-22 04:13 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Apparently 4.3.0 is actually performing range checking whereas
> 4.2.0 was not, hence 4.2.0 would not issue an error by default.
No. 4.2.0 performs range checking. The overflow is now caugh
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-22 04:30 ---
-g -fno-emit-class-debug-always will produce the same effect on the mainline
and the 4.2 branch so I am going to say this is still a 4.2/4.3 Regression.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
The following example should give an EOR error.
program record
integer, parameter :: reclength = 10
real, dimension(reclength) :: array
integer :: x = 0
open(unit=10, file="testfile", form="unformatted", access="sequential",
recl=10)
array = 2.0
write(10) array, 1
close(10)
end progr
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-22 06:12
---
Patch in progress
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-22 07:34
---
Fixed on trunk. Will go to 4.2 in a day or so.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
11 matches
Mail list logo
