--- Comment #8 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 09:27 ---
Reopening...
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOL
--- Comment #9 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 09:28 ---
...to close as INVALID.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
S
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 10:23 ---
While GCC 4.0.x had:
.uleb128 0x3# (DIE (0x8a) DW_TAG_variable)
.ascii "t\0"# DW_AT_name
.byte 0x1 # DW_AT_decl_file
.byte 0x5 # DW_AT_decl_line
.long 0xab
gcc-4.0 branch from 2005-12-28; arm-linux target
$ cc1 -O2 phaser.i -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -g -O2 -Wall
-falign-loops=4 -falign-jumps=4 -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer
-finline-functions -funroll-loops
yields:
phaser.i: In function ‘phaser1set’:
phaser.i:61: fatal error: internal cons
--- Comment #1 from pb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 10:56 ---
Created an attachment (id=10560)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10560&action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25588
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 11:18 ---
I have just submitted a patch for this, which I intend to commit tomorrow
morning.
Thank you for reporting the bug I hope that the inconvenience is outweighed by
gfortran handling derived types correctly.
Paul
--
--- Comment #7 from martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2005-12-28 11:36
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I have just submitted a patch for this, which I intend to commit tomorrow
> morning.
Great, thanks!
> Thank you for reporting the bug I hope that the inconvenience is outweighed b
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #9 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 14:09 ---
Subject: Bug 25394
Author: dberlin
Date: Wed Dec 28 14:09:28 2005
New Revision: 109109
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109109
Log:
2005-12-28 Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fix P
--- Comment #10 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 14:10
---
Fixed
--
dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2005-12-28 15:46 ---
I will be able to fix this at the beginning of January. If anybody wants to
revert my combine.c patch before that, go ahead.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25578
Flags that are passed to newly built gcc when compiling code for
target system during are determined by value of `CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET'
makefile variable as defined in top level `Makefile'. `CFLAGS' in
that `Makefile' are passed on for use with old compiler used to
bootstrap gcc.
Can not configure
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
Executing on host: /home/dave/gcc-4.2/objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/dave/gcc-4.2/objdi
r/gcc/ /home/dave/gcc-4.2/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-11.c -O2
-ftree-vectorize -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=3 -fdump-tree-vect-stats
-fno-show-co
lumn -lm -o ./gen-vect-11.exe(timeout = 300)
PASS:
--- Comment #1 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 16:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=10561)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10561&action=view)
tree dump
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25590
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 16:20 ---
I noticed this on x86_64 also.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 16:30 ---
Confirmed, just a missing XFAIL as we have unsigned char + unsigned char which
gets changed to (int)(unsigned char)+(int)(unsigned char) after Kazu's patch:
2005-12-26 Kazu Hirata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR tr
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 16:37 ---
gfc_build_st_parameter is the cause:
len = strlen (st_parameter[ptype].name);
gcc_assert (len <= sizeof (name) - sizeof ("__st_parameter_"));
memcpy (name, "__st_parameter_", sizeof ("__st_parameter_"));
memc
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 16:39 ---
I have a fix.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|un
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 16:47 ---
Yeah, change:
memcpy (name, "__st_parameter_", sizeof ("__st_parameter_"));
memcpy (name + sizeof ("__st_parameter_") - 1, st_parameter[ptype].name,
len);
into:
memcpy (name, "__st_parameter_", sizeof (
--- Comment #13 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 16:53 ---
Benchmarking -mtune=i386 tuned code on Athlon64 is simply a bad idea.
Either you need to tune for your CPU (or at least some contemporary one
like -mtune=pentium4 if you want to run quickly on a wider range of CPUs),
--- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 19:03 ---
Fixed.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRM
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 19:22 ---
Subject: Bug 25587
Author: pinskia
Date: Wed Dec 28 19:21:55 2005
New Revision: 109120
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109120
Log:
2005-12-28 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fo
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 19:27 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 19:27 ---
Subject: Bug 25587
Author: pinskia
Date: Wed Dec 28 19:27:31 2005
New Revision: 109121
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109121
Log:
2005-12-28 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fo
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 19:37 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
The following code compiled with -fvisibility=hidden produces only typeinfo
symbols with hidden visibility:
#define GOTT_EXPORT __attribute__ ((visibility("default")))
template struct GOTT_EXPORT spelled_t {};
template
inline std::type_info const &spell() {
return typeid(spelled_t);
}
... spe
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 20:05 ---
Simplified testcase:
#include
template struct __attribute__ ((visibility("default"))) Abc{
~Abc(){}
Abc(){}
};
const std::type_info *f(void)
{
return &typeid(Abc);
}
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 20:19 ---
Fixed in 4.1.0.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|
--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 20:33 ---
Closing, as per Laurent's message.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #33 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 20:58
---
Subject: Bug 25139
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Dec 28 20:58:08 2005
New Revision: 109122
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109122
Log:
2005-12-28 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 20:58
---
Subject: Bug 25510
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Dec 28 20:58:08 2005
New Revision: 109122
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109122
Log:
2005-12-28 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #34 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 21:12
---
Subject: Bug 25139
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Dec 28 21:12:52 2005
New Revision: 109123
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109123
Log:
2005-12-28 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 21:18 ---
I have a fix.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|un
--- Comment #19 from eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com 2005-12-28 23:01
---
Bugmasters,
Is there any more information needed, or can this bug be marked as NEW?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19087
When using jcraft's jsch ssh2 port forwarding in a gcj compiled application,
connections terminate unexpectedly. It works fine in Sun's java.
I've tried to make a test case with HServer/HClient. The server listens to a
port, and then the client connects to it. The OutputStream is closed while t
--- Comment #1 from ovidr at users dot sourceforge dot net 2005-12-28
23:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=10562)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10562&action=view)
Testcase (HServer.java and HClient.java)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25593
./xeigtsts < sbal.in > sbal.out 2>&1
make: *** [sbal.out] Error 2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] TESTING]$ cat sbal.out
At line 76 of file schkbl.f
Fortran runtime error: Bad integer for item 2 in list input
[EMAIL PROTECTED] TESTING]$
--
Summary: LAPACK regression in schkbl.f
Product:
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 23:37
---
This regression was with 4.2 with no compiler options. I will check 4.1 later
today.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25594
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 23:55
---
I do not see this failure with 4.1 so that pretty much points to something I
did. I will withhold my recent patches to 4.2 from 4.1 until I figure this
out. The failed line of code is:
READ( NIN, FMT = *
--- Comment #2 from hjl at lucon dot org 2005-12-29 01:01 ---
I have identified that
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg01261.html
causes the unaligned access in SPEC CPU 2K on ia64. We are working on a small
testcase.
--
hjl at lucon dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #4 from amodra at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 01:10 ---
Subject: Bug 25572
Author: amodra
Date: Thu Dec 29 01:10:05 2005
New Revision: 109133
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109133
Log:
PR target/25572
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (creat
--- Comment #5 from amodra at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 01:14 ---
Subject: Bug 25572
Author: amodra
Date: Thu Dec 29 01:14:18 2005
New Revision: 109134
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109134
Log:
PR target/25572
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (creat
--- Comment #3 from hjl at lucon dot org 2005-12-29 01:18 ---
The difference between good and bad assembly outputs are
--- good.s 2005-12-28 17:06:29.0 -0800
+++ bad.s 2005-12-28 17:16:11.0 -0800
@@ -37339,11 +37339,11 @@ uvset_:
.mmi
mov r1 =
--- Comment #6 from amodra at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 01:20 ---
Subject: Bug 25572
Author: amodra
Date: Thu Dec 29 01:20:15 2005
New Revision: 109135
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109135
Log:
PR target/25572
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (creat
--- Comment #7 from amodra at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 01:29 ---
Subject: Bug 25572
Author: amodra
Date: Thu Dec 29 01:29:18 2005
New Revision: 109136
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109136
Log:
PR target/25572
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (creat
--- Comment #8 from amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2005-12-29 01:29
---
Fixed
--
amodra at bigpond dot net dot au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIG
--- Comment #4 from hjl at lucon dot org 2005-12-29 02:23 ---
For my case, the unaligned access happens in HORDFC.
--
hjl at lucon dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 04:26
---
I have isolated this to the patch for PR25419. Will be studying this one some
more.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25594
--- Comment #15 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 04:27 ---
Subject: Bug 24342
Author: hp
Date: Thu Dec 29 04:27:24 2005
New Revision: 109137
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109137
Log:
PR target/24342
* config/cris/cris.c (cris_split_movdx
--- Comment #16 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 04:31 ---
Fixed, 4.1 and HEAD/4.2.
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|
GCC produces an ICE when compiling the attached sample program. This is a
preprocessed sourcefile from xorg-x11 package.
To reproduce the problem.
arm-none-gcc -mthumb -Os -S a.i
a.i:3383: warning: '__malloc__' attribute ignored
a.i: In function 'xxGlyphs':
a.i:13406: error: insn does not satis
--- Comment #1 from raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2005-12-29 05:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=10563)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10563&action=view)
preprocessed source file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25595
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 06:11 ---
Subject: Bug 25532
Author: pault
Date: Thu Dec 29 06:11:21 2005
New Revision: 109138
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109138
Log:
2005-12-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 06:18 ---
Subject: Bug 20889
Author: pault
Date: Thu Dec 29 06:18:23 2005
New Revision: 109139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109139
Log:
2005-12-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 06:18 ---
Subject: Bug 20864
Author: pault
Date: Thu Dec 29 06:18:23 2005
New Revision: 109139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109139
Log:
2005-12-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 06:18 ---
Subject: Bug 25053
Author: pault
Date: Thu Dec 29 06:18:23 2005
New Revision: 109139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109139
Log:
2005-12-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 06:18 ---
Subject: Bug 25532
Author: pault
Date: Thu Dec 29 06:18:23 2005
New Revision: 109139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109139
Log:
2005-12-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 06:18 ---
Subject: Bug 23152
Author: pault
Date: Thu Dec 29 06:18:23 2005
New Revision: 109139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109139
Log:
2005-12-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 06:18 ---
Subject: Bug 25018
Author: pault
Date: Thu Dec 29 06:18:23 2005
New Revision: 109139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109139
Log:
2005-12-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 06:18 ---
Subject: Bug 19362
Author: pault
Date: Thu Dec 29 06:18:23 2005
New Revision: 109139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109139
Log:
2005-12-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #17 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 06:18 ---
Subject: Bug 20244
Author: pault
Date: Thu Dec 29 06:18:23 2005
New Revision: 109139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109139
Log:
2005-12-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 06:18 ---
Subject: Bug 25064
Author: pault
Date: Thu Dec 29 06:18:23 2005
New Revision: 109139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109139
Log:
2005-12-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 06:18 ---
Subject: Bug 25391
Author: pault
Date: Thu Dec 29 06:18:23 2005
New Revision: 109139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109139
Log:
2005-12-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 06:18 ---
Subject: Bug 20862
Author: pault
Date: Thu Dec 29 06:18:23 2005
New Revision: 109139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109139
Log:
2005-12-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 06:18 ---
Subject: Bug 25066
Author: pault
Date: Thu Dec 29 06:18:23 2005
New Revision: 109139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109139
Log:
2005-12-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 06:18 ---
Subject: Bug 25068
Author: pault
Date: Thu Dec 29 06:18:23 2005
New Revision: 109139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109139
Log:
2005-12-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 06:18 ---
Subject: Bug 25067
Author: pault
Date: Thu Dec 29 06:18:23 2005
New Revision: 109139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109139
Log:
2005-12-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 06:18 ---
Subject: Bug 25063
Author: pault
Date: Thu Dec 29 06:18:23 2005
New Revision: 109139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109139
Log:
2005-12-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-29 06:18 ---
Subject: Bug 25307
Author: pault
Date: Thu Dec 29 06:18:23 2005
New Revision: 109139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109139
Log:
2005-12-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #18 from milan at cmm dot ki dot si 2005-12-29 07:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=10564)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10564&action=view)
patch against gcc-4.1-20051223
As requested, I am posting Rob's patch which goes against the Dec 23 snapshot.
I di
--- Comment #5 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2005-12-29 07:53 ---
I had an obvious fix yesterday but I had no time to bootstrap/regtest it. So
if possible please don't revert...
The reduced C testcase is
int f(int x)
{
return x >> 31 ? -1 : 1;
}
The MPFR_SIGN macro (invoked via mpfr_
73 matches
Mail list logo
