Are there plans to maintain the CFG througout the compilation?

I would like to analyse code using the GCC CFG, however, some steps invalidate it notably delay slot scheduling. Are there plans to move toward "how it ought to work" as outlined in : http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/basic_block_graph Peter.

Re: Are there plans to maintain the CFG througout the compilation?

Thanks Ian. Any idea what the size of the problem would be , perhaps first for backends that don't chose to vandalise things themselves 1st?

backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6

Well, at least with my cross it does. this change, or something like it: http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=09a77c2ea0b41fdff8820cbcbe41b35762db5c45 introduces a reference to TS_TYPED into the 4.6 branch for fold-const.c, and it isnt defined, or at least neither I nor my compiler c

Re: backported fix to fold-const.c breaks gcc 4.6

Thanks for the prompt and indeed helpful hint. I'll comment the offending line out locally for now. On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Peter Garbett > wrote: >> Well, at least with my cross it does. >> >&

Re: Debugging incorrect generation of RTL

I suspect the assertion in set_last_insn in emit-rtl.h is giving me false positives.