ents. I am not on this list, so please ensure I am cc'd with
any responses. I'll be happy to file a bug, if it is a bug.
Thanks,
Karen
--
Karen Shaeffer
Neuralscape, Palo Alto, Ca. 94306
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neuralscape.com
do realize, no one should have a gripe, because
the code is buggy to begin with. But addresses should always be
reported accurately IMHO. Of course, I obviously know nothing
about compilers. (smiles ;)
Thanks for your comments.
Karen
--
Karen Shaeffer
Neuralscape, Palo Alto, Ca. 94306
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neuralscape.com
e common sense scope of the bounds
of what this assignment's undefined behavior potential effects
might be. It is interesting. Thank you for your comment.
Thanks,
Karen
--
Karen Shaeffer
Neuralscape, Palo Alto, Ca. 94306
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neuralscape.com
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 09:52:17PM -0400, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 9:44 PM, Karen Shaeffer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:01:31AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> >> > output
wrote:
> Karen Shaeffer wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:01:31AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> >>>
> >>> output ~~
> >>> $ const_ints
>
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 09:41:26AM -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 08:51:24PM -0700, Karen Shaeffer wrote:
> > I see your point. My sticking point is that the process is actually
> > running on a physical machine.
>
> And that's the problem. You, like m
