Not quoted option names in errors and warnings

2018-11-15 Thread Martin Liška
Hi. I've done a quick grep of gcc/po/gcc.pot and I see quite a lot of missing quotations of option names (~400). Is it something we should fix? How important is that? Martin #: diagnostic.c:477: compilation terminated due to -fmax-errors=%u.\n #: gcov-tool.c:420: -f, --function

Re: Parallelize the compilation using Threads

2018-11-15 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 10:47 PM Giuliano Augusto Faulin Belinassi wrote: > > As a brief introduction, I am a graduate student that got interested > > in the "Parallelize the compilation using threads"(GSoC 2018 [1]). I > am a newcommer in GCC, but already have sent some patches, some of > them ha

Re: Parallelize the compilation using Threads

2018-11-15 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 10:29, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 10:47 PM Giuliano Augusto Faulin Belinassi > wrote: > > Additionally, I know that GCC must not > > change the project layout, but from the software engineering perspective, > > this may be a bad smell that indicates t

Re: Status of powerpc*-*-*spe* ports in GCC 9?

2018-11-15 Thread Nathan Sidwell
On 11/14/18 3:50 PM, Richard Biener wrote: On November 14, 2018 9:16:17 PM GMT+01:00, Dries Deschout wrote: I could not find any more recent info about the status of the powerpc*-*-*spe* ports for GCC 9. Will powerpc*-*-*spe* support be available in GCC 9? It looks like we'll rip it out.

Re: Status of powerpc*-*-*spe* ports in GCC 9?

2018-11-15 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 10:54:39AM -0500, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > On 11/14/18 3:50 PM, Richard Biener wrote: > > On November 14, 2018 9:16:17 PM GMT+01:00, Dries Deschout > > wrote: > > > > I could not find any more recent info about the status of the > > > powerpc*-*-*spe* ports for GCC 9. > >

Re: Not quoted option names in errors and warnings

2018-11-15 Thread Martin Sebor
On 11/15/2018 03:12 AM, Martin Liška wrote: Hi. I've done a quick grep of gcc/po/gcc.pot and I see quite a lot of missing quotations of option names (~400). Is it something we should fix? How important is that? That's quite a few... I've been fixing these as I notice them, usually as part of

Re: Parallelize the compilation using Threads

2018-11-15 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/15/18 3:29 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > >> 2. Did I correctly understand the goal of the parallelization? Can >> anyone provide extra details to me? > > You may want to search the mailing list archives since we had a > student application (later revoked) for the task with some discussion. >

Re: Parallelize the compilation using Threads

2018-11-15 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
On 15/11/18 10:29, Richard Biener wrote: > In my view (I proposed the thing) the most interesting parts are > getting GCCs global state documented and reduced. The parallelization > itself is an interesting experiment but whether there will be any > substantial improvement for builds that can alre

Question about make_extraction() in combine.c

2018-11-15 Thread Michael Eager
In combine, simplify_comparison() is being called with the following arguments: code = EQ op0 = (and:SI (mem:SI (reg/v/f:SI 50 [ gp ]) (const_int 4 [0x4])) op1 = (const_int 0 [0]) € After churning down through make_compound_operation() and make_compound_operation_int(), processing gets to

gcc-7-20181115 is now available

2018-11-15 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-7-20181115 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/7-20181115/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 7 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-7

PING: Re: Fixing Bug Id 66074

2018-11-15 Thread nick
On 2018-11-06 2:05 p.m., nick wrote: > Greetings all, > I am wondering why this bug is only for the function reported: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66074 > Seems there are lots of other functions in that file that could > use the exact same optimization, would it be better to