contrib/test_summary mail error

2013-01-04 Thread Cynthia Rempel
Hi, I tried to run the following command: ../gcc/contrib/test_summary -p my_commentary.txt -m gcc-testresu...@gcc.gnu.org | sh and got the following error: sh: 22297: Mail: not found After digging through emails, ran accross http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2002/04/msg00065.html Mint com

Re: contrib/test_summary mail error

2013-01-04 Thread Toon Moene
On 01/04/2013 04:14 PM, Cynthia Rempel wrote: Hi, I tried to run the following command: ../gcc/contrib/test_summary -p my_commentary.txt -m gcc-testresu...@gcc.gnu.org | sh I added "| sed -e 's/Mail/mailx/'" before the "| sh" and it worked for Debian Tesing (several months ago). Apparentl

Re: contrib/test_summary mail error

2013-01-04 Thread Joel Sherrill
I would love to add that as a command line option and another to let us say which BSP we used on the subject line. But I can't figure out the relationship between the shell code and the awk code which does the dirty work. Can anyone explain how the arguments/variablles get passed from the shell c

Re: contrib/test_summary mail error

2013-01-04 Thread Andreas Schwab
Joel Sherrill writes: > Can anyone explain how the arguments/variablles > get passed from the shell code to the embedded awk > script? Via parameter substitution. The awk script does not need to look at them. The mailto variable is passed in the environment, since it is only used by the produc

Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb

2013-01-04 Thread David Edelsohn
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> AIX still uses STABS. GCC produces it and GDB consumes it. >> >> Recent releases of AIX now support DWARF as well, but GCC and GDB have >> not been converted to use it on AIX. > > Note that GNU ld is now completely usable; and one of the s

gcc-4.6-20130104 is now available

2013-01-04 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.6-20130104 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.6-20130104/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.6 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb

2013-01-04 Thread David Edelsohn
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:20 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >>> AIX still uses STABS. GCC produces it and GDB consumes it. >>> >>> Recent releases of AIX now support DWARF as well, but GCC and GDB have >>> not been converted to use it on AIX. >>

error: invalid use of void expression

2013-01-04 Thread Bruce Korb
You may have been thinking you were using "memcpy", but you were using "bcopy" instead. Please apply the patch to md5.c. Thanks! $ gcc -c shar-i.c shar-i.c: In function 'md5_process_bytes': shar-i.c:3087:13: error: invalid use of void expression 1034 extern void bcopy (__const void *__src,

Re: error: invalid use of void expression

2013-01-04 Thread Eric Blake
On 01/04/2013 05:47 PM, Bruce Korb wrote: > You may have been thinking you were using "memcpy", but you were > using "bcopy" instead. Please apply the patch to md5.c. Thanks! > Rather than fixing the call site of memcpy, we should instead fix the real bug, the fact that you are even doing *ifnd

Re: stabs support in binutils, gcc, and gdb

2013-01-04 Thread Joel Brobecker
> > Can you please clarify what "GNU ld is not completely usable" means? > > Is that referring to DWARF support? to compatibility with specific AIX > > releases? to compatibility with AIX DWARF feature? > > Sorry, I meant what "GNU ld is now completely usable" means because I > believe that it act