Re: SMS issues

2012-07-19 Thread Andrey Belevantsev
Hello Alex, On 18.07.2012 18:40, Alex Turjan wrote: Im writing to you with respect to some strange SMS functionality. In the code bellow there are 2 instructions (a builtin store and a builtin load) as they appear in the program flow before SMS: ... Issues: 1. What is the reason why (T

Re: get email addr from username (was: Ad-hoc notes from the "pending patches" BOF at the GNU tools cauldron.)

2012-07-19 Thread Dimitrios Apostolou
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 11:24 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: > Note that people that patched a file are not necessary maintainers of that > file. > Maintainers are listed exclusively in the MAINTAINERS file. I was just looking for a quick and easy hack for my own convenience, based on the logic tha

Re: get email addr from username (was: Ad-hoc notes from the "pending patches" BOF at the GNU tools cauldron.)

2012-07-19 Thread Dimitrios Apostolou
On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 19:23 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > Add @gcc.gnu.org to it? Unfortunately this is rarely in agreement with MAINTAINERS. For now I found it easier to just grep the Changelog file. Thanks, Dimitris

Re: SMS issues

2012-07-19 Thread Alex Turjan
Andrey, Thanks for the patch. I applied it and so far it seams ok. I will run further testing and let you know if i see problems. Back to the last part of my email, Im still wondering what happens in case the variable modulo expanded is a memory location? because as I see generate_reg_moves is no

Re: GNU MPC 1.0 release candidate - Second call for help

2012-07-19 Thread Rainer Jung
On 13.07.2012 20:38, Andreas Enge wrote: Hello, thanks to those who sent us installation reports! On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 05:13:39PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of the first release candidate for GNU MPC 1.0 at http://www.multiprecision.

bootstrap fails using default c++ mode in stage 2 and 3 for native x86_64-w64-mingw32

2012-07-19 Thread Rainer Emrich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Affected versions are 4.7.x and 4.8.0. PR 53912 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912 shows the failures in stage 2 for gcc-4.8.0. Most are of the form "error: cast from 'void*' to 'long int' loses precision" or similar. AFAIK a switch to

Re: bootstrap fails using default c++ mode in stage 2 and 3 for native x86_64-w64-mingw32

2012-07-19 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Rainer Emrich wrote: > > PR 53912 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912 shows the failures > in stage 2 for gcc-4.8.0. Most are of the form "error: cast from 'void*' to > 'long int' loses precision" or similar. > > AFAIK a switch to c++ mode is planned

Re: [Bug bootstrap/53912] [4.7/4.8 Regression] bootstrap fails using default c++ mode in stage 2 and 3 for native x86_64-w64-mingw32

2012-07-19 Thread Rainer Emrich
Am 19.07.2012 18:12, schrieb redi at gcc dot gnu.org: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912 > > --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-19 > 16:12:18 UTC --- > Does changing the definition of POINTER_HASH to use intptr_t instead of long > work? > This works for ggc-common.c. I

Re: [Bug bootstrap/53912] [4.7/4.8 Regression] bootstrap fails using default c++ mode in stage 2 and 3 for native x86_64-w64-mingw32

2012-07-19 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Rainer Emrich wrote: > ../../../src/gcc-4.8.0/gcc/pointer-set.c: In function 'size_t hash1(const > void*, > long unsigned int, long unsigned int)': > ../../../src/gcc-4.8.0/gcc/pointer-set.c:67:32: error: cast from 'const void*' > to 'long unsigned int' loses pre

Re: Bad gcc/gtype-desc.h generated when using sparse checkout

2012-07-19 Thread Gary Funck
On 07/15/12 21:53:02, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > [...] > It took me a while to get back to this, but your suggestion worked, > this patch allows bootstrapping to get past cp/lex.o, it hasn't > finished yet so I haven't run the tests: > [...] > Presumably gengtype goes through directories alphabetical