On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:29:35 +0200 (CEST)
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Sep 2009, Ryan Hill wrote:
> >> I haven't been able to bootstrap x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu at all since this
> >> started. Latest attempt was with r151649.
> >> Configured as:
> > I was able to build using --enable-checki
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Pedro LamarÃo wrote on Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:24:07AM CEST:
> > 2009/8/26 Ralf Wildenhues:
> >
> > >> The problem is that AC_CHECK_DECLS gets confused by overloaded
> > >> functions, and glibc 2.10 has overloaded declarations of basename
> > >> and some other string fun
Hopefully the combined wisdom on this list can help getting this
addressed (one way or the other). :-)
I can see five cases:
1) Some of these have requested gcc.gnu.org access only to be
"bugmasters", for example they have no commits.
>dalecki (Marcin Dalecki )2006-1
Rob,
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Rob Myers wrote:
> The gnu.org webmaster team are going to be updating all the pages in the
> gnu.org/software subdirectory, which includes -
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/fortran
>
> This will involve changing the design of the page to match the new style
> of gnu.or
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 06:39:10PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Martin Jambor writes:
>
> > I have run the testsuite on hppa with the following patch and I
> > successfully bootstrapped and tested it on x86_64. Unless someone
> > objects, I will bootstrap it on hppa and commit it in a week o
Snapshot gcc-4.3-20090913 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20090913/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.3 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
>>> I'm thinking of changing my auto tester to report a broken bootstrap
>>> (the first time a bootstrap fails), is there a normalized way to
>> report such failures to gcc-testresults@ or g...@?
>> I report it to gcc-regress...@.
> It's documented by http:
Recently, we have been working on upgrading GCC/UPC (see
http://gccupc.org) to the GCC trunk. Previously,
we've sync'ed with the latest stable release, but
now we want to stay more current.
When built with GCC versions 4.0 through 4.3, we used
the gimplify language hook, LANG_HOOKS_GIMPLIFY_EXPR
Hi Martin,
> Having said that, if anybody has problems with this patch going in,
> please speak out now rather than later.
I very much appreciate the work you have done on this problem. However,
the patch doesn't work as expected. I get multiple comparison failures
with this change on hppa-unkn
Jerry Quinn writes:
> Index: include/libiberty.h
> ===
> --- include/libiberty.h (revision 149964)
> +++ include/libiberty.h (working copy)
> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@
> declaration without arguments. If it is 0, we checke
10 matches
Mail list logo
