On 09.12.22 22:12, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Found when working on the just submitted/committed patch.
Committed as r13-4590 – but it required a follow-up that I somehow
missed :-/ but that is now committed as well (as r13-4597).
Tobias
-
Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH;
On 12/10/22 1:23 PM, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote:
Dear all,
I'm submitting the attached patch on behalf of Steve.
It fixes an ICE that occurs on an obscure use of a
statement function as argument to that function.
Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline?
Thanks,
Harald
OK, lo
My main contribution to the early (*really* early, I started with g95)
intrinsics implementation was a lot of cutting-and-pasting and typing. I just
replicated functions fairly mindlessly and made appropriate substitutions. But
I hope at least that my copyright assignment paperwork is still in
Dear all,
the attached patch improves checking of array specs in two ways:
- bad assumed size array spec
- a bad first array element spec may already trigger an error,
leading to a more consistent behavior
Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline?
Thanks,
Harald
From 06c1d0a96544640
On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 11:33:43PM +0100, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> the attached patch improves checking of array specs in two ways:
> - bad assumed size array spec
> - a bad first array element spec may already trigger an error,
> leading to a more consistent behavior
>
