Re: [PATCH] PR28204, debuginfod IMA

Hi - Thanks for the review. > [...] > BTW. The diff doesn't show the newly added binary files. So the patch > cannot be applied. Please use git send-email or git format-patch for > that. I would not expect the emailed patch to apply, esp. with all the other work done in the intermediate months,

Re: [PATCH] PR28204, debuginfod IMA

Hi, Continued review... On Thu, 2023-09-07 at 08:55 -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler via Elfutils-devel wrote: > diff --git a/debuginfod/debuginfod.cxx b/debuginfod/debuginfod.cxx > index d72d2ad16960..8c3298586672 100644 > --- a/debuginfod/debuginfod.cxx > +++ b/debuginfod/debuginfod.cxx > @@ -113,6 +113

[PATCH] Fixed formatting of man page and --help options and added additional test case to ensure the correct source file is output.

Hello, Here are the requested changes. --- doc/Makefile.am| 2 +- doc/srcfiles.1 | 58 ++ src/srcfiles.cxx | 29 ++- tests/run-srcfiles-self.sh | 6 4 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff

Re: [PATCH] Fixed formatting of man page and --help options and added additional test case to ensure the correct source file is output.

On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 1:35 PM Housam Alamour wrote: > > Hello, > Here are the requested changes. Thanks Housam. I made a couple tweaks to the testcases, squashed this patch into "PR 3: debuginfod-find should have a source-list verb" and merged it into the main branch. Aaron

[Bug debuginfod/30000] introduce new srcfiles tool

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3 Aaron Merey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amerey at redhat dot com Resolu

☠ Buildbot (Sourceware): elfutils - failed test (failure) (master)

A new failure has been detected on builder elfutils-gentoo-sparc while building elfutils. Full details are available at: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/225/builds/112 Build state: failed test (failure) Revision: cb4f0e0fffbcdb124bd1b82f558095a9c7aa64b1 Worker: gentoo-sparc

Re: [PATCH] PR28204, debuginfod IMA

Hi Frank, On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 09:27:43AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > > BTW. The diff doesn't show the newly added binary files. So the patch > > cannot be applied. Please use git send-email or git format-patch for > > that. > > I would not expect the emailed patch to apply, esp. with all

[Bug libdw/30980] offline.c:53: dwfl_offline_section_address: Assertion `mod->e_type == ET_REL' failed.

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30980 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org See Also|