https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21522
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21525
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 18:17 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> The tricky case is that last case. If the previous frame is a signal
> frame then this frame is also an activation (so you don't need to
> subtract 1 to get the actual address that was executing). I am not sure
> I fully understand anymore w
On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 18:15 +0200, Milian Wolff wrote:
> > I am not following the above trace completely, but what is going on
> > seems to be that we have CFI and want to get a register value. So we
> > call dwarf_frame_register to determine the DWARF expression operations
> > that we need to exec